Acknowledgment to the Reviewers of Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences in 2025
2026-02-06
Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Resource Management: Balancing Ecosystem Integrity and Human Development
Authors
-
Qi Liu
School of Marxism, Baise University, Baise 533000, China
-
Daoling Zhang
School of Marxism, Baise University, Baise 533000, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i7.12981Abstract
With the increased pressure on natural resources in the world, sustainable management of resources that resonates with both the integrity of ecosystem maintenance with the development of humankind has been a burning issue of concern. This review discusses new approaches, including the ecological protection in the framework of the developmental aims, when systemic approaches are used, instead of an individual intervention. The paper discusses some of the major directions towards sustainability, such as technological solutions (e.g., precision agriculture, digital monitoring), nature-based solutions (e.g., restoration, agroecology), circular economy, financial mechanisms (e.g., payments to ecosystem services, green bonds), and governance innovations (e.g., adaptive management, polycentric governance). It highlights the importance of multi-sectoral approaches that realize both ecological and social aspects of sustainability, and specifically equity and inclusiveness. The review also gives much attention to the role of measurements and monitoring, which is very critical and identifies the necessity to monitor not only the results of ecological integrity but also the results of human development. It also talks about the issue of balancing trade-offs between trade and conservation and provides advice on the reduction of risks of the leakage effect, rebound effects, and unfair allocation of benefits. Finally, the article also introduces the need to replace the concept of balancing with the co-optimizing of human development and ecosystem health, and its future agenda of research, policies, and practices will be to construct a resilient, just, and sustainable future of both people and nature.
Keywords:
Sustainable Resource Management; Ecosystem Integrity; Innovation Pathways; Equity; GovernanceReferences
[1] Macy, J., 2021. World as Lover, World as Self: Courage for Global Justice and Planetary Renewal. Parallax Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.
[2] Qureshi, F., 2024. Sustainable Resource Management: Balancing Human Needs and Environmental Protection. Frontiers in Environmental Science and Sustainability. 1(1), 1–19.
[3] Putnam, L., Martin, J., 2025. Everything new is old again: The coming metaverse, platforms as premises, and addressing harms that occur behind the veil of scale. Yale Journal of Law and Technology. 27, 151.
[4] Bhambri, P., Kautish, S., 2024. Technological advancements in promoting ecosystem health. In Digital Technologies to Implement the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 413–432.
[5] Hussain, S., Sharma, S., Sobti, R., et al., 2025. Science, technology, and novelty for sustainable development goals: Perspectives and challenges from environment, ecology, and human society in a changing world. In Role of Science and Technology for Sustainable Future. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 3–21.
[6] Olorunsogo, T.O., Ogugua, J.O., Muonde, M., et al., 2024. Environmental factors in public health: A review of global challenges and solutions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 21(1), 1453–1466.
[7] Ugwu, C.N., Ugwu, O.P.C., Alum, E.U., et al., 2025. Sustainable development goals (SDGs) and resilient healthcare systems: Addressing medicine and public health challenges in conflict zones. Medicine. 104(7), e41535.
[8] Aiguobarueghian, I., Adanma, U.M., Ogunbiyi, E.O., et al., 2024. An overview of initiatives and best practices in resource management and sustainability. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 22(2), 1734–1745.
[9] Xuan, S., Song, D., You, G., 2024. Financial risk prevention and corporate green innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the new asset management regulation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 88, 102566.
[10] Adeoba, M.I., Odjegba, E.E., Pandelani, T., 2025. Nature-based solutions: Opportunities and challenges for water treatment. In Smart Nanomaterials for Environmental Applications. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 575–596.
[11] Ogwu, M.C., Kosoe, E.A., 2025. Environmental Economics: Valuing Ecosystem Services and Green Technologies. In Evaluating Environmental Processes and Technologies. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 487–511.
[12] Ntawuhiganayo, E.B., Dobie, P., 2025. Incentives and Financing Mechanisms for Improved Landscape Management, Biodiversity Conservation, Nature-Based Solutions and Livelihood Development. CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia; ICRAF: Nairobi, Kenya.
[13] Gayer, T., Horowitz, J.K., 2006. Market-Based Approaches to Environmental Regulation. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics. 1(4), 201–326.
[14] Andrae, S., 2025. Financing Mechanisms for the Conservation of Biodiversity: A Multi-Country Comparison. In Biodiversity Finance: The Economic, Operational, and Societal Impacts of Biodiversity Loss. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 269–299.
[15] Sarioguz, O., Miser, E., 2024. Integrating AI in financial risk management: Evaluating the effects of machine learning algorithms on predictive accuracy and regulatory compliance. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. 13(2), 789–811.
[16] Helgeson, J.F., Al Kajbaf, A., Fung, J.F., 2025. Co-benefits of resilience planning: A review of analysis tools and methods. Frontiers in Climate. 7, 1539858.
[17] Herath, P., Bai, X., 2024. Benefits and co-benefits of urban green infrastructure for sustainable cities: six current and emerging themes. Sustainability Science. 19(3), 1039–1063.
[18] D’Adamo, I., Di Carlo, C., Gastaldi, M., et al., 2024. Economic performance, environmental protection and social progress: A cluster analysis comparison towards sustainable development. Sustainability. 16(12), 5049.
[19] Amorocho‐Daza, H., van der Zaag, P., Sušnik, J., 2024. Ethical considerations of using system dynamics in participatory settings: A social‐ecological‐systems perspective. System Dynamics Review. 40(2), e1755.
[20] He, J., Zhou, Y., Pandey, R., et al., 2025. Characteristics and Framework for Assessing Supply and Demand Relationship for Ecosystem Services Using a Trade‐off and Synergy Lens. Land Degradation & Development. 36(6), 1771–1786.
[21] Smith, G., Atkins, J., Gregory, A., et al., 2025. The minimum complexity necessary: The value of a simple Social-Ecological systems analysis in holistic marine environmental management. Sustainable Futures. 9, 100476.
[22] Zhang, J., Ji, Q., Skene, K.R., et al., 2025. Bridging resilience and sustainability: A reconciled framework for navigating social-ecological systems. Regional Environmental Change. 25(3), 106.
[23] Gomez‐Jaramillo, Y., Berrouet, L., Villegas‐Palacio, C., et al., 2024. Conceptual framework for analyzing the sustainability of socio‐ecological systems with a focus on ecosystem services that support water security. Sustainable Development. 32(3), 2298–2313.
[24] Angeon, V., Casagrande, M., Navarrete, M., et al., 2024. A conceptual framework linking ecosystem services, socio-ecological systems and socio-technical systems to understand the relational and spatial dynamics of the reduction of pesticide use in agrifood systems. Agricultural Systems. 213, 103810.
[25] Cao, J., Deng, Z., Huang, Z., et al., 2025. Identifying Conservation Priority Areas of China: A methodological framework for ecosystem integrity and authenticity. Biological Conservation. 302, 110924.
[26] Wang, H.-Z., 2024. Assessments and diagnoses of aquatic ecosystem integrity based on integrity requirements of ecosystem service targets. Water Biology and Security. 3(1), 100230.
[27] Liu, R., Gao, W., Yang, F., 2025. Authenticity, Integrity, and Cultural–Ecological Adaptability in Heritage Conservation: A Practical Framework for Historic Urban Areas—A Case Study of Yicheng Ancient City, China. Buildings. 15(8), 1304.
[28] Islam, F.S., 2025. Artificial intelligence-driven optimization of nature-based carbon sequestration: A scalable architecture for urban climate resilience. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 15(7), 252–277.
[29] Ma, L., Xu, Z., Fan, L., et al., 2025. Multi-Source Data Integration and Model Coupling for Watershed Eco-Assessment Systems: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Processes. 13(9), 2998.
[30] Özkan, F.H., Gürbüz, İ.B., 2024. The Influence of Inflation, Human Development Index, and Poverty. Contemporary Research in Social, Human and Administrative. 21.
[31] Fonchingong Che, C., Bang, H.N., 2024. Towards a “Social Justice Ecosystem Framework” for Enhancing Livelihoods and Sustainability in Pastoralist Communities. Societies. 14(11), 239.
[32] Allouche, J., 2024. Nexus framing of sustainability issues: Feasibility, synergies, and trade-offs in terms of water-energy-food. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 49(1), 501–518.
[33] Zhang, Q., Avraamidou, S., Paulson, J.A., et al., 2025. Navigating the Trade-offs and Synergies of Economic and Environmental Sustainability Using Process Systems Engineering. In Proceedings of the 2025 American Control Conference (ACC), Denver, CO, USA, 7–10 July 2025.
[34] Jain, S.K., Tiwari, M., Choubey, S., 2024. Environmental Degradation and Management for Healing through Collective Efforts—A Comprehensive Study. International Journal of Pharmacology & Biological Sciences. 18(2).
[35] Kealy, T., 2024. Review of the Interlinked Environmental, Economic and Social Realms of Sustainability. In Empirical Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects for Sustainable Development. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1–33.
[36] Sorrentino, M., Cirillo, V., Nappi, L., 2019. Development of flexible procedures for co-optimizing design and control of fuel cell hybrid vehicles. Energy Conversion and Management. 185, 537–551.
[37] Muhdiarta, U., 2025. The Role of Community Participation in Shaping Policies and Its Implications for Government Legitimacy. The Journal of Academic Science. 2(4), 1109–1117.
[38] Vargas, C.M., Cooper, P.J., 2024. Implementing Sustainable Development: From Global Policy to Local Action. Bloomsbury Publishing USA: New York, NY, USA.
[39] Katsou, E., Nika, C.-E., Buehler, D., et al., 2020. Transformation tools enabling the implementation of nature-based solutions for creating a resourceful circular city. Blue-Green Systems. 2(1), 188–213.
[40] Raffaelli, R., Glynn, M.A., Tushman, M., 2019. Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management Journal. 40(7), 1013–1039.
[41] Schot, J., Steinmueller, W.E., 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy. 47(9), 1554–1567.
[42] Bessant, J., Öberg, C., Trifilova, A., 2014. Framing problems in radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management. 43(8), 1284–1292.
[43] Zhai, Z., Martínez, J.F., Beltran, V., et al., 2020. Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 170, 105256.
[44] Sajib, M.M.H., Sayem, A.S.M., 2025. Innovations in Sensor-Based Systems and Sustainable Energy Solutions for Smart Agriculture: A Review. Encyclopedia. 5(2), 67.
[45] Kennedy, M.A., 2016. Adaptive practice: Next generation evidence-based practice in digital environments. In Nursing Informatics 2016. IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 417–421.
[46] Westfall-Greiter, T., Dienhofer, H., 2017. From Evidence-Based to Evidence Generating Practice: Implications for Education Research in the Context of Innovation. In Erfahrungen deuten–Deutungen erfahren: Vignettes and Anecdotes as Research, Evaluation and Mentoring Tool. StudienVerlag: Innsbruck, Austria. pp. 77–94.
[47] King, C., 2022. Beyond sustainability: A global study of nature-based solutions in regenerative tourism. Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally. 38, 219–227.
[48] Cheng, C., Li, F., 2024. Ecosystem restoration and management based on nature-based solutions in China: Research progress and representative practices. Nature-Based Solutions. 6, 100176.
[49] Lindenmayer, D.B., Likens, G.E., Andersen, A., et al., 2012. Value of long‐term ecological studies. Austral Ecology. 37(7), 745–757.
[50] Sibanda, N., 2024. Eco-Social Contracting for Environmental Justice: Assessing the Effectiveness of Community-Based Natural Resource Management. UNRISD: Geneva, Switzerland.
[51] Yang, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., et al., 2023. Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 21(1), 55–80.
[52] Gaustad, G., Krystofik, M., Bustamante, M., et al., 2018. Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 135, 24–33.
[53] Khanna, N.Z., Zhang, J., Lu, H., et al., 2023. Conceptualizing demand-side technological and social innovations in modeling pathways to carbon neutrality. Energy Research & Social Science. 100, 103115.
[54] Note, O.C.P.R.B., 2023. Competition in the Circular Economy. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
[55] Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P., et al., 2016. Steering innovations towards a green economy: Understanding government intervention. Journal of Cleaner Production. 135, 426–434.
[56] Agrawal, A., Lemos, M.C., 2007. A greener revolution in the making?: Environmental governance in the 21st century. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 49(5), 36–45.
[57] Bodin, Ö., 2017. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science. 357(6352), eaan1114.
[58] Lebel, L., Anderies, J.M., Campbell, B., et al., 2006. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society. 11(1), 19.
[59] Chapman, B., Lindenmayer, D.B., 2019. A novel approach to the sustainable financing of the global restoration of degraded agricultural land. Environmental Research Letters. 14(12), 124084.
[60] Akhtar-Schuster, M., Thomas, R.J., Stringer, L.C., et al., 2011. Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: Institutional, financial, legal and science‐policy challenges and solutions. Land Degradation & Development. 22(2), 299–312.
[61] Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., et al., 2021. Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. 30(8), 4237–4257.
[62] Chang, Y.-Y., Chiang, F.-Y., Hu, Q., et al., 2025. From green HRM to SDG success: Pathways through exploratory innovation and developmental culture. Review of Managerial Science. 19(6), 1711–1741.
[63] Thrane, S., Blaabjerg, S., Møller, R.H., 2010. Innovative path dependence: Making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes. Research Policy. 39(7), 932–944.
[64] Maturo, M.G., Soligo, M., Gibson, G., et al., 2020. The greater inflammatory pathway—High clinical potential by innovative predictive, preventive, and personalized medical approach. EPMA Journal. 11(1), 1–16.
[65] Oeij, P.R.A., van der Torre, W., Vaas, F., et al., 2019. Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: Applying the innovation journey model. Journal of Business Research. 101, 243–254.
[66] Fischer, A., Petersen, L., Feldkötter, C., et al., 2007. Sustainable governance of natural resources and institutional change—An analytical framework. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice. 27(2), 123–137.
[67] Lavorel, S., Grigulis, K., 2012. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology. 100(1), 128–140.
[68] Leitner, K.-H., Warnke, P., Rhomberg, W., 2016. New forms of innovation: Critical issues for future pathways. Foresight. 18(3), 224–237.
[69] Pahl-Wostl, C., Knüppe, K., 2016. Water security and environmental water needs: The role of the ecosystem services concept and transformation of governance systems. In Handbook on Water Security. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 226–238.
[70] Qin, K., Liu, J., Yan, L., et al., 2019. Integrating ecosystem services flows into water security simulations in water scarce areas: Present and future. Science of the Total Environment. 670, 1037–1048.
[71] Vargas, D.C.M., Hoyos, C.d.P.Q., Manrique, O.L.H., 2023. The water-energy-food nexus in biodiversity conservation: A systematic review around sustainability transitions of agricultural systems. Heliyon. 9(7), e17016.
[72] Pulighe, G., Pirelli, T., 2023. Assessing the sustainability of bioenergy pathways through a land-water-energy nexus approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 184, 113539.
[73] Lu, N., Liu, L., Yu, D., et al., 2021. Navigating trade-offs in the social-ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 48, 77–84.
[74] Garnett, T., Godfray, C., 2012. Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture. Navigating a Course through Competing Food System Priorities. University of Oxford: Oxford, UK. pp. 51.
[75] Vikas, Ranjan, R., 2024. Agroecological approaches to sustainable development. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8, 1405409.
[76] Bigger, P., Dempsey, J., Rojas-Marchini, F., et al., 2021. Beyond the Gap: Placing Biodiversity Finance in the Global Economy. The University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[77] Mery, G., Katila, P., Galloway, G., et al., 2010. Forests and Society: Responding to Global Drivers of Change. IUFRO: Vienna, Austria. pp. 441–486.
[78] Pacifici, M., 2025. Ecologically sound strategies for renewable energy transition: Balancing conservation and energy development in coal plant conversions. Ecological Solutions and Evidence. 6(2), e70001.
[79] Raj, R., Sharma, S., 2025. Green Energy, Greener Earth: Innovations in Renewable Energy and Ecosystem Conservation. In Green Equilibrium: Deciphering Earth's Ecosystems for Sustainable Tomorrow. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 255–279.
[80] Özcan, Z., Willaarts, B., Klessova, S., et al., 2024. From nexus thinking to nexus implementation in South Europe and beyond: Mutual learning between practitioners and policymakers. Sustainability Nexus Forum. 32, 6.
[81] Joss, S., 2011. Eco-cities: The mainstreaming of urban sustainability—Key characteristics and driving factors. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 6(3), 268–285.
[82] Riffat, S., Powell, R., Aydin, D., 2016. Future cities and environmental sustainability. Future Cities and Environment. 2(1), 1.
[83] Yanda, P.Z., Mabhuye, E., Johnson, N., et al., 2019. Nexus between coastal resources and community livelihoods in a changing climate. Journal of Coastal Conservation. 23(1), 173–183.
[84] Di Franco, A., Hogg, K.E., Calò, A., et al., 2020. Improving marine protected area governance through collaboration and co-production. Journal of Environmental Management. 269, 110757.
[85] Alongi, D.M., 2018. Blue Carbon: Coastal Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
[86] Hejnowicz, A.P., Kennedy, H., Rudd, M.A., et al., 2015. Harnessing the climate mitigation, conservation and poverty alleviation potential of seagrasses: Prospects for developing blue carbon initiatives and payment for ecosystem service programmes. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2, 32.
[87] Jahan, F., 2025. A Systematic Review of Blue Carbon Potential in Coastal Marshlands: Opportunities for Climate Change Mitigation and Ecosystem Resilience. Frontiers in Applied Engineering and Technology. 2(1), 40–57.
[88] Vaughan, M., Jernigan, J., Pitt Barnes, S., et al., 2017. Evaluating cross-cutting approaches to chronic disease prevention and management: Developing a comprehensive evaluation. Preventing Chronic Disease. 14, E131.
[89] Bieker, T., Waxenberger, B., 2002. Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics—Developing a balanced scorecard for integrity management. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Göteborg, Sweden, 23–26 June 2002.
[90] Bennett, M., James, P., Klinkers, L., 2017. Sustainable Measures: Evaluation and Reporting of Environmental and Social Performance. Routledge: London, UK.
[91] Hilliard-Boone, T., Firminger, K., Dutta, T., et al., 2022. Stakeholder‐driven principles for advancing equity through shared measurement. Health Services Research. 57, 291–303.
[92] LaPaix, R., Freedman, B., Patriquin, D., 2009. Ground vegetation as an indicator of ecological integrity. Environmental Reviews. 17, 249–265.
[93] Reining, C.E., Lemieux, C.J., Doherty, S.T., 2021. Linking restorative human health outcomes to protected area ecosystem diversity and integrity. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 64(13), 2300–2325.
[94] Smith, L.M., Case, J.L., Smith, H.M., et al., 2013. Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index. Ecological Indicators. 28, 79–90.
[95] Waylen, K.A., Blackstock, K.L., 2017. Monitoring for Adaptive Management or Modernity: Lessons from recent initiatives for holistic environmental management. Environmental Policy and Governance. 27(4), 311–324.
[96] Weyant, J., Davidson, H., Dowlatabadi, H., et al., 1995. Integrated assessment of climate change: An overview and comparison of approaches and results. In Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[97] Avello, P., Allakulov, U., Barreto-Dillon, L., et al., 2023. The integrity management toolbox in action: A study of 22 urban water service cases. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development. 13(12), 952–961.
[98] Wurtzebach, Z., Schultz, C., 2016. Measuring ecological integrity: History, practical applications, and research opportunities. BioScience. 66(6), 446–457.
[99] Tierney, G.L., Faber-Langendoen, D., Mitchell, B.R., et al., 2009. Monitoring and evaluating the ecological integrity of forest ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 7(6), 308–316.
[100] Macleod, K., 2021. Increasing Demands for Environmental Monitoring Data, Reporting, and Verification Due to Changes in Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Disclosure Related to the Climate and Biodiversity Crises. The James Hutton Institute: Aberdeen, UK.
[101] Gregory, A., Spence, E., Beier, P., et al., 2021. Toward best management practices for ecological corridors. Land. 10(2), 140.
[102] Wijeratne, W., Perera, B., De Silva, L., 2014. Identification and assessment risks in maintenance operations. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. 4(4), 384–405.
[103] Erdil, A., Erbıyık, H., 2023. Failures prevention methods for sustainability of production-failure modes and effect analysis in a business: A case study. Research Journal of Business and Management. 10(3), 134–151.
[104] Carlson, C.S., 2012. Effective FMEAs: Achieving Safe, Reliable, and Economical Products and Processes Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
[105] Leach, M., Reyers, B., Bai, X., et al., 2018. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: A social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Global Sustainability. 1, e13.
[106] Löfqvist, S., Kleinschroth, F., Bey, A., et al., 2023. How social considerations improve the equity and effectiveness of ecosystem restoration. BioScience. 73(2), 134–148.
[107] Collins, S.L., Carpenter, S.R., Swinton, S.M., et al., 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for long‐term social–ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 9(6), 351–357.
[108] Brown, E.D., Williams, B.K., 2016. Ecological integrity assessment as a metric of biodiversity: are we measuring what we say we are? Biodiversity and Conservation. 25(6), 1011–1035.
[109] Bainton, N., Kemp, D., Lèbre, E., et al., 2021. The energy‐extractives nexus and the just transition. Sustainable Development. 29(4), 624–634.
[110] Redman, C.L., Grove, J.M., Kuby, L.H., 2004. Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems. 7(2), 161–171.
[111] Kuebbing, S.E., Reimer, A.P., Rosenthal, S.A., et al., 2018. Long‐term research in ecology and evolution: A survey of challenges and opportunities. Ecological Monographs. 88(2), 245–258.
[112] Hughes, B. B., Beas-Luna, R., Barner, A. K., et al., 2017. Long-term studies contribute disproportionately to ecology and policy. BioScience. 67(3), 271–281.
[113] Sovacool, B. K., Ali, S. H., Bazilian, M., et al., 2020. Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science. 367(6473), 30–33.
Downloads
How to Cite
Liu, Q., & Zhang, D. (2026). Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Resource Management: Balancing Ecosystem Integrity and Human Development. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(7), 180–204. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i7.12981
Issue
Article Type
Review
License
Copyright © 2026 Qi Liu, Daoling Zhang
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
