Investigation of the Development Process of Expository Text Structure for University Students with Hearing Impairments

Authors

  • Guzin Karasu Sivas

    School for the Handicapped, Anadolu University, Eskisehir 26470, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9080
Received: 13 March 2025 | Revised: 24 April 2025 | Accepted: 23 May 2025 | Published Online: 4 June 2025

Abstract

This study aims to explore the teaching process of expository text structures to hearing-impaired university students enrolled in vocational education programs. This action research study involves eight second-year Computer Operator Program students with hearing impairments at a special education institution, along with the researchers. The applications followed the principles and elements of Balanced Literacy Instructional Approach (BLIA).  Inductive analysis was employed to analyze the research data, which included lesson videotape recordings, validity committee audio recordings and meeting minutes, lesson plans, the researcher's diary, student products and documents, and pre- and post-test results. The research revealed that students exhibited limited development in reading comprehension of expository texts in relation to their language levels. Nevertheless, the practices are believed to have positively influenced the students' understanding of the strategies they should use, their comprehension of text structures, and their ability to think critically while engaging with the texts. The finding that students require additional time and repetition to enhance their abilities aligns with the existing literature. The students' language skills indicate that they were unable to benefit from effective education during the educational processes they underwent, despite the current legal regulations' sufficiency. To ensure that students improve their literacy, it is recommended to establish strategies for the effective implementation of teaching and practices at all educational levels, starting from pre-school education.

Keywords:

Expository Text Structure; Literacy Development Strategies; Individuals With Hearing Impairments; Teacher Research

References

[1] Karasu, G., 2019. Ortaöğretim mezunu işitme engelli öğrencilerin yazma düzeyleri. In Proceedings of the 29. Uluslararası Katılımlı Ulusal Özel Eğitim Kongresi-UOEK 2019, Aydın, Turkey, 6–9 November 2019. Available from: https://www.kongreuzmani.com/29-uluslararasi-katilimli-ulusal-ozel-egitim-kongresi-uoek-2019.html

[2] Guzin, K., Umit, G., Yildiz, U., et al., 2016. Vocabulary developing strategies applied to individuals with hearing impairments. Educational Research and Reviews. 11(15), 1402–1414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2835

[3] Selvi, H. H., 2021. İşitme Engelliler Meslek Lisesinden Mezun Olan Öğrencilerin Başarı Düzeylerinin Betimlenmesi. International Journal of Barrier Free Life and Society. 4(1), 44–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/baflas.2020.266.4

[4] Uzuner, Y., Girgin, U., Kaya, Z., et al., 2011. An examination of balanced literacy instructional model implemented to youths with hearing loss. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 11(4), 2111–2134. Available from: https://earsiv.anadolu.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11421/10984/10984.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

[5] Duke, N.K., Pearson, P.D., 2009. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education. 189(1–2), 107–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208

[6] Meyer, B.J.F., 1975. The organization of prose and its effects on memory. North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[7] Roehling, J.V., Hebert, M., Nelson, J.R., et al., 2017. Text structure strategies for improving expository reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher. 71(1), 71–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1590

[8] Hebert, M., Bohaty, J.J., Nelson, J.R., et al., 2016. The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. 108(5), 609–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000082

[9] Luetka-Stahlman, B., Griffiths, C., Montgomery, N., 1998. Development of text structure knowledge as assessed by spoken and signed retelling of a deaf second-grade student. American Annals of the Deaf. 143(4), 337–346. DOI: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/383871/pdf

[10] Palincsar, A.S., Ransom, K., Derber, S., 1982. Collaborative research and development of Reciprocal Teaching. Educational Leadership. 46(4), 37–40. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ387011

[11] Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L., 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1(2), 117–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

[12] Tompkins, G.E., 2007. Literacy for the 21st century, teaching reading and writing in prekindergarten through grade 4. Merrill Prentice-Hall Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[13] Pressley, M., Roehrig, A., Bogner, K., et al., 2002. Balanced literacy instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children. 34(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v34i5.6788

[14] Schirmer, B.R., 2000. Language and literacy development in children who are deaf. Boston (US). Allyn and Bacon Inc.: Boston, MA, USA.

[15] Tompkins, G.E., 1997. Literacy for the 21st Century, A Balanced Approach. Merrill Prentice-Hall Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[16] Asselin, M., 1999. Balanced literacy. Teacher Librarian. 27(1), 69–70.

[17] Bruce, C., Salzman, J., 2002. Leaving no child behind: Combining project read and guided reading to improve at-risk students' literacy skills. Ohio Reading Teacher. 35, 43–51.

[18] Richek, M.A., Caldwell, J.S., Jennings, J.H., et al., 2002. Reading Problems Assessment and Teaching Strategies, 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon Inc.: Boston, MA, USA.

[19] Luckner, J.L., Cooke, C., 2010. A summary of the vocabulary research with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf. 155(1), 38–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0129

[20] Paul, V.P., 1998. Literacy and deafness: The development of reading, writing and literate thought. Allyn and Bacon Inc.: Boston, MA, USA.

[21] Rupley, W.H., Blair, T.R., Nichols, W.D., 2009. Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: The role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties. 25(2–3), 125–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683523

[22] Schirmer, B.R., Mc Gough, S.M., 2005. Teaching reading to children who are deaf: Do the Conclusions of the National Reading Panel Apply. Review of Educational Research. 75(1), 83–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001083

[23] Taylor, D.B., Mraz, M., Nichols, W.D., et al., 2009. Using explicit instruction to promote vocabulary learning for struggling readers. Reading-Writing Quarterly. 25, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683663

[24] Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., McCaslin, E., 1983. Vocabulary development: All contexts are not created equal. Elementary School Journal. 83, 177–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461307

[25] Kelly, L., 1996. The interaction of syntactic competence and vocabulary during reading by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 1(1), 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014283

[26] Akturel, I.E., Gurgur, H., 2020. How is physics course conducted at vocational high schools' inclusion classes? Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education. 21(4), 687–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.547702

[27] Avcı, G., Sakalli Demirok, M., 2022. The opinions of secondary school teachers working in different branches with special needs students in the classroom on inclusive education. International Anatolian Social Sciences Journal. 6(2), 501–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1033233

[28] Sarec Unlu, M., 2024. Examination of Supporting Education Services Provided to Students with Hearing Loss Continuing Inclusive Education [Master's Thesis]. Anadolu University: Tepebaşı, Turkey. pp. 1–225.

[29] Basar, M., Ozmen, E.R., 2018. Comprehension of expository texts: Using strategies based on text structure. Journal of Mother Tongue Education. 6(4), 1179–1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.458522

[30] Icden, G., 2003. The use of “question-answer" strategy for answering post-reading questions by hearing impaired university prep-class students [postgraduate dissertation]. Anadolu University: Eskisehir, Turkey.

[31] Uzuner, Y., Icden, G., Girgin, U., et al., 2005. An examination of impacts of text related questions on story grammar acquisition of three Turkish youths with hearing loss. International Journal of Special Education. 20(2), 111–121.

[32] Uzuner, Y., 2005. Özel eğitimden örneklerle eylem araştırmaları. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education. 6(02), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000092

[33] Cochran-Smith, M., Lytle, S.S., 1993. Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA.

[34] Mills, G.E., 2003. Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Merrill, Prentice Hall Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[35] Johnson, P.A., 2002. A short guide to action research. Allyn and Bacon Inc.: Boston, MA, USA.

[36] Stremmel, A.,2012. Reshaping the landscape of early childhood teaching through teacher research. In: Pery, G., Henderson, B., Meier, D., (Eds.) Our inquiry, our practice: Undertaking, supporting, and learning from early childhood teacher research(ers). National Association for the Education of Young Children: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 107–116.

[37] Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., 2003. How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.

[38] KNILT (The Knowledge Network for Innovations in Learning and Teaching). What is and why use action research. Available from: https://knilt.arcc.albany.edu/Unit_1:_What_is_and_why_use_action_research (cited 11 October 2024).

[39] Girgin, M.C., 2003. Isitme engelli cocukların egitimine giris. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları: Eskişehir, Turkey.

[40] TUSES (Turkey Socio-Economic Status Index). 2024. Available from: https://tyap.net/mediaf/TUSES_Hakk%C4%B1nda.pdf

[41] Ministry of National Education. Curriculum Monitoring and Evaluation System. Ministry of National Education: Ankara, Turkey.

[42] Karasu, H.P., Girgin, U., Uzuner, Y., 2013. Formel olmayan okuma envanterleri. Nobel Akademik Yayncılık: Ankara, Turkey.

[43] Creswell, J.W., 2005. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Columbus: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

[44] Raphael, T.E., 1986. Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. Reading Teacher. 39(6), 516–522. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-22972-001

[45] Alberto, P.A., Troutman, A.C., 1990. Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Merrill, Prentice Hall, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 133–135.

[46] Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications: London, UK.

[47] Ezell, H.K., Hunsicker, S.A., Quinque, M.M., 1997. Comparison of two strategies for teaching reading comprehension skills. Education and Treatment of Children. 20(4), 365–382. DOI: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ563936

[48] Graham, L., Wong, B.Y.L., 1993. Comparing two modes in teaching a question answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: Didactic and self instructional training. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 26(4), 270–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1170/002221949302600407

[49] Fountas, I.C., Pinel, G.S., 1996. Guided reading, good first teaching for all children. Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH, USA.

[50] Istel, C., Uzuner, Y., Girgin, U., et al., 2020. An Examination of the Improvement Process of the Building Construction Course Applied to the Youths with Hearing Loss. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education. 21(2), 193–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.523789

[51] Baker, L., Brown, A.L., 1984. Metacognitive skills and reading. In: Pearson, P.D., Barr, R., Kamil, M.L., et al., (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research. Longman: New York, NY, USA. pp. 353–394.

[52] Oczkus, L.D., 2003. Reciproal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. International Reading Assocation: Newark, DE, USA.

[53] Joseph, N., 2006. Strategies for success: Teaching metacognitive skills to adolescent learners. The New England Reading Association Journal. 42(1), 33–39.

[54] Irwin, J.L., Buelhl, D.R., Radcliffe, B.J., 2007. Strategies to enhance literacy and learning in middle school content area classrooms. Pearson Inc.: Boston, MA, USA.

[55] Kucuk, S., 2002. Orgun Eğitim Ikinci Kademe Turkce Oğretiminde Olcme ve Değerlendirme Calışmalarında Karşılaşılan Guclukler. Milli Egitim Dergisi: Kış-Bahar, Turkey. pp. 153–154.

[56] Ozbay, M., 2002. Ilkogretim Okulları Turkce Ders Kitaplarindaki Anlama Sorularinin Ogrencilerin Dusunce Becerilerine Katkisi. Turk Dili Dergisi. 609, 536–546.

[57] Le Noir, W.D., 1993. Teacher questions and schema activation. Clearing House. 66(6), 349–352.

[58] Cooter, R.B., Flynt, E.S., 1996. Teaching reading in the content areas: Developing content literacy for all students. Merrill: New York, NY, USA.

[59] Marschark, M., Lang, H.G., Albertini, J.A., 2002. Educating deaf students. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[60] Ahn, S., 1996. A Study of Incidental Vocabulary Learning from Context During Natural Reading in Students with Hearing Impaired [doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University: Columbus, OH, USA.

[61] Nagy, W.E., 1988. Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. International Reading Assn.: Newark, DE, USA.

[62] Graham, S., Hebert, M., 2010. Writing to reading: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. Alliance for Excellence in Education: Washington, DC, USA.

[63] Lederberg, A.R., Schick, B., Spencer, P.E., 2013. Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: Successes and challenges. Developmental Psychology. 49(1), 15–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029558

[64] Jacobs, H.H., 1989. Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: San Francisco, VA, USA; Alexandria, Egypt. pp. 4–5.

Downloads

How to Cite

Karasu Sivas, G. (2025). Investigation of the Development Process of Expository Text Structure for University Students with Hearing Impairments. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9080

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 6 (June 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Guzin Karasu Sivas

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.