Blue Horizons: Assessing Geopolymers as Eco-Friendly Materials in the Context of the Transition to a Sustainable Blue Economy

Authors

  • Jihene Nouairi

    National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics—OGS, 34010 Trieste, Italy

    International Centre for Theoretical Physics—ICTP, 34151 Trieste, Italy

    EMUNI Centre of Excellence on Sustainable Blue Economy, Euro-Mediterranean University (EMUNI), 6000 Koper, Slovenia
  • Slavka Andrejkovičová

    Geosciences Department, Geobiotec Research Unit, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
  • Angelo Camerlenghi

    National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics—OGS, 34010 Trieste, Italy
  • Mounir Ghribi

    National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics—OGS, 34010 Trieste, Italy

    EMUNI Centre of Excellence on Sustainable Blue Economy, Euro-Mediterranean University (EMUNI), 6000 Koper, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v8i1.12635
Received: 31 October 2025| Revised: 8 December 2025 | Accepted: 3 March 2026| Published Online: 24 March 2026

Abstract

Geopolymers, characterized by their sustainable composition, are increasingly recognized as viable alternatives in construction materials. This paper examines the prospects of geopolymers within the sustainable blue economy, as a context emphasizing blue growth in smart, inclusive and above all sustainable development in the marine and maritime sectors. A synthesis of existing knowledge, emphasizing geopolymers’ potential contribution to sustainable practices within the blue economy is presented, delving into specific but innovative applications such as the use of alternative and non-conventional materials for marine infrastructures and offshore construction, and assessing the performance and the many advantages of geopolymers in challenging marine environments through a number of studies. Sustainability considerations and environmental impact are analysed, comparing geopolymers with conventional materials. The paper also identifies challenges related to the applications for marine infrastructures and offshore construction, proposing research directions and solutions. Finally, regulatory aspects are explored outlining current guidelines and advocating for a regulatory framework supportive of geopolymer integration in the Blue Economy sectors, and future trends and innovations are discussed, providing insights into ongoing research. The aim of the present review is to inform researchers, practitioners and policymakers involved in the intersection of geopolymer materials, marine ecosystems and circular economy.

Keywords:

Geopolymers; Eco-Friendly Materials; Marine Infrastructure; Offshore Construction; Environmental Impact; Sustainability; Blue Economy

References

[1] Qu, F., Li, W., Dong, W., et al., 2021. Durability deterioration of concrete under marine environment from material to structure: A critical review. Journal of Building Engineering. 35, 102074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102074

[2] Li, X., Grassl, H., Hesse, C., et al., 2024. Unlocking the potential of ordinary Portland cement with hydration control additive enabling low-carbon building materials. Communications Materials. 5(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-023-00441-9

[3] Cong, P., Cheng, Y., 2021. Advances in geopolymer materials: A comprehensive review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 8(3), 283–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2021.03.004

[4] Fouad, H., Bayomy, M., 2025. Durability and steel corrosion resistance of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete exposed to water of Lake Qaroun. Port Said Engineering Research Journal. 29(1), 69–80.

[5] Davidovits, J., 1991. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis. 37, 1633–1656.

[6] Provis, J.L., van Deventer, J.S.J., 2014. Alkali-Activated Materials: State of the Art Report, RILEM TC 224-AAM. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

[7] Khasawneh, M.A., 2025. Geopolymer concrete in construction projects: A review. Discover Civil Engineering. 2, 124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00281-1

[8] Yuan, H., Failler, P., 2025. Defining the Blue Economy—In a language functional approach. Maritime Studies. 24, 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-025-00403-6

[9] Davidovits, J., 2008. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, 5th ed. Institut Géopolymère: Saint-Quentin, France.

[10] Adjei, S., Elkatatny, S., Aggrey, W.N., et al., 2022. Geopolymer as the future oil-well cement: A review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 208(Part B), 109485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109485

[11] Elgarahy, A.M., Maged, A., Eloffy, M.G., et al., 2023. Geopolymers as sustainable eco-friendly materials: Classification, synthesis routes, and applications in wastewater treatment. Separation and Purification Technology. 324, 124631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124631

[12] Aziz, I.H., Al Bakri Abdullah, M.M., Heah, C.Y., et al., 2015. A review on mechanical properties of geopolymer composites for high temperature application. Key Engineering Materials. 660, 34–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.660.34

[13] Korhonen, H., Timonen, J., Suvanto, S., et al., 2023. The mechanical properties of geopolymers from different raw materials and the effect of recycled gypsum. Inorganics. 11(7), 298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070298

[14] Liu, J., Shi, X., Zhang, G., et al., 2023. Study the mechanical properties of geopolymer under different curing conditions. Minerals. 13(5), 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050690

[15] Utami, F.A.R., Triwiyono, A., Agustini, N.K.A., et al., 2020. Thermal conductivity of geopolymer with polypropylene fiber. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 742(1), 012031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/742/1/012031

[16] Prałat, K., Ciemnicka, J., Koper, A., et al., 2022. Determination of the thermal parameters of geopolymers modified with iron powder. Polymers. 14(10), 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14102009

[17] Samuel, D.M., Inumerable, N., Stumpf, A., et al., 2022. Thermal conductivity of several geopolymer composites and discussion of their formulation. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 20(1), 475–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.14200

[18] Santos, A., Andrejkovičová, S., Perná, I., et al., 2024. Mechanical and thermal properties of geopolymers derived from metakaolin with iron mine waste. Applied Clay Science. 258, 107452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2024.107452

[19] Zulkifly, K., Yong, H.C., Abdullah, M.M.A.B., et al., 2017. International Conference on Innovative Research—ICIR EUROINVENT 2017. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 209, 012085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/209/1/012085

[20] El Nagar, A., Khater, M., 2018. Development of High Thermal Stability Geopolymer Composites Enhanced by Nano Metakaolin. Journal of Building Materials and Structures. 6(1), 10–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v6i1.64

[21] Godinho, D., Pelisser, F., Bernardin, A.M., 2022. High temperature performance of geopolymers as a function of the Si/Al ratio and alkaline media. Materials Letters. 311, 131625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131625

[22] Giannopoulou, I., Robert, P.M., Sakkas, K.M., et al., 2023. High temperature performance of geopolymers based on construction and demolition waste. Journal of Building Engineering. 72, 106575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106575

[23] Abd El-Moatey, A.R., El-Rashed, I., Al-Saed, W., et al., 2018. Permeability of geopolymer concrete with and without geopolymer paint and comparison with permeability of traditional concrete. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 5(10), 1833–1839.

[24] Sitarz, M., Choińska, M., Hager, I., et al., 2020. Mechanical behaviour and permeability of geopolymer mortars. MATEC Web of Conferences. 322, 01043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032201043

[25] Zheng, D., Ulerio II, G., Denduluri, V.S., et al., 2024. Permeability and self-healing behavior of alkali-activated geopolymers for well cementing applications. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4778187

[26] Palacios, M., Puertas, F., 2007. Effect of shrinkage-reducing admixtures on the properties of alkali-activated slag mortars and pastes. Cement and Concrete Research. 37(5), 691–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.021

[27] Shi, C., Stegemann, J.A., 2000. Acid corrosion resistance of different cementing materials. Cement and Concrete Research. 30(5), 803–808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00234-9

[28] Yang, W., Zhu, P., Liu, H., et al., 2021. Resistance to sulfuric acid corrosion of geopolymer concrete based on different binding materials and alkali concentrations. Materials. 14(23), 7109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237109

[29] Ooi, W.-E., Liew, Y.-M., Heah, C.-Y., et al., 2023. Acid-resistance of one-part geopolymers: Sodium aluminate and carbonate as alternative activators to conventional sodium metasilicate and hydroxide. Construction and Building Materials. 404, 133264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133264

[30] Mostazid, M.I., 2024. Acid resistance of geopolymer concrete—Literature review, knowledge gaps, and future development. Brilliant Engineering. 4(4), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36937/ben.2023.4875

[31] Rożek, P., Król, M., Mozgawa, W., 2019. Geopolymer-zeolite composites: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 230, 557–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.152

[32] Mohan Kumar, S.G.K., Kinuthia, J.M., Oti, J., et al., 2025. Geopolymer chemistry and composition: A comprehensive review of synthesis, reaction mechanisms, and material properties—Oriented with sustainable construction. Materials. 18(16), 3823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163823

[33] Luhar, S., Nicolaides, D., Luhar, I., 2021. Fire resistance behaviour of geopolymer concrete: An overview. Buildings. 11(3), 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030082

[34] Soong, L.S., Liu, M.Y.J., Yap, S.P., et al., 2022. The potential of geopolymer in development of green coating materials: A review. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 47, 12289–12299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-06882-7

[35] Rong, X., Wang, Z., Xing, X., et al., 2021. Review on the adhesion of geopolymer coatings. ACS Omega. 6(8), 5108–5112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06343

[36] Wong, L.S., 2022. Durability performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Polymers. 14(5), 868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050868

[37] Singh, N.B., Middendorf, B., 2020. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Construction and Building Materials. 237, 117455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455

[38] Jwaida, Z., Dulaimi, A., Mashaan, N., et al., 2023. Geopolymers: The green alternative to traditional materials for engineering applications. Infrastructures. 8(6), 98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8060098

[39] Neupane, K., 2022. Evaluation of environmental sustainability of one-part geopolymer binder concrete. Cleaner Materials. 6, 100138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100138

[40] Chaeng, 2017. The Global Cement Report. Available from: https://www.greatwallcorporation.com/news/467.html (cited 15 October 2025).

[41] Almutairi, A.L., Tayeh, B.A., Adesina, A., et al., 2021. Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 15, e00733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733

[42] Zhang, D., Zhu, T., Yang, Q., et al., 2024. Influence of ground granulated blast furnace slag on recycled concrete powder-based geopolymer cured at ambient temperature: Rheology, mechanical properties, reaction kinetics and air-void characteristics. Construction and Building Materials. 438, 137190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137190

[43] Vigneshkumar, A., Freeda Christy, C., Muthukannan, M., et al., 2024. Experimental investigations on fresh and mechanical properties of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings. in Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2024.01.051

[44] Venkatesan, G., Alengaram, U.J., Ibrahim, S., et al., 2024. Effect of fly ash characteristics, sodium-based alkaline activators, and process variables on the compressive strength of siliceous fly ash geopolymers with microstructural properties: A comprehensive review. Construction and Building Materials. 437, 136808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136808

[45] Jian, H., Wang, C., Dou, G., et al., 2024. Research on composite municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash and granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymers with sodium alginate for sealing coal seam gas drainage boreholes. Fuel. 358(Part B), 130278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130278

[46] Alrowaili, Z.A., Alnairi, M.M., Olarinoye, I.O., et al., 2024. Radiation attenuation of fly ash and rice husk ash-based geopolymers as cement replacement in concrete for shielding applications. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 217, 111489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111489

[47] Ismail, A.H., Kusbiantoro, A., Tajunnisa, Y., et al., 2024. A review of aluminosilicate sources from inorganic waste for geopolymer production: Sustainable approach for hydrocarbon waste disposal. Cleaner Materials. 13, 100259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.100259

[48] Nanda, B., Mishra, J., Patro, S.K., 2024. Synthesis of rice husk ash based alkaline activators for geopolymer binder systems: A review. Journal of Building Engineering. 91, 109694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109694

[49] Nouairi, J., Hajjaji, W., Rocha, F., et al., 2021. Toxic metal-rich extraction by-product: Contamination assessment and reprocessing. In Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions, 2nd ed. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51210-1_53

[50] Karoui, O., Andrejkovicova, S., Pato, P., et al., 2024. Alkali-activated geopolymers based on calcined phosphate sludges and metakaolin. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 31(32), 45138–45161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34025-y

[51] Hajjaji, W., Nouairi, J., Rocha, F., et al., 2021. Used lamps recycling in geopolymers. In Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions, 2nd ed. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51210-1_42

[52] Occhicone, A., Graziuso, S.G., De Gregorio, E., et al., 2024. Synthesis and characterization of new acid-activated red mud-metakaolin geopolymers and comparison with their alkaline counterparts. Journal of Cleaner Production. 435, 140492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140492

[53] Haq, M.U., Sood, H., Kumar, R., et al., 2024. Sustainable geopolymers from polyethylene terephthalate waste and industrial by-products: A comprehensive characterisation and performance predictions. Journal of Materials Science. 59, 3858–3889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09447-1

[54] McLellan, B.C., Williams, R.P., Lay, J., et al., 2011. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 19(9–10), 1080–1090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010

[55] Hewlett, P.C., 2003. Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK.

[56] Wang, K.T., Tang, Q., Cui, X.M., et al., 2016. Development of near-zero water consumption cement materials via the geopolymerization of tektites and its implication for lunar construction. Scientific Reports. 6, 29659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29659

[57] Provis, J.L., van Deventer, J.S.J., 2009. Geopolymers: Structure, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK.

[58] Duxson, P., Provis, J.L., Lukey, G.C., et al., 2007. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science. 42, 2917–2933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

[59] Shekarchi, M., Farahani, E.M., Oskouei, A.V., 2019. Effect of seawater on pull-out behavior of glued-in single rods set parallel to the grain of timber joints. Construction and Building Materials. 222, 342–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.140

[60] European Commission, 2021. The EU Blue Economy Report 2021. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

[61] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2016. The Ocean Economy in 2030. OECD Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264251724-en

[62] Rahman, S.K., Al-Ameri, R., 2022. Experimental and artificial neural network-based study on the sorptivity characteristics of geopolymer concrete with recycled cementitious materials and basalt fibres. Recycling. 7(4), 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7040055

[63] Shahedan, N.F., Abas, N.F., Al Bakri Abdullah, A.M., et al., 2024. Potential of fly ash geopolymer concrete as repairing and retrofitting solutions for marine infrastructure: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 20, e03214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03214

[64] Alzeer, M., MacKenzie, K.J.D., 2013. Synthesis and mechanical properties of novel composites of inorganic polymers (geopolymers) with unidirectional natural flax fibres (Phormium tenax). Applied Clay Science. 75–76, 148–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.03.010

[65] Alahmari, T.S., Abdalla, T.A., Rihan, M.A.M., 2023. Review of recent developments regarding the durability performance of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete. Buildings. 13(12), 3033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123033

[66] Zaland, S., Wang, J., Li, K., et al., 2026. Geopolymers as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement: Synthesis, durability, applications, environmental impacts, and cost analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 225, 116157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116157

[67] Rintala, A., Havukainen, J., Abdulkareem, M., 2021. Estimating the cost-competitiveness of recycling-based geopolymer concretes. Recycling. 6(3), 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6030046

[68] Berto, L., Saetta, A., Talledo, D., 2015. Constitutive model of concrete damaged by freeze–thaw action for evaluation of structural performance of RC elements. Construction and Building Materials. 98, 559–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.035

[69] Danish, A., Ozbakkaloglu, T., Mosaberpanah, M.A., et al., 2022. Sustainability benefits and commercialization challenges and strategies of geopolymer concrete: A review. Journal of Building Engineering. 58, 105005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105005

[70] Wu, J., Li, J., Rao, F., et al., 2020. Characterization of slag reprocessing tailings-based geopolymers in marine environment. Minerals. 10(9), 832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090832

[71] Hardjito, D., Wallah, S.E., Sumajouw, D.M.J., et al., 2004. On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Materials Journal. 101(6), 467–472.

[72] Neville, A.M., 2004. Properties of Concrete, 4th ed. Pearson Education: London, UK.

[73] Nied, D.B., Enemark-Rasmussen, K., L’Hôpital, E., et al., 2016. Properties of magnesium silicate hydrates (M–S–H) binder systems and phase evolution. Cement and Concrete Research. 79, 323–337.

[74] Perná, I., Novotná, M., Hanzlíček, T., et al., 2024. Metakaolin-based geopolymer formation and properties: The influence of the maturation period and environment (air, demineralized and sea water). Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 134, 415–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.01.005

[75] Luhar, S., Luhar, I., 2020. Application of seawater and sea sand to develop geopolymer composites. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 8(5), 5625–5633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E5681.018520

[76] Lyu, X., Robinson, N., Elchalakani, M., et al., 2022. Sea sand seawater geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering. 50, 104141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104141

[77] Živica, V., Bajza, A., 2001. Acidic attack of cement based materials—A review: Part 1. Principle of acidic attack. Construction and Building Materials. 15(8), 331–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00012-5

[78] Noushini, A., Castel, A., 2018. Performance-based criteria to assess the suitability of geopolymer concrete in marine environments using modified ASTM C1202 and ASTM C1556 methods. Materials and Structures. 51, 146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1267-z

[79] Buchwald, A., Dombrowski, K., Weil, M., 2005. The influence of calcium content on the performance of geopolymeric binder especially the resistance against acids. In Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer, Saint Quentin, France, 28 June–1 July 2005; pp. 35–39.

[80] Fernandez-Jimenez, A., Garcia-Lodeiro, I., Palomo, A., 2007. Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious material. Journal of Materials Science. 42, 3055–3065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0584-8

[81] Kalyoncu Erguler, G., Dahi Taleghani, A., 2025. Geopolymer applications in deep-sea energy and mining infrastructure: A review of properties, challenges, and future prospects. Environmental Earth Sciences. 84, 345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12339-5

[82] Rezaifar, O., Hasanzadeh, M., Gholhaki, M., 2016. Concrete made with hybrid blends of crumb rubber and metakaolin: Optimization using Response Surface Method. Construction and Building Materials. 123, 59–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.047

[83] Khezrloo, A., Aghaie, E., Tayebi, M., 2018. Split tensile strength of slag-based boroaluminosilicate geopolymer. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society. 54(1), 65–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-017-0127-6

[84] Khezrloo, A., Tayebi, M., Shafiee, A., et al., 2021. Evaluation of compressive and split tensile strength of slag-based aluminosilicate geopolymer reinforced by waste polymeric materials using Taguchi method. Materials Research Express. 8(2), 025504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abe101

[85] Aghaie, A., Khezrloo, A., Tayebi, M., et al., 2022. Application of DOE method in evaluating split tensile strength of slag-based boroaluminosilicate geopolymers reinforced with steel fibers. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society. 58, 135–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-021-00675-1

Downloads

How to Cite

Nouairi, J., Andrejkovičová, S., Camerlenghi, A., & Ghribi, M. (2026). Blue Horizons: Assessing Geopolymers as Eco-Friendly Materials in the Context of the Transition to a Sustainable Blue Economy. Journal of Building Material Science, 8(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v8i1.12635

Issue

Vol. 8, Iss. 1 (March 2026)

Article Type

Review

License

Copyright © 2026 Jihene Nouairi, Slavka Andrejkovičová, Angelo Camerlenghi, Mounir Ghribi

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC