-
3265
-
2352
-
1520
-
1224
-
1025
A Study of the Versatility of ‘Over’ and Other Prepositions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7346Abstract
This study investigates the multifunctionality of English prepositions—focusing on “over”—analyzing their usage as prepositions and adverbs. Using data from the British National Corpus, the research employs statistical methods, including Z-scores and correlation analysis, to examine the variability in prepositional and adverbial functions across ten common English prepositions. The findings reveal that “over” exhibits significant versatility, frequently shifting from a prepositional role to an adverbial function, making it more complex and challenging than other prepositions. The study highlights the inverse relationship between prepositional and adverbial usage, suggesting that prepositions heavily used in one function tend to be less prominent in the other. The educational implications of these findings underscore the need for targeted instructional strategies in teaching English as a second or foreign language, emphasizing the dual roles of prepositions like “over” and incorporating authentic language examples to enhance learner comprehension.
Keywords:
Prepositional Complexity; Adverbial Usage; English Language Learning; Polysemy; English PrepositionReferences
[1] Tummers, J., Heylen, K., Geeraerts, D., 2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 1(2), 225–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.225
[2] Tyler, A., Evans, V., 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 132–177.
[3] Sweller, J., 1988. Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 12(2), 257–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
[4] Langacker, R.W., 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I, Theoretical Prerequisites, 3rd ed. Stanford University Press: Redwood City, USA. pp. 214–243.
[5] Evans, V., 2009. How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 153–182.
[6] Lakoff, G., 2008. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, 3rd ed. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IN, USA. pp. 416–461.
[7] Huddleston, R., Pullum, G., 2005. Introduction to English grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik. 53(2), 195–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2005-0210
[8] Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., et al., 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman: London, UK. pp. 655–722.
[9] Levinson, S.C., 2023. Gesture, spatial cognition, and the evolution of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 378(1875), 20210481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0481
[10] Jackendoff, R., 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty, 3rd ed. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 47–81.
[11] Lindstromberg, S., 2001. Preposition entries in UK monolingual learners’ dictionaries: problems and possible solutions. Applied Linguistics. 22(1), 79–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.79
[12] Ellis, R., 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 31–32.
[13] Nation, I.S.P., 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 126–132.
[14] Mori, S., 2019. A cognitive analysis of the preposition over: Image-schema transformations and metaphorical extensions. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique. 64(3), 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2018.43
[15] Roussel, E., 2012. The viewpoint of the preposition over. Open Edition Journals, Corela Cognition, Representation, Language. 10(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.2683
[16] Aajami, R.F., 2022. A cognitive linguistic study of the English prepositions above, on, and over. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 18(1), 738–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.216
[17] Cappelle, B., 2005. Particle patterns in English: a comprehensive coverage [Ph.D. Thesis]. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Leuven, Belgium.
[18] Gilquin, G., 2022. Constructing learner speech: On the use of spoken data in Applied Construction Grammar. Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar: Learning and Teaching (with) Constructions. 73–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-003
[19] Laufer, B., Webb, S., Kim, S.K., et al., 2021. How well do learners know derived words in a second language? The effect of proficiency, word frequency and type of affix. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 172(2), 229–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20020.lau
[20] Gaventa, J., 2020. Beyond the prepositions: Using power analysis to inform strategies for social action. Journal of Political Power. 14(1), 1–22.
[21] Celce–Murcia, M., Larsen–Freeman, D., 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course, 2nd ed. Heinle & Heinle: Boston, USA. pp. 403–426.
[22] Yule, G., 1998. Explaining English Grammar: A Guide to Explaining Grammar for Teachers of English as a Second or Foreign Language. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[23] Ellis, R., 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 150–152.
[24] Lightbown, P.M., Spada, N., 2021. How Languages Are Learned, 5th ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[25] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 58–74.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.