A New Simplified Transient Theory for Heating and Cooling Loads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v7i3.11402Abstract
This paper introduces a thermodynamically grounded framework that replaces conventional energy-centric building simulation with a heat-based reconstruction method, enabling the use of standard-year weather data without bespoke weather files. High-accuracy predictive models are developed to estimate seasonal heating and cooling loads and to derive convective heat transfer coefficients for transitional seasons. Models are calibrated against extended AMeDAS records for Kurume, Fukuoka Prefecture, demonstrating improved capture of local climatic variability compared with standard practice. Methodologically, the study establishes time-series regression relationships linking outdoor air temperature, incident solar radiation, and wind speed to instantaneous thermal demand and surface convective rates. These empirical relations feed a reconstruction algorithm that adjusts simulation outputs to standardized climatic conditions by rescaling heat flows and convective parameters rather than altering meteorological inputs. Results indicate that reframing simulation inputs in terms of heat enhances reliability and transferability of performance predictions and reduces uncertainty associated with variable weather. The paper examines essential assumptions affecting applicability, including the assumed linearity of convective correlations, representativeness of the reference building envelope, and the use of virtual walls for parameter identification. It further proposes a novel procedure to compute a physical adjustment coefficient for the convective heat transfer coefficient, addressing a parameter gap in macro-scale models while acknowledging challenges for conventional comparative validation. The authors recommend future work on automated calibration routines and on extending the method to tropical and arid climates to broaden applicability and support foundational reform of building energy simulation.
Keywords:
Energy Simulation; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Numerical Analysis; Heat LoadReferences
[1] Ofosu-Peasah, G., Ofosu Antwi, E., Blyth, W., et al., 2024. Assessment of energy security in West Africa: A case study of three countries. Heliyon. 10(21), e39794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39794
[2] Zhang, Q., Lin, B., 2024. The effect of energy efficiency retrofits on radical innovation: From the perspective of supply chain. Energy. 311, 133362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133362
[3] Rong, F., Yu, Z., Zhang, K., et al., 2024. Performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of hydrogen-based integrated energy systems driven by renewable energy sources. Energy. 313, 133698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133698
[4] Fattah, T.R., Mohammed, D., Katona, T.J., et al., 2025. Cactus-inspired multifunctional bio-kinetic façade for energy performance improvement assessed by a novel energy simulation framework. Energy and Buildings. 346, 116188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116188-
[5] Rayegan, S., Mortezazadeh, M., Zhan, D., et al., 2026. Development of a 3D ray tracing-based direct solar shading model for urban building energy simulation. Renewable Energy. 256, 123883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123883
[6] Wessies, S.S., Yang, J.C., 2024. On the Nusselt number correlations of tandem surrogate firebrands on a flat surface. Fire Safety Journal. 148, 104207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104207
[7] Imran, M., Lau, K.K., Ahmad, F., et al., 2025. A comprehensive review of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling of membrane gas separation process. Results in Engineering. 26, 105531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105531
[8] Csölleová, L., Kotrík, M., Kupček, D., et al., 2024. Post-harvest recovery of microclimate buffering and associated temporary xerophilization of vegetation in sub-continental oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 572, 122238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122238
[9] Le, A.-V., Hip, O.-M., Yang, S.-Y., et al., 2024. Sensitivity analysis of building material, ground material, and tree parameters in microclimate simulations. Urban Climate. 58, 102184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102184
[10] Vuaille, J., Holbak, M., Perslev, M., et al., 2022. Can information on past and near-future weather and field conditions predict the safest pesticide application day? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 203, 107454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107454
[11] JahaniRahaei, A., Milelli, M., Chiesa, G., 2025. Urban weather dataset for building energy simulations: Data collection and EPW file generation for Torino, Italy (2014–2023). Data in Brief. 61, 111708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.111708
[12] Hu, J.-W., Zhang, W.-W., 2022. Mesh-Conv: Convolution operator with mesh resolution independence for flow field modeling. Journal of Computational Physics. 452, 110896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110896
[13] SEMENS, 2025. Siemens Available from: https://www.siemens.com/jp/ja.html (cited 30 July 2025).
[14] ANSYS, 2025. ANSYS Available from: https://www.ansys.com/ja-jp (cited 30 July 2025).
[15] MItsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., 2025. MItsubishi Heavy Industries. Available from: https://www.mhi.com/jp (cited 30 July 2025).
[16] Hitachi, Ltd., 2025. Hitachi. Available from: https://www.hitachi.co.jp/ (cited 30 July 2025).
[17] OpenCFD Ltd., 2025. OpenCFD. Available from: https://www.openfoam.com/ (cited 30 July 2025).
[18] Bashar, M.S., Hossain, R., Rahman, M.H., et al., 2024. CFD analysis of non-Newtonian blood flow through human carotid artery bifurcation: Carotid sinus susceptible to atherosclerosis. Heliyon. 10(22), e40286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40286
[19] Diallo, A.B., Yapıcı, R., İncebay, Ö., et al., 2025. Geometric optimization of a blood pump impeller using the Taguchi method: CFD analysis and experimental evaluation. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices. 26, 100364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2025.100364
[20] Djukic, T., Topalovic, M., Filipovic, N., 2023. Validation of lattice Boltzmann based software for blood flow simulations in complex patient-specific arteries against traditional CFD methods. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 203, 957–976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2022.07.027
[21] Yalamanchili, R., Rodriguez-Roda, I., Galizia, A., et al., 2024. Can a forward osmosis-reverse osmosis hybrid system achieve 90 % wastewater recovery and desalination energy below 1 kWh m⁻³? A design and simulation study. Desalination. 585, 117767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117767
[22] Peinturier, L., Wallom, D.C.H., 2025. Building energy simulation calibration accuracy and modelling complexity: Implications for energy performance improvement. Energy and Buildings. 344, 115971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115971
[23] National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2025. International System of Units (SI). Available from: https://unit.aist.go.jp/nmij/library/si-units/ (cited 30 July 2025).
[24] Freitas, J.d.S., Cronemberger, J., Soares, R.M., et al., 2020. Modeling and assessing BIPV envelopes using parametric Rhinoceros plugins Grasshopper and Ladybug. Renewable Energy. 160, 1468–1479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.137
[25] The BEST Program, 2025. BEST. Available from: https://www.ibecs.or.jp/best/ (cited 30 July 2025).
[26] Fu, S., Hao, Z., Wang, L., 2024. A pressure-based lattice Boltzmann method for the volume-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 516, 113350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113350
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Tatsuhiro Yamamoto

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.