-
507
-
467
-
458
-
384
-
347
Meteorological Determinants of PM2.5 and PM10 Concentrations During the Transition Season in Campo Grande, Central Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jasr.v8i4.10903Abstract
Air pollution remains a pressing environmental issue in Brazilian cities, particularly during the dry season when meteorological conditions favor pollutant accumulation. This study investigates the influence of meteorological variables on PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀ concentrations in the urban atmosphere of Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, during the transition period between the wet and dry seasons (March to June 2021). Data were obtained from the air quality monitoring station at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), including daily measurements of particulate matter and meteorological parameters such as temperature, humidity, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, and wind direction. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, multiple linear regression, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were employed to explore the relationships between meteorological drivers and particulate matter. Results revealed that relative humidity and precipitation are negatively correlated with PM concentrations, indicating their role in atmospheric cleansing through wet deposition. Conversely, wind speed and atmospheric pressure were positively associated with PM levels, suggesting pollutant transport or accumulation under stable atmospheric conditions. The PM₂.₅/PM₁₀ ratios of 0.55 (1-hour) and 0.44 (24-hour) point to a predominance of fine particles from anthropogenic sources. The findings highlight the complexity of pollutant-meteorology interactions and underscore the need to incorporate meteorological data into air quality forecasting and management strategies. This approach is especially critical for medium-sized tropical cities that experience seasonal climate extremes and are subject to both urban and biomass-burning emissions.
Keywords:
Air Pollution; Particulate Matter; Meteorological Variables; Statistical Analysis; Campo Grande; Particulate Matter (PM₂.₅, PM₁₀); Tropical Urban ClimateReferences
[1] World Health Organization, 2021. WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228 (cited 21 February 2025).
[2] Zhang, K., Zheng, S., Liang, J., et al., 2023. Microplastic load of benthic fauna in Jiaozhou Bay, China. Environmental Pollution. 320, 121073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121073
[3] Zhang, Q., Zheng, Y., Tong, D., et al., 2019. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(49), 24463–24469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907956116
[4] Sun, C., Yang, X., Gu, Q., et al., 2023. Comprehensive analysis of nanoplastic effects on growth phenotype, nanoplastic accumulation, oxidative stress response, gene expression, and metabolite accumulation in multiple strawberry cultivars. Science of The Total Environment. 897, 165432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165432
[5] Ren, F., Abodurezhake, Y., Cui, Z., et al., 2022. Effects of Meteorological Factors and Atmospheric Pollution on Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease in Urumqi Region. Frontiers in Public Health. 10, 913169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.913169
[6] Tai, A.P.K., Ma, P.H.L., Chan, Y.-C., et al., 2021. Impacts of climate and land cover variability and trends on springtime East Asian dust emission over 1982–2010: A modeling study. Atmospheric Environment. 254, 118348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118348
[7] Andrade, M.D.F., Ynoue, R.Y., Freitas, E.D., et al., 2015. Air quality forecasting system for Southeastern Brazil. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00009
[8] Qiao, Y., Guo, Q., Wu, X., et al., 2021. Environmental risk analysis of surface water based on multi-source data in Tianjin Binhai New Area, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 193(8), 481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09273-x
[9] Souza, A.D., De Medeiros, E.S., Özonur, D., et al., 2024. Dynamic monitoring of tropospheric ozone concentrations in northeast and Midwest Brazil: insights into seasonal variations and climatic influences. International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 13(2), 204–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14419/m28s9z69
[10] Souza, A.D., Jimenez, J.R.Z., Júnior, J.F.D.O.-, et al., 2025. Statistical Modeling of PM2.5 Concentrations: Prediction of Extreme Events and Evaluation of Advanced Methods for Air Quality Management. Journal of Atmospheric Science Research. 8(3), 67–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jasr.v8i3.10878
[11] Dantas, G., Siciliano, B., França, B.B., et al., 2020. The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Science of The Total Environment. 729, 139085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085
[12] Parra, J.C., Gómez, M., Salas, H.D., et al., 2024. Linking Meteorological Variables and Particulate Matter PM2.5 in the Aburrá Valley, Colombia. Sustainability. 16(23), 10250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310250
[13] Rautela, K.S., Goyal, M.K., 2025. Spatio-temporal analysis of extreme air pollution and risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Management. 373, 123807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123807
[14] Seijger, C., 2023. How shifts in societal priorities link to reform in agricultural water management: Analytical framework and evidence from Germany, India and Tanzania. Science of The Total Environment. 886, 163945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163945
[15] Oliveira-Júnior, J.F.D., Teodoro, P.E., Silva Junior, C.A.D., et al., 2020. Fire foci related to rainfall and biomes of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 282–283, 107861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107861
[16] Souza, A.D., Oliveira-Júnior, J.F.D., Cardoso, K.R.A., et al., 2025. The Impact of Meteorological Variables on Particulate Matter Concentrations. Atmosphere. 16(7), 875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070875
[17] Crilley, L.R., Shaw, M., Pound, R., et al., 2018. Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 11(2), 709–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018
[18] Davis Instruments, 2013. Tipping Bucket Rain Gauge: Instruction manual. Davis Instruments: Hayward, CA, USA.
[19] Kipp & Zonen., 2016. CMP3 Pyranometer manual. Kipp & Zonen: Delft, The Netherlands.
[20] Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2012. Personal DataRAM™ pDR-1500 aerosol monitor: Operating manual. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc: Waltham, MA, USA.
[21] Vaisala, 2017. WXT520 weather transmitter user’s guide. Vaisala Oyj: Vantaa, Finland.
[22] Vaisala, 2018. HMP155 humidity and temperature probe user guide. Vaisala Oyj: Vantaa, Finland.
[23] Jiang, B., Xie, Z., Chen, A., et al., 2023. Effects of atmospheric oxidation processes on the latitudinal distribution differences in MSA and nss-SO42- in the Northwest Pacific. Atmospheric Environment. 298, 119618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119618
[24] Grange, S.K., Carslaw, D.C., 2019. Using meteorological normalisation to detect interventions in air quality time series. Science of The Total Environment. 653, 578–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.344
[25] Abdi, H., Williams, L.J., 2010. Principal component analysis. WIREs Computational Statistics. 2(4), 433–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
[26] Jolliffe, I.T., Cadima, J., 2016. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 374(2065), 20150202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
[27] Li, R., Mei, X., Wei, L., et al., 2019. Study on the contribution of transport to PM2.5 in typical regions of China using the regional air quality model RAMS-CMAQ. Atmospheric Environment. 214, 116856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116856
[28] Cai, J., Ge, Y., Li, H., et al., 2020. Application of land use regression to assess exposure and identify potential sources in PM2.5, BC, NO2 concentrations. Atmospheric Environment. 223, 117267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117267
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Amaury de Souza, Widinei A. Fernandes , Hamilton Germano Pavao, José Francisco de Oliveira Júnior, Ivana Pobocikova, Kelvy Rosalvo Alencar Cardoso

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.




Amaury de Souza