Reunifying Feature Inheritance and Speech Act Projections: Testing the Model on Peripheral Constructions from Arabic

Authors

  • Saleem Abdelhady

    Liberal Arts Department, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6778
Received: 20 June 2024 | Revised: 20 August 2024 | Accepted: 10 October 2024 | Published Online: 15 November 2024

Abstract

This study aims to bridge a gap between Feature Inheritance (FI) and Speech Act Projections (SAPs), addressing the significant challenge SAPs pose to FI and its underlying mechanism, AGREE. Previous studies highlight the need for reallocating features within the syntax to reconcile FI with cartographic structures, suggesting that moving the C head above Foc and ToP heads is necessary. However, this reallocation is problematic as it fails to account for SAPs, creating a mismatch between syntax and pragmatics, where C must be c-commanded by SAPs rather than simply articulated by them. To address this issue, the study redefines the locus of features in syntactic derivations, proposing that syntactic operations target clausal structures while pragmatic constructions target utterances. Given that every clause is an utterance, but not every utterance is a clause, the study argues that features originate in a head higher than C, identified as U(tterance). This redefinition unifies the use of upward and downward AGREE in the pragmatic-syntactic interface and simplifies grammar by eliminating arbitrary processes like feature sharing. The study tests this new model using data from Arabic, demonstrating that C patterns with other phasal heads such as T and v, inheriting its features from the U head. The findings suggest that this approach provides a more coherent account of the interaction between syntax and pragmatics, with recommendations for further exploration of the model across different languages to validate its applicability and potential to simplify syntactic theory.

Keywords:

Feature Inheritance; Agree; Speech Act Projections

References

[1] Rizzi, L., 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: Haegeman, L. (Ed.). Elements of Grammar. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 281–337.

[2] Rizzi, L., 2014. Syntactic Cartography and the Syntacticisation of Scope-Discourse Semantics. In: Reboul, A. (Ed.). Mind, Values, and Metaphysics. Springer International: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 517–533.

[3] Weifeng, H., Dingxu, S., 2016. Topic and left periphery in Shanghainese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. 44(1), 29–59.

[4] Shlonsky, U., 2014. Topicalization and focalization: A preliminary exploration of the Hebrew left periphery. In: Cardinaletti, A., Cinque, G., Endo, Y. (Eds.). Peripheries. H. Syobo:Tokyo, Japan. pp. 327–341.

[5] AlShammiry, K., 2007. The clause structure of Turaif Arabic [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Kansas: Lawrence, KS, USA.

[6] Al-Shorafat, M.O., 1999. Topics in Arabic: A Minimalist approach. Al-'Arabiyya. 32, 1–21.

[7] Chomsky, N., 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[8] Branigan, P., 2016. Multiple feature inheritance and the phase structure of the left periphery. In: Wolfe, S., Woods, R. (Eds.). Rethinking V2. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[9] Haegeman, L., Hill, V., 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. Syntax and Its Limits. 370–390.

[10] Hill, V., 2007. Vocatives and the pragmatics–syntax interface. Lingua. 117(12), 2077–2105.

[11] Hill, V., 2013. Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics. Brill: Leiden.

[12] Ritter, E., Wiltschko, M., 2018. Nominal speech act structure: Evidence from the structural deficiency of impersonal pronouns. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique. 64(4), 709–729.

[13] Wiltschko, M., Heim, J., 2016. The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. In: Kaltenböck, G., Keizer, E., Lohmann, A. (Eds.). Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam. pp. 305–340.

[14] Gutzmann, D., 2019. The grammar of expressivity. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[15] Alcazar, A., Saltarelli, M., 2013. The Syntax of Imperatives. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794391

[16] Miyagawa, S., 2017. Agreement beyond Phi. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[17] Ouali, H., 2008. On C-to-T -feature transfer: The nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement in Berber. In Interface Explorations. Agreement restrictions. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 159–180.

[18] Chomsky, N., 2005. On phases. In: Freidin, R., Otero, C.P., Zubizarreta, M.L. (Eds.). Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 133–166.

[19] Chomsky, N., 2001. Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.). Ken Hale: A life in language. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 1–52.

[20] Richards, M.D., 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Linguistic Inquiry. 38(3), 563–572.

[21] Chomsky, N., 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua. 130, 33–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003

[22] Pesetsky, D., Torrego, E., 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In: Karimi, S., Samiian, V., Wilkins, W.K. (Eds.). Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 262–294.

[23] Abdelhady, S., 2017. Agreement and anti-agreement in Berber: A Multiple-Feature Inheritance Account. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS). 4(2), 1–14.

[24] Murphy, E., Shim, J.-Y., 2018. Copy invisibility, (Non-)Categorial Labeling and Feature Embedding, 2 & Shim3. University College London: London, UK.

[25] Speas, P., Tenny, C.L., 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In: Di Sciullo, A.M. (Ed.). Asymmetry in grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 315–344.

[26] Ross, J.R., 1970. On declarative sentences. In: Jacobs, R.A., Rosenbaum, P.S. (Eds.). Readings in English transformational grammar. Ginn and Company: Oxford, UK. pp. 222–272.

[27] Abdelhady, S., 2023. A Nanosyntactic analysis of Arabic complementizers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 13(8), 1888–1899.

[28] Biberauer, T., 2018. Peripheral significance: A phasal perspective on the grammaticalisation of speaker perspective. In: Wolfe, S., Woods, C. (Eds.), Rethinking verb second. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–26.

[29] Kaur, G., 2018. Addressee agreement as the locus of imperative syntax. In: Collins, M.D., Kaplan, A., Hucklebridge, S. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. GLSA Publications. pp. 1–14.

[30] Wright, W., 1896. A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[31] Frege, G., 1979. Posthumous writings. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

[32] Potts, C., 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics. 33(2), 165–198.

[33] Wiltschko, M., 2005. The syntax of precategorial roots. In: Armoskaite, S., Thompson, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas (pp. 245–259). University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics: Vancouver, BC, Canada. p. 17.

[34] Abdelhady, S., Alkinj, M., 2023. Vocatives of entreaty in Arabic: Evidence for PP selection. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 14(3), 576–586.

[35] Starke, M., 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd. 36(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/12.213

Downloads

How to Cite

Saleem Abdelhady. (2024). Reunifying Feature Inheritance and Speech Act Projections: Testing the Model on Peripheral Constructions from Arabic. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6778

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 5 (November 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Saleem Abdelhady

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.