Motivational Mechanisms and Semantic Structures of Polysemous Nominal Nouns in the Kazakh Language

Authors

  • Marina Maretbayeva

    Languages Development Center, NC JSC Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan

  • Anarkul Salkynbay

    Department of Kazakh Linguistics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan

  • Olga Sorokina

    Languages Development Center, NC JSC Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan

  • Tatyana Kabush

    Languages Development Center, NC JSC Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan

  • Dilnara Kassymova

    Multidisciplinary Education Center, SDU University, Kaskelen 040900, Kazakhstan

  • Guncham Nurakhunova

    Multidisciplinary Education Center, SDU University, Kaskelen 040900, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10199
Received: 30 May 2025 | Revised: 13 June 2025 | Accepted: 17 June 2025 | Published Online: 15 July 2025

Abstract

This study explores the polysemous nature of nominal nouns in the Kazakh language through an in-depth examination of their semantic structure and motivational mechanisms. By focusing on both primary and secondary meanings of lexemes, the research classifies polysemy into several distinct types — namely, derived, figurative, dialectal, and terminological — based on linguistic, ethnolinguistic, and cultural factors. While polysemy is a cross-linguistic phenomenon, its nationally specific characteristics and culturally embedded motivations in Kazakh offer a unique perspective for cognitive-semantic interpretation. The paper applies a combination of componential, etymological, and ethnolinguistic analyses to examine how lexical meanings evolve from core referents to metaphorical and context-dependent interpretations. Findings reveal that Kazakh polysemous nouns are shaped by formal, functional, material, spatial, and associative motivations. Furthermore, motivational chains exhibit varying levels of complexity: simple, parallel, sequential, and parallel-sequential models are observed across examples. The study provides a typology of semantic shifts, highlighting intricate relationships among lexical meanings from both diachronic and synchronic perspectives. Ultimately, the research demonstrates that polysemy in Kazakh is not merely a linguistic phenomenon but also a cognitive and cultural one, deeply embedded in the worldview and lived experience of its speakers. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of semantic derivation and nomination theory within Turkic linguistics.

Keywords:

Polysemy; Nominal Noun; Motivations; Semantic Structures; Secondary Meanings; Kazakh Language

References

[1] Abaev, V.I., 1957. On the presentation of homonyms in a dictionary. Questions of Linguistics. (3), 31–43.

[2] Ufimtseva, A.A., Aznaurova, E.S., Teliya, V.N., et al., 2019. Linguistic Nomination: Types of Naming, Reprint. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. pp. 7–98.

[3] Gak, V.G., 1971. On the problem of the epistemological aspects of word semantics. In: Ministry of Higher and Secondary Special Education of the USSR, Moscow State Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages (eds.). Issues of Describing the Lexical and Grammatical System of Language, Part 1. Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia. pp. 17–24.

[4] Gak, V.G., 1976. On the Dialectics of Semantic Relations in Language. In: Editorial Board of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (ed.). Principles and Methods of Semantic Research. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. pp. 45–56.

[5] Serebrennikov, B.A., Ufimtseva, A.A. (eds.), 1977. Linguistic Nomination: Types of Naming. Nauka: Moscow, Russia.

[6] Zvengentsev, V.A., 1957. Semasiology. Moscow State University Press: Moscow, Russia.

[7] Alpatov, V.M., 2001. History of Linguistic Doctrines: A Textbook, 3rd ed. Languages of Slavic Culture: Moscow, Russia.

[8] Karlinsky, A.E., 2007. Selected Works on Language Theory and Linguodidactics. Kantana-Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[9] Karlinsky, A.E., 2009. Methodology and Paradigms of Modern Linguistics. Kantana-Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[10] Levitsky, Yu.A., 2005. History of Linguistic Doctrines: A Textbook. Vysshaya Shkola: Moscow, Russia.

[11] Stepanov, Yu.S., 2009. Methods and Principles of Modern Linguistics, 7th ed. Librocom Publishing House: Moscow, Russia.

[12] Zubkova, N.G., 2015. The Evolution of Concepts about Language. Languages of Slavic Culture: Moscow, Russia.

[13] Sharapatuly, Sh., 2011. Semantic Derivation of Turkic Vocabulary. Kantana-Press: Astana, Kazakhstan. pp. 18–44.

[14] Orazov, M., 1983. Semantics of the Kazakh Verb: An Attempt at Semantic Classification [PhD thesis]. Institute of Linguistics: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 63–78.

[15] Zhanuzakov, T. (ed.), 2008. Explanatory Dictionary of the Kazakh Language. Daik-Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[16] Kandalaki, T.L., 1977. Semantics and Motivation of Terms. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. p. 111.

[17] Sadykbekov, R., 1972. Problems of Polysemy in the Kazakh Language [PhD thesis]. S.M. Kirov Kazakh State University: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 5–15.

[18] Katznelson, S.D., 1986. General and Typological Linguistics. Nauka: Leningrad, Russia. p. 49.

[19] Beloshapkova, V.A. (ed.), 1989. Modern Russian Language. Moscow, Russia. pp. 171–205.

[20] Landiel, L., 1972. Figurative meaning and imaginative usage. In: Apresyan, Y.D. (ed.). Lexicology and Lexicography. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. pp. 58–60.

[21] Elubay, S., 2004. Oysylkara. Raritet: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[22] Klychkov, G.S., 1961. Meaning and polysemy of the word. In: Dektereva, T.A. (ed.). Laws of Semantic Development in Language. Publishing House of the Higher Party School and Academy of Social Sciences under the CPSU Central Committee: Moscow, Russia. pp. 100–120.

[23] Atabaeva, M.S., 1985. The Dialectal Meaning of the Word in the Kazakh Language [PhD thesis]. Abai Kazakh Pedagogical Institute: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 16.

Downloads

How to Cite

Maretbayeva, M., Salkynbay, A., Sorokina, O., Kabush, T., Kassymova, D., & Nurakhunova, G. (2025). Motivational Mechanisms and Semantic Structures of Polysemous Nominal Nouns in the Kazakh Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10199