Revisit the Resultative Construction in Mandarin Chinese

Authors

  • Yanxiao Ma

    China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6458
Received: 28 April 2024 | Revised: 7 June 2024 | Accepted: 19 May 2024 | Published: 5 September 2024

Abstract

This study revisits the syntactic derivation of two resultative patterns in Mandarin Chinese: the compounding resultative and the DE-resultative. A splitting light verb structure is examined in these two patterns, both of which contain multiple adjacent light verbs along with feature inheritance. The v-splitting approach is better than a base-generated structure with two separate v heads. One advantage is that it allows us to formulate the analysis in which the root raises to the light verb v* without violating the head movement constraint. It also works well to explain the specificity of the postverbal argument in the resultative construction.

Keywords:

Resultative construction; Light verb; Splitting; Chinese; Grammar

References

Boas, H.C., 2011. Resultatives at the Crossroads between the Lexicon and Syntax. Available online:https://www.laits.utexas.edu/hcb/pdf-pubs/Resultatives_between_lexicon_and_syntax_2000.pdf.

Chomsky, N., 1998. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15. MIT Press: Cambridge.

Chomsky, N., 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua. 130, 33–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.

Chomsky, N., 2014. Problems of projection: extensions. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.

Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. The MIT Press: Cambridge.

Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J. (editors), 2003. A note on countercyclicity and minimalist grammars. Proceedings of FGVienna: The 8th Conference on Formal Grammar; 2003 Aug 16–17; Vienna, Austria.

Geuder, W., 2002. Oriented adverbs: Issues in the lexical semantics of event adverbs [Ph.D. thesis]. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.

Hale, K., Keyser, S.J., 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. The New from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MIT Press: Cambridge.

Hoekstra, T., 1988. Small clause results. Lingua. 74(2–3), 101–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3

Huang, C.T.J., 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. Chinese Syntax in a Cross-linguistic Perspective. 1, 48.

Huang, C.T.J., 1988. Wǒ pǎo de kuài and Chinese phrase structure. Language. 64(2), 274–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/415435.

Jespersen, O., 1949. A modern English grammar on historical principles, VI, Morphology. George Allen and Urvin Ltd: London.

Larson, R.K., 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry. 19(3), 335–391.

Lee, J., 2022. A new type of secondary predicate construction in English. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics. 22, 1428–1442.

Lee, L., Ackerman, F., 2011. Mandarin resultative compounds: A family of lexical constructions. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=55d0ff5f4ffafaf695a8a7a1b251636178272bd0#page=320.

Levin, B., Hovav, M.R., 1994. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. MIT Press: Cambridge.

Marantz, A., 1994. A late note on late insertion. A festschrift for Dong-Whee Yang: Explorations in generative grammar. Hankuk Publishing Co.: Seoul. pp. 396–413.

Pollock, J.Y., 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry. 20(3), 365–424.

Roberts, I., 2012. Phases, head movement and second-position effects. Phases developing the framework. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin. pp. 385–440.

Shi, C., 2006. The valence hierarchies of verb-resultative constructions and the related issue of multivalence. Foreign language teaching and research, (2006)4: 45-57. (in Language: Chinese). Link: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=sxrP1m9hSI-33wkKW9BFTw_WT48HiNcT8qUE1un25NewAkZX9tSOUBD4FiGkGn_t8PsJsck6nPcrDghvgzFuQ223hTH3VQ_73DrgKVKU65w3QdoBXikLNYJN1AMYg4I8IJP1BQ1EnMgOhwQ10EpAqYdi5b9AfRkH8zjoVH7Hh7lAZLCzUvrZ1A==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.

Si, F., 2018. Hierarchical cartography of light verbs. Linguistic research, 2018(1): 11-17. (in Language: Chinese). Link: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=sxrP1m9hSI_DGshnmA8Zh58-7KfJKwpeLlhqJ58Lkc05t93h1elN6ddnwoslsOtV33MyP4J2pe9PlwBWkDANBzOXzbTf6An1xr1JabKhFpva5VJZi82gzQN8htD4mfqt-AN9FC7agCJya00pc4zJexhi_W9mKB0XUKJuslGxROw-i4vNuI-I1w3uJw7_JRQzQaKICEQXxRk=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.

Thompson, S.A., 1973. Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A case for lexical rules. Language. 49(2), 361–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412459.

Tsai, W., 2016. On the distribution and interpretation of inner and outer light verbs in Chinese. Language science, 15(4): 362-376. (in Language: Chinese). Link: https://doi.org/10.7509/j.linsci.201604.029845.

Wang, J. & Wu, Ya., 2008. A critical review of studies on Chinese resultative construction. Modern foreign languages, 31(2):203-211.(in Language: Chinese). Link: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=sxrP1m9hSI9V7ooVKMvN4GH4jktKS7E3WUKEKNK9Cgw5MsYgoj_NBynAQ795NWEN1ZldSGdcMSqeaougHBvlNlZsG5JYSv5FOuHOE1UYw3htbradr0QL3XUvNLqGPzRqWnP92Zm6xsDxnzOIV3NgGyPAqsZXxPInQwF_ZQu5UqsB0PsHRxuSng==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.

Wechsler, S., 2005. Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. The syntax of aspect. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Williams, A. (editor), 2008. Word order in resultatives. Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics; 2007 Apr 27–29; Berkeley US.

Xiong, Z. & Yang, Z., 2020. Introducing light verbs into generative grammar. Chinese teaching in the world, 34(04):451-465.(in Language: Chinese). Link: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13724/j.cnki.ctiw.2020.04.001.

Zhang, N., 2001. The structures of depictive and resultative constructions in Chinese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics. 22, 191–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.22.2001.107.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ma, Y. (2024). Revisit the Resultative Construction in Mandarin Chinese. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6458