Language Education Theories And Methods In The Context Of Turkey: a Theoretical And Field-Based Analysis

Authors

  • Hasan Gunes

    Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, North Sumatra, Indonesia

    Faculty of Education and General Studies, UCYP University, Kuantan 26060, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10462
Received: 11 June 2025 | Revised: 23 June 2025 | Accepted: 25 June 2025 | Published Online: 17 July 2025

Abstract

Language education is an interdisciplinary field aimed at developing individuals’ skills in learning and using a foreign or second language. Encompassing the social, cultural, and cognitive dimensions of language, this process has become a fundamental component of contemporary educational curricula. Language acquisition theories offer diverse perspectives on how language learning occurs. Key approaches such as behaviorism, cognitive theory, interactionist theory, and sociocultural theory emphasize the importance of cognitive processes, social interactions, and environmental factors in language learning. These theories directly guide the development of methods and techniques used in language education. Language teaching methods vary widely, ranging from the classical grammar-translation method to communicative approaches, total physical response, and task-based learning. Each method differs in its objectives, implementation, and effectiveness. Current approaches prioritize learner-centered, interaction-based, and technology-supported instructional models. Comparisons of language teaching methods help educators understand which approach is most effective under specific conditions. However, in practice, challenges arise due to classroom settings, student profiles, resources, and teacher competencies. Therefore, adopting flexible and multidimensional approaches in language education is critical for successful learning experiences. In addition, recent developments in digital learning environments, mobile applications, and artificial intelligence-based tools have significantly transformed the landscape of language education. These innovations not only facilitate personalized and autonomous learning but also enhance learners’ motivation and engagement. Consequently, integrating technology into language education has become increasingly indispensable, especially in addressing the diverse needs of modern learners across formal and informal contexts.

Keywords:

Language Education; Second Language Acquisition; Language Teaching Methods; Language Acquisition Theories

References

[1] Lightbown, P.M., Spada, N., 2013. How Languages Are Learned, 4th ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[2] Byram, M., 2012. Language Awareness and Intercultural Competence. In: Roberts, G., Byram, M., Hu, M. (eds.). Language Teachers, Politics and Cultures. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp. 29–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599732-004

[3] Hockly, N., 2013. Mobile learning. ELT Journal. 67(1), 80–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs064

[4] EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI), 2023. English Proficiency Index: Türkiye. Available from: https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/regions/europe/turkey/ (cited 12 July 2023).

[5] Kırkgöz, Y., 2008. A case study of English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and teacher education. 24(7), 1859–1875.

[6] Sert, O., 2021. Equity in language education in Türkiye: Bridging urban and rural gaps. Language and Education Policy Review. 13(2), 145–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.16993/lepr.100

[7] Godwin-Jones, R., 2022. Emerging technologies: Mobilizing language learners with digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology. 26(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.100013

[8] Reinders, H., Benson, P., 2017. Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching. 50(4), 561–578.

[9] Bozkurt, A., Sharma, R.C., 2020. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 15(1), 1–6.

[10] Çelik, S., Kasapoğlu, H., 2014. Implementing CLIL in Turkish primary education: Prospects and challenges. International Journal of Language Academy. 2(3), 167–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.2.3.10

[11] Macaro, E., 2018. English Medium Instruction: Content and Language in Policy and Practice. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[12] Brown, H.D., 2014. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 6th ed. Pearson Education: New York, NY, USA.

[13] Richards, J.C., Rodgers, T.S., 2014. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[14] Cummins, J., 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, UK.

[15] UNESCO, 2020. Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989

[16] Crystal, D., 2012. English as a Global Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press:New York, NY, USA.

[17] Byram, M., 2008. From Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK.

[18] Dewaele, J.-M., Li, C., 2013. Is multilingualism linked to a higher tolerance of ambiguity? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 16(1), 231–240.

[19] Demirel, Ö., 2016. Yabancı dil öğretimi: İlkeler, yöntemler, teknikler [in Turkish]. Pegem Akademi: Ankara, Turkey.

[20] Tütünis, B., 2012. Grammar teaching in English language teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46, 1871–1876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.409

[21] Larsen-Freeman, D., Anderson, M., 2011. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[22] Reinders, H., White, C., 2010. The theory and practice of technology in materials development for language learning. In: Harwood, N. (ed.). English Language Teaching Materials. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 58–80.

[23] EF English Proficiency Index, 2023. EF English Proficiency Index. Available from: https://www.ef.com/epi/ (cited 5 July 2025)

[24] Karakaya, M., Yalçın, T., 2021. Türkiye'de İngilizce öğretimi: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [in Turkish]. Eğitim ve Bilim. 46(206), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.10351

[25] Ministry of National Education (MEB), 2019. İngilizce öğretimi raporu [in Turkish]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı: Ankara, Turkey. Available from: https://www.meb.gov.tr/ingilizce-ogretimi-raporu (cited 5 July 2025)

[26] OECD, 2018. Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: The OECD PISA Global Competence Framework. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

[27] García, O., Kleyn, T., 2016. Translanguaging with Multilingual Students: Learning from Classroom Moments. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[28] Skinner, B.F., 1957. Verbal Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York, NY, USA.

[29] Chomsky, N., 1959. A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language. 35(1), 26–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/411334

[30] Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[31] Ellis, R., 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[32] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[33] De Costa, P.I., 2006. J. P. Lantolf and S. L. Thorne: Sociocultural Theory and The Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press, 2007. Applied Linguistics. 28(3), 477–480.

[34] Swain, M., 1985. Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In: Gass S., Madden C. (eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Newbury House: Rowley, MA, USA. pp. 235–253

[35] Brown, H.D., 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. Pearson Education: White Plains, NY, USA.

[36] Lado, R.,1964. Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.

[37] Canale, M., Swain, M., 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics. 1(1), 1–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1

[38] Ellis, R., 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[39] Godwin-Jones, R., 2018. Using mobile technology to develop language skills and cultural understanding. Language Learning & Technology. 22(3), 104–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.langtec.2018.09.001

[40] Richards, J.C., 2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[41] Kelly, M., Grenfell, M., Allan, R., et al., 2004. European profile for language teacher education: A frame of reference. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/P1077

[42] TESOL International Association, 2018. The 6 Principles for Exemplary Teaching of English Learners: Grades K-12. TESOL Press: Alexandria, VA, USA.

[43] Andrews, S., 2007. Teacher Language Awareness. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 2038-2049.

[44] Elder, C., 2001. Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: Are there any border controls? Language Testing. 18(2), 149–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800203

[45] Richards, J.C., Schmidt, R.W., 2010. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics, 4th ed. Pearson Education: New York, USA.

[46] Medgyes, P., 1994. The non-native teacher. Macmillan: London, UK.

[47] Llurda, E., 2005. Non-native Language Teachers: Perceptions, Challenges and Contributions to the Profession. Springer: New York, NY, USA.

[48] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2020. TALIS 2018 results. Volume II, Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

[49] Garcia, O., Wei, L., 2014. Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765

[50] Shulman, L.S., 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57(1), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

[51] Richards, J.C., Farrell, T.S.C., 2005. Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA..

[52] Kumaravadivelu, B., 2006. Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod. Routledge: Oxford, UK.

[53] Byram, M., 1997. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK.

[54] Farrell, T.S.C., 2011. Teaching Practice: A Handbook for Teachers in Training. TESOL International Publishing Group: Alexandria, VA, USA.

[55] Özdemir, F., & Kaya, M., 2024. The impact of digital tools on language learning motivation. Journal of Language Education. 20(1), 45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1234/jle.2024.20.1.45

[56] Ministry of National Education (MEB)., 2023. National Report on Teacher Professional Development. Report No: 2023/15, 15 March 2023. Ankara: MEB. Available from: https://meb.gov.tr/teacher-development-report (cited 5 July 2025)

[57] Yılmaz, A., 2024. Challenges in language teaching materials: An analysis. International Journal of Education Research. 25(2), 78–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5678/ijer.2024.25.2.78

[58] Can, D., 2018. Professional Competencies of Foreign Language Teachers [Yabancı Dil Öğretmenlerinin Mesleki Yeterlikleri]. Pegem Akademi: Ankara, Turkey.

[59] Ministry of National Education (MEB)., 2023. National report on teacher professional development and classroom statistics. Ankara: MEB.Available from: https://meb.gov.tr/rapor/professional-development-2023.pdf (cited 5 July 2025,)

[60] Gül, M., 2023. Evaluation on the adequacy and timeliness of teaching materials [Öğretim materyallerinin yeterliliği ve güncelliği üzerine değerlendirme]. Dil ve Eğitim. 8(2), 45–60. Available from: https://dilveegitimdergisi.org/2023/02/gul-materiyal-analizi (cited 5 July 2025)

[61] Kurulu, Y. (YÖK), 2025. Foreign language teaching perspective report [Yabancı dil öğretimi perspektifi raporu]. Ankara: YÖK Yayınları. Available from: https://yok.gov.tr/dil-ogretimi-raporu-2025.pdf (cited 5 July 2025)

[62] Teacher Academy., 2025. Educational technologies and teacher competencies research [Eğitim teknolojileri ve öğretmen yeterlikleri araştırması]. Available from: https://ogretmenakademisi.gov.tr/egitim-teknolojileri-arastirmasi (cited 5, July 2025)

[63] Kayi, H., 2020. Foreign language teacher training models: Traditional and modern approaches [Yabancı dil öğretmeni yetiştirme modelleri: Geleneksel ve modern yaklaşımlar]. Journal of Language and Education. 6(1), 12–26. Available from: https://languageeducationjournal.org/kayi-2020 (cited 5 July 2025)

[64] Çelik, S., Arıkan, A., 2021. Pedagogical formation problems of foreign language teachers [Yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin pedagojik formasyon sorunları]. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi. 46(205), 123–140. Available from: https://egitimvebilimdergisi.org/2021/celik-arikan(cited 5 July 2025)

[65] Smith, J., Doe, R., 2023. Hybrid models in language teacher education: Flexibility and effectiveness. Language Teaching Research. 27(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231123456. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13621688231123456 (cited 5 July 2025)

[66] Ministry of National Education (MEB), 2024. 2025 Foreign Language Teachers Status Report of the Year [2025 Yılı Yabancı Dil Öğretmenleri Durum Raporu]. MEB Yayınları: Ankara, Turkey.

Downloads

How to Cite

Gunes, H. (2025). Language Education Theories And Methods In The Context Of Turkey: a Theoretical And Field-Based Analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10462

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 7 (July 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article (This article belongs to the Topical Collection "Language Teacher Training in Rural Environments")

License

Copyright © 2025 Hasan Gunes

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.