Innovation Empowerment in Construction 4.0 by the Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)—Approach. A New Field of Scientific Research for the Digital Breakthrough

Authors

  • Bianca Christina Weber-Lewerenz

    Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering InaB, Faculty of Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52062, Germany
  • Marzia Traverso

    Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering InaB, Faculty of Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52062, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jaeser.v6i3.5915

Abstract

The architecture, engineering and construction industry (AEC) undergoes digital transformation, one of the major drivers for technical innovation and dynamism to all working processes. Emerging technologies were only used to a limited extent due to the lack of will to innovate and the unavailability of appropriate orientation guiding users with a more comprehensible framework. The research defined a new gap in scientific research with the concept of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) in Construction 4.0—a term representing the digitization of the branch. The traditionally conservative, highly fragmented industry is predestined for this given the advanced technology, human potential and appreciation of values. Understanding the complex possibilities of innovation and recognizing the potential impact on the sustainability of buildings and the built environment promotes the adoption of corporate responsibility. The implementation of digital strategies, secured by an adapted legal framework, would accelerate the overall human, societal and digital transformation. This primary research investigates the challenges affecting the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The study highlights in which fields CDR can significantly catalyze innovation to achieve efficient, economic construction life cycles. The study used a mix of methods with a structured literature analysis and expert interview surveys enabling a critical-reflexive analysis of key factors. It evaluates the key tasks to master technological feasibility. By assessing multiple expert perspectives, the study takes stock of the acceptance of new technologies. The findings are expected to inspire corporates, researchers and practitioners across disciplines. Necessary corporate steps are outlined in the study to lay the path for defining their own digital strategy. The study shows that new research questions require a holistic approach.

Keywords:

Construction; CDR; Innovation; Digitization; AI; Digital transformation; Human transformation; Ethics; SDGs

References

[1] Kohnke, O., 2017. It’s not just about technology: The people side of digitization. Shaping the digital enterprise. Springer Publishing: Berlin. pp. 69-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40967-2_3

[2] Lehmann, A., Zschieschang, E., Traverso, M., et al., 2013. Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 18, 1581-1592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0594-0

[3] McAleenan, P., 2020. Moral responsibility and action in the use of artificial intelligence in construction. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law. 173(4), 166-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.19.00056

[4] Veluwenkamp, H., van den Hoven, J., 2023. Design for values and conceptual engineering. Ethics and Information Technology. 25(1), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09675-6

[5] Murtagh, N., Scott, L., Fan, J., 2020. Sustainable and resilient construction: Current status and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production. 268, 122264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122264

[6] Young, D., Panthi, K., Noor, O., 2021. Challenges involved in adopting BIM on the construction jobsite. EPiC Series in Built Environment. 2, 302-310.

[7] Kamat, V.R., Martinez, J.C., 2001. Visualizing simulated construction operations in 3D. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 15(4), 329-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:4(329)

[8] Chan, A.P., Ma, X., Yi, W., et al., 2018. Critical review of studies on building information modeling (BIM) in project management. Frontiers of Engineering Management. 5(3), 394-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2018203

[9] Abioye, S.O., Oyedele, L.O., Akanbi, L., et al., 2021. Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building Engineering. 44, 103299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299

[10] Hossain, M.U., Ng, S.T., Antwi-Afari, P., et al., 2020. Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 130, 109948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109948

[11] Thonipara, A. et al., 2020. Digitalisierung im Handwerk—ein Forschungsüberblick, No. 36, Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung (German) [Digitization in crafts—a research overview, No. 36, Göttingen Contributions to Crafts Research] [Internet]. Economic Institute for SMEs and Crafts at the University of Göttingen (ifh) [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/235251/1/1761153927.pdf

[12] Cataldo, I., Banaitis, A., Samadhiya, A., et al., 2022. Sustainable supply chain management in construction: An exploratory review for future research. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 28(7), 536-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2022.17202

[13] Lai, X., Liu, J., Georgiev, G., 2016. Low carbon technology integration innovation assessment index review based on rough set theory—an evidence from construction industry in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 126, 88-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.035

[14] Ortiz, O., Castells, F., Sonnemann, G., 2009. Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials. 23(1), 28-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012

[15] Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Ertz, M., et al., 2023. What we learn is what we earn from sustainable and circular construction. Journal of Cleaner Production. 382, 135183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135183

[16] Nikas, A., Poulymenakou, A., Kriaris, P., 2007. Investigating antecedents and drivers affecting the adoption of collaboration technologies in the construction industry. Automation in Construction. 16(5), 632-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.10.003

[17] Rogerson, S., 2022. Ethical digital technology in practice. CRC Press: Boca Raton.

[18] Franklin, U.M., 1999. The real world of technology. House of Anansi Press: Toronto.

[19] Barratt, J., 2007. Design for an ageing society. Gerontechnology. 6(4), 188-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2007.06.04.002.00

[20] Hofstadler, C., Motzko, C., 2021. Agile digitalisierung im baubetrieb: Grundlagen, in-novationen, disruptionen und best practices (German) [Agile digitization in construction: Basics, innovations, disruptions and best practices]. Springer Publishing: Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34107-7

[21] Liu, J., Wu, P., Jiang, Y., et al., 2021. Explore potential barriers of applying circular economy in construction and demolition waste recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production. 326, 129400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129400

[22] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) AI Principles [Internet]. OECD; 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.oecd.ai/en/dashboards/ai-principles

[23] Weber-Lewerenz, B., 2022. Accents of added value in Construction 4.0—Ethical observations in digitization and AI. Springer Nature Publishing: Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39407-3

[24] Ethics Council: Artificial Intelligence Must not Diminish Human Flourishing [Internet]. German National Ethics Council; 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.ethikrat.org/en/press-releases/press-releases/2023/ethics-council-artificial-intelligence-must-not-diminish-human-flourishing/

[25] Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter [Internet]. Future of Life Institute; 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments

[26] Rogerson, S., 2021. Rebooting Ethics Education in the Digital Age [Internet]. Academia Letter [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/44986988/Rebooting_ethics_education_in_the_digital_age

[27] Blundell, B.G., 2020. Ethics & Lifelong Learning. Itnow. 62(4), 22-23.

[28] Shen, L.Y., Tam, V.W., Tam, L., et al., 2010. Project feasibility study: The key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice. Journal of Cleaner Production. 18(3), 254-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014

[29] Lima, L., Trindade, E., Alencar, L., et al., 2021. Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production. 289, 125730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125730

[30] Araujo, A.G., Carneiro, A.M.P., Palha, R.P., 2020. Sustainable construction management: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 256, 120350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120350

[31] Backes, J.G., Traverso, M., 2021. Life cycle sustainability assessment—a survey based potential future development for implementation and interpretation. Sustainability. 13(24), 13688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413688

[32] Artificial Intelligence in Construction Market to Reach $4.51 Billion by 2026 [Internet]. Construction News; 2019 [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.forconstructionpros.com/latest-news/news/21080665/artificial-intelligence-ai-in-construction-market-to-reach-451-billion-by-2026

[33] Kamat, V.R., Martinez, J.C., 2002. Scene graph and frame update algorithms for smooth and scalable 3D visualization of simulated construction operations. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 17(4), 228-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.00272

[34] Chau, K.W., Cao, Y., Anson, M., et al., 2003. Application of data warehouse and decision support system in construction management. Automation in Construction. 12(2), 213-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00087-0

[35] Castro-Lacouture, D., Skibniewski, M.J., 2003. Applicability of e-Work models for the automation of construction materials management systems. Production Planning & Control. 14(8), 789-797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280310001647869

[36] Delgado, J.M.D., Oyedele, L., Ajayi, A., et al., 2019. Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption. Journal of Building Engineering. 26, 100868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100868

[37] Bock, T., 2015. The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Automation in Construction. 59, 113-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.022

[38] Bilal, M., Oyedele, L.O., Qadir, J., et al., 2016. Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 30(3), 500-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001

[39] Gomez-Trujillo, A.M., Gonzalez-Perez, M.A., 2021. Digital transformation as a strategy to reach sustainability. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 11(4), 1137-1162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-01-2021-0011

[40] Nikmehr, B., Hosseini, M.R., Martek, I., et al., 2021. Digitalization as a strategic means of achieving sustainable efficiencies in construction management: A critical review. Sustainability. 13(9), 5040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095040

[41] Prebanić, K.R., Vukomanović, M., 2021. Realizing the need for digital transformation of stakeholder management: A systematic review in the construction industry. Sustainability. 13(22), 12690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212690

[42] Alencar, M.H., Priori Jr, L., Alencar, L.H., 2017. Structuring objectives based on value-focused thinking methodology: Creating alternatives for sustainability in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 156, 62-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.221

[43] Weber-Lewerenz, B., 2021. Corporate digital responsibility (CDR) in construction engineering—ethical guidelines for the application of digital transformation and artificial intelligence (AI) in user practice. SN Applied Sciences. 3, 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04776-1

[44] Data Ethic Commission of German Government, 2019. Assessment on data ethic. Brandenburg University: Berlin.

[45] The Pontifical Academy for Life in Rom, 2020. Rome Call for AI Ethics. Rome, 1st Edition, 28 February 2020. Available from: https://www.romecall.org/the-call/#:~:text=The%20call%20%7C%20Rome%20Call&text=The%20Call%20for%20AI%20Ethics,ethical%20approach%20to%20artificial%20intelligence.

[46] Offray de La Mettrie. J., 1748. Der Mensch eine maschine (German) [L’Homme machine]. Reclams Universal-Bibliothek Publishing: Ditzingen.

[47] Eastman, C., 1974. An Outline of the Building Description System [Internet]. Research Report No. 50. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED113833

[48] Manning, C., 2020. Artificial Intelligence Definitions [Internet]. Stanford University, Human-Centered AI [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2020-09/AI-Definitions-HAI.pdf

[49] Funk, M., 2022. Roboter- und KI-Ethik als philosophische Disziplin (Bedeutung 1). Roboter- und KI-Ethik (German) [Robot and AI ethics as philosophy discipline (Meaning 1)]. Springer Vieweg Publishing: Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34666-9_2

[50] Funk, M., 2022. Welchen Regeln und Gesetzen müssen Maschinen folgen? (Bedeutung 4). Roboter- und KI-Ethik (German) [Which rules and regulations do machines have to follow? (Meaning 4)]. Springer Vieweg Publishing: Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34666-9_5

[51] Grunwald, A., Hillerbrand, R., 2021. Überblick über die Technikethik. Handbuch Technikethik (German) [Overview on technology ethics. Handbook technology ethics]. J.B. Metzler Publishing: Stuttgart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04901-8_1

[52] Grunwald, A., 2020. Verantwortung und Technik: zum Wandel des Verantwortungsbegriffs in der Technikethik. Entgrenzte Verantwortung (German) [Responsibility and technology: To the change of the term responsibility in technology ethic. Unlimited responsibility]. Springer Publishing: Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60564-6_13

[53] Jonas, H., 1987. Warum die Technik ein Gegenstand für die Ethik ist: fünf Gründe. Technik und Ethik (German) [Why technology is a subject for Ethics: Five reasons. Technology and Ethics]. 2, 81-91.

[54] Grunwald, A., 2010. Technikfolgenabschätzung: Eine Einführung (Vol. 1) (German) [Technology assessment: An introduction (Vol.1)]. Sigma Publishing: Kanagawa.

[55] Holz, H.H., Hubig, C., 2013. Technik-und Wissenschaftsethik. Ein Leitfaden, 1993. Nachdenken über Technik (German) [Technology and science ethics. A Guide, 1993. Reflection on technology]. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Publishing: Baden-Baden. pp. 449-454.

[56] Hubig, C., Reidel, J., 2003. Ethische Ingenieurverantwortung. Handlungsspielräume und Perspektiven der Kodifizierung.(Gemany) [Ethical responsibility in engineering. Scope for action and perspectives of codification]. Berlin: edition sigma

[57] Blankenbach, J., Becker, R., 2020. BIM und die Digitalisierung im Bauwesen. Handbuch Industrie 4.0: Recht, Technik, Gesellschaft (German) [BIM and digitization in construction. Handbook Industry 4.0: Law, technology and society]. Springer Publishing: Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58474-3_40

[58] Lockwood, T. C., 2005. A Topical Bibliography of Scholarship on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: 1880 to 2004. Journal of philosophical research. 30, 1-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr20053048

[59] Unternehmensverantwortung im digitalen Wandel Ein Debattenbeitrag zu (German) [Corporate Digital Responsibility] [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/user_upload/UN_Verantwortung_im_digitalen_Wandel.pdf

[60] Spiekermann, S., 2021. Value-based Engineering: Prinzipien und Motivation für bessere IT-Systeme (German) [Value-based engineering: Principles and motivation for better IT systems]. Informatik Spektrum, 44(4), 247-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-021-01378-4

[61] Giannakidis, A., Weber-Lewerenz, B., Stolze D., 2021. AI in Construction in Germany [Internet]. Study by Fraunhofer Institute Stuttgart IAO [cited 2021 Apr 17]. Available from: https://publica.fraunhofer.de/entities/publication/a3da80e4-54b7-4d15-9d84-83cb36b84bd9/details

[62] Weber-Lewerenz, B., 2020. Corporate digital responsibility in construction engineering: Ethical principles in dealing with digitization and AI. International Journal of Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making (IJRLEDM). 2(1), 32-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijrledm.2020010103

[63] Nothelle-Wildfeuer, U., 2021. Künstliche Intelligenz (KI/AI)—eine Herausforderung für die Ethik. Personen gestalten Institutionen—Institutionen prägen Personen (German) [Artificial Intelligence AI—A Challenge for Ethics. People shape institutions—institutions shape people]. Friedrich Pustet Publishing: Regensburg. pp. 225-241.

[64] Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., et al., 2022. Opportunities and adoption challenges of AI in the construction industry: A PRISMA review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 8(1), 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045

[65] Javed, A.A., Pan, W., Chen, L., et al., 2018. A systemic exploration of drivers for and constraints on construction productivity enhancement. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. 8(3), 239-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0099

[66] Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., et al., 2021. Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research. 122, 875-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006

[67] McGowan, J., Sampson, M., 2005. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 93(1), 74.

[68] Olanipekun, A.O., Sutrisna, M., 2021. Facilitating digital transformation in construction—a systematic review of the current state of the art. Frontiers in Built Environment. 7, 660758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.660758

[69] Oesterreich, T.D., Teuteberg, F., 2016. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry. 83, 121-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006

[70] Pan, M., Linner, T., Pan, W., et al., 2020. Structuring the context for construction robot development through integrated scenario approach. Automation in Construction. 114, 103174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103174

[71] Opoku, D.G.J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., et al., 2023. Barriers to the adoption of digital twin in the construction industry: A literature review. Journal of Informatics. 10(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010014

[72] Kor, M., Yitmen, I., Alizadehsalehi, S., 2023. An investigation for integration of deep learning and digital twins towards Construction 4.0. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 12(3), 461-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-08-2021-0148

[73] Papadonikolaki, E., Krystallis, I., Morgan, B., 2020. Digital Transformation in Construction-Systematic Literature Review of Evolving Concepts [Internet]. Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference (EPOC) 2020. Engineering Project Organization Society (EPOS) [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10113245

[74] Maskuriy, R., Selamat, A., Ali, K.N., et al., 2019. Industry 4.0 for the construction industry—how ready is the industry? Applied Sciences. 9(14), 2819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142819

[75] Torraco, R.J., 2016. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review. 15(4), 404-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

[76] Mihale-Wilson, C., Hinz, O., van der Aalst, W., et al., 2022. Corporate digital responsibility: Relevance and opportunities for business and information systems engineering. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 64(2), 127-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00746-y

[77] Dörr, S., 2021. Go for impact! Show effectiveness. Corporate digital responsibility. Springer: Berlin. pp. 171-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63853-8_6

[78] Filipovic, A., Altmeppen, K.D., 2019. Corporate digital responsibility. Zur Verantwortung von Medienunternehmen in digitalen Zeiten (German) [Corporate digital responsibility. Responsibilities of media corporates in the digital age]. Journal of Communicatio Socialis. 52(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2019-2-202

[79] Merbecks, U., 2023. Corporate digital responsibility (CDR) in Germany: Background and first empirical evidence from DAX 30 companies in 2020. Journal of Business Economics. 1-25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01148-6

[80] Spiekermann, S., 2022. Digitale Ethik und die Künstliche Intelligenz. Philosophisches Handbuch Künstliche Intelligenz (German) [Digital ethics and AI. Philosophical handbook AI]. Springer Publishing: Wiesbaden. pp. 1-24.

[81] Jones, P., Wynn, M.G., 2023. Artificial intelligence and corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science. 1(2), 50-58.

[82] McCaffrey, G., Raffin-Bouchal, S., Moules, N.J., 2012. Hermeneutics as research approach: A reappraisal. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 11(3), 214-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100303

[83] Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A., 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1(2), 112-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

[84] Corbin, J., Strauss, A., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.

[85] Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N., 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.

[86] Jamshed, S., 2014. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy. 5(4), 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942

[87] Buckley, J.W., Buckley, M.H., Chiang, H.F., et al., 1976. Research methodology and business decisions. National Association of Accountants: Canada.

[88] Crotty, M.J., 1998. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. The foundations of social research. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.

[89] Weber-Lewerenz, B., Traverso, M., 2023. Best Practices in Construction 4.0—Catalysts of digital innovations (Part I). Journal of Architectural Environment & Structural Engineering Research. 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jaeser.v6i1.5362

[90] Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., Windridge, K., 2001. An introduction to qualitative research. Trent Focus Group: London.

[91] Mayring, P., 2015. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. Approaches to qualitative research mathematics education. Springer Publishing: Dordrecht. pp. 365-380.

[92] Thomas, D.R., 2003. A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. American Journal of Evaluation. 27(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

[93] Musonda, I., Okoro, C.S., 2022. A hermeneutic research on project management approaches applied in a business process re-engineering project. Business Process Management Journal. 28(8), 66-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0694

[94] Heckmann, F., 1992. Interpretationsregeln zur Auswertung qualitativer Interviews und sozialwissenschaftlich relevanter „Texte“. In: Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P. (eds) Analyse verbaler Daten (German) [Interpretation rules for evaluating qualitative interviews and social science-relevant “texts”. In: Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P. (edt.) Analysis of verbal data]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90092-0_6

[95] Paterson, M., Higgs, J., 2005. Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice. Qualitative Report. 10(2), 339-357.

[96] Roller, M.R., Lavrakas, P.J., 2015. Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Publications: New York.

[97] Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N., 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.

[98] McCarthy, J., 2007. What is Artificial Intelligence? [Internet]. Available from: https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf

[99] Emaminejad, N., Akhavian, R., 2022. Trustworthy AI and robotics: Implications for the AEC industry. Automation in Construction. 139, 104298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104298

[100] Wang, K., Guo, F., 2022. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of construction 4.0: Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Buildings. 12(10), 1708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101708

[101] Ågerfalk, P.J., Conboy, K., Crowston, K., et al., 2022. Artificial intelligence in information systems: State of the art and research roadmap. Association for Information Systems. 50(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05017

[102] Kitchenham, B., 2004. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews [Internet] [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=29890a936639862f45cb9a987dd599dce9759bf5

[103] Bednárová, M., Serpeninova, Y., 2023. Corporate digital responsibility: Bibliometric landscape-chronological literature review. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research. 23, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v23_1

[104] Rogerson, S., 2009. A review of information ethics. Journal of Information and Management. 30(3), 6-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20627/jsim.30.3_6

[105] Sherratt, D., Rogerson, S., Fairweather, N.B., 2005. The challenge of raising ethical awareness: A case-based aiding system for use by computing and ICT students. Science and Engineering Ethics. 11, 299-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0047-7

[106] Asikhia, O., Nneji, N., Olafenwa, A., et al., 2021. Change management and organisational performance: A review of literature. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management. 3, 67-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0694

[107] Leitl, M., 2007. Humankapital? (German) [Human capital?] [Internet]. Harvard Business Manager [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.manager-magazin.de/tan-for/humankapital-a-8ecfb3e4-0002-0001-0000-000052601707

[108] Spiekermann, S., Winkler, T., 2022. Value-based engineering with IEEE 7000. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 41(3), 71-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2022.3197116

[109] Marrone, A., 2020. Corporate governance variables and integrated reporting. International Journal of Business and Management. 15(5), 26-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n5p26

[110] Brilakis, I., Pan, Y.D., Borrmann, A., et al., 2019. Built Environment Digital Twinning [Internet] [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://publications.cms.bgu.tum.de/reports/2020_Brilakis_BuiltEnvDT.pdf

[111] A New European Innovation Agenda [Internet]. European Commission; 2022. Available from: https://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0332

[112] A Strategic Foresight Report 2022: Twinning the Green and Digital Transitions in the New Geopolitical Context [Internet]. European Commission; 2022 [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.ec.europa.eu/info/files/strategic-foresight-report-2022_en

[113] Building Europe’s Digital Sovereignty Conference, 2022. Task Force on Digital Commons in 2022 [Internet] [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_3898

[114] Weber-Lewerenz, B., Vasiliu-Feltes, I., 2022. Empowering digital innovation by diverse leadership in ICT—A roadmap to a better value system in computer algorithms. Humanistic Management Journal. 7(1), 117-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-022-00123-7

[115] Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M., et al., 2013. The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. Own the future: 50 ways to win from the Boston Consulting Group. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204084.ch15

[116] Schumacher, T., 2013. Lehrbuch der Ethik in der sozialen Arbeit (German) [Textbook on ethics in social work]. Beltz Juventa Publishing: Bad Langensalza.

Downloads

How to Cite

Weber-Lewerenz, B. C., & Traverso, M. (2023). Innovation Empowerment in Construction 4.0 by the Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)—Approach. A New Field of Scientific Research for the Digital Breakthrough. Journal of Architectural Environment & Structural Engineering Research, 6(3), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.30564/jaeser.v6i3.5915

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 3 (July 2023)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2023 Bianca Christina Weber-Lewerenz, Marzia Traverso

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC