Toward Postulating a Critical Digital Pedagogy Scale: Development and Validation of a Meta-Connective Attitude Questionnaire for the Online Classrooms

Authors

  • Subashini K Rajanthran

    Teaching and Learning Centre, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

  • Mehdi Manoochehrzadeh

    Zerodale, Centre for Research in Entrepreneurship Education and Development group, Zerodale Inc, Toronto, ON M2K 2H6, Canada

  • Hamed Barjesteh

    Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Amol, Iran

  • Maya Shakiyeva

    Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6676
Received: 27 May 2024 | Revised: 11 June 2024 | Accepted: 18 June 2024 | Published Online: 14 October 2024

Abstract

Although digital technology and democracy through digital learning environments are gaining attention in applied linguistics, the lack of a measurement scale with robust psychometric properties hinders progress towards education quality   and learning opportunities. To address this gap, this study is a report on designing, constructing, and validating the practicality of critical digital pedagogy (CDP) scale. To undertake the study, a quantitative research following a survey design was adopted to (a) develop and validate the scale, and (b) to screen English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ perceptions. To gauge teachers’ perspectives, this study aimed to conceptualize the construct of CDP through the development and validation of a scale specifically designed for use in online classrooms. Utilizing both data-driven and theoretical approaches among 412 EFL teachers has resulted in the development of a 27-item CDP scale. Notably, the findings indicated a high level of internal consistency and satisfactory construct validity of the of the newly developed scale. Such scale can bridge the gap between critical pedagogy and digital instruction.

Keywords:

Critical digital pedagogy; Digital learning environments; EFL teachers; Validation

References

Atai, M., Moradi, H., 2016. Critical pedagogy in the context of Iran: Exploring English teachers’ perceptions. Applied Research on English Language. 5(2), 121–144.

Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., et al., 2023. The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research. 3(2), 818–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009

Baako, I., Abroampa, W.K., 2023. Research trends on ICT integration in Education: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education. 10(2), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2281162

Barjesteh, H., 2019. Dynamicity of transformative L2 materials preparation model in EFL classroom: Place of critical language pedagogy in teacher education. TESL Quarterly. 38(2) 47–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.34142.2707

Barjesteh, H., Frouzandehfar, L., 2022. Education in the Third Millennium: Towards an Operational Model in Language Teaching. Society Publishing.

Bendraou, R., Sakale, S., 2023. Enhancing critical thinking skills and communication skills through flipped learning technology in Moroccan middle schools. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. 6(5), 49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.5.6

Boczar, A., Jordan, S., 2022. Continuity during COVID: Critical digital pedagogy and special collections virtual instruction. IFLA Journal. 48(1), 99–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211023795

Canagarajah, A.S., 2005. Critical pedagogy in L2 learning and teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and research (pp. 931–951). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carvalho, I., Ivanov, S., 2024. ChatGPT for tourism: applications, benefits and risks. Tourism Review. 79(2), 290–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2023-0088

Coles, T., 2024. Critical Pedagogy: A teacher's companion. John Catt.

Creswell, J.W., 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.

Crookes, G., 2010. Language teachers’ philosophies of teaching: Bases for development and possible lines of investigation. Language and Linguistics Compass. 4(12), 1126–1136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00258.x

Dreamson, N., 2021. Cultural diversity pedagogy and meta-case design: A new approach to diversity in education. Routledge.

Efremova, N., Huseynova, A., 2023. Digital pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges of learning in the information environment. In Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M., Artiuk, V. (Eds.), XV International Scientific Conference. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 574. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_29

Field, A., 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

Fovet, F., 2023. When being online hinders the act of challenging banking model pedagogy: neo-liberalism in digital higher education. In Köseoğlu, S., Veletsianos, G., Rowell, V. (Eds.), Critical digital pedagogy in higher education (pp. 93–111). AU Press.

Freire, P., 1996. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Galloway, S., 2019. Ranciere, Freire and Critical Pedagogy. In Cowden, S.R. (Ed.), The Practice of Equality: Jacques Ranciere and Critical Pedagogy (pp. 21–43). Peter Land Ltd Academic Publishers.

Gao, P.P., Nagel, A., Biedermann, H., 2020. Categorization of educational technologies as related to pedagogical practices. In Tirri, K., Toom, A. (Eds.), Pedagogy in basic and higher education: Current developments and challenges (pp. 167–182). IntechOpen.

Gonye, J., Moyo, N., 2023. Critical digital pedagogy and indigenous knowledge: Harnessing technologies for decoloniality in higher education institutions of the global south. institutions of the global south. In Köseoğlu, S., Veletsianos, G., Rowell, V. (Eds.), Critical digital pedagogy in higher education (pp. 133–159). AU Press.

Ipek, Z.-H., Gözüm, A.-C.-I., Papadakis, S., et al., 2023. Educational applications of ChatGPT, an AI system: A systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal. 12(3), 26–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123.2

Karakose, T., Demirkol, M., Aslan, N., et al., 2023. A Conversation with ChatGPT about the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Education: Comparative Review Based on Human–AI Collaboration. Educational Process. 12(3), 7–25.

Köseoğlu, S., Veletsianos, G., Rowell, C., 2022. Critical Digital Pedagogy in Higher Education. AU press.

Krosnick, J.A., 2018. Improving Question Design to Maximize Reliability and Validity. In Vannette, D., Krosnick, J. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research (pp. 95–101). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_13

Luna-Thomas, M.V., Romero-Hall, E. (2023). La Clave Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Digital Praxis. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and research (pp 931–951). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Masood. M.M., Haque. M., 2021. From critical pedagogy to critical digital pedagogy: a prospective model for the EFL classrooms. Saudi Journal of Language Studies. 1(1), 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-03-2021-0005

Morris, S., Stommel, J., 2018. An urgency of teachers: The work of critical digital pedagogy. Hybrid Pedagogy. Press books.

Pennycook, A., 2006. Critical applied linguistics. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Elsevier Science.

Pouwels, J., 2023. Infinitive avoidance and splendid isolation: Rousseau and the use of conflicts in education. International Journal of Social Pedagogy. 12(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2023.v12.x.014

Pouwels. J., 2019. We are in need of each other. Paulo Freire and the role of conflicts in education. International Journal of Social Pedagogy. 8(1), 1–15.

Singh, B., Gupta. V., Jain. A., et al., 2023. Transforming Education in the Digital Age: A comprehensive study on the effectiveness of online learning. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM). 7(7), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM24405

Timotheou, S., Miliou. O., Dimitriadis. Y., 2023. Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies. 28(6), 6695–6726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Väätäjä, J.O., Ruokamo, H., 2021. Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. 15, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395

Vijayaratnam. P., Jiang. L., Siqi. H., et al., 2023. Quality Education: A Study on the Factors Influencing Enjoyment of Learning English among Higher Educational Institution Students. Migration Letters. 20(S3), 54–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS3.3755

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., Potter, J., 2020. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology. 45(2), 107–114.

Wieland, A., Durach, C.F., Kembro, J., et al., 2017. Statistical and Judgmental Criteria for Scale Purification. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 22(4), 321–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM07-2016-0230

Wink, J., 2000. Critical Pedagogy: Notes from the Real World. Addison Wesley Longman.

Downloads

How to Cite

Rajanthran, S. K., Manoochehrzadeh, M., Barjesteh, H., & Shakiyeva, M. (2024). Toward Postulating a Critical Digital Pedagogy Scale: Development and Validation of a Meta-Connective Attitude Questionnaire for the Online Classrooms. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6676

Issue

Article Type

Article