Angel Paniagua
Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Madrid, 28002, Spain
Through the Latour concept of philosophy of science of laboratory life, the life course of a (geo) ethnographer researcher is analyzed, in order to establish the emotional or more personal dimensions that do not usually appear in research papers, but that have notable relevance in qualitative research. The text is structured in three large parts: A conceptual vision of the new experimental geography; the experimental geo-ethnography in old social, new social and place scenarios; and finally, the most personal and emotional dimension of the research. The first part establishes the geo-ethnographic experimental context and the assumptions in fieldwork, in addition to the geo-ethnographic reconciliation process. In the second part, the main qualitative research problems related to mobility, resistance and dynamics in place are established. Finally, in the third part the research perceptions, the personal experiences, and the emotional dimension of the research in remote rural areas are established. The laboratory life of a researcher, allows one to establish scalar conclusions and rigor in qualitative research.
[1] Latour, B., 1986. Laboratory life. The constructions of scientific facts. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
[2] Johnston, R., Hepple, L., Hoare, T., et al., 2003. Contemporary fiddling in human geography while Rome burns: Has quantitative analysis been largely abandoned—and should it be? Geoforum. 34(2), 157-161.
[3] Robinson, G., 1998. Methods and techniques in human geography. John Wiley and Sons: London.
[4] Hay, I., 2003. Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
[5] Valentine, G., 2006. Relevance and rigour: The advantages of reusing and scaling up qualitative data. Environment and Planning A. 38, 413-415.
[6] Baxter, J., Eyles, J., 1997. Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 22(4), 505-525.
[7] Wimark, T., Lewis, N.M., Caretta, M.A., 2017. A life course approach to the field and fieldwork. Area. 49(4), 390-393.
[8] Lewis, N.M., 2017. Linked life courses in fieldwork: Researcher participant and field. Area. 49(4), 394-401.
[9] Massey, D., 2005. For space. Sage: London.
[10] Murdoch, J., 2006. Post-structuralist geography. Sage: London.
[11] Leitner, H., 2012. Spaces of encounters: Immigration, race, class, and the politics of belonging in small-town America. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 102(4), 828-846.
[12] Willet, J., 2023. Place-based rural development: A role for complex adaptive region assemblages? Journal of Rural Studies. 97, 583-590.
[13] Cloke P., Johnston, R. (editors), 2005. Spaces of geographical thought. Sage: London.
[14] Gregory, D., 1994. Social theory and human geography. Human geography: Society, space and social science. McMillan Press: London. pp. 78-112.
[15] Butz, D., Besio, K., 2009. Autoethnography. Geography Compass. 3(5), 1660-1674.
[16] Gold, L., 2002. Positionality, worldview and geographical research: A personal account of a research journey. Ethics, Place & Environment. 5(3), 223-237.
[17] Fisher, K.T., 2015. Positionality, subjectivity, and race in transnational and transcultural geographical research. Gender, Place & Culture. 22(4), 456-473.
[18] Kusek, W.A., 2014. Navigating the city: Gender and positionality in cultural geography research. Journal of Cultural Geography. 31(2), 152-165.
[19] Wickramasingha, S., 2023. Constructing (im)perfect geographical knowledge: Negotiating positionality in comparative sites. The Professional Geographer. 1-11.
[20] Elder, G.H., Johnson, M.K., Crosnoe, R., 2003. The emergence and development of life course theory. Handbook of the life course. Kluwer Academics: New York. pp. 3-19.
[21] Ng, I., 2017. When [inter]personal becomes transformational: [re-]examining life course-related emotions in PHD research. Area. 49(4), 409-414.
[22] Shaw, S.W., 2013. Auto-ethnography and autobiography in geographical research. Geoforum. 46, 1-4.
[23] Fois, F., 2017. Understanding ethnography through a life course framework: A research journey into alternative spiritual spaces. Area. 49(4), 421-428.
[24] Davidson, J., Bondi, L., Smith, M. (editors), 2005. Emotional geographies. Routledge: London.
[25] Hay, I., 2003. Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
[26] Cloke, P., Cooke, P., Cursons, J., et al., 2000. Ethics, reflexivity and research: Encounters with homeless people. Ethics, Place and Environment. 3(2), 133-154.
[27] Careta, M.A., Cheptum, F.J., 2017. Leaving the field: (de-)linked lives of the researcher and research assistant. Area. 49(4), 415-420.
[28] Gambold, L.L., 2017. Maybe you will remember: Interpretation and life course reflexivity. Area. 49(4), 402-408.
[29] Hooks, B., 2014. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Routledge: London.
[30] Hoggart, K., Lees, L., Davies, A., 2002. Researching human geography. Arnold: London.
[31] Crang, M., 2003. Telling materials. Using social theory: Thinking though research. Sage: London. pp. 127-144.
[32] Paniagua, A., 2017. The (lost) life of a historic rural route in the core of Guadarrama Mountains, Madrid (Spain). A geographical perspective. Landscape History. 38(1), 81-94.
[33] Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., 1996. Reconstituting rurality. UCL Press: London.
[34] Hoggart, K., Paniagua, A., 2001. The restructuring of rural Spain? Journal of Rural Studies. 17, 63-80.
[35] Paniagua, A., 2000. Analysis of the evolution of farmers’ early retirement policy in Spain. The case of Castille and Leon. Land Use Policy. 17(2), 113-120.
[36] Paniagua, A., 2001. Agri-environmental policy in Spain. The agenda for socio-political developments at the national, regional and local levels. Journal of Rural Studies. 17, 81-97.
[37] Buller, H., Wilson, G., Holl, A., 2000. Agri-environmental policy in the European Union. Ashgate: London.
[38] Cloke, P. J., Doel, M. A., Matless, D., et al., 1994. Witing the rural: Five cultural geographies. Paul Chapman Publishing: London.
[39] Cloke, P., Little, J. (editors), 1997. Contested countryside cultures: Otherness, marginalisation and rurality. Routledge: London.
[40] Deleuze, G., 1994. Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press: New York.
[41] Valentine, G., 2008. Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography. 32(3), 323-337.
[42] Elwood, S.A., Martin, D.G., 2000. “Placing” interviews: Location and scales of power in qualitative research. The Professional Geographer. 52, 649-657.
[43] Dunn, K., 2003. Interviewing. Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 50-82.
[44] Cloke, P., Phillips, M., Thrift, N., 1995. The new middle class and the social construction of rural living. Social change and the middle classes. UCL Press: London. pp. 220-238.
[45] Hoggart, K., 1997. The middle classes in rural England 1971-1991. Journal of Rural Studies. 13(3), 253-273.
[46] Hoggart, K., 2007. The diluted working classes of rural England and Wales. Journal of Rural Studies. 23(3), 305-317.
[47] Paniagua, A., 2002. Counterurbanization and new social class in rural Spain: The environmental and rural dimension revisited. Scottish Geographical Journal. 118(1), 1-18.
[48] Paniagua, A., 2002. Urban-rural migration, tourism entrepreneurs and rural restructuring in Spain. Tourism Geographies. 4, 349-372.
[49] Phillips, M., 1998. The restructuring of social imaginations in rural Geography. Journal of Rural Studies. 14, 121-153.
[50] Phillips, M., Smith, D.P., 2018. Comparative ruralism and ‘opening new windows’ on gentrification. Dialogues in Human Geography. 8(1), 51-58.
[51] Paniagua, A., 2008. The environmental dimension in the constitution of new social groups in an extremely depopulated rural area of Spain (Soria). Land Use Policy. 25(1), 17-29.
[52] Paniagua, A., 2008. The environment in the process of differentiation of new social fractions in depopulated areas of Spain: Key environmental considerations in the way from big cities to extreme depopulated areas. CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios. 16, 31-41.
[53] Holloway, L., 2002. Smallholding, hobby-farming, and commercial farming: Ethical identities and the production of farming spaces. Environment and Planning A. 34, 2055-2070.
[54] Paniagua, A., 2014. Perspectives of livestock farmers in an urbanized environment. Land. 3, 19-33.
[55] Paniagua, A., 2019. Farmers’ resistance in urbanised and remote rural places: A geographical perspective. Rural Society. 28, 15-28.
[56] Besio, K., 2020. Autoethnography. International encyclopedia of human geography (second edition). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
[57] Crang, M.A., 2007. Doing ethnographies. Sage: London.
[58] Willianson, K., 2018. Etnographic research. Research methods: Information, systems and contexts (second edition). Elsevier: Cambridge. pp. 311-335.
[59] Cresswell, T., 1996. In place/out of place. Geography, ideology and transgression. University of Minneapolis Press: Minneapolis.
[60] Agnew, J., 2015. Place and politics. The geographical mediation of State and society. Routledge: London.
[61] Halfacree, K., 2006. Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. Handbook of rural studies. Sage: London. pp. 44-62.
[62] Paniagua, A., 2009. The politics of place: Official, intermediate and community discourses in depopulated rural areas of Central Spain. The case of the Riaza river valley (Segovia, Spain). Journal of Rural Studies. 25(2), 207-216.
[63] Paniagua, A., 2015. Geographical trajectories, biographical determinants and (new) place political elites in selected remote rural areas of north-central Spain. The Geographical Journal. 181(4), 401-412.
[64] Paniagua, A., 2017. Spatial and individual resistance(s) in depopulated and remote rural areas. Space and Polity. 21, 303-317.
[65] Paniagua, A., 2020. Alternative communities in rural spaces. A world of others. Researches Reviews of the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management. 49(1), 51-69.
[66] Paniagua, A., 2012. The rural as a site of recreation: Evidences and contradictions in Spain from a geographical perspective. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change. 10, 264-275.
[67] Paniagua, A., 2016. New rurality, events and festivals in selected places of rural Spain. Social Studies. 2, 113-129.
[68] Paniagua, A., 2010. I live out in the countryside. Exploring extreme processes of individualization in rural Spain. Scottish Geographical Journal. 126(1), 9-23.
[69] Paniagua, A., 2016. An individual rural geography. The Professional Geographer. 68(3), 511-518.
[70] Paniagua, A., 2014. Rurality, identity and morality in remote rural areas in Northern Spain. Journal of Rural Studies. 35, 49-58.
[71] Paniagua, A., 2018. Local people unprotected by protected (depopulated) natural areas: The case of Sierra Norte Guadalajara, Spain. Geojournal. 83(5), 993-1004.
[72] Bryant, R.L., Paniagua, A., Kizos, T.H., 2011. Conceptualising ‘shadow landscape’ in political ecology and rural studies. Land Use Policy. 28, 450-471.
[73] Paniagua, A., 2013. Farmer living in remote rural areas: The worth of permanence in the place. Land Use Policy. 35, 1-7.
[74] Paniagua, A., 2019. Encounters in the valley: Love and emotions in microprocesses of gentrification in depopulated rural areas. Geojournal. 84, 471-481.
[75] McGarrol, S., 2017. The emotional challenges of conducting in-depth research into significant health issues in health geography: Reflections on emotional labour, fieldwork and life course. Area. 49(4), 436-442.
Copyright © 2023 Angel Paniagua
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
