The Biogeographic Network of Birds in the Brazilian Cerrado May Guide Conservation Efforts


  • Lívia P. De Sordi Department of Ecology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil
  • Rochely S. Morandini Department of Ecology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil
  • Vânia R. Pivello Department of Ecology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil
  • Mariana M. Vidal Department of Ecology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil
  • José C. Motta-Junior Department of Ecology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil



The Brazilian Cerrado, characterized by grasslands, savannahs and riverine forests, is a biodiversity hotspot, threatened by the expansion of the agricultural frontier, and therefore, needs effective conservation actions. At the national level, the Cerrado core-region has received more conservation efforts than the marginal (non-core) areas, being considered more biodiverse. However, many marginal areas are also home to high species richness and endemism. Birds represent a highly diverse and widely distributed biological group, whose variety of functions gives them important roles in the maintenance of ecosystem services. In this study the authors analysed the distribution patterns of bird biodiversity in the Brazilian Cerrado and verified whether a separation into core and marginal Cerrado zones would make sense for birds’ distribution, as this is an important issue concerning resources allocation for biodiversity conservation. The authors developed a biogeographic network analysis considering 42 sites with savannah vegetation distributed throughout the country and built two presence-absence matrices for birds – with and without species typical of the woodland Cerrado and forest physiognomies – and generated two biogeographic networks. The network without woodland/forest bird species showed no modularity, whereas the complete network produced three modules: Northwest, Centre-South and Centre-North. Network modularity was mainly determined by forest/woodland bird species. The Northwest region was richer and had a greater number of regional species compared to the other two modules; lower richness of bird species was found in the Centre-South region, which had more widespread species. The biogeographic pattern for the Cerrado birds perceived in this study did not evidence a clear dichotomy between core versus marginal regions. Therefore, the same conservation effort should be implemented throughout the Cerrado.


Bird assembly, Bird species distribution, Conservation effort, Savannah


[1] Koskimies, P.,1989. Birds as a tool in environmental monitoring. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 26, 153-166. DOI:

[2] Roché, J., Godinho, C., Rabaça, J.E., et al., 2010. Birds as bio-indicators and as tools to evaluate restoration measures. Conference: 7th European Conference on Ecological Restoration, Avignon, France. pp. 1-5.

[3] Maas, B., Tscharntke, T., Saleh, S., et al., 2015. Avian species identity drives predation success in tropical cacao agroforestry. Journal of Applied Ecology. 52(3), 735-743. DOI:

[4] Whelan, C.J., Sekercioglu, C.H., Wenny, D.G., 2015. Bird ecosystem services: Economic ornithology for the 21st century. Why Birds Matter: Bird Ecosystem Function and Ecosystem Services (C.H. Sekercioglu, D.G. Wenny, C.J. Whelan, Editors). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.

[5] Pimm, S.L., Jenkins, C.N., Abell, R., et al., 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science. 344(6187), 1246752. DOI:

[6] Cavalcanti, R.B., 1999. Bird species richness and conservation in the Cerrado region of Central Brazil. Studies Avian Biology. 19, 244-249.

[7] Carstensen, D.W., Dalsgaard, B., Svenning, J., et al., 2012. Biogeographical modules and island roles: a comparison of Wallacea and the West Indies. Journal of Biogeography. 39(4), 739-749. DOI:

[8] Kougioumoutzis, K., Simaiakis, S.M., Tiniakou, A., 2014. Network biogeographical analysis of the Central Aegean Archipelago. Journal of Biogeography. 41(10), 1848-1858. DOI:

[9] Lenormand, M., Papuga, G., Argagnon, O., et al., 2019. Biogeographical network analysis of plant species distribution in the Mediterranean region. Ecology and Evolution. 9(1), 237-250. DOI:

[10] Thébault, E., 2013. Identifying compartments in presence-absence matrices and bipartite networks: insights into modularity measures. Journal of Biogeography. 40(4), 759-768. DOI:

[11] Vilhena, D.A., Antonelli, A., 2015. A network approach for identifying and delimiting biogeographical regions. Nature Communications. 6(6848), 6848. DOI:

[12] Barber, M.J., 2007. Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks. Physical Review E. 76(6), 066102. DOI:

[13] Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M., 2004. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E. 69(2), 026113_1-026113_5. DOI:

[14] Ab’Sáber, A.N., 2003. Nature domains in Brazil: landscape potentialities. São Paulo: Ed. Ateliê. (in Portuguese)

[15] Ab’Saber, A.N., 1977. Morphoclimatic domains in South America: first approximation. Geomorfologia, São Paulo. 52, 1-22. Available from: (in Portuguese)

[16] Coutinho, L.M., 2016. Brazilian biomes. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos. (in Portuguese)

[17] Forzza, R.C., Baumgratz, J.F.A., Bicudo, C.E.M., et al., 2012. New Brazilian Floristic List Highlights Conservation challenges. BioScience. 62(1), 39-45. DOI:

[18] MMA, 2015. Mapping Cerrado Land Use and Cover: TerraClass Cerrado project. Brasília: Ministry of Environment. pp. 67. Available from: (Accessed 8 November 2021). (in Portuguese)

[19] Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, et al., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403(6772), 853-858. DOI:

[20] IBGE, 2004. Map of Brazilian biomes - first approximation. Available from: (Accessed 11 July 2022) (in Portuguese)

[21] Durigan, G., 2006. Observations on the southern cerrados and their relationship with the core area. Pennington, R. T., Lewis, G. P., & Ratter, J. A. (eds) Neotropical savannas and dry forests: diversity, biogeography and conservation. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 67-77.

[22] Oliveira-Filho, A.T., Fontes, M.A.L., 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica. 32(4b), 793-810. DOI:

[23] Eiten, G., 1972. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. The Botanical Rewiew, New York. 38(2), 201-341.

[24] Laboriau, L.C., 1966. Review of the plant ecology status in the cerrados. In Annals Symposium About the Cerrado. Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Academy of Sciences. 38 (Supl.), 5-38. (in Portuguese)

[25] Rizzini, C.T., 1963. The flora of the Cerrado: floristic analysis of the central savannas. In M. G. Ferri (Coord.), Symposium About the Cerrado. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher/EDUSP. pp. 105-153. (in Portuguese)

[26] Ratter, A.J., Bridgewater, S., Ribeiro, J.F., 2006. Biodiversity patterns of the woody vegetation of the Brazilian Cerrado. R. T. Pennington, G. P. Lewis & J. A. Ratter, Neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests: plant diversity, biogeography, and conservation, CRC Press. pp. 31-66.

[27] Ratter, J.A., Bridgewater, S., Ribeiro, J.F., 2003. Analysis of the floristic composition of the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation III: Comparison of the woody vegetation of 376 areas. Edinburgh Journal of Botany. 60(1), 57-109. DOI:

[28] Aguiar, L.M.S., Machado, R.B., Marinho-Filho, J.A., 2004. Biological diversity of the Cerrado. In L. M. S. Aguiar & A. J. A. Camargo (eds), Cerrado: ecology and characterization. Brasília: Embrapa. 19-42. Available from: (in Portuguese)

[29] Pichorim, M., Silva, M., França, B.R.A., et al., 2014. A Cerrado bird community in the northernmost portion of northeastern Brazil—recommendations for conservation. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 22(4), 347-362. DOI:

[30] Silva, J.M.C., 1995. Avian Inventory of the Cerrado Region, South America: implications for biological conservation. Bird Conservation International. 5(2- 3), 15-28. DOI:

[31] Silva, J.F., Fariñas, M.R., Felfili, J.M., et al., 2006. Spatial Heterogeneity, land use and conservation in the cerrado region of Brazil. Journal of Biogeography. 33(3), 536-548. DOI:

[32] Tubelis, D.P., Cavalcanti, R.B., 2001. Community similarity and abundance of bird species in open habitats of a Central Brazilian Cerrado. Ornitologia Neotropica. 12, 57-73.

[33] Nóbrega, C.C., De Marco, P., 2011. Unprotecting the rare species: a niche-based gap analysis for odonates in a core Cerrado area. Diversity and Distributions. 17(3), 491-505. DOI:

[34] Silva, J.M.C., Bates, J.M., 2002. Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American Cerrado: A tropical Savanna hotspot. BioScience. 52(3), 225-233. DOI:[0225:BPACIT]2.0.CO;2

[35] Silva, J.M.C., 1995. Biogeographic analysis of the South American Cerrado avifauna. Steenstrupia. 22, 46-67.

[36] Silva, J.M.C., 1997. Endemic bird species and conservation in the Cerrado Region, South America. Biodiversity and Conservation. 6(3), 435-450. DOI:

[37] Silva, J.M.C., Santos, M.P.D., 2005. The relative importance of biogeographic processes on shaping the avifauna of the Cerrado and other Brazilian biomes. A. Scariot, J.C. Sousa-Silva & J.M. Felfili (eds.), Cerrado: ecology, biodiversity and conservation. Brasília: Ministry of Environment. pp. 219-233. Available from: (in Portuguese)

[38] Morandini, R., 2013. Functional diversity of the Cerrado birds with simulations of loss of grassland physiognomies and endangered species: implications for conservation. MSc. Dissertation. Institute of Biosciences. University of São Paulo. Available from: (in Portuguese)

[39] Brasil, 2000. SNUC-National System for Protected Areas; Law 9.985, July 18, 2000. Ministry of Environment. Available from: (Accessed 8 November 2021). (in Portuguese)

[40] Souza, C.M., Shimbo, J.Z., Rosa, M.R., et al., 2020. Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine - Remote Sensing. 12(17). DOI:

[41] Carstensen, D.W., Dalsgaard, B., Svenning, J., et al., 2013. The functional biogeography of species: biogeographical species roles of birds in Wallacea and the West Indies. Ecography. 36(10), 1097-1105. DOI:

[42] Carstensen, D.W., Olesen, J.M., 2009. Wallacea and its nectarivorous birds: nestedness and modules. Journal of Biogeography. 36(8), 1540-1550. DOI:

[43] Guimerà, R., Amaral, L.A., 2005. Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles. Journal of statistical mechanics (Online). 2005(P02001), nihpa35573. DOI:

[44] Olesen, J.M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y.L., et al., 2007. The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104(50), 19891-19896. DOI:

[45] Coutinho, L.M., 2002. The Cerrado biome. Klein, A.L. (Ed.) Eugene Warming and the Brazilian Cerrado: a century later. Rio Claro: UNESP. pp. 77-92. Available from: (in Portuguese)

[46] Bagno, M.A., Marinho-Filho, J., 2001. The avifauna of Distrito Federal: use of open and forested environments and threats. In J.F. Ribeiro, C.E.L. Fonseca & J.C. Sousa-Silva, (eds). Cerrado: characterization and recovery of gallery forests. Planaltina: EMBRAPA, pp. 495-528. Available from:›bitstream›CERRADO-Caract-recup-matas-galeria.pdf(in Portuguese)

[47] Silva, J.M.C., 1995. Birds of the Cerrado Region, South America. Steenstrupia. 21, 69-92.

[48] Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C.J., et al., 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100(16), 9383-9387. DOI:

[49] R Core Team, 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. (Accessed 12 January 2020).

[50] QGIS Development Team, 2017. QGIS geographic information system developers mannual. Opensource geospatial foundation project: (Accessed 12 July 2020).

[51] Françoso, R.D., Dexter, K.G., Machado, R.B., et al., 2020. Delimiting floristic biogeographic districts in the Cerrado and assessing their conservation status. Biodiversity and Conservation. 29, 1477-1500. DOI:

[52] Sano, E.E., Rodrigues, A.A., Martins, E.S., et al., 2019. Cerrado ecoregions: A spatial framework to assess and prioritize Brazilian savanna environmental diversity for conservation. Journal of Environmental Management. 232(15), 818-828. DOI:

[53] Whitmore, T.C., Prance, G.T., 1987. Biogeography and Quaternary history in tropical America. Oxford UK: Clarendon Press.

[54] Strassburg, B.B.N., Brooks, T., Feltran-Barbieri, R., et al., 2017. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 1(4), 99. DOI:

[55] Marini, M.A., Garcia, F.I., 2005. Conservation of birds in Brazil. Megadiversidade. 1(1), 95-102. Available from: (in Portuguese)

[56] Marini, M.A., Barbet-Massin, M., Lopes, L.E., et al., 2009. Predicted climate-driven bird distribution changes and forecasted conservation conflicts in a Neotropical savanna. Conservation Biology. 23(6), 1558-1567. DOI:

[57] Marini, M.A., Barbet-Massin, M., Lopes, L.E., et al., 2009. Major current and future gaps of Brazilian reserves to protect Neotropical savanna birds. Biological Conservation. 142(12), 3039-3050. DOI:


How to Cite

De Sordi, L. P., Morandini, R. S., Pivello, V. R., Vidal, M. M., & Motta-Junior, J. C. (2022). The Biogeographic Network of Birds in the Brazilian Cerrado May Guide Conservation Efforts. Research in Ecology, 4(3), 42–53.


Article Type