Acknowledgment to the Reviewers of Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences in 2025
2026-02-06
Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Techniques: A Comparative Review of Models and Applications
Authors
-
Tao Guo
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
-
Shaokang Yan
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13513Abstract
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability is a prerequisite tool that safeguards the subsurface water resources against mounting pressures of contamination caused by agricultural intensification, urbanization, and industrialization. The review gives a critical and elaborate comparison of some of the most popular methods of vulnerability assessment of groundwater, such as index-based methods, process-based numerical methods, statistical methods, and new methods based on machine learning. The conceptual framework that shapes the vulnerability assessment is first discussed, which shows the difference between intrinsic and specific vulnerability and the importance of key hydrogeological factors. After that, popular models are systematically divided and analyzed according to their predictive performance, data needs, computational complexity, interpretability, and scalability. It is found that index-based models continue to be important in large-scale applications as they are simple, whereas process-based models are more physically realistic in site-specific studies but demand a lot of data. Machine learning methods are highly predictive but have difficulties concerning the dependency and transparency of the data. Multi-methodological hybrid models are promising to overcome these weaknesses. The usefulness of vulnerability assessments in groundwater management has been demonstrated through the use of the tool in a variety of different hydrogeological environments, with the problems of uncertainty, data access, and model transferability remaining. This review reveals that standardized methodologies, better uncertainty quantification, and increased incorporation of advanced data sources are necessary. The future studies must target the development of dynamic, data-driven, and hybrid frameworks in order to improve the credibility and usability of groundwater vulnerability assessment.
Keywords:
Groundwater Vulnerability; DRASTIC Model; Machine Learning; Hydrogeological Modeling; Geographic Information System (GIS)-Based AssessmentReferences
[1] Islam, M.S., 2023. Groundwater: Sources, Functions, and Quality. In Hydrogeochemical Evaluation and Groundwater Quality. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 17–36.
[2] Scanlon, B.R., Fakhreddine, S., Rateb, A., et al., 2023. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(2), 87–101.
[3] Brindha, K., Schneider, M., 2019. Impact of urbanization on groundwater quality. In GIS and Geostatistical Techniques for Groundwater Science. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 179–196.
[4] Alemu, E.B., 2025. Evaluating the environmental impacts of industrialization and urbanization on groundwater quality: A comprehensive review of methodological approaches in Ethiopia. Green Energy and Environmental Technology. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/geet.20240087
[5] Danielopol, D.L., Griebler, C., Gunatilaka, A., et al., 2003. Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environmental Conservation. 30(2), 104–130.
[6] Banerjee, A., Creedon, L., Jones, N., et al., 2023. Dynamic groundwater contamination vulnerability assessment techniques: A systematic review. Hydrology. 10(9), 182.
[7] Wachniew, P., Zurek, A.J., Stumpp, C., et al., 2016. Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 46(9), 827–884.
[8] Kumar, P., Thakur, P., Debnath, S., 2019. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping Using DRASTIC Model. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[9] Ourarhi, S., Barkaoui, A.-E., Zarhloule, Y., et al., 2024. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Triffa Plain based on GIS combined with DRASTIC, SINTACS, and GOD models. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 10(1), 619–629.
[10] Bear, J., Cheng, A.H.-D., 2010. Modeling Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[11] Chen, W., Li, Y., Tsangaratos, P., et al., 2020. Groundwater spring potential mapping using artificial intelligence approach based on kernel logistic regression, random forest, and alternating decision tree models. Applied Sciences. 10(2), 425.
[12] Jain, H., 2023. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mitigation: A comprehensive review of the techniques and applications. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 22, 100968.
[13] Dritsas, E., Trigka, M., 2025. Remote sensing and geospatial analysis in the big data era: A survey. Remote Sensing. 17(3), 550.
[14] Zaresefat, M., Derakhshani, R., 2023. Revolutionizing groundwater management with hybrid AI models: A practical review. Water. 15(9), 1750.
[15] Rabie, A.B., Elhag, M., Subyani, A., 2025. Remote sensing, GIS, and machine learning in water resources management for arid agricultural regions: A review. Water. 17(21), 3125.
[16] Kumar, A., Nehdi, M.L., 2026. Data-driven approaches to groundwater modelling: Methods, applications, and challenges. Hydrological Insights. 1–10.
[17] Gorelick, S.M., Zheng, C., 2015. Global change and the groundwater management challenge. Water Resources Research. 51(5), 3031–3051.
[18] Foster, S., Chilton, P.J., 2003. Groundwater: The processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 358(1440), 1957–1972.
[19] Chenini, I., Zghibi, A., Kouzana, L., 2015. Hydrogeological investigations and groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping for groundwater resource protection and management: State of the art and a case study. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 109, 11–26.
[20] Dahan, O., 2020. Vadose Zone Monitoring as a Key to Groundwater Protection. Frontiers in Water. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2020.599569
[21] Allouche, N., Maanan, M., Gontara, M., et al., 2017. A global risk approach to assessing groundwater vulnerability. Environmental Modelling & Software. 88, 168–182.
[22] Libera, A., Henri, C.V., De Barros, F.P., 2019. Hydraulic conductivity and porosity heterogeneity controls on environmental performance metrics: Implications in probabilistic risk analysis. Advances in Water Resources. 127, 1–12.
[23] Worrall, F., Besien, T., Kolpin, D.W., 2002. Groundwater vulnerability: Interactions of chemical and site properties. Science of the Total Environment. 299(1–3), 131–143.
[24] Haidery, A., Umar, R., Saba, N., 2023. Approaches for groundwater vulnerability assessment in relation to pollution potential: A critical evaluation and challenges. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 99(8), 1149–1157.
[25] Busico, G., Alessandrino, L., Mastrocicco, M., 2021. Denitrification in intrinsic and specific groundwater vulnerability assessment: A review. Applied Sciences. 11(22), 10657.
[26] Saidi, S., Bouri, S., Ben Dhia, H., et al., 2011. Assessment of groundwater risk using intrinsic vulnerability and hazard mapping: Application to Souassi aquifer, Tunisian Sahel. Agricultural Water Management. 98(10), 1671–1682.
[27] Sorichetta, A., Masetti, M., Ballabio, C., et al., 2011. Reliability of groundwater vulnerability maps obtained through statistical methods. Journal of Environmental Management. 92(4), 1215–1224.
[28] Fekete, A., Damm, M., Birkmann, J., 2010. Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards. 55(3), 729–747.
[29] Ni, C.-F., Vu, T.-D., Li, W.-C., et al., 2023. Stochastic-based approach to quantify the uncertainty of groundwater vulnerability. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 37(5), 1897–1915.
[30] Shaikh, M., Birajdar, F., 2024. Advancements in remote sensing and GIS for sustainable groundwater monitoring: Applications, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management. 7(3), 16–24.
[31] Geng, C., Lu, D., Qian, J., et al., 2023. A review on process-based groundwater vulnerability assessment methods. Processes. 11(6), 1610.
[32] Najafpour, N., Soltaninia, S., 2025. Groundwater quality assessment and refining vulnerability index through machine learning and pollution index integration: A case study of the Koohpayeh Plain in Central Iran. Anthropogenic Pollution. 9(1).
[33] Falae, P.O., 2025. Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment. Developments in Environmental Science. 19, 191–205.
[34] Ali, K., 2024. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Comparison of Existing Methods [Master’s Thesis]. Politecnico di Torino: Turin, Italy.
[35] Solomatine, D.P., Trigka, M., 2008. Data-driven modelling: Some past experiences and new approaches. Journal of Hydroinformatics. 10(1), 3–22.
[36] Elshorbagy, A., Corzo, G., Srinivasulu, S., et al., 2010. Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology—Part 1: Concepts and methodology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 14(10), 1931–1941.
[37] Singh, A.K., Patra, A.K., 2025. Pathways for Sustainable Development and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Using AI and GIS. In Artificial Intelligence, Geographic Information Systems, and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Improving Sustainable Development. Auerbach Publications: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 1–17.
[38] Patel, P., Mehta, D., Sharma, N., 2022. A review on the application of the DRASTIC method in the assessment of groundwater vulnerability. Water Supply. 22(5), 5190–5205.
[39] Mehta, D., Patel, P., Sharma, N., et al., 2024. Comparative analysis of DRASTIC and GOD model for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 10(1), 671–694.
[40] Jahromi, M.N., Gomeh, Z., Busico, G., et al., 2021. Developing a SINTACS-based method to map groundwater multi-pollutant vulnerability using evolutionary algorithms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(7), 7854–7869.
[41] Kumar, P., Bansod, B.K.S., Debnath, S.K., et al., 2015. Index-based groundwater vulnerability mapping models using hydrogeological settings: A critical evaluation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 51, 38–49.
[42] Heudorfer, B., Haaf, E., Stahl, K., et al., 2019. Index-based characterization and quantification of groundwater dynamics. Water Resources Research. 55(7), 5575–5592.
[43] Zhang, H., Yang, R., Guo, S., et al., 2020. Modeling fertilization impacts on nitrate leaching and groundwater contamination with HYDRUS-1D and MT3DMS. Paddy and Water Environment. 18(3), 481–498.
[44] Zhang, A., Winterle, J., Yang, C., 2020. Performance comparison of physical process-based and data-driven models: A case study on the Edwards Aquifer, USA. Hydrogeology Journal. 28(6), 2025–2037.
[45] Borzì, I., 2025. Modeling groundwater resources in data-scarce regions for sustainable management: Methodologies and limits. Hydrology. 12(1), 11.
[46] Patel, P.S., Pandya, D.M., Shah, M., 2023. A holistic review on the assessment of groundwater quality using multivariate statistical techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30(36), 85046–85070.
[47] Naghibi, S.A., Ahmadi, K., Daneshi, A., 2017. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resources Management. 31(9), 2761–2775.
[48] Clark, S.R., Fu, G., Janardhanan, S., 2025. Explainable AI for interpreting spatiotemporal groundwater predictions. Water Resources Research. 61(10), e2025WR041303.
[49] Mallick, J., Alqadhi, S., Hang, H.T., et al., 2024. Interpreting optimised data-driven solution with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for water quality assessment for better decision-making in pollution management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 31(30), 42948–42969.
[50] Eid, M.H., Elbagory, M., Tamma, A.A., et al., 2023. Evaluation of groundwater quality for irrigation in deep aquifers using multiple graphical and indexing approaches supported with machine learning models and GIS techniques, Souf Valley, Algeria. Water. 15(1), 182.
[51] Machiwal, D., Cloutier, V., Güler, C., et al., 2018. A review of GIS-integrated statistical techniques for groundwater quality evaluation and protection. Environmental Earth Sciences. 77(19), 681.
[52] Menichini, M., Franceschi, L., Raco, B., et al., 2022. Groundwater modeling with process-based and data-driven approaches in the context of climate change. Water. 14(23), 3956.
[53] National Research Council, 1993. Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Predicting Relative Contamination Potential under Conditions of Uncertainty. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA.
[54] Sun, J., Hu, L., Li, D., et al., 2022. Data-driven models for accurate groundwater level prediction and their practical significance in groundwater management. Journal of Hydrology. 608, 127630.
[55] Wali, S.U., Usman, A.A., Usman, A.B., et al., 2024. Resolving challenges of groundwater flow modelling for improved water resources management: A narrative review. International Journal of Hydrology. 8(5), 175–193.
[56] Mogaji, K.A., 2018. Application of vulnerability modeling techniques in groundwater resources management: A comparative study. Applied Water Science. 8(5), 127.
[57] White, E., Costelloe, J., Peterson, T.J., et al., 2019. Do groundwater management plans work? Modelling the effectiveness of groundwater management scenarios. Hydrogeology Journal. 27(7), 2447–2470.
[58] Najafzadeh, M., Homaei, F., Mohamadi, S., 2022. Reliability evaluation of groundwater quality index using data-driven models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(6), 8174–8190.
[59] Lindström, R., 2005. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Process-Based Models [PhD Thesis]. KTH: Stockholm, Sweden.
[60] Mohammed, M.A., Szabó, N.P., Szűcs, P., 2025. Exploring spatiotemporal groundwater flow patterns in heterogeneous systems: A comprehensive workflow combining multiple machine learning models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 39(11), 5029–5048.
[61] Singh, V.P., Singh, R., Paul, P.K., et al., 2024. Hydrological Processes Modelling and Data Analysis. Springer Nature: Singapore.
[62] Saleh, M.A., Rasel, H., 2024. Machine learning for groundwater levels: Uncovering the best predictors. Sustainable Water Resources Management. 10(5), 166.
[63] Yadav, M., Vashisht, B.B., Jalota, S.K., et al., 2025. Stakeholders participation and groundwater management: Raising the awareness. In Water Sustainability and Hydrological Extremes. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 293–314.
[64] Huan, H., Wang, J., Zhai, Y., et al., 2016. Quantitative evaluation of specific vulnerability to nitrate for groundwater resource protection based on process-based simulation model. Science of the Total Environment. 550, 768–784.
[65] Raisa, S.S., Sarkar, S.K., Sadiq, M.A., 2024. Advancing groundwater vulnerability assessment in Bangladesh: A comprehensive machine learning approach. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 25, 101128.
[66] Cai, H., Shi, H., Zhou, Z., et al., 2024. Explaining the mechanism of multiscale groundwater drought events: A new perspective from interpretable deep learning model. Water Resources Research. 60(7), e2023WR035139.
[67] Sorichetta, A., Ballabio, C., Masetti, M., et al., 2013. A comparison of data-driven groundwater vulnerability assessment methods. Groundwater. 51(6), 866–879.
[68] Miro, M.E., Groves, D., Tincher, B., et al., 2021. Adaptive water management in the face of uncertainty: Integrating machine learning, groundwater modeling and robust decision making. Climate Risk Management. 34, 100383.
[69] Abu El-Magd, S., Masoud, A.M., Brink, H.G., et al., 2025. Groundwater vulnerability under climate change: A machine learning framework. Earth Systems and Environment. 10(4), 4953–4972.
[70] Davamani, V., John, J.E., Poornachandhra, C., et al., 2024. A critical review of climate change impacts on groundwater resources: A focus on the current status, future possibilities, and role of simulation models. Atmosphere. 15(1), 122.
[71] Zhao, F., Wang, X., Wu, Y., et al., 2023. Prefectures vulnerable to water scarcity are not evenly distributed across China. Communications Earth & Environment. 4(1), 145.
[72] Sundararaj, P., Sivakumar, V., Chidambaram, S.M., et al., 2025. Assessing groundwater vulnerability in South India's tannery industrial zone using GIS based integrated SINTACS and DRASTIC-LU hydrogeological models. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 27(11), 28135–28155.
[73] Liggett, J.E., Talwar, S., 2009. Groundwater vulnerability assessments and integrated water resource management. Streamline Watershed Management Bulletin. 13(1), 18–29.
[74] Goudarzi, S., Jozi, S.A., Monavari, S.M., et al., 2015. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution caused by agricultural practices. Water Quality Research Journal. 52(1), 64–77.
[75] Kurwadkar, S., 2017. Groundwater pollution and vulnerability assessment. Water Environment Research. 89(10), 1561–1577.
[76] Pérez-Lucas, G., Vela, N., El Aatik, A., et al., 2018. Environmental risk of groundwater pollution by pesticide leaching through the soil profile. In Pesticides-Use and Misuse and Their Impact in the Environment. IntechOpen: London, UK.
[77] Aduck, J.N., Mufur, A.M., Fonteh, M.F., 2024. A review of methods to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution. American Journal of Environmental Protection. 13(4), 93–107.
[78] Samani, S., 2021. Assessment of groundwater sustainability and management plan formulations through the integration of hydrogeological, environmental, social, economic and policy indices. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 15, 100681.
[79] Khadam, I.M., Kaluarachchi, J.J., 2003. Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 23(6), 683–721.
[80] Barron, O.V., Emelyanova, I., Van Niel, T.G., et al., 2014. Mapping groundwater-dependent ecosystems using remote sensing measures of vegetation and moisture dynamics. Hydrological Processes. 28(2), 372–385.
[81] Ali, A., Bilal, M., 2025. A comprehensive review of GIS and remote sensing applications in assessing land use and land cover impacts on groundwater systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 32(31), 18631–18652.
[82] Rajeev, A., Shah, R., Shah, P., et al., 2025. The potential of big data and machine learning for ground water quality assessment and prediction. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 32(2), 927–941.
[83] KC, S., Shrestha, S., Nguyen, T.P.L., et al., 2022. Groundwater governance: A review of the assessment methodologies. Environmental Reviews. 30(2), 202–216.
[84] Bamal, A., Uddin, M.G., Olbert, A.I., 2024. Harnessing machine learning for assessing climate change influences on groundwater resources: A comprehensive review. Heliyon. 10(17).
[85] Treidel, H., Martin-Bordes, J.L., Gurdak, J.J., 2011. Climate Change Effects on Groundwater Resources: A Global Synthesis of Findings and Recommendations. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Downloads
How to Cite
Guo, T., & Yan, S. (2026). Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Techniques: A Comparative Review of Models and Applications. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(8), 1218–1238. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i8.13513
Issue
Article Type
Review
License
Copyright © 2026 Tao Guo, Shaokang Yan
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
