Materials for a Regenerative Built Environment: A Review of Novel Green Construction Technologies

Authors

  • Yayuqiong Zeng

    Jiangxi Environmental Engineering College, Ganzhou 341000, China

  • Qi Huang

    Ganzhou Architectural Design Institute Co., Ltd., Ganzhou 341000, China

  • Liuchun Zhang

    China Construction First Group Fifth Construction Co., Ltd., Beijing 100024, China

  • Zhiwei Lin

    Guangzhou Rong Baosheng Architectural Engineering Design Consulting Co., Ltd., Ganzhou 341000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13564
Received: 27 May 2026 | Revised: 16 June 2026 | Accepted: 24 June 2026 | Published Online: 19 August 2026

Abstract

The built environment is a significant contributor to global resource use, Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and construction and demolition waste, and the current approach of sustainable construction needs to evolve from a linear supply and use model, towards a more regenerative material system. The review article discusses new green construction technologies that can contribute to a regenerative built environment, which minimizes embodied carbon, carbon sequestration, circularity, and supports ecological functions and the health of the occupants. The article critically reviews the progress of the materials that are bio-derived and carbon-storing, such as engineered timber, bamboo, hempcrete, straw, cork, mycelium composites, algae-derived materials, cellulose and lignin-based materials. It also examines low-carbon or circular mineral-based alternatives like low-clinker cement, limestone calcined clay cement, geopolymers, alkali-activated binders, recycled aggregate concrete, carbon-cured concrete, re-used metals, re-used glass and earth-based materials. Furthermore, new technologies such as additive manufacturing, prefabrication and modular construction, smart materials, living systems, digital twin and material passports are assessed as means of system-level regeneration. The review emphasizes that regeneration can only be measured through whole life assessment and is not just a part of the material origin or embodied carbon but also through durability, circularity, toxicity, land use, scalability, ecological value and social acceptance. The results indicate that future buildings that are regens will rely on integrated material systems, not just material substitutions. The research priorities include standardized assessment frameworks, long-term field validation, circular design protocols, digital traceability and policy support for low-carbon and reusable construction materials.

Keywords:

Regenerative Built Environment; Green Construction Materials; Bio-Based Materials; Low-Carbon Concrete; Circular Construction

References

[1] Wilbanks, T.J., Fernandez, S. (eds.), 2014. Climate Change and Infrastructure, Urban Systems, and Vulnerabilities: Technical Report for the US Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics: Washington, DC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-556-4

[2] Shukla, S.K., Kaul, S., 2024. Advanced Building Materials. In Thermal Evaluation of Indoor Climate and Energy Storage in Buildings. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003415695-1

[3] Bungau, C.C., Bungau, T., Prada, I.F., et al., 2022. Green Buildings as a Necessity for Sustainable Environment Development: Dilemmas and Challenges. Sustainability. 14(20), 13121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013121

[4] Kitsopoulou, A., Bellos, E., Tzivanidis, C., 2024. An Up-to-Date Review of Passive Building Envelope Technologies for Sustainable Design. Energies. 17(16), 4039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164039

[5] Temizel-Sekeryan, S., Rios, F.C., Geremicca, F., et al., 2023. Circular Design and Embodied Carbon in Living Buildings: The Missing Potential. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 29(3), 04023013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1445

[6] El Kouche, J., 2024. Regenerative Construction: Overview and Key Insights [Master’s Thesis]. Politecnico di Milano: Milan, Italy.

[7] Slamani, M., Louhichi, B., Amroune, S., et al., 2026. Next‐Generation Composite Materials and Manufacturing: A Review of Smart, Sustainable, and Digital Advancements. Advanced Materials Technologies. 11(9), e01409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202501409

[8] Sajadieh, S.M.M., Noh, S.D., 2025. A Review of Digital Twin Integration in Circular Manufacturing for Sustainable Industry Transition. Sustainability. 17(16), 7316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167316

[9] Habert, G., Göswein, V., 2026. Building to Heal: Regenerative Design and the Impact of Sustainable Construction Materials, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003405672

[10] Housh Sadat, S.Z., Bararzadeh Ledari, M., Dehvari, H., et al., 2024. Aligning Net zero energy, carbon Neutrality, and regenerative concepts: An exemplary study of sustainable architectural practices. Journal of Building Engineering. 90, 109414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109414

[11] Saini, H., Ledwani, L., 2024. A review on application of green materials in different construction systems, their processing, surface modification, testing and certification. MRS Energy & Sustainability. 11(2), 267–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-024-00088-0

[12] Raja, P., Murugan, V., Ravichandran, S., et al., 2023. A Review of Sustainable Bio‐Based Insulation Materials for Energy‐Efficient Buildings. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 308(10), 2300086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202300086

[13] Lisco, M., 2025. Reuse Strategies in Building Design [PhD Thesis]. Lund University: Lund, Sweden.

[14] Pacheco-Torgal, F., 2025. An introductory overview of bio-based construction materials. In Advances in Bio-Based Materials for Construction and Energy Efficiency. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-32800-8.00008-1

[15] Behera, D., Liu, K.-Y., Rachman, F., et al., 2025. Innovations and Applications in Lightweight Concrete: Review of Current Practices and Future Directions. Buildings. 15(12), 2113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122113

[16] Jain, A.K., 2023. Climate Resilient, Green and Low Carbon Built Environment, Green Energy and Technology. Springer Nature: Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0216-3

[17] Oyefusi, O., 2025. From Green to Regenerative Supply Chain Management in Construction: Development of a Robust Integrated Decision-Making Approach to Facilitate the Paradigm Shift. Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington: Wellington, New Zealand. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.29319578

[18] Ahmadizadeh, M., Heidari, M., Thangavel, S., et al., 2024. Development of new materials for sustainable buildings. In Sustainable Technologies for Energy Efficient Buildings. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 30–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003496656-2

[19] Baniya, B., 2023. Circularity in Facility Management: Conceptualisation and Potential Areas for Circularity-Oriented Actions. Sustainability. 15(11), 8460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118460

[20] Kumar, D., Maurya, K.K., Mandal, S.K., et al., 2025. Life Cycle Assessment in the Early Design Phase of Buildings: Strategies, Tools, and Future Directions. Buildings. 15(10), 1612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101612

[21] Almusaed, A., Yitmen, I., Myhren, J.A., et al., 2024. Assessing the Impact of Recycled Building Materials on Environmental Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Framework for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Buildings. 14(6), 1566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061566

[22] Bühler, M., Hollenbach, P., Köhler, L., et al., 2024. Unlocking resilience and sustainability with earth-based materials: a principled framework for urban transformation. Frontiers in Built Environment. 10, 1385116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1385116

[23] Barbhuiya, S., Das, B.B., Adak, D., et al., 2025. Low carbon concrete: advancements, challenges and future directions in sustainable construction. Discover Concrete and Cement. 1(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44416-025-00002-y

[24] Mouton, L., Allacker, K., Röck, M., 2023. Bio-based building material solutions for environmental benefits over conventional construction products – Life cycle assessment of regenerative design strategies (1/2). Energy and Buildings. 282, 112767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112767

[25] Zakkour, P., Kuijper, M., Dixon, P., et al., 2024. Carbon storage units and carbon storage obligations: A review of policy approaches. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 133, 104087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104087

[26] Baiani, S., Altamura, P., 2022. Reusable Cities: A Circular Design Approach to Urban Regeneration through Materials Reuse. In: Battisti, A., Baiani, S. (eds.). Sustainable Development Dimensions and Urban Agglomeration. IntechOpen: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105219

[27] Parveen, S., Tariq, M., 2023. Bioreceptive Building Materials for Urban Ecology. New Environmentally-Friendly Materials. 2(1), 41–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55121/nefm.v2i1.856

[28] Mlote, D.S., Budig, M., Cheah, L., 2024. Adaptability of buildings: a systematic review of current research. Frontiers in Built Environment. 10, 1376759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1376759

[29] Mattinzioli, T., Lo Presti, D., Jiménez Del Barco Carrión, A., 2022. A critical review of life cycle assessment benchmarking methodologies for construction materials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 33, e00496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00496

[30] Keyhani, M., Abbaspour, A., Bahadori-Jahromi, A., et al., 2023. Whole Life Carbon Assessment of a Typical UK Residential Building Using Different Embodied Carbon Data Sources. Sustainability. 15(6), 5115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065115

[31] Leinonen, I., 2022. A general framework for including biogenic carbon emissions and removals in the life cycle assessments for forestry products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 27(8), 1038–1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02086-1

[32] Samani, P., 2023. Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Science of The Total Environment. 903, 166611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166611

[33] Kolkwitz, M., Luotonen, E., Huuhka, S., 2023. How changes in urban morphology translate into urban metabolisms of building stocks: A framework for spatiotemporal material flow analysis and a case study. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 50(6), 1559–1576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221140892

[34] Gunaware, P.D., 2025. Next-Generation Sustainable and Ultra-High-Performance Materials for Climate Resilient Structures. Open Access Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 1(7), 17–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47760/OAJMR.2025.v01i07.002

[35] Mannucci, S., 2025. Beyond Sustainability: Paradigms for Complexity and Resilience in the Built Environment. Urban Science. 9(6), 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9060212

[36] Kujundzic, K., Stamatovic Vuckovic, S., Radivojević, A., 2023. Toward Regenerative Sustainability: A Passive Design Comfort Assessment Method of Indoor Environment. Sustainability. 15(1), 840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010840

[37] Kazmi, R., Jain, D., 2025. Role of Construction Material Transport for Achieving a Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: a Systematic Literature Review. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 5(5), 3743–3761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00553-z

[38] Yahia, A.K.M., Rahman, M.M., Shahjalal, M., et al., 2024. Sustainable Materials Selection in Building Design and Construction. International Journal of Science and Engineering. 1(4), 106–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62304/ijse.v1i04.199

[39] Sala Benites, H., Osmond, P., Prasad, D., 2022. A Future-Proof Built Environment through Regenerative and Circular Lenses—Delphi Approach for Criteria Selection. Sustainability. 15(1), 616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010616

[40] Haque, M.M., Uddin, S.Z., 2024. A Review on Sustainable Building Materials and Their Role in Enhancing U.S. Green Infrastructure Goals. Journal of Sustainable Development and Policy. 3(4), 65–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63125/bfmmay79

[41] Khoshnava, S.M., Rostami, R., Mohamad Zin, R., et al., 2020. The Role of Green Building Materials in Reducing Environmental and Human Health Impacts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(7), 2589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072589

[42] Giacomello, E., Perrucci, G., Trabucco, D., 2024. Reducing the embodied carbon using bio-based building materials: the biogenic carbon content of timber. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1402(1), 012037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1402/1/012037

[43] Ijeoma, M.W., 2025. Advancing Life Cycle Assessment of Mass Timber: Environmental Performance, Circular Design and End-Of-Life Strategies [PhD Thesis]. Clemson University: Clemson, SC, USA.

[44] Bredenoord, J., 2024. Bamboo as a Sustainable Building Material for Innovative, Low-Cost Housing Construction. Sustainability. 16(6), 2347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062347

[45] Li, Y., 2023. Bamboo-Wood Structural Composite Lumber: Material Grading and Product Development [Master’s Thesis]. University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada.

[46] Kumar, V., Abubakar, A.S., Qureshi, T., et al., 2025. Sustainable Building Materials from Agricultural Wastes. In: Shaffie, E., Hassan, R., Arshad, A.K., et al. (eds.). Sustainable Green Infrastructure. Springer Nature: Singapore. pp. 97–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1486-8_6

[47] Asghari, N., Memari, A.M., 2024. State of the Art Review of Attributes and Mechanical Properties of Hempcrete. Biomass. 4(1), 65–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4010004

[48] Antunes E Sousa, G.J., Silva, S.P., Fernandes, F.A.O., et al., 2026. Cork-Based Composite Materials for Multifunctional Engineering Applications: Processing, Performance and Research Challenges. Applied Composite Materials. 33(3), 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-026-10468-z

[49] Madusanka, C., Udayanga, D., Nilmini, R., et al., 2024. A review of recent advances in fungal mycelium based composites. Discover Materials. 4(1), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-024-00084-8

[50] Liadi, M.A., Ayodele, T.O., Tijani, A., et al., 2026. From Biomass to Biofabrication: Advances in Substrate Treatment Technologies for Fungal Mycelium Composites. Clean Technologies. 8(2), 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020030

[51] Roudbari, M.S., 2025. Algae-based building materials: Applications, challenges, and prospects. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering, Innovation & Technology, Brussel, Belgium, 10 March 2025.

[52] Marinho, E., 2025. Cellulose: A comprehensive review of its properties and applications. Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment. 11, 100283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scenv.2025.100283

[53] Mili, M., Hashmi, S.A.R., Ather, M., et al., 2022. Novel lignin as Natural‐Biodegradable binder for various sectors—A review. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 139(15), 51951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51951

[54] Luhar, S., Ashour, A., Luhar, I., 2026. Decarbonising the Cement and Concrete Industry—A Step Forward to a Sustainable Future. Journal of Composites Science. 10(5), 226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10050226

[55] Fode, T.A., Chande Jande, Y.A., Kivevele, T., 2023. Effects of different supplementary cementitious materials on durability and mechanical properties of cement composite – Comprehensive review. Heliyon. 9(7), e17924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17924

[56] Backes, J.G., Del Rosario, P., Petrosa, D., et al., 2022. Building Sector Issues in about 100 Years: End-Of-Life Scenarios of Carbon-Reinforced Concrete Presented in the Context of a Life Cycle Assessment, Focusing the Carbon Footprint. Processes. 10(9), 1791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091791

[57] Xiao, J., Yu, C., Wang, B., et al., 2026. Recycled aggregate concrete design, application and challenges. Nature Reviews Clean Technology. 2(1), 67–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00125-2

[58] Su, Y., Yao, Y., Wang, Y., et al., 2023. Modification of Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Its Use in Concrete: An Overview of Research Progress. Materials. 16(22), 7144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16227144

[59] Zhang, M., Liu, X., Kong, L., 2023. Evaluation of carbon and economic benefits of producing recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste. Journal of Cleaner Production. 425, 138946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138946

[60] Sorout, J., Raj, S., Kaur, D.P., et al., 2023. Waste-Based Bricks: Evaluation of Strength Behaviour of Bricks Containing Different Waste Materials as an Additive. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 234(7), 424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06438-x

[61] Pacios, A., Tejado, E., Martín, A., et al., 2024. High-temperature performance of clay-enhanced alkali-activated binders: A sustainable alternative to Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials. 453, 138860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138860

[62] Sbahieh, S., McKay, G., Al-Ghamdi, S.G., 2023. Comprehensive Analysis of Geopolymer Materials: Properties, Environmental Impacts, and Applications. Materials. 16(23), 7363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237363

[63] Reisch, D., Temme, K., 2025. Plastics in Architecture: Trends of a Building Material in Transition. In: Buettner, A., Weidner, E. (eds.). Springer Handbook of Circular Plastics Economy. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1073–1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66209-6_56

[64] Bristogianni, T., Oikonomopoulou, F., 2023. Glass up-casting: a review on the current challenges in glass recycling and a novel approach for recycling “as-is” glass waste into volumetric glass components. Glass Structures & Engineering. 8(2), 255–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00206-9

[65] Gupta, R.K., Agarwal, S., Mukhopadhyay, P., 2024. Plastics in Buildings and Construction. In Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 683–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88667-3.00010-2

[66] Bailly, G.C., El Mendili, Y., Konin, A., et al., 2024. Advancing Earth-Based Construction: A Comprehensive Review of Stabilization and Reinforcement Techniques for Adobe and Compressed Earth Blocks. Eng. 5(2), 750–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5020041

[67] Koda, E., Vaverková, M.D., Reddy, K.R., et al. (eds.), 2025. Emerging Trends in Sustainable Geotechnics: Keynote Volume of EGRWSE 2024. Springer Nature: Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2714-1

[68] Dumée, L.F., 2022. Circular Materials and Circular Design—Review on Challenges Towards Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 2(1), 9–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00085-2

[69] Cervantes Puma, G.C., Salles, A., Turk, J., et al., 2025. Circular Economy Best Practices in the Built Environment. In: Bragança, L., Griffiths, P., Askar, R., et al. (eds.). Circular Economy Design and Management in the Built Environment. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_1

[70] Pajonk, A., Prieto, A., Blum, U., et al., 2022. Multi-material additive manufacturing in architecture and construction: A review. Journal of Building Engineering. 45, 103603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103603

[71] Faleschini, F., Trento, D., Masoomi, M., et al., 2023. Sustainable mixes for 3D printing of earth-based constructions. Construction and Building Materials. 398, 132496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132496

[72] Rocha, P.F., Ferreira, N.O., Pimenta, F., et al., 2022. Impacts of Prefabrication in the Building Construction Industry. Encyclopedia. 3(1), 28–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010003

[73] Rashid, F.L., Al-Obaidi, M.A., Dulaimi, A., et al., 2023. A Review of Recent Improvements, Developments, and Effects of Using Phase-Change Materials in Buildings to Store Thermal Energy. Designs. 7(4), 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/designs7040090

[74] Hossain, M.R., Sultana, R., Patwary, M.M., et al., 2022. Self-healing concrete for sustainable buildings. A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 20(2), 1265–1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01375-9

[75] Pavel, M., Anastasescu, C., State, R.-N., et al., 2023. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants to Harmless End Products: Assessment of Practical Application Potential for Water and Air Cleaning. Catalysts. 13(2), 380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020380

[76] Theodoridou, I., Vatitsi, K., Stefanidou, M., et al., 2025. Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Buildings—The Potential of Vertical Greenery: A Brief Review of Benefits and Challenges of Implementation. Urban Science. 9(10), 398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9100398

[77] Lungu, K., Shikabonga, J., Mulenga, M., et al., 2025. Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in Road and Building Construction: A Systematic Review of a Novel Approach to Aggregate Formation. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 7(2), 42864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.42864

[78] Senarathne, H.N.Y., Weerasinghe, N.P., Zhang, G., 2025. Developing a Standardized Materials Passport Framework to Unlock the Full Circular Potential in the Construction Industry. Sustainability. 17(14), 6337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146337

[79] Ahmed, A.M., Sayed, W., Asran, A., et al., 2023. Identifying barriers to the implementation and development of sustainable construction. International Journal of Construction Management. 23(8), 1277–1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1967577

Downloads

How to Cite

Zeng, Y., Huang, Q., Zhang, L., & Lin, Z. (2026). Materials for a Regenerative Built Environment: A Review of Novel Green Construction Technologies. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(8), 1011–1036. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13564

Issue

Article Type

Review