Restoring and Nurturing a Forest Devastated by Wildfires into a Nature Reserve That Qualifies for ASEAN Heritage Site Recognition in Vietnam

Authors

  • Luom Thanh Thai

    Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Kien Giang University, Rach Gia 91000, Vietnam

  • Mo Danh

    Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Kien Giang University, Rach Gia 91000, Vietnam

  • Gieo Hoang Phan

    Forest Science Institute of South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam

  • Quang Thanh Le

    Department of Agriculture and Environment in An Giang Province, Rach Gia 91000, Vietnam

  • Hao Thanh Truong

    Department of Agriculture and Environment in An Giang Province, Rach Gia 91000, Vietnam

  • Bao Manh Ngoc Nguyen

    Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i4.13257
Received: 4 March 2026 | Revised: 26 March 2026 | Accepted: 1 April 2026 | Published Online: 9 July 2026

Abstract

Post-fire restoration of peatland Melaleuca forests is critical for ecosystem recovery and carbon conservation in tropical wetlands. This study evaluates natural regeneration, growth dynamics, peat degradation, and biogeochemical characteristics in U Minh Thuong National Park, Vietnam, over 20 years following a major fire disturbance. Field surveys and peat analyses were conducted across gradients of peat thickness and hydrological conditions. Results show that Melaleuca forests exhibit strong natural regeneration capacity from residual seed banks, following a four-stage successional trajectory: seedling emergence, young stand development (1–3 m), canopy closure within two years (3–4 m), and long-term maturation (~20 years). Forest growth (DBH, height, bole height, and canopy diameter) is significantly influenced by peat thickness, with optimal performance observed in 60–80 cm peat layers, while thinner or hydrologically unstable peat limits growth. Fire disturbance and subsequent water management led to substantial peat and carbon losses. Peat volume declined from 26.77 to 10.74 million m3, corresponding to reductions in peat mass (6.37 to 2.58 million t) and carbon stock (2.68 to 1.09 million t C). Peat and water chemistry varied systematically with peat thickness, with decreasing pH and humic acid, and increasing concentrations of nutrients and ions (SO₄²⁻, NH₄⁺, P₂O₅, total N, K₂O, Fe²⁺). Humic acid showed the strongest correlation with peat thickness, while key chemical variables influenced forest growth. These findings highlight the critical role of peat properties and hydrological management in regulating forest recovery and carbon dynamics in fire-affected peatland ecosystems.

Keywords:

Peatland Restoration; Post-Fire Regeneration; Melaleuca Forest; Forest Succession; Peat Dynamics; Carbon Storage; Hydrology; Ecosystem Recovery; U Minh Thuong National Park

References

[1] Tran, V.T., 2016. U Minh peat swamp forest: Mekong River Basin (Vietnam). In: Finlayson, C.M., Milton, G.R., Prentice, R.C., et al. (eds.). The Wetland Book. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

[2] Thai, L.T., Tran, T.V., Le, K.V., et al., 2024. Peatmass Change and Water Level Influencing Regenerated Melaleuca Forest after a Fire in U Minh Thuong National Park, Vietnam. Sustainability. 16(2), 620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020620

[3] Dinh Thong, V., Van Viet, N., Van Nha, P., et al., 2025. Remarkable records of mammals and conservation status of Sundasciurus hippurus and Macaca fascicularis from U Minh Ha National Park, southern Vietnam. Journal of Science Natural Science. 70(4), 101–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1059.2025-0058

[4] Anh, L.N.T., Diep, N.T.H., Chinh, N.V., et al., 2025. Mapping biomass and carbon reserves of Melaleuca forest (Melaleuca cajuputi Powell) in U Minh Thuong National Park, Kien Giang Province. Electronic Journal of Agriculture and Environment. (17). Available from: https://tapchikhoahoc.nnmt.net.vn/vjae/article/view/370

[5] Nguyen, T.N.T., Huynh, B.A.Q., Nguyen, T.L., et al., 2020. The species composition of fish distributed in surrounding areas of U Minh Thuong and U Minh Ha National Parks. Can Tho University Journal of Science. 56, 185–191.

[6] Vietnam Nature Conservation Center, 2004. U Minh Thuong National Park. In Sourcebook of Existing and Proposed Protected Areas in Vietnam, 2nd ed. Vietnam Nature Conservation Center: Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from: https://thiennhienviet.org.vn/sourcebook/pdf/4%20Mekong%20Delta/U%20Minh%20Thuong.pdf (cited 1 March 2026).

[7] Huat, B.K., 2004. Organic and Peat Soils Engineering. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia: Selangor, Malaysia.

[8] Jauhiainen, J., Takahashi, H., Heikkinen, J.E.P., et al., 2005. Carbon fluxes from a tropical peat swamp forest floor. Global Change Biology. 11, 1788–1797.

[9] Posa, M.R.C., Wijedasa, L.S., Corlett, R.T., 2011. Biodiversity and conservation of tropical peat swamp forests. BioScience. 61, 49–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.10

[10] Page, S.E., Siegert, F., Rieley, J.O., et al., 2002. The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997. Nature. 420, 61–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01131

[11] Girkin, N.T., Cooper, H.V., Ledger, M.J., et al., 2022. Tropical peatlands in the Anthropocene: The present and the future. Anthropocene. 40, 100354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100354

[12] Kuwata, M., 2024. Atmospheric emissions, processes, and impacts of tropical peatland fire haze in Equatorial Asia: A review. Atmospheric Environment. 331, 120575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120575

[13] Harrison, M.E., Ottay, J.B., Cheyne, S.M., et al., 2020. Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: Challenges and directions. People and Nature. 2(1), 4–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10060

[14] Ngo Bieng, M.A., Finegan, B., Sist, P., 2022. Active restoration of secondary and degraded forests in the context of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Forest Ecology and Management. 503, 119770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119770

[15] Dharma, A.B., Marlinda, P., Adianto, A., et al., 2024. The implementation of peat ecosystems in mitigating the disaster of Riau forest fires. E3S Web of Conferences. 506, 08002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450608002

[16] TCVN 14286-2:2024. 2024. Forest Inventory Method – Part 2: Regenerated Tree Layer. Available from: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/TCVN/Nong-nghiep/TCVN-14286-2-2024-Phuong-phap-dieu-tra-rung-Phan-2-Tang-cay-tai-sinh-921593.aspx

[17] Palaghianu, C., 2016. Forest regeneration analysis: Statistical and computational perspectives. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1601.06191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.06191 (in Romanian)

[18] Hooijer, A., Page, S., Canadell, J.G., et al., 2010. Current and future CO₂ emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences. 7(5), 1505–1514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1505-2010

[19] Gytarsky, M., Hiraishi, T., Irving, W., et al., 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/

[20] Ratefinjanahary, I., MacKenzie, R., Sharma, S., et al., 2025. Development of soil organic carbon quantification model and comparison based on CHN analyser, Loss on Ignition, and Walkley-Black methods for mangrove soils in Madagascar. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 317, 109182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109182

[21] Ziegel, E.R., Polhemus, N.W., 2000. Statistical Analysis Using STATGRAPHICS Plus, Volume 2: Quality Control and Experimental Design. Technometrics. 42(3), 323.

[22] Gazzaz, N.M., Yusoff, M.K., Aris, A.Z., et al., 2012. Artificial neural network modeling of the water quality index for Kinta River (Malaysia) using water quality variables as predictors. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 64(11), 2409–2420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.005

[23] Tu, S., Li, C., Shepherd, B.E., 2024. Between- and within-cluster Spearman rank correlations. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2402.11341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.11341

[24] Bao, H., 2009. Statistics in Forestry: Application of Statgraphics Centurion and MS. Tay Nguyen University: Buon Ma Thuot, Vietnam.

[25] Danh, M., Thai, L.T., Ngo, T.V., et al., 2025. Assessing Sustainable Development of Carbon Stock and Melaleuca Forest Growth in U Minh Thuong National Park after Big Fires Vietnam. Research in Ecology. 7(4), 125–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v7i4.10232

[26] Quoi, L.P., Truyen, N.T., Thang, T.V., 2016. Restoration of Peatland Ecosystems and Biodiversity in U Minh Region of Mekong Delta, Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 15th International Peat Congress (IPC 2016), Kuching, Malaysia, 15–19 August 2016. Available from: https://peatlands.org/assets/uploads/2019/06/ipc16p445-450a325quoi.truyen.etal_.pdf

[27] Johnstone, J.F., Allen, C.D., Franklin, J.F., et al., 2016. Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 14(7), 369–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1311

[28] Turner, M., Baker, W., Peterson, C., et al., 1999. Factors Influencing Succession: Lessons from Large, Infrequent Natural Disturbances. Ecosystems. 1, 511–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900047

[29] Page, S.E., Rieley, J.O., BanksS, C.J., 2011. Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Global Change Biology. 17(2), 798–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.x

[30] Brady, N.C., Weil, R.R., 2016. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed. Pearson: New York, NY, USA.

[31] Giesen, W., 2015. Utilising non-timber forest products to conserve Indonesia’s peat swamp forests and reduce carbon emissions. Journal of Indonesian Natural History. 3(2), 17–24.

[32] Wösten, J.H.M., Clymans, E., Page, S.E., et al., 2008. Peat–water interrelationships in a tropical peatland ecosystem in Southeast Asia. Catena. 73(2), 212–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.07.010

[33] Turetsky, M.R., Kane, E.S., Harden, J.W., et al., 2011. Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands. Nature Geoscience. 4(1), 27–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1027

[34] Smith, S.M., Newman, S., Garrett, P.B., et al., 2001. Differential Effects of Surface and Peat Fire on Soil Constituents in a Degraded Wetland of the Northern Florida Everglades. Journal of Environmental Quality. 30(6), 1998–2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.1998

[35] Jiang, D., Nie, T., Yan, J., et al., 2025. Restoration type determines synchronic recovery of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in mangrove wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management. 385, 125658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125658

[36] Quan, Q., Zhou, J., Hanson, P.J., et al., 2025. Drought-induced peatland carbon loss exacerbated by elevated CO₂ and warming. Science. 390(6771), 367–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adv7104

[37] Kasischke, E.S., Verbyla, D.L., Rupp, T.S., et al., 2010. Alaska’s changing fire regime — implications for the vulnerability of its boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 40(7), 1313–1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-098

[38] Austin, K.G., Elsen, P.R., Honorio Coronado, E.N., et al., 2025. Mismatch Between Global Importance of Peatlands and the Extent of Their Protection. Conservation Letters. 18(1), e13080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13080

[39] Gorham, E., 1991. Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. Ecological Applications. 1(2), 182–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941811

Downloads

How to Cite

Thai, L. T., Danh, M., Phan, G. H., Le, Q. T., Truong, H. T., & Nguyen, B. M. N. (2026). Restoring and Nurturing a Forest Devastated by Wildfires into a Nature Reserve That Qualifies for ASEAN Heritage Site Recognition in Vietnam. Research in Ecology, 8(4), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i4.13257