LANGUAGE AND BRAND RECOGNITION: AN INVESTIGATION INTO BRAND NAMING PRACTICES IN VIETNAM

Authors

  • Thao Thi Minh Le

    Department for Scientific Research and External Relations, Hanoi Open University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

  • Hung Quang Nguyen

    Faculty of Chinese Language and Culture, VNU University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9565

Abstract

The relationship between linguistic characteristics and brand identification in the Vietnamese consumer market is investigated in this study. We conducted a survey of 89 Vietnamese consumers (M_age = 34.7, SD = 12.3) and examined 255 brand names (160 domestic, 95 international) using a mixed-methods approach. Four major language elements that impact brand identity were found through factor analysis: sound symbolism (21.4%), semantic/cultural meaning (18.3%), uniqueness (15.6%), and brevity and pronunciation ease (27.8% variation). The results indicated that two to three syllable names (74.1% of the sample) were more memorable (M = 4.12, SD = 0.78) than longer names (M = 3.45, SD = 0.92, p < 0.01). Names of Vietnamese origin generated more trust (M = 4.47, SD = 0.75) than foreign names (M = 3.58, SD = 1.12, p < 0.001). Semantic/cultural factors were found to have the most influence on purchase intent in the multiple regression analysis (β = 0.52, p < 0.001, R² = 0.64). The best cultural fit (M = 4.32, SD = 0.82) and purchase intent (M = 4.25, SD = 0.84) were demonstrated by hybrid tactics for multinational companies that included Vietnamese characteristics with original names. Our research identifies the effects of interaction between linguistic and cultural components in brand identity and applies the notion of sound symbolism to tonal isolating languages. In addition to offering particular guidelines for successful brand name formation in line with Vietnamese language and cultural traits, this study gives an empirical framework for optimizing brand naming strategies in multilingual markets.

Keywords:

Linguistic Marketing; Factor Analysis; Consumer Behavior; Mixed Techniques; Vietnamese Phonology; Branding; Sound Symbolism; Brand Identity

References

[1] Kohli, C., LaBahn, D.W., 1997. Observations: Creating effective brand names: A study of the naming process. Journal of Advertising Research. 37(1), 67–75.

[2] Alserhan, B.A., Alserhan, Z.A., 2012. Naming businesses: Names as drivers of brand value. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. 22(4), 329–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421211247169

[3] Duduciuc, A., Ivan, L., 2014. Brand naming: Sound symbolism, brand preference and brand performance. Studies and Scientific Researches: Economics Edition. 20, 169–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i20.275

[4] Lowrey, T.M., Shrum, L.J., 2007. Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research. 34(3), 406–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/518530

[5] Yorkston, E., Menon, G., 2004. A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research. 31(1), 43–51.

[6] Zeroual, M., 2022. Syllable variation impact on brand name preference. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. 5(10), 62–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.10.8

[7] Shrum, L.J., Lowrey, T.M., Luna, D., et al., 2012. Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 29(3), 275–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.03.002

[8] Moisescu, O.I., Gică, O.A., 2007. A comparative analysis regarding brand name strategies. Review of Young Economists. 1(9S), 79–86.

[9] Erben Johansson, N., Anikin, A., Carling, G., et al., 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology. 24(2), 253–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2034

[10] Basciano, B., 2016. A linguistic overview of brand naming in the Chinese-speaking world. Annali di Ca' Foscari: Serie Orientale. 52, 243–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14277/2385-3042/AnnOr-52-16-10

[11] Dao, C.T., Phung, T.K., Kieu, T.A., et al., 2023. The influence of brand sound on brand recognition of Vietnamese consumers. VNU Journal of Economics and Business. 3(6), 36–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57110/vnujeb.v3i6.221

[12] Huang, Y.Y., Chan, A.K.K., 2005. The role of language and culture in marketing communication: A study of Chinese brand names. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication. 15(2), 257–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.15.2.04hua

[13] Topolinski, S., Zürn, M., Schneider, I.K., 2015. What's in and what's out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, 585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585

[14] Topolinski, S., 2017. Articulation Patterns in Names: A Hidden Route to Consumer Preference. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 2(4), 382–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/692820

[15] Hong, F.C., Pecotich, A., Shultz, C.J., 2002. Brand name translation: Language constraints, product attributes, and consumer perceptions in East and Southeast Asia. Journal of International Marketing. 10(2), 29–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.10.2.29.19534

[16] de la Cova, E., 2021. Language and brand: Problems for localization. HERMES: Journal of Language and Communication in Business. 61, 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi61.127925

[17] Verdonschot, R.G., Phương, H.T.L., Tamaoka, K., 2022. Phonological encoding in Vietnamese: An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 75(7), 1355–1366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211053244

[18] Pham, T.H., Richards, J.E., 2015. The Western brands in the minds of Vietnamese consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 32(5), 367–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2014-1159

[19] Nguyen, A., Özçaglar-Toulouse, N., 2021. Nation branding as a market-shaping strategy: A study on South Korean products in Vietnam. Journal of Business Research. 122, 131–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.029

[20] NielsenIQ, 2023. Vietnam Shopper Trends 2023/24: Annual report on shopper behaviour and retailperformance within the grocery retail sector. 10 June 2024.

[21] Krippendorff, K., 2022. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

[22] Strauss, A., Corbin, J., 2012. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

[23] Gee, J.P., 2025. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, 5th ed. Routledge: New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003535935

[24] Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.), 2010. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

[25] Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A., Creswell, J.W., 2013. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research. 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

[26] Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G., 1974. Working memory. In: Bower, G.A. (ed.). Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. Vol. 8. Academic Press: New York, USA. pp. 47–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1

Downloads

How to Cite

Le, T. T. M., & Nguyen, H. Q. (2025). LANGUAGE AND BRAND RECOGNITION: AN INVESTIGATION INTO BRAND NAMING PRACTICES IN VIETNAM . Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9565