Robust Knowledge of the World rather than Syntax: Using Literature in Second Language Learning and Teaching

Authors

  • Fahd Shehail Alalwi

    Department of English Language and Literature, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.10541
Received: 17 June 2025 | Revised: 24 June 2025 | Accepted: 28 July 2025 | Published Online: 25 September 2025

Abstract

Using literature to help acquire a second language has often proven highly valuable, though its effectiveness not always universally agreed upon. The major aim of this paper is to critically review in a qualitative study the practical and theoretical tenets that foreground such use and encourage educators to recognize literature's role in enhancing the competence and performance of students of English as a second or a foreign language. The objective is not simply to recommend inclusion a few literary texts in the curriculum. Rather, there is a pressing need for a more comprehensive approach. It is a need for adoption of an "approach" not mere methods or isolated techniques. Such an approach should foreground the use of literary sources through dynamic interaction to gain the benefits of this reference-point approach. Other approaches often emphasise teaching "about" the target language, rather than facilitating its internalization in a manner that similar to first language acquisition. The proposed literature-based approach approach benefits from insights of neurolinguistics, psycholinguistics and even research in computer science and artificial intelligence. The use of the literature approach also benefits from world knowledge to support natural internalisation of language competence and performance enriched by the complexity of various texts, the diversity of themes, and cultural context. Narratives (short stories, novellas, novels, and storytelling) as well as drama and poetry help learners acquire the natural flow of the target language with its syntax, rich vocabulary, and idioms, while simultaneously contributing general cognitive development.

Keywords:

Literary Texts; Foreign Language Acquisition; Natural Method; Syntax; Neuroscience

References

[1] Anthony, E.M., 1963. Approach, method, and technique. ELT Journal. XVII(2), 63–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/XVII.2.63

[2] Richards, J.C., Rodgers, T.S., 2014. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[3] Hilgendorf, S., Chapelle, C.A., 2020. History of Language-Teaching Methods. The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[4] Omaggio, A., 1993. Teaching Language in Context: Proficiency-Oriented Instruction, 2nd ed. Heinle & Heinle: Boston, MA, USA.

[5] Kramsch, C., Kramsch, O., 2000. The avatars of literature in language study. Modern Language Journal. 84(4), 533–573.

[6] Carter, R., 2007. Literature and language teaching 1986–2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 17(1), 3–13.

[7] Lee, J., VanPatten, B., 2003. Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Education: Boston, MA, USA.

[8] Maley, A., 2012. Literature in Language Teaching. In: Alsagoff, L., McKay, S.L., Hu, G.W., et al., (eds.). Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 299–317.

[9] Maley, A., Kiss, T., 2018. Creativity and English Language Teaching: From Inspiration to Implementation. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.

[10] Russell, S.J., Norvig, P., 2022. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Pearson Education Limited: London, UK.

[11] Schank, R.C., 1999. Dynamic Memory Revisited. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[12] Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P., 1995. Knowledge and Memory: the Real Story. In: Wyer, R.S., (ed.). Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story, 1st ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA. pp. 1–85.

[13] Schank, R.C., 2015. Conversation-Based Search: How to Build an Intelligent Corporate Memory. Socratic Arts. Available from: https://www.rogerschank.com/conversation-based-search (cited 15 February 2024)

[14] Dewey, J., 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA.

[15] Whitehead, A.N., 1929. The Aims of Education and Other Essays. The Free Press: New York, NY, USA.

[16] Young, D., 2017. The Art of Reading. Scribe Publications: London, UK.

[17] Clark, C., 2013. A Novel Look at How Stories May Change the Brain. Emory University press release: Atlanta, GA, USA.

[18] Kemmerer, D., 2014. Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA.

[19] Siegel, D.J., 2020. The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA.

[20] Cohn-Sheehy, B.I., Delarazan, A.I., Reagh,Z.M., et al., 2021. The hippocampus constructs narrative memories across distant events. Current Biology. Available from: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/09/210929112809.htm (cited 15 February 2024)

[21] Zull, J.E., 2011. From Brain to Mind: Using Neuroscience to Guide Change in Education. Stylus Publishing: Sterling, VA, USA.

[22] Dennett, D.C., 1987. The Intentional Stance. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[23] Dennett, D.C., 2013. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.

[24] Sparks, S.D., 2012. Neuroscientists Find Learning is Not ‘Hard-Wired’. Education Week. 31(33), 1.

[25] Traynor, B.J., Singleton, A.B., 2010. Nature versus nurture: Death of a dogma, and the road ahead. Neuron. 68(2), 196–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.002

[26] Dizikes, P., 2010. 3 Questions: Evelyn Fox Keller on the nature-nurture debates. MIT News. Available from: https://news.mit.edu/2010/3q-keller-1129 (cited 15 February 2024)

[27] Dean, J., 2021. Why Nature vs. Nurture is a False Dichotomy. Developmental Psychiatry. Available from: https://developmentalpsychiatry.com/2021/08/03/why-nature-vs-nurture-is-a-false-dichotomy/ (cited 15 February 2024)

[28] Bobkina, J., Domínguez, E., 2014. The Use of Literature and Literary Texts in the EFL Classroom: Between Consensus and Controversy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 3(3), 248–260.

[29] Calafato, R., 2023. Literature in Language Education: Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs, Practices, Creativity, and Literary Competence. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 19(1), 80–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2164500

Downloads

How to Cite

Alalwi, F. S. (2025). Robust Knowledge of the World rather than Syntax: Using Literature in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.10541