The System of Mythical Symbols in The Cognitive Layer of a Literary Text

Authors

  • Yesbol Sultan

    Department of Kazakh Literature, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan

  • Zhumagul Sagymbai

    Department of Kazakh Literature, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan

  • Saulesh Aituganova

    Department of Kazakh Literature, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10194
Received: 30 May 2025 | Revised: 13 June 2025 | Accepted: 24 June 2025 | Published Online: 22 July 2025

Abstract

This article explores the role of mythical symbols in shaping the cognitive layer of a literary text, using D. Ramazan’s short story “The Elder and the White Serpent” as a case study. Mythical symbols such as “serpent,” “water,” “elder,” and “dream” are examined not merely as artistic devices but as elements that reflect cultural memory, traditional worldviews, and cognitive frameworks. These symbols, deeply rooted in Kazakh mythology, serve as semiotic signs that encode collective knowledge and influence the reader’s interpretive process. By engaging with symbolic structures, the narrative activates culturally shared schemas, enhancing its conceptual depth. The study employs a combination of semiotic, cognitive, and intertextual analysis to reveal how these mythological elements contribute to the semantic richness of the text. The serpent is interpreted as a sacred figure associated with wisdom and protection; water is viewed as a life-giving and purifying force; the elder symbolizes ancestral knowledge; and dreams function as cognitive messages or blessings. Each symbol creates connections with cultural prototypes and intertextual sources, thereby enriching the cognitive experience of the reader. The article emphasizes that the cognitive layer of literature is constructed through symbolic encodings, which stimulate associative thinking and emotional engagement. Mythological symbols act as dynamic units that transform abstract concepts into tangible meanings. By investigating the symbolic systems embedded in the literary text, this study demonstrates how cultural and cognitive layers are intertwined, shaping both authorial intention and reader perception. Ultimately, the research highlights the relevance of cognitive literary studies in understanding the interplay between myth, language, and thought.

Keywords:

Mythical Symbol; Semiotics; Cognitive Layer; Mythological Consciousness; Cognitive Literary Studies

References

[1] Losev, A., 1976. The Problem of the Symbol and Realist Art. Iskusstvo: Moscow, Russia.

[2] Kaskabasov, S., 2002. Spiritual Nourishment. Audarma: Astana, Kazakhstan.

[3] Barthes, R., 1972. Mythologies. Hill and Wang: New York, NY, USA.

[4] Frye, N., 1982. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: New York, NY, USA.

[5] Campbell, J., 1949. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

[6] Zhumaliev, Q., 1960. Issues of Kazakh Literary History and the Language of Abai's Poetry. State Publisher of Kazakh Literature: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[7] Baitursynuly, A., 2003. Literary Theory: Studies and Poems. Atamura: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[8] Dzhusupov, N., 2011. Turkic Symbol in Literary Text (Linguocognitive Aspect). Saryarka: Astana, Kazakhstan.

[9] Eco, U., 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA.

[10] Chandler, D., 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. Routledge: London, UK.

[11] Musaly, Z., 2015. Symbolic Representation and Its Artistic Function. An Arys: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[12] Aĭmukhambet, Z., Karakhankyzy, U., 2019. Metamythic Symbolism in Text Structures. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov ENU. Philology Series. (1), 7–13.

[13] Eliade, M., 1963. Myth and Reality. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA.

[14] Akhmetova, A., 2019. The Conceptual History in Literary Studies. KazNPU Bulletin. Philology Series. (2), 225–232.

[15] Barthes, R., 1977. Image–Music–Text (Heath, S., Trans.). Fontana Press: London, UK.

[16] Cassirer, E., 1944. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA.

[17] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

[18] Lotman, Y., 1977. The Structure of the Artistic Text. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

[19] Tsur, R., 1992. What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive? Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA.

[20] Turner, M., 1991. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

[21] Lozinskaya, E., 2010. Cognitive Literary Studies: Authors, Methods, Perspectives. Man: Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects. (1), 192–225.

[22] Aksenova, N.S., 2013. Intertextuality in Sacred-Mystical Texts as a Linguistic Phenomenon of Cross-Cultural Dialogue. MGOU Press: Moscow, Russia.

[23] Barthes, R., 2007. From Work to Text. Iskusstvo: Moscow, Russia.

[24] Kartaeva, T., 2018. The Cult of Water: A Reference Book. Kazakh University Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[25] Kondybay, S., 2004. Proto-Kazakh Mythology. Daik-Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[26] Rosch, E., 1975. Cognitive Reference Points. Cognitive Psychology. 7(4), 532–547.

[27] Herman, D., 2003. Stories as a Tool for Thinking. Center for the Study of Language and Information: Stanford, CA, USA.

Downloads

How to Cite

Sultan, Y., Sagymbai, Z., & Aituganova, S. (2025). The System of Mythical Symbols in The Cognitive Layer of a Literary Text. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10194