New Concept of Animal Underpass - Green Bridge

Authors

  • Slawomir Wojciech Karas Lublin University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v1i1.591

Abstract

In Poland, the ecological corridor map overlaps with forests, as well as with the road network. The police have recorded near a 100% increase in animal mortality over the last decade. In most cases, bridges automatically serve as passages for animals, even if they have not been considered and designed for such a role. The following facts are importand: silence is positive for animals, natural guides are better then fences and walls, gentle lighting moderates car lights at night. Therefore, the semi-transparent canopy-type noise screens should be used, as well as olfactory tracks. The solution proposed here is beneficial for both the environment and road users. For the proper functioning of the bridge, it is crucial to take into consideration that animals are more efficiently guided by their smell than by channelling fences. However, the commonly used fences would also be provided. Olfactory traces can come in two kinds: animal faecal matter and mating scents.  In a natural habitat, decreasing the immediate proximity between animals and humans should also be considered. A multi-criteria analysis was conducted to prove benefits both in terms of bridge maintenance effort and the impact on the environment. The criteria were selected on the basis of expert opinions. 

Keywords:

Ecology; Green bridge; Environment; Sustainable development; Animal mortality

References

[1] Karas S., Kowal M. Passages for animals on the S17 section between the Kurów Zachód and Lublin Felin nodes [J]. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2016, 15(1): 71-80. (In Polish): https://www.google.pl/search?source=hp&ei=oyqZXNrdKeOArwSH2bu4BQ&q=Budownictwo+i+Architektura+15%281%29+%282016%29%2C+71-80&btnK=Szukaj+w+Google&oq=Budownictwo+i+Architektura+15%281%29+%282016%29%2C+71-80&gs_l=psy-ab.3...1038.1038..1811...0.0..0.68.68.1......0....2j1..gws-wiz.....0.R4ppNEqJNjc:03.02.2019.

[2] Kustusch K., Wuczyński A. Animal mortality on roads in Poland in 2016 [R]. Annual report of the "National Register on Animal Mortality on the Roads", 2017. (In Polish), https://www.zwierzetanadrodze.pl:03.02.2019

[3] DIRECTIVE1992/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [S], http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31992L0043:10.02.2019.

[4] COST 341. Habitat Fragmentation due to Transportation Infrastructure. Wildlife and Traffic [M]. A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions, 2003. http://www.iene.info/wp-content/uploads/COST341_Handbook.pdf:03.02.2019.

[5] EN 13791 Assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete components [S]. 2007.

[6] Terry G.R., Franklin S.G., Principles of management [M]. 1994, AITBS Publishers and Distributors.

[7] Biruk S. at al. Decision-making in construction project management. Problems and methods [M]. 2017. https://www.bc.pollub.pl/dlibra/publication/13440/edition/13111?language=pl:27.01.2019.

[8] Johnson C.G., A Design Framework of metaheuristics [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2008, 29 (2): 136-178.

[9] Bolognini M., Democrazia elettronica. Metodo Delphi e politiche pubbliche [M]. 2001, Rome: Carocci Editore, ISBN 88-430-2035-8.

Downloads

How to Cite

Karas, S. W. (2019). New Concept of Animal Underpass - Green Bridge. Research in Ecology, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v1i1.591

Issue

Article Type

Articles