-
2713
-
2250
-
2098
-
1264
-
951
From Uncle Sam to Just Trump: A Long Way of Alternating Irony-hate-ambivalence among Russian Users-Students Regarding Politicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/mmpp.v2i2.1049Abstract
The paper is discusses the role of emotionally significant political images in youth culture. The study covers the period between 2006 and 2017 during which Russia saw not only a political and economic transition but also dramatic changes in communication technology. The 6-stage research included two waves of testing in 2006, 2012, 2017. Respondents were aged 17 to 24 years old. In 2017 the general youth international value agenda can be considered formed, with its essential feature being the further reduction of the influence of advertising and communication of politicians’ brands.
Keywords:
Russia; America; Youth; Imaginary characters; Values; Heroes; Antiheroes; Сultural studies; Political culture; Social media; Online showsReferences
[1] Ulianovskii, A., Golubev, V., Filatova, O., Smirnov, A. Social Media Impact on the Transformation of Imaginary Political Characters in Russian Youth Culture. In Chugunov, A., Bolgov R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G.,Wimmer, M. (eds.) The Digital Transformations & Global Society. Conference paper, CCIS, Springer, 2016, 674: 35-44.
[2] Bottici, C. A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge University Press , 2007.
[3] Cassirer, E.. The Myth of the State. Greenwood Press, 1979.
[4] Danilov, M. Fol’klornye obrazy v predstavlenii socialno-gumanitarnoi intelligenzii nacha-la XXI veka. In: Ulianovskii, A. V. (Ed.). Vymyshlennye sushchestva epokhi massmedia: Rossiia, XXI vek. Volna 2012. St Petersburg: Svoe Izdatelstvo, 2013: 200- 208.
[5] Esch, J. Legitimizing the ‘War on Terror’: Political Myth in Official-Level Rhetoric. Political Psychology, 2010, 31(3): 357-391.
[6] Evans, D. Social Media Marketing: An Hour a Day. Symbex, 2008.
[7] Flood, C. G. Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction. New York: Garland Pub. Inc., 1996.
[8] Halligan, B., Shan, D. Inbound Marketing: Get Found Using Google, Social Media, and Blogs. Wiley, 2009.
[9] Ilchenco, S.N.The dualism of the internet in modern media: pros and cons. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference. Sovremennye SMI v kontexte informacionnyh tehnologii, The St Petersburg State University of Technology and Design, St Petersburg, 2015.
[10] Jakobson, R. Selected Writings. 8 vols. ʾs-Gravenhage: Mouton, 1998.
[11] Karlan, D., Lazar, A., Salter, J. (2006). The 101 Most Influential People Who Never Lived: How Characters of Fiction, Myth, Legends, Television, and Movies Have Shaped Our Society, Changed Our Behavior, and Set the Course of History. William Morrow, 2006.
[12] Kaushik, A. Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and Science of Customer Centricity. Sybex, 2009.
[13] Kim, M.N.. The production of media in a converge of mass media. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference. Sovremennye SMI v kontexte informacionnyh tehnologii. St Petersburg State University of Tecnology and Design, St Petersburg, 2015.
[14] Lieberman, S., Gray, T. (2007). The Role of Political Myth in the International Conflict over Genetically Modified Foods and Crops. European Environment: The Journal of European Environmental Policy, 2007, 17(6): 376-386.
[15] Persson, E., Petersson, B.. Political Mythmaking and the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi: Olympism and the Russian Great Power Myth. East European Politics, 2014, 30 (2): 192-209.
[16] Propp, V. Morphology of the Folktale. L.: Academi, 1928.
[17] Qualman, E. Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. Wiley, 2009.
[18] Ulianovskii, A. V. Vymyshlennye sushchestva epokhi massmedia: Rossiia, XXI vek. St Petersburg: Knizhnyi Dom, 2008.
[19] Ulianovskii, A. V. (Ed.). Vymyshlennye sushchestva epokhi massmedia: Rossiia, XXI vek. Volna 2012. St Petersburg: Svoe Izdatelstvo, 2013.
[20] Aaker, D.A. Building a strong brand. New York. Free Press, 1996: 178-179.
[21] Domnin, V. Branding: new technologies in Russia. SPb., Piter, 2002: 82.