Great News | Journal of Building Material Science Receives First CiteScore of 0.5!
2025-06-12
Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Lightweight Aggregate under Microwave Curing Condition
Authors
-
Adam Saab Najim
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Malaysia
-
Salmia Beddu
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Malaysia
Institute of Energy Infrastructure (IEI), College of Engineering, University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Malaysia
-
Zarina Itam
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Malaysia
Institute of Energy Infrastructure (IEI), College of Engineering, University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v7i3.9946Abstract
Geopolymer composites are remarkable binding materials due to their sustainability and recyclability. This study investigates the behaviour of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete (SCGC) as a viable alternative to conventional concrete. It examines the effects of adding Lightweight Coarse Aggregate (LWCA) and Steel Fibre (SF) under different curing environments on the fresh and hardened properties of SCGC. Curing was applied using microwave and ambient environments. SF was added at 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% of the binder content. Natural coarse aggregate was partially replaced with LWCA by weight at 0%, 33.3%, 66.67%, and 100%. The SCGC mixes were analysed in both fresh and hardened states to evaluate their mechanical properties. Results showed that higher LWCA and SF ratios led to more viscous and cohesive mixes. SCGC specimens under ambient curing exhibited lower compressive, flexural, and tensile strengths compared to those under microwave curing. Microwave-cured samples demonstrated improved performance, with a 38.09% increase in compressive strength for the B6 mix and a 28.02% enhancement in flexural strength. The highest tensile strength (TS) was 4.67 MPa for the B3 mix with 1.5% SF. However, using 66.67% LWCA under microwave curing resulted in a 27.9% reduction in TS. The study recommends using industrial-scale microwave curing and recycled materials, such as steel fibres and LWCA, to produce cost-effective and sustainable SCGC.
Keywords:
Geopolymer; SCGC; Flexural; Compression; Microwave; ConcreteReferences
[1] Dal Pozzo, A., Carabba, L., Bignozzi, M.C., et al., 2019. Life cycle assessment of a geopolymer mixture for fireproofing applications. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 24, 1743–1757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01603-z
[2] Hassan, A., Arif, M., Shariq, M., 2020. A review of properties and behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete structural elements – A clean technology option for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 245, 118762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118762
[3] Najim, A.S., Beddu, S., Itam, Z., 2024. Enhancing mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced self-compacting geopolymer concrete using lightweight aggregate. Annales de Chimie - Science des Matériaux. 48(5), 699–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/acsm.480511
[4] Al Zand, A.W., Hosseinpour, E., Badaruzzaman, W.H.W., et al., 2021. Performance of the novel C-purlin tubular beams filled with recycled-lightweight concrete strengthened with CFRP sheet. Journal of Building Engineering. 43, 102532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102532
[5] Davidovits, J., 2015. False values on CO2 emission for geopolymer cement/concrete published in scientific papers. Geopolymer Institute Library Technical Paper. 24, 1–9.
[6] Kastiukas, G., Ruan, S., Liang, S., et al., 2020. Development of precast geopolymer concrete via oven and microwave radiation curing with an environmental assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 255, 120290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120290
[7] Semache, S., Bouteldja, F., Belachia, M., et al., 2024. Local materials in geopolymer mortar: a case study on metakaolin and blast-furnace slag. Annales de Chimie - Science des Matériaux. 48(1), 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/acsm.480104
[8] Zhang, Z., Provis, J.L., Reid, A., et al., 2014. Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Construction and Building Materials. 56, 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081
[9] Juenger, M.C.G., Winnefeld, F., Provis, J.L., et al., 2011. Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cement and Concrete Research. 41(12), 1232–1243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012
[10] Turkey, F.A., Beddu, S.B.T., Al-Hubboubi, S.K., et al., 2023. Elevated temperature effects on geo-polymer concrete: an experimental and numerical-review study. Annales de Chimie - Science des Matériaux. 47(5), 325–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/acsm.470507
[11] Wang, L., Cho, D.W., Tsang, D.C.W., et al., 2019. Green remediation of As and Pb contaminated soil using cement-free clay-based stabilization/solidification. Environment International. 126, 336–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.057
[12] Lei, H., Gao, H., Feng, R., et al., 2024. Effect of calcination temperature on the activity of basalt tailings for the lightweight geopolymer from microwave curing. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 328, 129991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129991
[13] Li, D., Shi, Z., Pan, Y., et al., 2024. Temporal effects on the micro- and nano-structural cement-slag pastes subjected to microwave curing over 7 years. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 21, e03611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03611
[14] Youssf, O., Mills, J., Elchalakani, M., et al., 2022. Geopolymer concrete with lightweight fine aggregate: material performance and structural application. Polymers. 2023(17), 10171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010171
[15] Rashad, A.M., Mohamed, R.A.E., Zeedan, S.R., et al., 2024. Basalt powder as a promising candidate material for improving the properties of fly ash geopolymer cement. Construction and Building Materials. 435, 136805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136805
[16] Nadesan, M.S., Dinakar, P., 2017. Structural concrete using sintered fly ash lightweight aggregate: a review. Construction and Building Materials. 154, 928–944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.005
[17] Zhang, J., Duan, Y., Wang, B., et al., 2020. Interfacial enhancement for carbon fibre reinforced electron beam cured polymer composite by microwave irradiation. Polymer. 192, 122327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122327
[18] Sidhu, A.S., Siddique, R., 2024. Review on effect of curing methods on high strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 438, 136858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136858
[19] Mohammed, Z., Al-Attar, T., Al-Shathr, B., 2021. Effect of steel fiber content on properties of fresh self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Engineering and Technology Journal. 39(12), 1875–1881. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.v39i12.2295
[20] Al Bakri Abdullah, M.M., Tahir, M.F.M., Hussin, K., et al., 2016. Effect of microwave curing to the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Materials Science Forum. 841, 193–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.841.193
[21] Graytee, A., Sanjayan, J.G., Nazari, A., 2018. Development of a high strength fly ash-based geopolymer in short time by using microwave curing. Ceramics International. 44, 8216–8222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.001
[22] Nurruddin, M., Haruna, S., Mohammed, B., et al., 2018. Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: a review. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 5, 31–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.01.005
[23] Dong, M., Feng, W., Elchalakani, M., et al., 2017. Development of a high strength geopolymer by novel solar curing. Ceramics International. 43, 11233–11243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.173
[24] Liu, C., Huang, X., Wu, Y.Y., et al., 2020. Review on the research progress of cement-based and geopolymer materials modified by graphene and graphene oxide. Nanotechnology Reviews. 9(1), 155–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0014
[25] Kumar, C., Karim, M.A., 2019. Microwave-convective drying of food materials: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 59, 379–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1373269
[26] Fuad, M.A.H.M., Hasan, M.F., Ani, F.N., 2019. Microwave torrefaction for viable fuel production: a review on theory, affecting factors, potential and challenges. Fuel. 253, 512–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.151
[27] Das, S., Mukhopadhyay, A.K., Datta, S., et al., 2009. Prospects of microwave processing: an overview. Bulletin of Materials Science. 32, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-009-0001-4
[28] Colangelo, F., Russo, P., Cimino, F., et al., 2017. Epoxy/glass fibres composites for civil applications: Comparison between thermal and microwave crosslinking routes. Composites Part B: Engineering. 126, 100–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.003
[29] Kim, B.J., Yi, C., Kang, K.I., 2015. Microwave curing of alkali-activated binder using hwangtoh without calcination. Construction and Building Materials. 98, 465–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.119
[30] Nayak, S.N., Bhasin, C.P., Nayak, M.G., 2019. A review on microwave-assisted transesterification processes using various catalytic and non-catalytic systems. Renewable Energy. 143, 1366–1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.056
[31] Rattanadecho, P., Suwannapum, N., Chatveera, B., et al., 2008. Development of compressive strength of cement paste under accelerated curing by using a continuous microwave thermal processor. Materials Science and Engineering A. 472, 299–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.035
[32] Shubbar, A.A., Sadique, M., Kot, P., et al., 2019. Future of clay-based construction materials – a review. Construction and Building Materials. 210, 172–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.206
[33] Zlotorzynski, A., 1995. The application of microwave radiation to analytical and environmental chemistry. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 25(1), 43–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408349508050557
[34] El-Feky, M.S., Kohail, M., El-Tair, A.M., et al., 2020. Effect of microwave curing as compared with conventional regimes on the performance of alkali activated slag pastes. Construction and Building Materials. 233, 117268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117268
[35] Itaya, Y., Uchiyama, S., Hatano, S., et al., 2005. Drying enhancement of clay slab by microwave heating. Drying Technology. 23, 1243–1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-200059487
[36] Venkatesh, M.S., Raghavan, G.S.V., 2004. An overview of microwave processing and dielectric properties of agri-food materials. Biosystems Engineering. 88, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.01.007
[37] Thostenson, E.T., Chou, T.W., 1999. Microwave processing: fundamentals and applications. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 30, 1055–1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X99)00020-2
[38] Sun, Y., Zhang, P., Hu, J., et al., 2021. A review on microwave irradiation to the properties of geopolymers: mechanisms and challenges. Construction and Building Materials. 294, 123491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123491
[39] Hammadi, A.A., Mohammed, A.M., Ramal, M.M., 2022. Enhancing of concrete properties by using aluminium and iron residues as a partial replacement of fine aggregate. Annales de Chimie - Science des Matériaux. 46(4), 207–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/acsm.460406
[40] Gude, V.G., Patil, P., Deng, S., 2012. Microwave energy potential for large scale biodiesel production. Proceedings of The World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF 2012, Including World Renewable Energy Congress XII and Colorado Renewable Energy Society (CRES) Annual Conference; May 13–17, 2012; Denver, CO, USA.pp. 751–759.
[41] Xu, J., 2015. Microwave Pretreatment. In: Pandey, A., Negi, S., Binod, P., et al. (eds.). Pretreatment of Biomass - Processes and Technologies. Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 157–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800080-9.00009-8
[42] Arpia, A.A., Chen, W., Lam, S.S., et al., 2020. Sustainable biofuel and bioenergy production from biomass waste residues using microwave-assisted heating: A comprehensive review. Chemical Engineering Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126233
[43] Nüchter, M., Müller, U., Ondruschka, B., et al., 2003. Microwave-assisted chemical reactions. Chemical Engineering and Technology. 26, 1207–1216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200301836
[44] Chemat-Djenni, Z., Hamada, B., Chemat, F., 2007. Atmospheric pressure microwave assisted heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Molecules. 12, 1399–1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/12071399
[45] Gao, D., Zhang, W., Tang, J., et al., 2024. Effect of steel fiber on the compressive performance and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete at elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials. 435, 136830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136830
[46] Philip, S., Nidhi, M., 2023. A review on the material performance of geopolymer concrete as green building materials. Materials Today: Proceedings. vol. 90, pp. 123–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.110
[47] ASTM C618, 2003. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International. Available from: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/60127/7d460e41e9e646f8847fae28948469db/ASTM-C618-08.pdf (cited 1 May 2025).
[48] ASTM C330, 2003. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials. Available from: https://www.intertekinform.com/en-au/standards/astm-c33-03-835487/ (cited 5 May 2025).
[49] Memon, F.A., Nuruddin, M.F., Khan, S., et al., 2013. Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on fresh properties and compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 8(1), 44–56.
[50] Aljumaili, M.W., Beddu, S.B., Itam, Z., et al., 2024. Investigating the influence of recycled coarse aggregate and steel fiber on the rheological and mechanical properties of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Annales de Chimie - Science des Matériaux. 48(2), 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/acsm.480206
[51] ASTM C494-05, 2005. Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/44829/863a1c71354046aab200a735e5fe37e0/ASTM-C94-C94M-05.pdf (cited 5 August 2025).
[52] EFNARC, 2005. The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete: specification, production and use. European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete. Available from: https://www.theconcreteinitiative.eu/images/ECP_Documents/EuropeanGuidelinesSelfCompactingConcrete.pdf (cited 8 August 2025).
[53] B.S. EN 12390-3, 2002. Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. British Standards Institution: London, United Kingdom.
[54] Aleem, M.I.A., Arumairaj, P.D., 2012. Geopolymer concrete – a review. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Emerging Technologies. 1(2), 118–122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7323/ijeset/v1_i2_14
[55] ASTM International Committee C496M, 2017. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
[56] Akcay, B., Agar-Ozbek, A.S., Bayramov, F., et al., 2012. Interpretation of aggregate volume fraction effects on fracture behavior of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 28(1), 437–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.080
[57] ASTM International, n.d. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete using simple beam with third-point loading. ASTM C100. Michigan, United States. pp. 19428–12959. Available from: cited 12August 2025.
[58] Nath, P., Sarker, P.K., 2014. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building Materials. 66, 163–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080
[59] Deir, E., Gebregziabiher, B.S., Peethamparan, S., 2014. Influence of starting material on the early age hydration kinetics, microstructure and composition of binding gel in alkali activated binder systems. Cement and Concrete Composites. 48, 108–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.010
[60] Hellal, N.N., Al-Dullayme, M.M., Abdulla, A.H., 2012. The effect of use silica sand on some properties of mechanical properties of concrete. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Science. 19(4), 48–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.19.4.10
[61] Belkowitz, J.S., Belkowitz, W.B., Nawrocki, K., et al., 2015. Impact of nanosilica size and surface area on concrete properties. ACI Materials Journal. 112(3), 419.
[62] Ambily, P.S., Umarani, R., Dattatreya, J.K., et al., 2014. Development of ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research. 66(2), 82–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.13.00057
[63] Shaikh, F.U.A., 2013. Deflection hardening behaviour of short fibre reinforced fly ash based geopolymer composites. Materials and Design. 50, 674–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.063
[64] Ganesan, N., Raj, J.B., Shashikala, A.P., 2013. Flexural fatigue behavior of self-compacting rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 44, 7–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.077
[65] Keshtegar, B., Bagheri, M., Yaseen, Z.M., 2019. Shear strength of steel fiber-unconfined reinforced concrete beam simulation: application of novel intelligent model. Composite Structures. 212, 230–242.
[66] Aljumaili, M.W., Beddu, S., Itam, Z., et al., 2024. Mechanical characteristics and durability of metakaolin-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete as a function of recycled aggregate and steel fiber contents. Journal of Composite & Advanced Materials/Revue des Composites et des Matériaux Avancés. 34(4), 465–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/rcma.340408
[67] Vu, T.H., Gowripalan, N., 2018. Mechanisms of heavy metal immobilisation using geopolymerisation techniques – a review. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. 16, 124–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.16.124
[68] Favier, A., Habert, G., Roussel, N., et al., 2015. A multinuclear static NMR study of geopolymerisation. Cement and Concrete Research. 75, 104–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.003
[69] Steins, P., Poulesquen, A., Diat, O., et al., 2012. Structural evolution during geopolymerization from an early age to consolidated material. Langmuir. 28, 8502–8510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/la300868v
Downloads
How to Cite
Najim, A. S., Beddu, S., & Itam, Z. (2025). Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Lightweight Aggregate under Microwave Curing Condition. Journal of Building Material Science, 7(3), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v7i3.9946
Issue
Article Type
Article
License
Copyright © 2025 Adam Saab Najim, Salmia Beddu, Zarina Itam
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
