Integrating Environmental Value into Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Empirical Application to a Multipurpose Rural Water Development Project in South Korea

Authors

  • Hyun No Kim

    Division for Green Transition, Korea Environment Institute, Bldg B, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, South Korea

  • Hwanhee Ryu

    Division for Green Transition, Korea Environment Institute, Bldg B, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i7.10357
Received: 5 June 2025 | Revised: 30 June 2025 | Accepted: 3 July 2025 | Published Online:15 July 2025

Abstract

This study examines the empirical feasibility of quantitatively integrating environmental value information into Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). An analytical framework was established to incorporate environmental cost estimates into the SEA process by utilizing ecosystem service unit values provided by the Environmental Valuation Information System (EVIS), a national platform developed to support the evaluation of policies and projects. The framework was applied to a case study involving a multipurpose rural water development project in South Korea. Ecosystem service losses resulting from the project were quantified using biophysical indicators, such as vegetation biomass, forest area, and hydrological functions, and subsequently monetized through the application of the market price method, replacement cost method, and contingent valuation method. The total annual environmental cost was estimated to be approximately KRW 56.18 billion, with the majority attributable to losses in forest conservation and climate regulation services. These findings demonstrate that quantified environmental data can serve as a robust basis for alternative comparison and site evaluation within SEA. The study provides empirical evidence supporting the advancement of SEA from a predominantly procedural tool focused on environmental protection to a more comprehensive sustainability assessment framework that integrates environmental, economic, and social considerations. Furthermore, the results suggest that EVIS-based quantitative information holds potential for broader application in other national evaluation systems, such as preliminary feasibility studies and regulatory impact assessments.

Keywords:

Environmental Valuation Information System (EVIS); Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA); Sustainability Assessment; Ecosystem Services; Environmental Decision-Making

References

[1] Carrasco, L.R., Papworth, S.K., Reed, J., et al., 2016. Five challenges to reconcile agricultural land use and forest ecosystem services in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology. 30(5), 962–971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12786

[2] Rozas-Vásquez, D., Fürst, C., Geneletti, D., et al., 2017. Multi-actor involvement for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial plans. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 62, 135–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.09.005

[3] Pope, J., Annandale, D., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 24(6), 595–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001

[4] White, L., Noble, B.F., 2013. Strategic environmental assessment for sustainability: a review of a decade of academic research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 42, 60–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.10.003

[5] Walther, F., Barton, D.N., Schwaab, J., et al., 2025. Uncertainties in ecosystem services assessments and their implications for decision support–a semi-systematic literature review. Ecosystem Services. 73, 101714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101714

[6] The Korean Law Information Center, 2022. Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/eng/engLsSc.do?menuId=2§ion=lawNm&query=Environmental+Impact+Assessment+Act&x=0&y=0#liBgcolor1 (cited 10 April 2025).

[7] Laurans, Y., Rankovic, A., Billé, R., et al., 2013. Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. Journal of Environmental Management. 119, 208–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008

[8] Kim, Y., Park, D., Um, M.J., et al., 2015. Prioritizing alternatives in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) using VIKOR method with random sampling for data gaps. Expert Systems with Applications. 42(22), 8550–8556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.010

[9] Malinga, R., Gordon, L.J., Jewitt, G., et al., 2015. Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents–areview. Ecosystem Services. 13, 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006

[10] Larsen, S.V., Hansen, A.M., Nielsen, H.N., 2018. The role of EIA and weak assessments of social impacts in conflicts over implementation of renewable energy policies. Energy Policy. 115, 43–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.050

[11] Dang, A.N., Jackson, B.M., Benavidez, R., et al., 2021. Review of ecosystem service assessments: pathways for policy integration in Southeast Asia. Ecosystem Services. 49, 101266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101266

[12] Khan, M., Chaudhary, M.N., Ahmad, S.R., Saif, S., Mehmood, A., 2018. Challenges to EIA consultants whilst dealing with stakeholders in Punjab, Pakistan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 73, 201–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.08.002

[13] Schirpke, U., Tscholl, S., Tasser, E., 2020. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service values: effects of land-use changes from past to future (1860–2100). Journal of Environmental Management. 272, 111068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111068

[14] Zhang, M., Chen, E., Zhang, C., et al., 2024. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and ecosystem service value based on the Markov–FLUS model in Ezhou City, China. Sustainability. 16(14), 6237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146237

[15] Alkemade, R., Burkhard, B., Crossman, N.D., et al., 2014. Quantifying ecosystem services and indicators for science, policy and practice. Ecological Indicators. 37, 161–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.014

[16] IPBES, 2016. The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Bonn, Germany. pp. 1–348.

[17] Environmental Valuation Information System (EVIS), n.d. Available from: http://evis.kei.re.kr (cited 10 April 2025)

[18] OECD, 2006. Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment: Good Practice Guidance for Development Co-Operation. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

[19] Partidário, M.R., 2000. Elements of an SEA framework—improving the added-value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 20(6), 647–663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00069-X

[20] Josimović, B., Cvjetić, A., Furundžić, D., 2021. Strategic Environmental Assessment and the precautionary principle in the spatial planning of wind farms–European experience in Serbia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 136, 110459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110459

[21] Ministry of Environment (MOE), Korea, 2023. Guidelines for strategic environmental assessment [in Korean]. Available from: https://www.me.go.kr/home/file/readDownloadFile.do?fileId=253400&fileSeq=1 (cited 26 March 2025).

[22] Therivel, R., 2012. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–288.

[23] Kværner, J., Swensen, G., Erikstad, L., 2006. Assessing environmental vulnerability in EIA—the content and context of the vulnerability concept in an alternative approach to standard EIA procedure. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 26(5), 511–527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.01.003

[24] Geneletti, D., 2011. Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management. 7(3), 143–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.617711

[25] Freeman III, A.M., Herriges, J.A., Kling, C.L., 2014. The Measurement oEnvironmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, 3rd ed. Routledge: Abingdon, UK. pp. 1–512.

[26] Häyhä, T., Franzese, P.P., 2014. Ecosystem services assessment: a review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling. 289, 124–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.002

[27] Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387(6630), 253–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

[28] De Groot, R., Brander, L., Van Der Ploeg, S., et al., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services. 1(1), 50–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005

[29] Retief, F.P., Steenkamp, C., Alberts, R.C., 2021. Strategic Environmental Assessment in South Africa: The Road Not Taken. In: Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 349–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909937.00036

[30] Noble, B.F., 2009. Promise and dismay: the state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 29(1), 66–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004

[31] Magnan, A.K., Li, J., Tanguy, A., et al., 2025. The value of structured expert judgment to help assess climate adaptation. Climate Risk Management. 47, 100692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100692

[32] Environmental Impact Assessment Support System (EIASS), n.d. Available from: https://www.eiass.go.kr (cited 26 March 2025).

[33] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan

[34] National Institute of Forest Science, 2020. A forest that gives generously, the public value of our forests is 221 trillion KRW [in Korean]. Available from: https://nifos.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?nttId=3143940&bbsId=BBSMSTR_1036 (cited 26 March 2025).

[35] Brander, L.M., Wagtendonk, A.J., Hussain, S.S., et al., 2012. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosystem Services. 1(1), 62–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003

Downloads

How to Cite

Hyun No Kim, & Ryu, H. (2025). Integrating Environmental Value into Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Empirical Application to a Multipurpose Rural Water Development Project in South Korea. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(7), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i7.10357