Contextualizing Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education: Pedagogical Strategies in Kindergarten to Grade3 Classrooms in the Philippines

Authors

  • Rey R. Garrido

    School of Arts and Sciences, Biliran Province State University, Naval Biliran 6560, Philippines
  • Roland A. Niez

    School of Arts and Sciences, Biliran Province State University, Naval Biliran 6560, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11139
Received: 18 July 2025 | Revised: 8 August 2025 | Accepted: 21 August 2025 | Published Online: 11 October 2025

Abstract

Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) was institutionalized in the Philippines as part of the K to 12 curriculum reform, aiming to enhance learning by using learners’ first language in early grade instruction. However, its implementation poses challenges, particularly in resource-limited and linguistically diverse contexts. This study investigates the emerging pedagogical practices in the implementation of the MTB-MLE program as mandated by the Department of Education. It focuses on how Kindergarten to Grade 3 teachers adapt instructional strategies to address diverse learner needs.Using a comparative case study design, the research involved purposively selected teachers from Kindergarten to Grade 3. Data were gathered through a validated researcher-made questionnaire and triangulated to ensure reliability. Results show that teachers consistently implement the MTB-MLE program and employ a variety of strategies to support learning. As grade levels progress, their approaches become increasingly creative and responsive. A notable divergence emerged between standardized instructional methods prescribed by the Department and the more flexible, adaptive strategies developed by teachers. These practices better accommodate contextual challenges and learner diversity.The study underscores the vital role of teachers in bridging policy and practice through pedagogical innovation, emphasizing the need to support teacher-led approaches for effective MTB-MLE implementation.

Highlights

  • Presents innovative pedagogical approaches in implementing Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) in the Philippines.
  • Provides practical insights from the classroom practices of K–Grade 3 teachers.
  • Offers evidence-based recommendations for enhancing MTB-MLE implementation.
  • Highlights the role of administrative and institutional support in effective MTB-MLE delivery.

Keywords:

Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education; Emerging Pedagogies; Early Grade Education; Comparative Case Study; Instructional Strategies; Teacher Innovation; Philippines

References

[1] Benson, C., 2004. Do not leave your language alone: The importance of mother tongue-based schooling for educational quality. Multilingual Philippines: Manila, Philippines.

[2] Rumenapp, J.C., 2014. Mother-tongue-based multilingual education. In: Thompson, S. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Diversity and Social Justice. Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA. pp. 532–533.

[3] UNESCO, 2003. Education in a multilingual world. UNESCO Education Position Paper. UNESCO: Paris, France.

[4] UNICEF, 1999. Education For All: Making the Right a Reality. In: The State of the World’s Children 1999. UNICEF: New York, NY, USA. pp. 44–45.

[5] Burton, L.A., 2013. Mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines: Studying top-down policy implementation from the bottom up [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN, USA.

[6] Jacob, J.W., 2016. Mother tongue-based multilingual education in Bangladesh: Lessons learned in SHARE education program. SHARE: Dhaka, Bangladesh.

[7] Monje, J., Orbeta, A., Francisco-Abrigo, K., et al., 2019. Starting where the children are: A process evaluation of the mother tongue-based multilingual education implementation. Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS): Quezon City, Philippines.

[8] Vincent, K., Joy, J., Ann, C., et al., 2019. A mobile-assisted learning application of mother tongue for Grade 3. International Journal of Computer Applications. 22(178), 15–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918949

[9] Jaca, C., Soledad, G., 2022. Lesson exemplars using original Cebuano stories in teaching mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE). International Journal of Education, Culture and Society. 7(1), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220701.11

[10] Cummins, J., 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, UK.

[11] Wa-Mbaleka, S., 2014. Teaching English to speakers of other languages: The case of the Philippines. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 3(3), 64–78.

[12] Borong, N., 2021. Morphological variations of languages in selected towns of the Fifth District of Leyte. International Journal of Research Studies in Education (IJRSE). 13(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.a058

[13] Tupas, R., 2015. Inequalities of multilingualism: Challenges to mother tongue-based

[14] multilingual education. Language and Education. 29(2), 112–124.

[15] Cansino, J.A., 2023. The Philippines MTB-MLE program: Reconciling its utilitarian and ideological rationales. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2(2), 780–798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i2.2996

[16] Barac, R., Bialystok, E., Castro, D.C., et al., 2014. The cognitive development of young dual language learners: A critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 29(4), 699–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003

[17] Hammer, C.S., Hoff, E., Uchikoshi, Y., et al., 2014. The language and literacy development of young dual language learners: A critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 29(4), 715–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.008

[18] Mahboob, A., Cruz, P., 2013. English and mother-tongue-based multilingual education: Language attitudes in the Philippines. Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 1–19.

[19] Lang-ay, P., Sannadan, J., 2021. Mother tongue based language education in Philippines and Cambodia: A comparative study. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS). 6(1), 337–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.61.44

[20] Paudel, J.R., 2018. Mother tongue based multilingual education (MT-MLE): Teachers’ language ideologies. Journal of NELTA Surkhet. 5, 28–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jns.v5i0.19483

[21] Gatil, T.B., 2021. Translanguaging in multilingual English language teaching in the Philippines: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. 4(1), 52–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.1.6

[22] Reyes, C., 2021. Landscaping the Philippine languages: The implementation of multilingual education policy. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL). 11(3), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.11.1

[23] Aperocho, M.D., 2023. A policy reform framework for mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 4(3), 692–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.03.02

[24] Alexander, R.J., 2001. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Blackwell: Oxford, UK.

[25] Corlet, N., Tarusan, N., 2022. Lived experiences of mother tongue-based teachers in IP schools: Stories to tell. EPRA. 8(2), 254–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra9627

[26] Lagura, R., Jan, D., Natividad, L., et al., 2022. Effectiveness of Istiku in teaching MTB-MLE 1 to the pupils of Mmsu-les. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation. 3(1), 21–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i3.334

[27] Lartec, J., Belisario, A., Bendanillo, J., et al., 2014. Strategies and problems encountered by teachers in implementing mother tongue-based instruction in a multilingual classroom. The IAFOR Journal of Language and Learning. 1(1).

[28] Nchang, C., 2022. Instructional approaches for the integration of cultural elements in indigenous language classroom: A case study of the Bafut language. International Journal of English Language and Literature Research (IJELLR). 10(2), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/ijellr.13/vo10.n2pp114

[29] Dimaculangan, N., Gonzales, M., 2020. Revisiting stakeholders’ attitude towards MTB-MLE and ELT. EPRA. 81–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra5838

[30] Banusing, R., Bual, J., 2020. The quality of Catholic education of diocesan schools in the Province of Antique. PSSJ. 2(3), 35–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i2.150

[31] Himoro, M., Pareja-Lora, A., 2022. Zamboanga Chavacano: A survey on written practices, reactions and impact of its (Standardised) orthography. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación. (91), 245–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.71831

[32] Nolasco, R.M.D., Datar, F.A., Azurin, A.M., 2010. Starting Where the Children Are: A Collection of Essays on Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education and Language Issues in the Philippines. Talaytayan MLE: Manila, Philippines.

[33] Piaget, J., 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[34] Shah, R.K., 2019. Child-centered education: Criticisms. International Journal of Education. 8(1), 22–37.

[35] Vygotsky, L.S., 1962. Thought and language. MIT Press:Cambridge, MA, USA.

[36] Wood, D.J., Bruner, J., Ross, G., 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 17(2), 89–100.

[37] Bernstein, B., 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA.

[38] De Jesus, L.F., 2021. Exploring pedagogical difficulties in teaching mother tongue: Underpinnings of intervention program. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 21(15), 29–42.

[39] Sanchez, G.G., Tomas, C.L., Pe, S.N., 2023. Mother tongue–based multilingual education: The case of Cervantes District. Sciences Studies. 5(4), 87–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.12

[40] Lavrakas, P.J., 2008. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

[41] Devi, B., 2022. Application of cross-national comparative research design in medical and nursing education. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 13(3), 306–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757734

[42] Aggarwal, R., Ranganathan, P., 2019. Study designs: Part 2 – Descriptive studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 10(1), 34–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18

[43] Patton, M.Q., 1999. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research. 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.

[44] Mertens, D.M., Hesse-Biber, S., 2012. Triangulation and mixed methods research: Provocative positions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 6(2), 75–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437100

[45] Yusuf, M., Adams, C., Dingley, K., 2015. In-depth comparative case study in participation: Interpretative approach. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on E-Government (ECEG), Portsmouth, UK.

[46] Deterding, N.M., Waters, M.C., 2021. Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research. 50(2), 708–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377

[47] Saldana, J., 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage: London, UK.

[48] Walsham, G., 1995. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method.European Journal of Information Systems. 4, 74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9

[49] Lo, C., Hew, K., 2017. A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (RPTEL). 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2

[50] Cheng, X., Lee, K., Chang, E., et al., 2016. The “Flipped Classroom” approach: Stimulating positive learning attitudes and improving mastery of histology among medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education. 10(4), 317–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1664

[51] Kawinkoonlasate, P., 2019. Integration in flipped classroom technology approach to develop English language skills of Thai EFL learners. English Language Teaching. 12(11), 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n11p23

[52] Haelermans, C., 2022. The effects of group differentiation by students’ learning strategies. Instructional Science. 50, 223–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09575-0

[53] McKeown, M.G., 2019. Effective vocabulary instruction fosters knowing words, using words, and understanding how words work. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 50(4), 466–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-VOIA-18-0126

[54] Yunus, M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., et al., 2013. Pros and cons of using ICT in teaching ESL reading and writing. International Education Studies. 7(6), 119–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p119

[55] Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., et al., 2020. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science. 24(2), 97–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

[56] Hoa, P., 2020. Combined learning, a good solution for Vietnamese universities. Journal of Science. 1(9), 78–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.9.1.273.2019

[57] Hu, J., 2022. The connotation of flipped classroom and strategies for practice in higher education. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Arts, Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Research (ASSEHR), July 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220704.039

[58] Lim, S., Nordin, N., Rashid, R., 2020. Effectiveness of using the syntactic tree structure approach in teaching vocabulary to low proficiency ESL learners. Journal of Behavioral and Social Dynamics (JBSD). 8(2), 37–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46754/jbsd.2020.09.004

[59] Parr, B., Edwards, M., Leising, J., 2009. Selected effects of a curriculum integration intervention on the mathematics performance of secondary students enrolled in an agricultural power and technology course: An experimental study. Journal of Agricultural Education. 50(1), 57–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2009.01057

[60] Wismanto, A., Samsi, K., 2022. Development of a design for implementation learning of oriented on CTL model to news writing during the COVID-19 pandemic. KnE Social Sciences. 7(14), 443–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.11996

[61] Cardino, J., Ortega-Dela Cruz, R., 2020. Understanding of learning styles and teaching strategies towards improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. LUMAT General Issue. 8(1), 4–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1348

[62] Ayaya, G., Makoelle, T., Merwe, M., 2020. Participatory action research: A tool for enhancing inclusive teaching practices among teachers in South African full-service schools. SAGE Open. 10(4), 21582440209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020963576

[63] Weselby, C., 2014. What is differentiated instruction? Examples of how to differentiate instruction in the classroom. Available from: https://resilienteducator.com/classroom-resources/examples-of-differentiated-instruction/ (cited 8 July 2025).

[64] Lincoln, M., McAllister, L., 1993. Peer learning in clinical education. Medical Teacher. 1(15), 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599309029007

[65] Fabunan, S., Farin, E., 2022. Reading modules using Marungko approach of grade one pupils in the elementary schools of Zambales, Philippines. Journal of Education and Social and Behavioral Sciences (JESBS). 35(6), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2022/v35i630427

[66] Shamim-ur-Rasul, N., Iqbal, N., Ghayyur, N., 2022. Inductive approach and grammatical awareness of student teachers. South Asian Journal of Education and Social Research. 5(4), 47–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol5-iss4-2022(47-52)

[67] Mangila, B.B., 2019. Pedagogic code-switching: A case study of the language practices of Filipino teachers in English language classrooms. English Language Teaching Educational Journal. 1(3), 115–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i3.643

[68] Bucjan, N., 2022. Sugbuanong Binisaya: A medium of instruction for grade two pupils. EPRA. 150–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra9917

[69] Toro, V., Camacho-Minuche, G., Pinza-Tapia, E., et al., 2019. The use of communicative language teaching approach to improve students' oral skills. English Language Teaching. 12(1).

[70] Jimenez, E.C., 2020. Contextualized E-Learning Resource: A tool for stronger academic platform. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE). 4(2), 110–116. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4018344

[71] Gentry, R., 2013. Differentiated instructional strategies to accommodate students with varying needs and learning styles. In Proceedings of the Urban Education Conference, Mississippi, United States, 18–20 November 2013; pp. 1–17.

[72] Bialystok, E., 2017. The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin. 143(3), 233–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099

[73] Walter, S., Dekker, D., 2011. Mother tongue instruction in Lubuagan: A case study from the Philippines. International Review of Education. 57(5–6), 667–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9245-4

Downloads

How to Cite

Garrido, R. R., & Niez, R. A. (2025). Contextualizing Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education: Pedagogical Strategies in Kindergarten to Grade3 Classrooms in the Philippines. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11139

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 10 (October 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Rey R. Garrido, Roland A. Niez

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.