Geological Engineering at the Climate Nexus: Innovations in Hazard Assessment, Resource Stability, and Environmental Protection

Authors

  • Maokang Pang

    Jinhua Municipal Land and Space Planning Technology and Research Center, Jinhua 321000, China
  • Shaoyong Li

    Geothermal Resources Institute, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Geophysical Prospecting and Survey Design Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310000, China
  • Dongqin Li

    Jinhua Municipal Land and Space Planning Technology and Research Center, Jinhua 321000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13749
Received: 9 July 2026 | Revised: 16 July 2026 | Accepted: 31 July 2026 | Published Online: 14 August 2026

Abstract

Geological engineering is changing because of climate change, as it changes the environmental boundary conditions that affect the stability of the ground, its security as a resource and the behavior of contaminants. Geological hazards are becoming more complex due to intensifying rainfall, sea-level rise, drought, permafrost degradation, coastal erosion, groundwater fluctuations, and extreme events, which are affecting the basic design assumptions of historical stationarity. This review explores the field of geological engineering in the context of climate change, with three interrelated themes: hazard identification, resource stability, and environmental protection. It brings together developments in slope-risk assessment, geohazard assessment in the coastal and riverine environment, cold-region instability, compound hazards, remote sensing, field monitoring, predictive modeling, and digital decision-support systems. Additionally, the review assesses the importance of sustainable subsurface engineering for the security of groundwater, critical mineral development, geothermal energy, carbon storage, and containment of my waste. It also covers an analysis of the geoenvironmental risks associated with climate change, adaptive remediation, nature-based and hybrid solutions, resilient infrastructure, land-use planning, and new policy needs. Analysis indicates that, going forward, geological engineering should shift from retrospective, single-hazard models to dynamic, multi-hazard, performance-based models. They need to be technologically innovative, but integration with the understanding of geological processes, uncertainty quantification, long-term monitoring, and adaptive governance are essential. Geological engineering can play a vital role in supporting resilient infrastructure, responsible resource development, and sustainable climate adaptation by connecting climate-related hazards, resources, and environmental protection.

Keywords:

Geological Engineering; Climate Change; Hazard Assessment; Subsurface Resource Stability; Environmental Protection

References

[1] Armah, A., Whajah, J., Annankra, J.A., 2025. The geomechanical behavior of mine waste rock slopes under climate-induced stressors: A global perspective. Journal of Engineering and Computer Sciences. 4(9), 454–466.

[2] Naskar, J., Kumar Jha, A., Singh, T.N., et al., 2025. Climate change and soil resilience: a critical appraisal on innovative techniques for sustainable ground improvement and ecosystem protection. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste. 29(4), 03125002.

[3] Kandalai, S., John, N.J., Patel, A., 2023. Effects of climate change on geotechnical infrastructures—state of the art. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30(7), 16878–16904.

[4] Lagesse, R.H., Hambling, J., Gill, J.C., et al., 2022. The role of engineering geology in delivering the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 55(3).

[5] Pham, T.A., 2025. Climate change impacts on geotechnical infrastructure: role of unsaturated soil mechanics for adaptation. Frontiers in Built Environment. 11, 1666334.

[6] Wang, F., Harindintwali, J.D., Wei, K., et al., 2023. Climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation. The Innovation Geoscience. 1(1), 100015.

[7] Sori, A., Moghaddas, J., Abedpour, H., 2024. Comprehensive review of experimental studies, numerical modeling, leakage risk assessment, monitoring, and control in geological storage of carbon dioxide: Implications for effective CO2 deployment strategies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology. 14(5), 887–913.

[8] Pugliese Viloria, A.d.J., Folini, A., Carrion, D., et al., 2024. Hazard susceptibility mapping with machine and deep learning: A literature review. Remote Sensing. 16(18), 3374.

[9] Dou, S., Xu, D., Zhu, Y., et al., 2023. Critical mineral sustainable supply: Challenges and governance. Futures. 146, 103101.

[10] Sadiq, M., Sharma, R., Bisht, B.S., et al., 2025. Ensuring long-term caprock integrity in carbon capture, utilisation and storage: a comprehensive review of geo-mechanical and monitoring approaches. Current Science. 129(2), 129–138.

[11] Winde, F., Newman-Portela, A.M., 2026. Assessing Mining-Related Water Impacts: A Case Study-Based Systematic Review Supporting a More Comprehensive Approach. Sustainability. 18(4), 1774.

[12] Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., Sun, G., et al., 2025. Low-carbon and recycled mineral composite materials for sustainable infrastructure: A comprehensive review. Sustainability. 17(17), 7908.

[13] Hussain, Y., Schlögel, R., Innocenti, A., et al., 2022. Review on the geophysical and UAV-based methods applied to landslides. Remote Sensing. 14(18), 4564.

[14] Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Yan, Y., et al., 2026. Research Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Geological Hazard Monitoring Methods in Mining Areas. Remote Sensing. 18(9), 1333.

[15] Sun, A.Y., Yoon, H., Shih, C.-Y., et al., 2022. Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A survey. In Knowledge Guided Machine Learning. Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 111–132.

[16] Huang, Y., Xiong, M., Hu, H., 2023. Guidelines for Probabilistic Performance-Based Seismic Design and Assessment of Slope Engineering. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland.

[17] Ibrahim, A., Meguid, M.A., Dang, K., et al., 2024. Thermal modeling of geosynthetics and earth structures in a changing climate: overview and future challenges. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 10(2), 24.

[18] Lei, W., Saeed, L., 2024. Climate-Resilient Geotechnics: Unsaturated Soils, Bio-Mediated Ground Improvement, and Nature-Based Solutions. Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Open. 1, 1–12.

[19] Grifoni, M., Franchi, E., Fusini, D., et al., 2022. Soil remediation: Towards a resilient and adaptive approach to deal with the ever-changing environmental challenges. Environments. 9(2), 18.

[20] Summers, J.K., Lamper, A., McMillion, C., et al., 2022. Observed changes in the frequency, intensity, and spatial patterns of nine natural hazards in the United States from 2000 to 2019. Sustainability. 14(7), 4158.

[21] Zong, H., Dai, Q., Zhu, J., 2024. Ensemble predictions of rainfall-induced landslide risk under climate change in China integrating antecedent soil-wetness factors. Atmosphere. 15(8), 1013.

[22] Stoffel, M., Allen, S.K., Ballesteros-Cánovas, J.A., et al., 2024. Climate change effects on debris flows. In Advances in Debris-Flow Science and Practice. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 273–308.

[23] Ahmed, M., Tanyas, H., Huser, R., et al., 2023. Dynamic rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility: A step towards a unified forecasting system. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 125, 103593.

[24] Pang, T., Wang, X., Nawaz, R.A., et al., 2023. Coastal erosion and climate change: A review on coastal-change process and modeling. Ambio. 52(12), 2034–2052.

[25] Van der Meulen, F., IJff, S., van Zetten, R., 2023. Nature-based solutions for coastal adaptation management, concepts and scope, an overview. Nordic Journal of Botany. 2023(1), e03290.

[26] Barrocu, G., Eslamian, S., 2022. Geomorphology and flooding. In Flood Handbook. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 23–54.

[27] Jin, H., Huang, Y., Bense, V.F., et al., 2022. Permafrost degradation and its hydrogeological impacts. Water. 14(3), 372.

[28] Hjort, J., Streletskiy, D., Doré, G., et al., 2022. Impacts of permafrost degradation on infrastructure. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 3(1), 24–38.

[29] Cruz, S., 2025. Thermal Modeling of Buried Structures in Permafrost Regions: Assessing Climate Change Impacts through Future Projections [Master’s Thesis]. McGill University: Montreal, QC, Canada.

[30] Aubry, T.J., Farquharson, J.I., Rowell, C.R., et al., 2022. Impact of climate change on volcanic processes: current understanding and future challenges. Bulletin of Volcanology. 84(6), 58.

[31] Alcántara-Ayala, I., 2025. Cascading hazards and compound disasters. npj Natural Hazards. 2(1), 54.

[32] Bakhtiari, S., 2024. Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of the Interconnected Infrastructure Systems. The University of Western Ontario: London, ON, Canada.

[33] Maity, B., 2023. Exploring the Role of Technology in Disaster Management. Disaster Administration and Management. 26.

[34] Saputra, N., Ekha Putera, R., Zetra, A., et al., 2025. Innovative capacity building strategies for sustainable disaster risk management: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions. E3S Web of Conferences. 604, 3004.

[35] Borre, A., 2025. Modelling the Dynamic Impacts of Consecutive Natural Hazards: A Framework for Time-Evolving Vulnerability and Recovery Analysis. Università degli studi di Genova: Genoa, Italy.

[36] Qiu, H., Li, T., Zhang, B., 2024. The impact of climate change on the earth system and its simulation predictions: Progress, challenges, and future directions. Geographical Research Bulletin. 3, 231–246.

[37] Miranda, T., Moldovan, I.D., Moutinho, J., 2023. Geotechnical monitoring in the digital age: Integrating IoT, remote sensing, and data analysis. In Transportation Geotechnics for Green, Digital, and Modern Infrastructures. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 145–165.

[38] Hencher, S., 2024. Practical Engineering Geology. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.

[39] Firoozi, A.A., Firoozi, A.A., 2023. Application of machine learning in geotechnical engineering for risk assessment. In Machine Learning and Data Mining Annual Volume 2023. IntechOpen: London, UK.

[40] Ye, C., Wu, H., Oguchi, T., et al., 2025. Physically based and data-driven models for landslide susceptibility assessment: principles, applications, and challenges. Remote Sensing. 17(13), 2280.

[41] Chen, M., Qian, Z., Boers, N., et al., 2023. Iterative integration of deep learning in hybrid Earth surface system modelling. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(8), 568–581.

[42] Insana, A., Uzielli, M., Bračko, T., et al., 2025. A framework for climate-adaptive geotechnical analysis and design. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 84(12), 1–18.

[43] Duque, L.-F., O'Connell, E., O'Donnell, G., 2023. A Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis framework demonstrating the advantages of probabilistic forecasting over deterministic forecasting in terms of flood warning reliability. Journal of Hydrology. 619, 129340.

[44] Carvalho, A.A., K, K., J, C.S., et al., 2024. Risk assessment and decision-making in geology-driven projects: a management perspective. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2(31), 329–339.

[45] Sättele, M., Bründl, M., Straub, D., 2015. Reliability and effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards: Concept and application to debris flow warning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 142, 192–202.

[46] Akbas, M., 2025. Sustainable Digital Transformation in Geotechnical-Related Engineering Disciplines: An Integrated Framework for Türkiye. Sustainability. 17(20), 9153.

[47] Bao, H., Zeng, C., Peng, Y., et al., 2022. The use of digital technologies for landslide disaster risk research and disaster risk management: progress and prospects. Environmental Earth Sciences. 81(18), 446.

[48] Haque, G.M.M., Akula, D.K., Mohammed, Y.S., et al., 2025. Cybersecurity risk management in the age of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. Emerging Frontiers Library for The American Journal of Engineering and Technology. 7(8), 126–150.

[49] Tan, W., Wu, S., Li, Y., et al., 2025. Digital twins’ application for geotechnical engineering: A review of current status and future directions in China. Applied Sciences. 15(15), 8229.

[50] Adeniran, I.A., Efunniyi, C.P., Osundare, O.S., et al., 2024. Enhancing security and risk management with predictive analytics: A proactive approach. International Journal of Scholarly Research in Engineering and Technology. 4(1), 32–40.

[51] Nathanail, J., Banks, V., 2009. Climate Change: Implications for Engineering Geology Practice. Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications: London, UK. pp. 65–82.

[52] Scanlon, B.R., Fakhreddine, S., Rateb, A., et al., 2023. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(2), 87–101.

[53] Lapworth, D.J., Boving, T.B., Kreamer, D.K., et al., 2022. Groundwater quality: Global threats, opportunities and realising the potential of groundwater. Science of the Total Environment. 811, 152471.

[54] Sinshaw, B.G., Dahlke, H.E., Viers, J.H., et al., 2026. Global advances in managed aquifer recharge: A systematic synthesis. Environmental Reviews. 34, 1–18.

[55] Kabeyi, M.J.B., Olanrewaju, O.A., 2022. Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research. 9, 743114.

[56] Punia, A., Singh, S.K., 2025. Concurrence of mining and climate change: environmental implications and mitigation strategies. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 47(7), 241.

[57] Lu, M., Zhao, Y., 2024. Mineral resource extraction and environmental sustainability for green recovery. Resources Policy. 90, 104616.

[58] Paluszny, A., Zimmerman, R.W., 2025. The role of subsurface geomechanics in the green energy transition. Royal Society Open Science. 12(5), 241516.

[59] Ngoma, M.C., Kolawole, O., Olorode, O., 2024. Geothermo-mechanical alterations due to heat energy extraction in enhanced geothermal systems: Overview and prospective directions. Deep Underground Science and Engineering. 3(3), 256–268.

[60] Zhou, W., Lanza, F., Grigoratos, I., et al., 2024. Managing induced seismicity risks from enhanced geothermal systems: A good practice guideline. Reviews of Geophysics. 62(4).

[61] Spurin, C., Callas, C., Darraj, N., et al., 2025. The importance and challenges associated with multi-scale heterogeneity for geological storage. InterPore Journal. 2(1), 76.

[62] Joel, O.T., Oguanobi, V.U., 2024. Geological survey techniques and carbon storage: optimizing renewable energy site selection and carbon sequestration. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology. 11(1), 39–51.

[63] Adams, M., Burkell, K., Dagenais, A.-M., et al., 2025. Application of digital innovation and automation for sustainable mine closure monitoring. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Mine Closure 2025, Luleå, Sweden, 23–25 September 2025.

[64] Mulligan, C.N., Fukue, M., Yong, R.N., 2025. Sustainable Practices in Geoenvironmental Engineering. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.

[65] Alfee, S.L., Bloor, M.C., 2025. A global review of river sediment contamination and remobilization through climate change-induced flooding. Sustainable Environment. 11(1), 2440957.

[66] Reddy, K.R., Janga, J.K., Kumar, G., 2025. Sustainability and resilience: A new paradigm in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 55(4), 2510–2531.

[67] Ommer, J., Bucchignani, E., Leo, L.S., et al., 2022. Quantifying co-benefits and disbenefits of nature-based solutions targeting disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 75, 102966.

[68] Mickovski, S.B., Gonzalez-Ollauri, A., Sorolla, A., et al., 2024. A case history of co-design and co-deployment of a nature-based solution (NbS) against erosion and slope instability. Ecological Engineering. 209, 107406.

[69] Hasheminezhad, A., Ceylan, H., Kim, S., et al., 2025. Geosynthetics for resilient geotechnics: A review of applications and innovations. Transportation Geotechnics. 55, 101676.

[70] Mulligan, C.N., 2026. Sustainable remediation principles, guidelines and practices. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 30(2), 100524.

[71] Dawoud, M.A., Al Hassan, W.A., 2025. Groundwater management and treatment: A resilient source for environmental protection. In Sustainable Remediation for Pollution and Climate Resilience. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 661–693.

[72] Kumar, P., 2024. Social and economic impact in the landslide prone zones and related policies. In Landslides in the Himalayan Region: Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy for Sustainable Management. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 499–529.

[73] Effiong, C.J., 2025. Climate justice in land use planning: Exploring the potential and challenges of nature-based solutions integration in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Management. 377, 124717.

[74] de Melo, D.L., Kendall, A., DeJong, J.T., 2024. Evaluation of life cycle assessment (LCA) use in geotechnical engineering. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability. 4(1), 012001.

[75] Schulze, M., 2023. Investigating How Climate Change Adaptation Can Be Incorporated into Mine Closure and Rehabilitation Strategies to Strengthen Social-Ecological Resilience [Master’s Thesis]. Stellenbosch University: Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Downloads

How to Cite

Pang, M., Li, S., & Li , D. (2026). Geological Engineering at the Climate Nexus: Innovations in Hazard Assessment, Resource Stability, and Environmental Protection. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(8), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13749

Issue

Vol. 8 , Iss. 8 (August 2026): In Progress

Article Type

Review

License

Copyright © 2026 Maokang Pang, Shaoyong Li, Dongqin Li

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC