Sustainable Economic Development: The Necessary Dialogue between Environmental Law and Economics

Authors

  • Ewerton R. Messias Department of the Professional Masters Program in Animal Health, Production and Environment, University of Marília, Marília, Saint Paul, Brazil
  • André L. R. Cateli Faculty of Business, University Center of Integrated Colleges of Ourinhos, Ourinhos, Saint Paul, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/mmpp.v4i1.4634

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the distinction between the concepts of economic growth, economic development, sustainable development and environmental justice; the inter-action between Environmental Law and Economics in the paradigm of environmental justice, and what is the purpose of such interaction; and environmental justice as a possible solution to the installed state of environmental imbalance. To this end, the concepts of economic growth, economic development, sustainable development and environmental justice are investigated; Complexity Theory and its transdisciplinary approach; and environmental justice as a new order capable of reversing a state of installed environmental imbalance. To obtain the results desired by the research, the method of approach to be followed will be the empirical-dialectical, using bibliographic research, having as a reference system of the Law and Economics of Richard A. Posner. In conclusion, it is pointed out that there is a need for a new development model, which, based on transdisciplinarity, should seek solutions in favor of socioeconomic-environmental balance for present and future generations, as a way of overcoming the state of environmental imbalance installed, as well as all the economic, political, cultural, social and environmental impacts caused by it.

Keywords:

Transdisciplinarity, Economic development, Sustainable development, Dignified life

References

[1] Atlas of Municipalities, 2013. United Nations Development Program – UNDP; Institute of Applied Economic Research – IPEA; João Pinheiro Foundation – JPF. http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/data/rawData/atlas2013_dadosbrutos_pt.xlsx (In Portuguese).

[2] Souza, N.J., 1999. Economic development (4th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas. (In Portuguese).

[3] Araújo, C.R.V., 1995. History of economic thought: an introductory approach. São Paulo: Atlas. (In Portuguese).

[4] Sachs, I., 2004. Development: inclusive, sustainable, sustained. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond. (In Portuguese).

[5] Boisier, S., 2001. (Local) development: what are we talking about? Madoery, O. & Vázquez Barquero, A.(Eds.), Global Transformations, Institutions and Local Development Policies. Rosario: Editorial Homo Sapiens. pp. 46-74. (In Spanish).

[6] Seers, D., 1969. The Meaning of Development, IDS Communication 44, Brighton: IDS. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14769

[7] Max-Neef, M.A., Elizalde, A., Hopenhayn, M., 1994. Human Scale Development - Concepts, applications and some reflections. Montevideo: Nordan-Community. (In Spanish).

[8] Boisier, S., 2001. (Local) development: what are we talking about? Madoery, O. & Vázquez Barquero, A.(Eds.), Global Transformations, Institutions and Local Development Policies. Rosario: Editorial Homo Sapiens. pp.46-74. (In Spanish).

[9] Boutros-Ghali, B., 1994. An Agenda for Development Report of the Secretary-General.

[10] Sachs, I., 2004. Development: inclusive, sustainable, sustained. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond. (In Portuguese).

[11] Morin, E., 2001. Introduction to complex thinking. Lisbon: Piaget Institute. (In Portuguese).

[12] Beck, U., 2011. Risk Society: towards another modernity; translation by Sebastião Nascimento (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Publisher. 34. (In Portuguese).

[13] Reid, W.V., Mooney, H.A., Cropper, A., et al., 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. United Nations. United Nations Environment Program. (In Portuguese).

[14] Leite, J.R.M., 2012. Environmental damage in the risk society. São Paulo: Saraiva. (In Portuguese).

[15] Boff, L., 1997. The Eagle and the Chicken (34th ed.). Petropolis: Voices. (In Portuguese).

[16] World Commission on Environment and Development, 1991. Our common future (2nd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas. (In Portuguese).

[17] Milaré, E., 2001. Environmental Law. Doctrine – practice – jurisprudence – glossary (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Journal of the Courts. (In Portuguese).

[18] Messias, E.R., Souza, P.R.P., 2015. Financing and Environmental Damage: The civil liability of financial institutions. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. (In Portuguese).

[19] Elkington, J., 2012. Cannibals with fork and knife. São Paulo: M. Books do Brasil. (In Portuguese).

[20] Derani, C., 2008. Economic Environmental Law (3rd ed). São Paulo: Saraiva. (In Portuguese).

[21] Gudynas, E., 2011. Development and environmental sustainability: Diversity of positions, persistent tensions. In: Ruíz, A. M. & Castellano, F. L. (Eds.). The Earth is not dumb: dialogues between sustainable development and post-development. pp.69-96. University of Granada, Granada. http://www.gudynas.com/publicaciones/GudynasUsosIdeasSustentabilidadGranada11.pdf (In Spanish).

Downloads

How to Cite

Messias, E. R., & Cateli, A. L. R. (2022). Sustainable Economic Development: The Necessary Dialogue between Environmental Law and Economics. Macro Management & Public Policies, 4(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.30564/mmpp.v4i1.4634

Issue

Article Type

Articles