A Comparison of the Genetic Shaft Types of Some Karst Areas Based on Their Specific Shaft Lengths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v1i3.1686Abstract
Shaft development can be documented on the basis of comparative studies of specific shaft lengths and shaft patterns. We calculated the specific length of shafts and the average specific shaft length of the shafts in some karst areas and we investigated the relation between the altitude of shaft floors and the specific shaft length. Taking the registered specific shaft lengths and the shaft patterns into consideration, it can be stated that some parts of the shafts developed paragenetically in the studied karst areas. In the Bakony Region, this was caused by surface water influx, rise of karst water level, and their simultaneous effect. As a result, shaft systems, bifurcating shafts and storeyed shafts developed. On glaciokarst areas, shafts may constitute a system with phreatic passages: either because a phreatic environment developed in the vadose zone due to the permanent impoundment of karst water or because a phreatic passage got into the vadose zone since the karst became elevated. On the studied karst areas, the following shaft development types are distinguished: glacial-high mountain surface flood development type (1), glacial-high mountain karst water and surface flood development type (2), glacial karst water and surface flood later phreatic development type (3), shaft with a passage that got into the vadose zone (4).
Keywords:
Shaft; Specific shaft length; Shaft development; Vadose zone; Phreatic zone; GlaciokarstReferences
[1] Klimchouk, A.. Unconfined versus confined speleogenetic settings: variations of solution porosity. International Journal of Speleology, 2006, 35(1): 19-24.
[2] Piccini, L.. Recent developments on morphometric analysis of karst caves Novi pristopi v morfometrični analizi kraškihj am. Acta Carsologica, 2011, 40 (1): 43-52.
[3] Ballesteros, D., et al., A multi-method approach for speleogenetic research on alpine karst caves. Torca La Texa shaft, Picos de Europa (Spain), Geomorphology, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.026
[4] Jouves, J., Viseur, S., Arfib, B., Baudement, C., Camus, H., Collon, P., Guglielmi, Y.. Speleogenesis, geometry, and topology of caves: A quantitative study of 3D karst conduits. Geomorphology, 2017, 298: 86-106
[5] Audra, P., Palmer, A.N.. The vertical dimension of karst: controls of vertical cave pattern. In: Shoroder, J. (Editor in chief), Frumkin, A. (Ed.), Treatise on Geomorphology, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, vol.6, Karst Geomorphology, 2013, 186-206
[6] Ford DC, Williams PW. Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology. - Unwin Hyman, London, 2007: 561.
[7] White WB. Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains. - Oxford University Press, New York - Oxford, 1988: 464.
[8] Mihevc, A.. The Morphology of shafts on the Trnovski gozd plateau in west Slovenia. Cave and Karst Science, 1995, 21(2): 67-69
[9] Veress M.. The genetic shaft types of the Bakony Region. Karsztfejlődés XXIII. 2018: 55-84. (in Hungarian)
[10] Veress M.. Shaft Lengths and Shaft Development Types in the Vadose Zone of the Bakony Region (Transdanubian Mountains, Hungary) - Journal of Soil and Water Science, 2019, 3(1) : 54-74.
[11] Palmer A.. Origin and morphology of limestone caves - Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1991, 103: 1-21.
[12] Farrant A.. Paragenesis - In: Gunn J. (szerk.), Encyclopedia of Caves and Karst Science. Fitzroy Dearborn, New York - London, 2004: 569-571.
[13] Pasini G.. Terminology matter: paragenesis, antigravitátive erosion or antigravitational erosion? - International Journal of Speleology, 2009, 38(2): 129-138.
[14] Slabe T.. Cave Rocky Relief. Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, 1995: 128.
[15] Böcker T. A. Karstwater movements under natural conditions. In: Szádeczky-Kardoss E (ed) II. Conference on material and energy flow. Academy Publisher, Budapest, 1972: 107-121 (in Hungarian)
[16] Pécsi M.. The Morphogenesis of the Pannonian Basin. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 1980, 29: 105-127. (in Hungarian)
[17] Pécsi M.. Geomorphology and relief classification.Geographical Research Institute, Budapest, 1991: 296. (in Hungarian)
[18] Budai T., Konrád Gy.. Geology of Hungary. University of Pécs, Pécs, 2011: 102 (in Hungarian)
[19] Kiss A., Takácsné Bolner K.. Montenegro-Njegusi 2003. Karst and Cave, 2002-2003 évfolyam, 2006: 80-83.
[20] Takácsné Bolner K.. Morphogenetic observations in the large caves of Njegusi polje, Montenegro. Karst development XI, 2006: 289-300. (in Hungarian)
[21] Dimitrijevič, M.D.. Geology of Yugoslavia - Geol. Inst. GEMINI” Spec. Publ., Belgrád 1 Zebre M, Stepišnik U. Glaciokarst landforms and processes of the southern Dinaric Alps. - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.373187
[22] Zebre M, Stepišnik U. Glaciokarst landforms and processes of the southern Dinaric Alps.- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3731
[23] Stepišnik, U., Žebre, M.. Glaciokras Lovčena. Collections E-GeograFF 2. Scientific Publishing House Philosophical Faculty Department of Geography, 2011: 82.
[24] RUBAN Dmitry A.. Jurassic transgressions and regressions in the Caucasus (northern Neotethys Ocean) and their influences on the marine biodiversity - Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2007a, 251: 422-436.
[25] Ruban Dmitry A.. Major Paleozoic-Mesozoic unconformities in the Greater Caucasus and their tectonic reinterpretation: a synthesis - GeoActa, Bologna, 2007b, 6: 91-102.
[26] Trikhunkova Ya. I, Zelenina E.A. Shalaevaa A.V., Marininb E., Novenkoc Yu E., Frolovd P.D., Revunovae A.O., Novikovac A.V., Kolesnichenkoa A.A.. Quaternary river terraces as indicators of the Northwestern Caucasus active tectonics - Quaternary International, 2019, 509: 62-72.
[27] Dubljanskij, V.N., Klimchouk, A.B., Kiselev, V.E., Vakhrushev, B.A., Kovalev, YU.N., Mel'nikov, V.P.,Ryzhkov, A.F., Tintilozov, Z.K., Chujkov, V.D., Churubrova, M.L.. Big karst caves of the USSR. III. Speleological provinces of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus. VINITI, Kiyv, 1987: 257. (in Russian)
[28] Lozovoj, S.P.. Lagonaki Highlands. Krasnodarskoe Publisher, Krasnodar, 1984: 160. (in Russian)
[29] Ruban, DmitryA.. Aesthetic properties of geological heritage landscapes: Evidence from the Lagonaki Highland (Western Caucasus, Russia). - Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 2018, 68: 289-296.
[30] Ridanović J.. Orjen-Dinaric Mountains. Publications of Zagreb University, Geographical Institute. Geographical Iinstitute of Zagreb University, Scientific - Mathematical Faculty: Zagreb, 1966, 5.
[31] Magaš D.. Natural-geographic characteristics of the Boka Kotorska area as the basis of development. Geoadria, 2002, 7(1): 51-81.
[32] Ford DC. A review of alpine karst in the Southern Rocky Mountains of Canada. Bulletin of the National Speleological Society, 1979, 41: 53-65.
[33] Veress M., Telbisz T., Tóth G., Ruban, A.D., Gutak, J. Lóczy D.. Glaciokarst. Springer Geography, Cham, 2019: 516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97292-3
[34] Bočič N, Faivre S, Kovacic M, Horvatincic N. Cave development under the influence of Pleistocene glaciation in the Dinarides - an example from Štirovača Ice Cave (Velebit Mt., Croatia). Geomorphological Journal, 2012, 56(4): 409-433.
[35] Vincent, S.J., Braham, W., Lavrishchev, V.A., Maynard, J.R., Harland, M.. The formation and inversion of the western Greater Caucasus Basin and the uplift of the western Greater Caucasus: Implications for the wider Black Sea region Tectonics, 2016, 35(12): 2948-2962.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2020 Márton Veress, András Hegedűs, Pavle Cikovac, Ruban Dmitry A., Kálmán Péntek
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Copyright and Licensing
The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.
Journal of Geological Research publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Journal of Geological Research agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.
License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials
If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.
Journal Policies on Data Sharing
We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.