Chuanqi Zhu
Mechanical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Periodic structures effectively address challenges in manufacturing, transportation, and installation of large-scale systems by streamlining processes and enhancing transport, replacement, and assembly efficiency. This paper introduces a topology optimization method specifically for cantilever beam structures, to minimize structural flexibility and optimize frequency by determining the optimal material distribution under given loads and constraints. The study explores continuum periodic structures, examining the effects of material properties, optimization parameters, and boundary conditions on the outcomes. Various aspects of periodic optimization design, such as structural configuration, connections, and layout, are also investigated. Through the application of topology optimization using SolidWorks and Ansys, the experimental results validate the method’s effectiveness in enhancing structural performance and material utilization. This research presents a systematic approach and highlights the practical potential of designing periodic structures.
[1] Rozvany, G.I.N., 2001. A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 21(3), 164–184.
[2] Qian, L., 2001. Optimal design of engineering structures. In: Qian Xuesen's Technical Scientific Thoughts and Mechanics. pp. 47–50.
[3] Lyu, Y., 2022. Finite element method: Element solutions. 1st ed. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3363-9
[4] Zuo, K., 2023. Research on the theory and application of continuum structural topology optimization [PhD thesis]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
[5] Bendsøe, M.P., Kikuchi, N., 1988. Generating optimal topologies in structural design. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 71(2), 197–224.
[6] van Dijk, N.P., Maute, K., Langelaar, M., et al., 2013. Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 48(3), 437–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0912-y
[7] Bendsøe, M., Sigmund, O., 1999. Techniques for material interpolation in topology optimization. Archive of Applied Mechanics. 69(9–10), 635–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004190050248
[8] Sigmund, O., Maute, K., 2013. Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 48(6), 1031–1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6
[9] Osanov, M., Guest, J.K., 2016. Topology optimization for architected materials design. Annual Review of Materials Research. 46(1), 211–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031826
[10] Xia, L., Xia, Q., Huang, X., 2018. Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: A comprehensive review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 25, 437–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9203-2
[11] Wu, J., Sigmund, O., Groen, J.P., 2021. Topology optimization of multi-scale structures: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 63(3), 1455–1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02881-8
[12] Zhou, M., Fleury, R., Shyy, Y.K., Thomas, H., Brennan, J., 2002. Progress in topology optimization with manufacturing constraints. In 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. p. 5614.
[13] Sugiyama, M., Suzuki, T., Kanamori, T., 2012. Density-ratio matching under the bregman divergence: A unified framework of density-ratio estimation. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 64(5), 1009–1044.
Copyright © 2024 Chuanqi Zhu
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
