Confrontation and Integration: An Analyze the Mechanism of Rights Transformation in Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Space Theories

Authors

  • Meng Chiu Chang Department of Economics, Fujian Business University , Fuzhou,China
  • Chien Han Institute of Land Ecnomic, Department of Land Management, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/mmpp.v1i1.737

Abstract

 As one of the subjects under city-related discussions, locality carries significance in the dimensions of both political and economic space. Western researches have brought about various arguments based on theories of human geography, particularly in the area of urbanization. Taiwan adopts urban renewal as an important approach of revitalizing cities. In view of space theories, multiple political and economic confrontations have occurred during the process of spatial differentiation and reproduction. The analysis on the social phenomenon derived from the urban renewal in Taiwan, China from the perspective of political and economic space, taking into consideration of the correlation between capital and rights, suggests the ongoing development of a new growing pattern of cities under the contention or collaboration among industrial, governmental and academic communities.

Keywords:

Urban renewal, Space theories, Rent gap, Rights transformation

References

[1] D. Flexible accumulation through urbanization : reflections on ‘post-modernism’ in the American city [J]. Antipode, 2010, 19(3):260-286.

[2] Massey. Space travel and exploration. IV. scientific results : The sun and solar terrestrial relations :short-wave astronomy[J]. Contemporary Physics, 1965, 6.

[3] Kreye O, Heinrichs J, Fröbel F. The new international division of Labor; Structural Unemployment in Industrial Countries and Industrial in Countries and Industrial in Developing Countries , Cambridge: Cambridge University press1980.

[4] Castells M. La question urbaine[C]// François Mapéro. 1972. Castells M. The urban question : a Marxist approach[M]. MIT Press, 1977. Rubin M, Castells M. The city and the grassroots :[M]. E. Arnold, 1983.

[5] Sandercock L, Berry M. Urban political economy: The Australian case[J]. 1983.

[6] Wang Y, Li J, Zhang G, et al. Fuzzy evaluation of comprehensive benefit in urban renewal based on the perspective of core stakeholders[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 66:163-170.

[7] Wong L K, Yu P H. Urban renewal and social sustainability: An exploratory study of the urban life of Wan Chai[J]. Springerplus, 2015, 4(S2):1-2.

[8] Castells M. La question urbaine[C]// François Mapéro. 1972. Castells M. The urban question: a Marxist ap-proach[M]. MIT Press, 1977. Rubin M, Castells M. The city and the grassroots :[M]. E. Arnold, 1983.

[9] NicholasFreudenberg, CarolSteinsapir. Not in our backyards: The grassroots environmental movement[J]. Society & Natural Resources, 1991, 4(3):235-245.

[10] Chang Meng Chiu. A Transaction Costs Framework Applied TO Urban Renewal:A Case Study of Taiwan[D],Remin University of China.2017.

[11] Luo Y, O'Connor N. Structural changes to foreign direct investment in China: An evolutionary perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 1998(1):95.

[12] Yung E H K, Zhang Q, Chan E H W. Underlying social factors for evaluating heritage conservation in urban renewal districts[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 66:135-148.

[13] Jacobs J. The Death and life of great American cities[M]. Vintage Books, 1992.

[14] Willmott P, Young M. Family and class in a London suburb[J]. Population, 1984, 17(2):369.

[15] Tao ran, Su u bing, Lu xi. Can economic growth lead to promotion? -- a logical challenge to the promotion championship competition theory and a provincial empirical revaluation [J]. Management of the world, 2010(12):13-26.

[16] Yung E H K, Zhang Q, Chan E H W. Underlying social factors for evaluating heritage conservation in urban renewal districts[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 66:135-148.

[17] Rittel,H.W. J. and M.M. Webber. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning [J].Policy Science1973,4:155-169.

[18] Brodkin E, Kingdon J W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy[J]. Political Science Quarterly, 1984, 100(1):165.

[19] Chau K W, Wong S K. Externalities of Urban Renewal: A Real Option Perspective[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 2014, 48(3):546-560.

[20] Pascal A H, Hanson R. Rethinking Urban Policy: Urban Development in an Advanced Economy[J]. National Academy Press, 1983, 3(4).

[21] Logan J R. Transition to the 21st Century: Prospects and Policies for Economic and Urban-Regional Transformation, by Donald A. Hicks; Norman J. Glickman[J]. Contemporary Sociology, 1984, 13(4):529.

[22] Savas E S. A Positive Urban Policy for the Future[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 1983, 18(4):447-453.

Downloads

How to Cite

Chang, M. C., & Han, C. (2019). Confrontation and Integration: An Analyze the Mechanism of Rights Transformation in Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Space Theories. Macro Management & Public Policies, 1(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.30564/mmpp.v1i1.737

Issue

Article Type

Articles