Enhancing Chinese University Students' Reading Comprehension and Self-Directed Learning Abilities through Collaborative Strategic Reading Instruction

Authors

  • Yili Wang

    English Language Teaching Program, Buriram Rajabhat University, Buriram 31000, Thailand
  • Akkarapon Nuemailhom

    English Language Teaching Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Buriram Rajabhat University, Buriram 31000, Thailand
  • Nawamin Prachanant

    English Language Teaching Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Buriram Rajabhat University, Buriram 31000, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10517
Received: 15 June 2025 | Revised: 30 June 2025 | Accepted: 22 July 2025 | Published Online: 4 September 2025

Abstract

Collaborative Strategic Reading Instruction (CSRI) refers to the practice of enhancing students' reading comprehension ability and Self-directed Learning (SDL) ability through cooperative learning strategies and structured reading activities. The purposes of the study were to 1) design CSRI to enhance Chinese university students' reading comprehension and SDL abilities, 2) examine the effect of CSRI on enhancing Chinese university students' reading comprehension abilities, and 3) investigate SDL abilities when they have learned through CSRI. The research was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the researcher developed and validated CSRI lesson plans, a reading comprehension test, and an SDL questionnaire, and surveyed 254 English major students to assess their current abilities. In the second phase, five CSRI lesson plans were implemented with 30 students over five weeks, and changes in reading comprehension, and SDL abilities. The results revealed that the experimental group receiving CSRI scored significantly higher (M = 25.80) than the control group (M = 20.08) in the post-test, with a large effect size (t = 8.43, p < 0.01). This indicates that CSRI is an effective instructional approach for improving English reading comprehension among university students. The experimental group who received CSRI showed significantly higher SDL scores (M = 59.43) than the control group (M = 45.30), with a large effect size (t = 9.081, p < 0.01). This demonstrates that CSRI effectively enhances students' SDL abilities compared to traditional instructional methods.

Keywords:

Collaborative Strategic Reading Instruction; Self-directed Learning Abilities; Chinese University Students; Reading Comprehension Abilities

References

[1] Elleman, A.M., Oslund, E.L., 2019. Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 6(1), 3–11.

[2] Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Zhu, S., et al., 2020. Isolation of 2019-nCoV from a stool specimen of a laboratory-confirmed case of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). China CDC Weekly. 2(8), 123.

[3] Liu, Z., 2022. Reading in the age of digital distraction. Journal of Documentation. 78(6), 1201–1212.

[4] Jiang, L., Zhang, L.J., May, S., 2019. Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: Teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 22(2), 107–119.

[5] Grabe, W., Stoller, F.L., 2019. Teaching and researching reading, 3rd ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–350.

[6] Wu, L., Valcke, M., Van Keer, H., 2019. Factors associated with reading comprehension of secondary school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 19(4), 34–47.

[7] Choy, D., Cheung, Y.L., 2022. Comparison of primary four students’ perceptions towards self-directed learning and collaborative learning with technology in their English writing lessons. Journal of Computers in Education. 9(4), 783–806.

[8] Ibrahim, K.A.A., Carbajal, N.C., Zuta, M.E.C., et al., 2023. Collaborative learning, scaffolding-based instruction, and self-assessment: Impacts on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety. Language Testing in Asia. 13(1), 16.

[9] National Reading Panel, 2000. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–350.

[10] Cain, K., Oakhill, J., Bryant, P., 2004. Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96(1), 313–338.

[11] Foorman, B.R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., et al., 2015. Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. 107(3), 884.

[12] Snow, P.C., 2016. Elizabeth Usher Memorial Lecture: Language is literacy is language—positioning speech-language pathology in education policy, practice, paradigms and polemics. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 18(3), 216–228.

[13] Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K., Zwaan, R.A., 1997. Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology. 48(1), 163–189.

[14] Morrow, L.M., 2008. Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, 2nd ed. Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–300.

[15] Freire, P., 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin: London, UK. pp. 1–200.

[16] Freire, P., 2020. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Toward a sociology of education. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–250.

[17] Klingner, J.K., Vaughn, S., 1996. Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. The Elementary School Journal. 96(3), 275–293.

[18] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Interaction between learning and development. In: Gauvain, M., Cole, M. (eds.). Readings on the Development of Children, 2nd ed. Scientific American Books: New York, NY, USA. pp. 34–41.

[19] Flavell, J.H., 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 34(10), 906–911.

[20] Fitzgerald, J., 1995. English-as-a-second-language learners’ cognitive reading processes: A review of research in the United States. Review of Educational Research. 65(2), 145–190.

[21] Pérez, B., 2004. Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy, 2nd ed. Routledge: Mahwah, NJ, USA. pp. 1–300.

[22] Kintsch, W., 1998. The representation of knowledge in minds and machines. International Journal of Psychology. 33(6), 411–420.

[23] Knowles, M.S., 1975. Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. The Adult Education Company: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–200.

[24] Candy, P.C., 1991. Self-direction for lifelong Learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 1–300.

[25] Jenwitthayayot, W., Tepsuriwong, S., 2016. Students’ perceptions about their self-study experience. Reflections. 21, 55–75.

[26] Bonk, C.J., Lee, M.M., 2017. Motivations, achievements, and challenges of self-directed informal learners in open educational environments and MOOCs. Journal of Learning for Development. 4(1), 36–57.

[27] Herlo, D., 2017. Self-directed learning on teacher training studies programs. Education Plus. 18(2), 7–17.

[28] Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D., 2014. Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–250.

[29] Bryant, D.P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., et al., 2000. Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly. 23(4), 238–252.

[30] Anwar, A.K., 2020. The effect of collaborative strategic reading toward students’ reading skill. Anglophile Journal. 1(1), 21–28.

[31] Nosratinia, M., Fateh, N. H., 2017. The comparative effect of collaborative strategic reading and content-based instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 6(6), 165–173.

[32] Bermillo, J.E., Merto, V.L.T., 2022. Collaborative strategic reading on students’ comprehension and motivation. European Journal of English Language Teaching. 7(1), 71–103.

[33] Abidin, M.J., Riswanto, R., 2012. Collaborative strategic reading (CSR) within cognitive and metacognitive strategies perspectives. European Journal of Business and Management. 4(1), 61–69.

[34] Zhao, W., Lertlit, S., 2023. The enhancements of self-directed learning on tertiary level students’ English reading skills: A Thai private university context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 16(2), 588–602.

Downloads

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Nuemailhom, A., & Prachanant, N. (2025). Enhancing Chinese University Students’ Reading Comprehension and Self-Directed Learning Abilities through Collaborative Strategic Reading Instruction. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10517

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 9 (September 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Yili Wang, Akkarapon Nuemailhom, Nawamin Prachanant

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.