
Coupling Transit, Land Use, and Ecology: A Critical Review of Urban Rail Transit's Environmental Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13276Abstract
Urban rail transit systems have now become a part of sustainable city development, bringing about environmental co-benefits such as lower greenhouse gas emissions, better air quality, and enhanced transit-oriented development. These advantages do not, however, come without trade-offs in the form of ecological costs associated with construction and habitat fragmentation, as well as the indirect effects of land-use changes. The article critically reviews the relationships among urban rail transit, land use, and ecology, with a focus on the intricate relationship between co-benefits and trade-offs. It provides a review of the main environmental impacts, including the decrease in car dependency and improvements in population health, as well as possible ecological impacts, including the carbon footprints of infrastructure and the disturbance of local ecosystems. The review highlights the significance of implementing an integrated planning approach with a focus on the ecological transit-oriented development (TOD) zoning concept, green rail design, and cross-sectoral policies that ensure the alignment of transportation, land-use, and ecological objectives. It also addresses spatial heterogeneity, determining how impacts can differ across urban densities, core-periphery processes, and regional contexts. The article ends by providing recommendations on how to advance social equity via inclusive governance and long-term environmental impact monitoring, thus indicating future research prospects in sustainable urban rail transport. Urban rails can help build stronger and more inclusive cities by balancing environmental sustainability and social inclusion.
Keywords:
Urban Rail Transit; Environmental Co-Benefits; Transit-Oriented Development; Ecological Impacts; Sustainable Urban PlanningReferences
[1] Mukherjee, S., Bairwa, D.H., 2025. Environmental issues arising from urbanization: A study on the ecological consequences of rapid urban growth. Journal of Humanities and Education Development. 7(3), 12–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.7.3.3
[2] Weng, D., Zhang, H., Wen, X., et al., 2025. Co-benefits of carbon and pollutant emission reduction in urban transport: Sustainable pathways and economic efficiency. Urban Climate. 60, 102348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102348
[3] Newell, R., Dale, A., Roseland, M., 2018. Climate action co-benefits and integrated community planning: Uncovering the synergies and trade-offs. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses. 10(4), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v10i04/1-23
[4] Molla, M.B., 2015. Urbanization process in developing countries: A review on urban ecosystem degradation and public health effect. Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management. 4(4), 291–298.
[5] Wan, T., Lu, W., Sun, P., 2023. Equity impacts of the built environment in urban rail transit station areas from a transit-oriented development perspective: A systematic review. Environmental Research Communications. 5(9), 092001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acf8b2
[6] Farnes, K., Hurst, N., Wong, W., et al., 2025. An exploratory study on the benefits of transit orientated development (TOD) to rail infrastructure projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 14(2), 310–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2023-0058
[7] Herath, P., Bai, X., 2024. Benefits and co-benefits of urban green infrastructure for sustainable cities: Six current and emerging themes. Sustainability Science. 19(3), 1039–1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01475-9
[8] Choi, C., Berry, P., Smith, A., 2021. The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management. 291, 112583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112583
[9] Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., 2014. Investigating the interplay between transport, land use and the environment: A review of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 11(8), 2121–2132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0691-z
[10] Sharifi, A., 2020. Trade-offs and conflicts between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 276, 122813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813
[11] Krawchenko, T., Tomaney, J., 2023. The governance of land use: A conceptual framework. Land. 12(3), 608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030608
[12] Mitropoulos, L.K., Prevedouros, P.D., 2016. Incorporating sustainability assessment in transportation planning: An urban transportation vehicle-based approach. Transportation Planning and Technology. 39(5), 439–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2016.1174363
[13] Wu, Q., Cao, Y., Fang, X., et al., 2022. A systematic coupling analysis framework and multi-stage interaction mechanism between urban land use efficiency and ecological carrying capacity. Science of the Total Environment. 853, 158444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158444
[14] Sharifi, A., 2025. Sustainability and resilience co-benefits and trade-offs of urban climate change adaptation and mitigation measures. In: Lackner, M., Sajjadi, B., Chen, W.Y. (Eds.). Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1751–1785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84483-6_118
[15] Lausselet, C., Brattebø, H., 2021. Environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of climate mitigation strategies applied to net-zero-emission neighbourhoods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 26(11), 2263–2277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01973-3
[16] Xiong, L., He, B.-J., 2022. Analytical framework for the analysis of co-benefits, conflicts and trade-offs of urban heat mitigation strategies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1078, 012133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012133
[17] Li, Z., Han, Z., Xin, J., et al., 2019. Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning. Land Use Policy. 82, 269–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.003
[18] Kasraian, D., Maat, K., Stead, D., et al., 2016. Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: An international review of empirical studies. Transport Reviews. 36(6), 772–792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1168887
[19] Wu, P., Li, R., Xiao, L., et al., 2024. Mediation effects of vegetation, land use and cover change and karst characteristics on hydrologic processes in heterogeneous karst basins. Hydrological Processes. 38(2), e15093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15093
[20] Wang, P., Yu, P., Lu, J., et al., 2022. The mediation effect of land surface temperature in the relationship between land use-cover change and energy consumption under seasonal variations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 340, 130804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130804
[21] Feng, X., Li, Y., Wang, X., et al., 2023. Impacts of land use transitions on ecosystem services: A research framework coupled with structure, function, and dynamics. Science of the Total Environment. 901, 166366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166366
[22] Milewicz, J., Mokrzan, D., Szymański, G.M., 2023. Environmental impact evaluation as a key element in ensuring sustainable development of rail transport. Sustainability. 15(18), 13754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813754
[23] Abujder Ochoa, W.A., Iarozinski Neto, A., Vitorio Junior, P.C., et al., 2025. The theory of complexity and sustainable urban development: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 17(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010003
[24] Dalkmann, H., 2019. Air quality co-benefits of sustainable and low-carbon transport system: Future in Asia. In Proceedings of the Intergovernmental Twelfth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia, Hanoi, Vietnam, 28–31 October 2019. Available from: https://uncrd.un.org/sites/default/files/12th-est_ps2_bgp.pdf
[25] Xu, S., Chen, Y., Liu, M., 2025. Can urban rail transit in China reduce carbon dioxide emissions? An investigation of the resource allocation perspective. Sustainability. 17(9), 3901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093901
[26] Chaturvedi, V., Kim, S.H., 2015. Long term energy and emission implications of a global shift to electricity-based public rail transportation system. Energy Policy. 81, 176–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.013
[27] Jiao, J., Huang, Y., Liao, C., 2020. Co-benefits of reducing CO₂ and air pollutant emissions in the urban transport sector: A case of Guangzhou. Energy for Sustainable Development. 59, 131–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.10.005
[28] Bleviss, D.L., 2021. Transportation is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment. 10(2), e390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.390
[29] Chester, M.V., Horvath, A., Madanat, S., 2010. Comparison of life-cycle energy and emissions footprints of passenger transportation in metropolitan regions. Atmospheric Environment. 44(8), 1071–1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.012
[30] Jia, C., Wang, X., Qian, C., et al., 2025. Quantitative study on the environmental impact of Beijing's urban rail transit based on carbon emission reduction. Scientific Reports. 15(1), 2380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86714-4
[31] Hargroves, K.C., Conley, D., Gallina, L., et al., 2018. Sustainable urban design co-benefits: Role of EST in reducing air pollution and climate change mitigation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Regional EST Forum in Asia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 2–5 October 2018.
[32] Fox, S.J., 2017. Planning for density in a driverless world. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2735148
[33] Wilson, S., Edwards, M., Mason, B., et al., 2021. Effective Implementation of Behaviour Change Techniques to Influence Health in the Rail Environment. Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB): London, UK.
[34] Sharifi, A., 2023. Resilience of urban social-ecological-technological systems (SETS): A review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 99, 104910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
[35] Song, Y., Wu, P., Hampson, K., et al., 2021. Assessing block-level sustainable transport infrastructure development using a spatial trade-off relation model. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 105, 102585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102585
[36] Huang, S.-L., Lee, Y.-C., Chiang, L.-Y., 2022. Assessing the synergies and trade-offs of development projects in response to climate change in an urban region. Journal of Environmental Management. 319, 115731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115731
[37] Chen, H., Yang, W., Li, T., 2022. The impact of rail transit on accessibility and spatial equity of public transit: A case study of Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(18), 11428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811428
[38] Chen, Z., Litvine, A., Shaw-Taylor, L., 2025. Railways and urban scaling in England and Wales over 190 years of development. Nature Cities. 2, 1240–1250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00351-6
[39] Beaudoin, J., Lawell, C.-Y.C.L., 2018. The effects of public transit supply on the demand for automobile travel. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 88, 447–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.007
[40] Wei, T., Chen, S., 2020. Dynamic energy and carbon footprints of urban transportation infrastructures: Differentiating between existing and newly-built assets. Applied Energy. 277, 115554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115554
[41] Hausberger, L., Cordes, T., Gschösser, F., 2023. Life cycle assessment of high-performance railway infrastructure, analysis of superstructures in tunnels and on open tracks. Sustainability. 15(9), 7064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097064
[42] Li, W., Kang, J., Wang, Y., 2024. Effects of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem services and their trade-offs in Southwest China: A multi-perspective analysis. Ecological Indicators. 167, 112699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112699
[43] Spielmann, M., de Haan, P., Scholz, R.W., 2008. Environmental rebound effects of high-speed transport technologies: A case study of climate change rebound effects of a future underground maglev train system. Journal of Cleaner Production. 16(13), 1388–1398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.001
[44] Giunta, M., 2023. Trends and challenges in railway sustainability: The state of the art regarding measures, strategies, and assessment tools. Sustainability. 15(24), 16632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416632
[45] Asghar, M., Ayaz, M., Ali, S., 2025. Ecological resilience in crisis: Analyzing the role of urban land use and institutional policies. Land Use Policy. 151, 107492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107492
[46] Yin, Y., Zhang, Y., 2021. Environmental pollution evaluation of urban rail transit construction based on entropy weight method. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 20(2), 819–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i02.044
[47] McCall, A., 2024. Assessment and mitigation of environmental impacts in large-scale infrastructure development. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387311604_Assessment_and_Mitigation_of_Environmental_Impacts_in_Large-Scale_Infrastructure_Development (cited 1 March 2026).
[48] Zou, S., Fan, X., Wang, L., et al., 2024. High-speed rail new towns and their impacts on urban sustainable development: A spatial analysis based on satellite remote sensing data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), 894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03337-2
[49] Cao, X., Ci, F., 2025. Evolution and spatial correlation network analysis of the coupling coordination degree of urban intelligent industry and green industry in the Yellow River Basin. Sustainability. 17(12), 5237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125237
[50] Du, Q., Huang, Y., Zhou, Y., et al., 2023. Impacts of a new urban rail transit line and its interactions with land use on the ridership of existing stations. Cities. 141, 104506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104506
[51] Song, T., Pu, H., Schonfeld, P., et al., 2021. GIS-based multi-criteria railway design with spatial environmental considerations. Applied Geography. 131, 102449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102449
[52] Bai, H., Weng, L., 2023. Ecological security pattern construction and zoning along the China–Laos railway based on the potential-connectedness-resilience framework. Ecological Indicators. 146, 109773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109773
[53] Huang, H., 1996. The land-use impacts of urban rail transit systems. Journal of Planning Literature. 11(1), 17–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229601100103
[54] Guerra, E., Cervero, R., 2011. Cost of a ride: The effects of densities on fixed-guideway transit ridership and costs. Journal of the American Planning Association. 77(3), 267–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.589767
[55] Creutzig, F., Mühlhoff, R., Römer, J., 2012. Decarbonizing urban transport in European cities: Four cases show possibly high co-benefits. Environmental Research Letters. 7(4), 044042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044042
[56] Pojani, D., Stead, D., 2018. Policy design for sustainable urban transport in the global south. Policy Design and Practice. 1(2), 90–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1454291
[57] Zhang, L., Fang, C., Zhu, C., et al., 2022. Ecosystem service trade-offs and identification of eco-optimal regions in urban agglomerations in arid regions of China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 373, 133823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133823
[58] Alamoudi, M., Imam, A., Majrashi, A., et al., 2024. Integrating intelligent and sustainable transportation systems in Jeddah: A multidimensional approach for urban mobility enhancement. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. 19, 1301–1314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctae078
[59] Long, H., Liu, Y., Hou, X., et al., 2014. Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: Implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China. Habitat International. 44, 536–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.011
[60] Karjalainen, L.E., Juhola, S., 2021. Urban transportation sustainability assessments: A systematic review of literature. Transport Reviews. 41(5), 659–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1879309
[61] Gulcimen, S., Aydogan, E.K., Uzal, N., 2021. Life cycle sustainability assessment of a light rail transit system: Integration of environmental, economic, and social impacts. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 17(5), 1070–1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4428
[62] Deng, Y., Li, X., Zhu, J., 2024. Effect of planning and construction of intercity railways on the economic development of the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration: An analysis based on the spatial Durbin model. Sustainability. 16(2), 738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020738
[63] Bateman, I.J., Jones, A., Lovett, A., et al., 2002. Applying geographical information systems (GIS) to environmental and resource economics. Environmental and Resource Economics. 22(1), 219–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015575214292
[64] Pavlovic, M., Ilic, S., Antonic, N., et al., 2022. Monitoring the impact of large transport infrastructure on land use and environment using deep learning and satellite imagery. Remote Sensing. 14(10), 2494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102494
[65] Trinder, J., Liu, Q., 2020. Assessing environmental impacts of urban growth using remote sensing. Geo-Spatial Information Science. 23(1), 20–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2019.1710438
[66] Huang, B., Zhao, B., Song, Y., 2018. Urban land-use mapping using a deep convolutional neural network with high spatial resolution multispectral remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 214, 73–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050
[67] Beach, T.E., 2018. Renewable Energy Landscapes: Approaches to Modeling Change in the Electrical System and Predicting the Influence on Urban Development and Environmental Resources [PhD Thesis]. University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA.
[68] Suzuki, H., Cervero, R., Iuchi, K., 2013. Transforming Cities with Transit: Transit and Land-Use Integration for Sustainable Urban Development. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.
[69] Huang, W., Wey, W.-M., 2019. Green urbanism embedded in TOD for urban built environment planning and design. Sustainability. 11(19), 5293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195293
[70] Benoliel, M.A., Ferreira, P., Silva, C.M., 2023. Green urban railway stations: A methodology to assess and improve sustainability. Transportation Research Procedia. 72, 1515–1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.618
[71] Fischer, T.B., 2023. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Transport and Land Use Planning. Routledge: London, UK.
[72] Kotsila, P., Anguelovski, I., García-Lamarca, M., et al., 2023. Injustice in Urban Sustainability: Ten Core Drivers. Routledge: London, UK.
[73] Williams, Z., Hartwell, C., 2025. A case for nature: The climate and public health co-benefits of nature-based solutions. In: Pachauri, S., Pachauri, A., Jonathan, M.P. (Eds.). Health and Climate Change: Unraveling the Connections. Academic Press: London, UK. pp. 361–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-29240-8.00020-1
[74] Ceder, A., 2021. Urban mobility and public transport: Future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 25(4), 455–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1799846
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Cui Hu

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.




Cui Hu