-
3265
-
2352
-
1520
-
1224
-
1025
The Linguistic and Sociolinguistic Profile Characteristics in Religious Discourses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7435Abstract
This article presents the results of an interdisciplinary study on respondents' linguistic profiles in relation to their ethnic and religious identities. The research focuses on how ideologemes about religion are perceived in a multilingual and multiethnic society. Since the 1990s, with the onset of sovereign development, societal values related to cultural mapping have shifted. Multilingualism, multiethnicity, and religious diversity contribute to a range of perspectives, leading to both consensus and disagreement. Discussions and communication practices reveal diverse views on key social developments, including the role and influence of religion. The study aimed to identify the linguistic and sociolinguistic profiles of respondents in their perception of religious ideologemes. Conducted at the intersection of sociolinguistics, religious studies, and sociology, the research analyzed sociological survey data and established correlations (using SPSS) between respondents’ connotations of religion and their complex self-identification (ethnic, linguistic, and religious) (N = 1800). Demarcations in understanding religion’s influence and its role were identified in both public and expert consciousness (N = 107). The study employed interdisciplinary sociocultural methods, including discourse analysis, content analysis, correlation analysis, census data analysis, comparative methods, and theoretical reconstruction. This approach allowed the researchers to establish links between the connotations of religion and respondents' multidimensional self-identification, while identifying their linguistic and sociolinguistic typological profiles and value-based distinctions. The findings may be of interest to researchers in contemporary sociolinguistics, the sociology of mass consciousness, and identity studies.
Keywords:
Bilingualism; Sociolinguistic Profile; Religious Ideologemes; Interdisciplinarity; Turkic Languages; KazakhstanReferences
[1] Sazonov, V.F., 2009–2022. Correlation and its meaning [Electronic resource]. Kineziolog. Available from: https://kineziolog.su/content/korrelyatsiya-i-ee-smysl (cited 20 September 2024).
[2] Office of National Statistics, Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2022. Itogi Natsional'noy perepisi naseleniya 2021 goda v Respublike Kazakhstan [Results of the 2021 National Population Census in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. 30 December 2022.
[3] Prokoshenkova, L. P., Getskina, I. B., 2006. Discourse analysis and its role in modern linguistic. Vestnik Chuvashskogo Universiteta. (4), 99–105. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diskursivnyy-analiz-i-ego-rol-v-sovremennoy-lingvistike
[4] Grigoryeva, V. S., 2007. Discourse as an element of the communicative process: Pragmatic and cognitive aspects. Tambov State Technical University: Tambov, Russia. pp. 241-257.
[5] Kazydub, N. N., 2008. Diskursivnoe prostranstvo kak aksiologicheskaya sistema [Discursive space as an axiological system]. Ethnosemiometry of Value Meanings: A Collective Monograph. Irkutsk State Linguistic University: Irkutsk, Russia. pp. 233–256.
[6] Kazydub, N. N., 2006. Diskursivnoe prostranstvo kak fragment yazykovoy kartiny mira (teoreticheskaya model') [Discursive space as a fragment of the linguistic worldview (theoretical model)] Irkutsk State Linguistic University: Irkutsk, Russia. pp. 200-211.
[7] Mirzoeva, L. Yu., Akhmetzhanova, Z. K., 2019. On the issue of interference errors as an element of the linguistic landscape under conditions of subordinative multilingualism. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filologiya. (60), 45–65.
[8] Malysheva, E. G., 2009. Ideologem as lingo-cognitive phenomenon: Definition and classification. Politicheskaya Lingvistika. 4(30), 32–40. https://politlinguistika.ru/images/4-2009/3.pdf
[9] Kozhemyakina, V. A., Kolesnik, N. G., Kryuchkova, T. B., Parfenova, O. S., et al., 2006. Glossary of Sociolinguistic Terms, 1st ed. Russian Academy of Sciences: Moscow, Russia. pp. 50-100.
[10] Khasanov, B. K. (1989). Natsionalnye yazyki, dvuyazychiye i mnogoyazychiye: Poiski i perspektivy [National languages, bilingualism, and multilingualism: Searches and prospects] Almaty: Kazakhstan. pp. 29–33.
[11] Suleimenova, E.D.; Shaimerdenova, N.Zh.; Akanova, D.Kh., 2007. Languages of the Peoples of Kazakhstan: A Sociolinguistic Handbook. Arman-PV Publishing: Astana, Kazakhstan. pp. 14-104.
[12] Bakhtikireeva, U. M., 2014. Is Russian a polyethnic language? Vestnik Rossiyskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov. Seriya Lingvistika. (2), 16–30.
[13] Suleimenova, E. D., Akanova, D. K., Aimagambetova, M. M., 2021. Biz birgemiz, or Once again about the diversification of the Russian language in Kazakhstan. Vestnik Rossiyskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov. Seriya: Teoriya Yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. 12(1), 7–22.
[14] Zharkynbekova, Sh. K., Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2022. Kazakh-Russian code-switching: A metacommunicative perspective. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Yazyk i Literatura. 19(4), 780–798.
[15] Vereshchagin, E.M., 2014. Psychological and Methodological Characteristics of Bilingualism. Direct-Media: Moscow, Russia. Available from: https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=252566 (cited 27 September 2024).
[16] Zabirova, A., 2024. Religioznost' v Kazakhstane: Tsennosti i smysly [Religiosity in Kazakhstan: Values and meanings]. Kazakhstan-Spektr. 110(2), 24-36.
[17] Grzybovsky, A.M., 2008. Correlation analysis. Human Ecology [in Russian], (9), pp. 50–60. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korrelyatsionnyy-analiz
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.