Forage Nutrient Fluctuations During the Dry Season: A Case Study of Tropical Grazing Land in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

Authors

  • Grace Maranatha

    Faculty of Animal Science, Marine and Fisheries, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang 85228, Indonesia
  • Putri Pandarangga

    Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang 85228, Indonesia
  • Yohanis Umbu Laiya Sobang

    Faculty of Animal Science, Marine and Fisheries, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang 85228, Indonesia
  • Fredeicus Dedy Samba

    Faculty of Animal Science, Marine and Fisheries, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang 85228, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v7i4.9954
Received: 15 May 2025 | Revised: 26 May 2025 | Accepted: 4 June 2025 | Published Online: 3 September 2025

Abstract

Natural grazing land plays a crucial role in extensive ruminant livestock systems, especially in semi-arid tropical regions such as East Nusa Tenggara (ENT), Indonesia. The availability and quality of forage during the dry season present significant challenges. This study aimed to identify variations in grass species composition and fluctuations in forage nutritional content in natural grazing lands of ENT during the dry season (July–October 2024). Sampling was conducted in four sub-districts: two representing lowland zones and two representing highland zones. In each sub-district, four grazing fields were selected, and ten plots were sampled per grazing field, totaling 160 sampling plots. Species identification and nutrient analysis included crude protein, crude fiber, energy content, and protein-energy ratio. Statistical analyses using ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test were performed to evaluate significant differences in nutritional parameters across months and zones. Dominant species identified were Themeda arguens, Heteropogon contortus, Brachiaria decumbens, Ischaemum timorense, Cynodon dactylon, and Pennisetum clandestinum. Results showed significant monthly fluctuations in crude protein and fiber contents (p < 0.05), with protein levels decreasing from July (9.31 ± 2.66%) to October (7.53 ± 3.10%). Energy content and protein-energy ratio also varied significantly across the dry season. A monthly shift in dominant grass species composition was observed, influenced by environmental conditions and species adaptability. The protein-energy ratio of forage remained below optimal levels throughout the dry season, potentially limiting livestock productivity. These findings provide important scientific insights for developing climate-resilient feeding strategies and support policy formulation for sustainable tropical livestock farming in semi-arid regions.

Keywords:

Dry Season; Forage; Nutrient Fluctuations; Tropical Grazing Land; East Nusa Tenggara

References

[1] Cheng, M., McCarl, B., Fei, C., 2022. Climate change and livestock production: A literature review. Atmosphere. 13(1), 140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010140

[2] Kelly, A.E., Goulden, M.L., 2008. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105(33), 11823–11826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802891105

[3] Viciedo, D.O., Prado, R. de M., Martínez, C.A., et al., 2019. Short-term warming and water stress affect Panicum maximum Jacq. stoichiometric homeostasis and biomass production. Science of The Total Environment. 681, 267–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.108

[4] Bita, C.E., Gerats, T., 2013. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 4, 273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273

[5] Feller, U., Vaseva, I.I., 2014. Extreme climatic events: Impacts of drought and high temperature on physiological processes in agronomically important plants. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2, 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00039

[6] Noguerol, R.M., Pérez, A.J.M., Pedroche, J., et al., 2023. Climate change alters pasture productivity and quality: Impact on fatty acids and amino acids in Mediterranean silvopastoral ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 358, 108703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108703

[7] Calcerrada, J.R., Chano, V., Matías, L., et al., 2022. Three years of warming and rainfall reduction alter leaf physiology but not relative abundance of an annual species in a Mediterranean savanna. Journal of Plant Physiology. 275, 153761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153761

[8] Muzzo, B.I., Ramsey, R.D., Villalba, J.J., 2025. Changes in climate and their implications for cattle nutrition and management. Climate. 13(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13010001

[9] Lourenço, M., Van Ranst, G., De Smet, S., et al., 2007. Effect of grazing pastures with different botanical composition by lambs on rumen fatty acid metabolism and fatty acid pattern of longissimus muscle and subcutaneous fat. Animal. 1(4), 537–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107703531

[10] Wintle, B., Moore, G., Nichols, P., 2009. Identifying sub-tropical grass seedlings. Bulletin 4775. Available from: https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/bulletins/199 (cited 15 May 2025).

[11] Elejalde, D., Nabinger, C., Cadenazzi, M., et al., 2012. Quality of the forage apparently consumed by beef calves in natural grassland under fertilization and oversown with cool season forage species. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science. 41, 1360–1368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000600007

[12] AOAC, 2010. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

[13] Hogan, J., 1996. Principles of supplementary feeding. In: Bakrie, B., Hogan, J., Liang, J.B., et al. (eds.). Ruminant Nutrition and Production in the Tropics and Subtropics. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra, Australia. pp. 66–73.

[14] Carrascosa, A., Moreno, G., Rodrigo, S., et al., 2024. Unravelling the contribution of soil, climate and management to the productivity of ecologically intensified Mediterranean wood pastures. Science of The Total Environment. 957, 177575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177575

[15] Fang, Y., Wan, L., Tong, J., et al., 2025. Hydrothermal conditions dominated sensitivity and lag effect of grassland productivity in Yunnan Province, China: Implications for climate change. Agricultural Water Management. 308, 109293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109293

[16] Maestre, F.T., Bagousse-Pinguet, Y.L., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., et al., 2022. Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands. Science. 378, 915–920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq4062

[17] Venter, Z.S., Cramer, M.D., Hawkins, H.J., 2019. Rotational grazing management has little effect on remotely-sensed vegetation characteristics across farm fence-line contrasts. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 282, 40–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.05.019

[18] Casale, F., Bocchiola, D., 2022. Climate change effects upon pasture in the Alps: The case of Valtellina Valley, Italy. Climate. 10, 173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10110173

[19] Huber, R., Briner, S., Peringer, A., et al., 2013. Modeling social-ecological feedback effects in the implementation of payments for environmental services in pasture-woodlands. Ecology and Society. 18, 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05487-180241

[20] Briner, S., Elkin, C., Huber, R., 2013. Evaluating the relative impact of climate and economic changes on forest and agricultural ecosystem services in mountain regions. Journal of Environmental Management. 129, 414–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.018

[21] Dibari, C., Costafreda-Aumedes, S., Argenti, G., et al., 2020. Expected changes to alpine pastures in extent and composition under future climate conditions. Agronomy. 10, 926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070926

[22] Elgersma, A., Tamminga, S., Ellen, G., 2006. Modifying milk composition through forage. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 131, 207–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.06.012

[23] Glasser, F., Doreau, M., Maxin, G., et al., 2013. Fat and fatty acid content and composition of forages: A meta-analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 185, 19–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.06.010

[24] Su, M., Chen, D., Zhou, J., et al., 2022. Effects of different dietary carbohydrate sources on the meat quality and flavor substances of Xiangxi Yellow Cattle. Animals. 12, 1136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091136

[25] Wu, G., Bazer, F.W., Dai, Z., et al., 2014. Amino acid nutrition in animals: Protein synthesis and beyond. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2, 387–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114113

[26] Habermann, E., Oliveira, D.E.A., Delvecchio, G., et al., 2021. How does leaf physiological acclimation impact forage production and quality of a warmed managed pasture of Stylosanthes capitata under different conditions of soil water availability? Science of The Total Environment. 759, 143505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143505

[27] Hart, E.H., Christofides, S.R., Davies, T.E., et al., 2022. Forage grass growth under future climate change scenarios affects fermentation and ruminant efficiency. Scientific Reports. 12, 4454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08309-7

[28] Deak, A., Hall, M.H., Sanderson, M.A., et al., 2007. Production and nutritive value of grazed simple and complex forage mixtures. Agronomy Journal. 99, 814–821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0166

[29] Li, C., Peng, F., Xue, X., et al., 2018. Productivity and quality of alpine grassland vary with soil water availability under experimental warming. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, 1790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01790

[30] Dumont, B., Andueza, D., Niderkorn, V., et al., 2015. A meta-analysis of climate change effects on forage quality in grasslands: Specificities of mountain and Mediterranean areas. Grass and Forage Science. 70, 239–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12169

[31] Silva, J., Cabral, L., Sousa, D., et al., 2017. Supplementation levels for non-lactating cows grazing during the rainy season. Semina Ciências Agrárias. 38(2), 885–894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p885

[32] Silva, M., Silva, D., Magalhães, A., et al., 2017. Influence of the period of year on the chemical composition and digestibility of pasture and fodder selected by goats in caatinga. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 18, 402–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402017000300001

[33] Lazzarini, I., Detmann, E., Valadares, S., et al., 2016. Nutritional performance of cattle grazing during rainy season with nitrogen and starch supplementation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 29, 1120–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0514

[34] Thompson, L.R., Rowntree, J.E., 2020. Invited review: Methane sources, quantification, and mitigation in grazing beef systems. Applied Animal Science. 36, 556–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2019-01951

[35] Serrano, J., Shahidian, S., Da Silva, J.M., 2018. Monitoring seasonal pasture quality degradation in the Mediterranean Montado ecosystem: Proximal versus remote sensing. Water. 10, 1422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101422

[36] Adar, S., Sternberg, M., Argaman, E., et al., 2023. Testing a novel pasture quality index using remote sensing tools in semiarid and Mediterranean grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 357, 108674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108674

[37] Whittington, H.R., Tilman, D., Wragg, P.D., et al., 2015. Phenological responses of prairie plants vary among species and year in a three-year experimental warming study. Ecosphere. 6, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00070.1

[38] Valencia, E., Mendez, M., Saavedra, N., et al., 2016. Plant size and leaf area influence phenological and reproductive responses to warming in a semiarid Mediterranean species. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 21, 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2016.05.003

[39] Guo, L., Liu X., Alatalo, J.M., Wang, C., et al., 2023. Climatic drivers and ecological implications of variation in the time interval between leaf-out and flowering. Current Biology. 33, 3338-3349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.064

[40] Jochum, G.M., Mudge, K.W., Thomas, R.B., 2007. Elevated temperatures increase leaf senescence and root secondary metabolite concentrations in the understory herb Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae). American Journal of Botany. 94, 819–826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.5.819

[41] Feller, U., 2016. Drought stress and carbon assimilation in a warming climate: Reversible and irreversible impacts. Journal of Plant Physiology. 203, 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2016.04.002

[42] Zeiter, M., Schärer, S., Zweifel, R., et al., 2016. Timing of extreme drought modifies reproductive output in semi-natural grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science. 27, 238–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12362

[43] Scafaro, A.P., Fan, Y., Posch, B.C., et al., 2021. Responses of leaf respiration to heatwaves. Plant, Cell & Environment. 44, 2090–2101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14018

[44] Avci, M., Hatipoglu, R., Çinar, S., et al., 2017. Assessment of yield and quality characteristics of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars with different fall dormancy rating. Legume Research. 41(3), 369–373. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18805/LR-364

[45] Lee, M.A., 2018. A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments. Journal of Plant Research. 131, 641–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1024-y

[46] Peeters, A., 2009. Importance, evolution, environmental impact and future challenges of grasslands and grassland-based systems in Europe. Grassland Science. 55, 113–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2009.00154.x

[47] Henkin, Z., Ungar, E.D., Dvash, L., et al., 2011. Effects of cattle grazing on herbage quality in a herbaceous Mediterranean rangeland. Grass and Forage Science. 66, 516–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00808.x

[48] Miao, F., Guo, Z., Xue, R., et al., 2015. Effects of grazing and precipitation on herbage biomass, herbage nutritive value, and yak performance in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. PLoS ONE. 10, e0127275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127275

[49] Tuturoong, R.A.V., Malalantang, S.S., Moningkey, S.A.E., 2020. Assessment of the nutritive value of corn stover and king grass in complete feed on Ongole steer calves productivity. Veterinary World. 13, 801–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.801-806

[50] Guerra, G., Becquer, T., Vendrame, P., et al., 2019. Nutritional evaluation of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu cultivated in soils developed from basalt and sandstone in the state of Paraná. Semina Ciências Agrárias. 40, 469–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n1p469

[51] Weiss, W., Tebbe, A., 2019. Estimating digestible energy values of feed and diets and integrating those values into net energy systems. Translational Animal Science. 3(3), 953–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy119

[52] Costa, P., Junqueira, S., Leonel, F., et al., 2012. Intercropping of corn, Brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: Productivity, quality and composition of silages. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science. 41, 2144–2149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012001000002

[53] Reddy, B.V.S., Reddy, P.S., Bidinger, F., et al., 2003. Crop management factors influencing yield and quality of crop residues. Field Crops Research. 84, 57–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00141-2

[54] Fariaszewska, A., Aper, J., Van Huylenbroeck, J., et al., 2017. Mild drought stress-induced changes in yield, physiological processes and chemical composition in Festuca, Lolium and Festulolium. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 203, 103–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12168

[55] Xu, Z., Heuschele, D.J., Lamb, J.F.S., et al., 2023. Improved forage quality in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) via selection for increased stem fiber digestibility. Agronomy. 13, 770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030770

[56] Poppi, D.P., Quigley, S., Da STACC., et al., 2018. Challenges of beef cattle production from tropical pastures. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720160419

[57] Delevatti, L.M., Cardoso, A.S., Barbero, R.P., et al., 2019. Effect of nitrogen application rate on yield, forage quality, and animal performance in a tropical pasture. Scientific Reports. 9, 7596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44138-x

Downloads

How to Cite

Maranatha, G., Pandarangga, P., Sobang, Y. U. L., & Samba, F. D. (2025). Forage Nutrient Fluctuations During the Dry Season: A Case Study of Tropical Grazing Land in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Research in Ecology, 7(4), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v7i4.9954

Issue

Vol. 7, Iss. 4 (October 2025)(in progress)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Grace Maranatha, Putri Pandarangga, Yohanis Umbu Laiya Sobang, Fredeicus Dedy Samba

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC