The Influence of Courtroom Discourse on Public Perception through Mass Media

Authors

  • Gulzat Kussepova

    Department of Theory and Practice of Foreign Languages, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
  • Lazzat Kussepova

    Department of Artificial Intelligence Technologies, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
  • Gulshat Beysembaeva

    Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
  • Sholpan Aktanova

    Department of Theory and Practice of Foreign Languages, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.10466
Received: 11 June 2025 | Revised: 25 June 2025 | Accepted: 1 July 2025 | Published Online: 22 August 2025

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to conduct a perceptual analysis of news reports among multilingual respondents (159 participants) to identify how prosodic features (e.g., intonation, tempo, pauses, and emphasis) affect listeners' perception of news reports, which words participants mentioned, and the extent to which these words relate to legal terminology. The research methodology comprised the selection of news items, preparation of an information letter and consent form, survey development, participant selection, survey administration, as well as qualitative and quantitative data analysis and comparative descriptive analysis of the results. The analysis revealed significant differences in the linguistic and statistical profiles of news reports in Kazakh, Russian, and English. In American jurisprudence, prosecutors and defense lawyers purposefully manage intonation to hold the audience's attention and create a dramatic effect. Speech strategies such as lengthening words, emphasizing sound signals, and using pauses are used to create a tense atmosphere. In Kazakh courtroom discourse, however, intonation fluctuations are more often conditioned by the speakers' emotional state. Moreover, the Kazakh language segment showed a high concentration of specialized terminology, predominantly legal concepts, while a wider thematic spectrum characterizes the Russian news segment. This indicates the anthropocentric nature of information presentation. The American news segment exhibits maximum polysemy and interdisciplinary terminology, reflecting an integrated approach to reporting events with a focus on factual accuracy in a global context.

Keywords:

Courtroom Discourse; Perception Analysis; Prosodic Analysis; Legal Terminology; Prosodic Features

References

[1] Baranauskas, A.J., Drakulich, K.M., 2018. Media construction of crime revisited: Media types, consumer contexts, and frames of crime and justice. Criminology. 56(4), 679–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12189

[2] Kort-Butler, L.A., Habecker, P., 2017. Framing and Cultivating the Story of Crime: The Effects of Media Use, Victimization, and Social Networks on Attitudes About Crime. Criminal Justice Review. 43(2), 127–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016817710696

[3] Alitavoli, R., Kaveh, E., 2018. The U.S. Media's Effect on Public's Crime Expectations: A Cycle of Cultivation and Agenda-Setting Theory. Societies. 8(3), 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030058

[4] Philippe, A., Ouss, A., 2018. “No hatred or malice, fear or affection”: Media and sentencing. Journal of Political Economy. 126(5), 2134–2178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/699210

[5] Simmons, A.J., 1995. Punishment. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA. pp. 352.

[6] Allen, T.T., Whitt, A., 2020. An examination of the relationship between media exposure and fear of victimization: Implications of the superpredator narrative on juvenile justice policies. Juvenile and Family Court Journal. 71(4), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12185

[7] Nagy, V., 2017. Narrative construction of sexual violence and rape online. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. 6(2), 95–108.

[8] Garoupa, N., Magalhães, P.C., 2020. Public trust in the European legal systems: independence, accountability and awareness. West European Politics. 44(3), 690–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1715605

[9] Xu, J., Liu, C., 2020. How Does Courtroom Broadcasting Influence Public Confidence in Justice? The Mediation Effect of Vicarious Interpersonal Treatment. Frontiers in psychology.11(1766), 1–11.

[10] Smagulova, J., 2017. Ideologies of language revival: Kazakh as school talk. International Journal of Bilingualism. 23(3), 740–756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916684920

[11] Glogar, O., 2023. The Concept of Legal Language: What Makes Legal Language ‘Legal‘? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 36, 1081–1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10010-5

[12] Smith, A., Higgins, M., 2020. The Language Of Journalism: A Multi-Genre Perspective. Bloomsbury Publishing USA: New York, NY, USA. pp. 225.

[13] Luchkina, T., Cole, J.S., 2019. Perception of Word-level Prominence in Free Word Order Language Discourse. Language and Speech. 64(2), 381–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919884089

[14] Luchkina, T., Cole, J.S., 2017. Structural and referent-based effects on prosodic expression in Russian. Phonetica. 73(3–4), 279–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000449104

[15] Luchkina, T., Ionin, T., 2015. The effect of prosody on availability of inverse scope in Russian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. 23, 418–437.

[16] Shingler, M., 2006. Fasten your seatbelts and prick up your ears: the dramatic human voice in film. Scope. 5, 1–12.

[17] Fitzgerald, L.P., DeDe, G., Shen, J., 2024. Effects of linguistic context and noise type on speech comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology. 15, 1345619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345619

[18] Phelan, J., 2014. Voice, tone, and the rhetoric of narrative communication. Language and Literature. 23(1), 49–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013511723

[19] Brēde, M., 2011. Stylistic Variation as Manifest in the Informational Style of Intonation (On the Basis of English and Latvian TV Broadcasts). Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture. 1, 4–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.01.2011.01

[20] Shkvorchenko, N., Rozhelyuk, I., Sharapanovska, Y., et al., 2024. The power of the voice: how prosody shapes the news we hear. Amazonia Investiga. 13(80), 109–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.80.08.10

[21] Reed, B.S., 2006. Prosodic Orientation In English Conversation. Springer: London, UK. pp. 246.

[22] Olsen, R.M., 2019. The acoustics of feeling: Emotional prosody in the StoryCorps corpus. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 145(3/Supplement), 1930.

[23] Gussenhoven, C., 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–355.

[24] Paulmann, S., Pell, M.D., 2010. Contextual influences of emotional speech prosody on face processing: how much is enough? Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 10(2), 230–242.

[25] Jannedy, S., Mendoza-Denton, N., 2005. Structuring information through gesture and intonation. Interdisciplinary studies on information structure. 632(3), 199–244.

Downloads

How to Cite

Kussepova, G., Kussepova, L., Beysembaeva, G., & Aktanova, S. (2025). The Influence of Courtroom Discourse on Public Perception through Mass Media. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(8), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.10466

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 8 (August 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Gulzat Kussepova, Lazzat Kussepova, Gulshat Beysembaeva, Sholpan Aktanova

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.