Social Communication and Language Use in Digital Era: A Critical Multiliteracies View

Authors

  • Arjulayana Arjulayana

    English Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Banten 15118, Indonesia
  • Desri Arwen

    Islamic Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Banten 15118, Indonesia
  • Risa Mufliharsi

    National Research and Innovation Agency, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN), Jakarta 12710, Indonesia
  • Nori Anggraini

    Indonesian Language Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Banten 15118, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Ahmad

    Law Postgraduate Program,Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Banten 15118, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10547
Received: 17 June 2025 | Revised: 27 June 2025 | Accepted: 7 July 2025 | Published Online: 2 September 2025

Abstract

This study explores how social communication and language use among university students are shaped by digital media, using a critical multiliteracies perspective. In an era where online interaction dominates daily communication, especially among youth, understanding the evolving nature of language practices becomes crucial. The study involved 40 EFL undergraduate students from Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang who participated in project-based tasks in-volving digital literacy, reflective writing, and multiliteracy activities. Data were collected through student-created digital artifacts, observations, and reflective interviews. The analysis revealed that students used a blend of formal and informal language, frequently engaging in code-switching, digital slang, and multimodal expressions to construct meaning and identity. While digital tools facilitated creativity and expressive freedom, challenges emerged in maintaining academic tone and critical awareness. The findings highlight the importance of integrating multiliteracies pedagogy into language education, enabling students to critically navigate digital discourse while developing communicative competence. This study contributes to the growing body of research on digital literacies by offering insights into how multilingual learners make sense of social interaction in technologically mediated environments. It also offers pedagogical implications for language teachers seeking to bridge traditional literacies with the evolving demands of the digital age.

Keywords:

Literacy skill; Social Interaction; Language Usage; Digital Era; Multiliteracy

References

[1] Herrero, J., Rodríguez, F.J., Urueña, A., 2023. Use of smartphone apps for mobile communication and social digital pressure: A longitudinal panel study. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 188, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122292

[2] Negash, Y.T., Calahorrano Sarmiento, L.S., 2023. Smart product-service systems in the healthcare industry: Intelligent connected products and stakeholder communication drive digital health service adoption. Heliyon. 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13137.

[3] Pujiati, T., Syarifudin, A., Arjulayana, A., et al., 2024. A realization of cultural diversity in command speech acts: a sociopragmatics study. In Proceedings of the 2nd Biology Trunojoyo Madura International Conference (BTMIC 2024), Surabaya, Indonesia, (7 October 2024); 146, Article 01010. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414601010

[4] Yuliana, R., Arjulayana, A., Roveneldo, R., et al., 2024. BTS Beyond Beats: Disclosing Semantics Through Lyric Analysis. World J English Lang. 14(4), 264–275.

[5] Abidin, Z.Z., Sharbawi, S., 2023. Zoomers in Brunei Darussalam: Language Use, Social Interaction and Identity. In: Fee, L.K., Carnegie, P.J., Hassan, N.H. (eds.). (Re)presenting Brunei Darussalam A Sociology of the Everyday. Springer: Singapore, Singapore. pp. 257–278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6059-8_14

[6] Bouirane, A., 2015. Metacognitive language learning strategies use, gender and learning achievement: A correlation study. English Lang Transl Stud. 3(02), 119–132.

[7] Maynard, D.W., Turowetz, J., 2013. Language Use and Social Interaction. In: DeLamater, J., Ward, A. (eds.). Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic Plenum: New York, NY, USA. pp. 251–279. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_9

[8] Gunarwan, A., 1992. Directives in Indonesian Language among Several Ethnic Groups in Jakarta. Directorate of Education and Teaching: Jakarta. Indonesia. (in Indonesian)

[9] Qomariyah, U., 2008. Development of Multiliteracy Skills Through the Strategy of Building an Integrated Literacy Community as an Effort to Strengthen Character. Kongres Bhs Indonesia. 9, 287.

[10] Lemy, D.M., Rahardja, A., Kilya, C.S., 2021. A Study in Tangerang. Journal Bus Hosp Tour. 6(2), 329–337. https://dx.doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v6i2 (in Indonesia)

[11] Arjulayana, Rafli, Z., Dewanti, R., 2021a. A Multiliteracy-based Public Speaking Module. CV Pena Persada: PT Pena Persada Kerta Utama: Purwokerto, Indonesia.

[12] Gu, Z., 2018. Study of Multiliteracy Pedagogy in College English Teaching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2018), Moscow, Russia, (29–30 March 2018); pp. 102–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/cesses-18.2018.23

[13] Lauren, B., 2016. Running Lean: Refactoring and the Multiliteracy Center. Comput Compos. (41), 68–77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.007

[14] Phang, D.C.W., Wang, K., Wang, Q., et al., 2019. How to derive causal insights for digital commerce in China? A Research Commentary on Computational Social Science Methods. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 35, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100837

[15] Liu, I., Young, S.S., 2015. An exploration of participative motivations in a community-based online English extensive reading contest with respect to gender difference. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(1), 48–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1090457

[16] Pasgaard, M., Chea, L., 2013. Double inequity? The social dimensions of deforestation and forest protection in local communities in Northern Cambodia. ASEAS-Austrian J South-East Asian Stud. 6(2), 330–355.

[17] Zhang, M., Cheng, M., 2022. Big data, social media, and intelligent communication. Telematics and Informatics Reports. 8(1), 46–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100026 .

[18] Pekkala, K., van Zoonen, W., 2022. Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy. Eur Manag Journal. 40(1), 67–76.

[19] Haukedal, C.L., Wie, O.B., Schauber, S.K., et al., 2022. Social Communication and Quality of Life in Children Using Hearing Aids. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 152, 111000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.111000

[20] Maloney, D., Freeman, G., Wohn, D.Y., 2020. "Talking without a Voice" : Understanding Non-Verbal Communication in Social Virtual Reality. Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA. 4(CSCW2), 1–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3415246

[21] Bharadwaj, A., 2024. Communication Skills for Global Leadership: Strategies for Effective Intercultural Management. Pbktyfrl: Abingdon, UK.

[22] Fadil, R., Andriani, D.I., 2021. Code Mixing Used in Masterchef Indonesia Season 5. VELES Voices English Lang Educ Soc. 5(2), 167–182.

[23] Gungor, F., Uysal, H.H., 2016. A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles Used by Native and Non-native Scholars. English Lang Teach. 9(6), 176.

[24] Svennevig, J., 2023. Self-Reformulation as a Preemptive Practice in Talk Addressed to L2 Users. Res Lang Soc Interact. 56(3), 250–268.

[25] New London Group, 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harv Educ Rev. 66(1), 60–92.

[26] Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., 2009. "Multiliteracies" : New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 4, 164–195.

[27] Bilonozhko, N., Syzenko, A., 2020. Effective Reading Strategies for Generation Z Using Authentic Texts. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 121–130. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt2.8

[28] Mayuni, I., Leiliyanti, E., Agustina, N., et al., 2020. School literacy movement and its implications towards students' learning: A comparative case study in Jakarta and Taiwan. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 29(4 Special Issue), 1555–1569.

[29] Nordbäck, E.S., Myers, K.K., McPhee, R.D., 2017. Workplace flexibility and communication flows: a structurational view. J Appl Commun Res. 45(4), 397–412.

[30] Nafisi, J., 2010. Gesture as a tool of communication in the teaching of singing. Aust J Music Educ. (2), 103–116. Available from: http://search.proquest.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/docview/862748833 (cited 5 February, 2025)

[31] Pla Ángel, A., 2022. Science Communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres. Lang Value. 15(1), 107–112.

[32] Patrona, M., 2006. Constructing the expert as a public speaker: Face considerations on floor-claiming in Greek television discussion programs. J Pragmat. 38(12), 2124–2143.

[33] Frith, C.D., 2012. The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 367(1599), 2213–2223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0123

[34] Tagg, C., Seargeant, P., 2021. Context design and critical language/media awareness: Implications for a social digital literacies education. Linguist Educ [Internet]. 62, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100776

[35] Arjulayana, A., Pujiati, T., 2024. Optimize Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach for Non English Learners Speaking Skill. JALIE J Appl Linguist Islam Educ. 08(September 2024), 215–237.

[36] Bancroft, J., 2016. Multiliteracy Centers Spanning the Digital Divide: Providing a Full Spectrum of Support. Comput Compos. 41, 46–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.002

[37] Setiawan, D., Hartati, T., Rahman, R., et al., 2019. The Effects of Critical Multiliteracy Learning Models on Mastery of Explanatory Text Concepts. Int J Sci Appl Sci Conf Ser. 3(1), 33.

[38] Becker, G.S., 1996. A Theory of Social Interactions. In: Becker, G.S. (ed.). Accounting for Tastes. Harvard University Press: London, UK. pp. 162–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020658-009

[39] Gerber, S., Brice, A., Capone, N., et al., 2012. Language use in social interactions of school-age children with language impairments: An evidence-based systematic review of treatment. Language Speech Hear Serv Sch. 43, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-00.

[40] Balbay, S., Kilis, S., 2017. Channel specifically designed for an Academic. Eurasian J Appl Linguist. 3(2), 235–251.

[41] Farhoudi, Z., Setayeshi, S., 2021. Fusion of deep learning features with mixture of brain emotional learning for audio-visual emotion recognition. Speech Commun. 127, 92–103.

[42] Banerjee, D.S., 2014. Learn and Unlearn: Drama as an Effective Tool in Teaching English Language and Communication. Int J English Lang Transl Stud. 2(1), 79–91.

[43] Hafifah, G.N., Sulistyo, G.H., 2020. Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 21(3), 186–198.

[44] Arjulayana, A., Enawar, E., 2022. Cosmetics Advertisement Language through Discursive Psychology. Linguist Journal Linguist Lang Teach. 8(2), 205.

[45] Rowsell, J., Walsh, M., 2017. Rethinking Literacy Education in New Times: Multimodality, Multiliteracies, & New Literacies. Brock Educ Journal. 21(1), 53–62.

[46] Al Zidjaly, N., 2019. Society in digital contexts: New modes of identity and community construction. Multilingua. 38(4), 357–375.

[47] Ghounane, N., 2020. Moodle or Social Networks: What Alternative Refuge is Appropriate to Algerian EFL Students to Learn during Covid-19 Pandemic. Arab World English Journal. 11(3), 21–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.2

[48] Grant, N., Shaw, J.W., 2014. Spit, Phishing, and Other Social Outings. Unified Commun Forensics. 1(1),15–24. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-59749-992-7.00002-0.

[49] La' biran, R., Garoga, M., Karuru, P., et al., 2023. Development of Listening and Speaking Textbook for General Communication Based on Laboratory Language Operating Software. Journal English Education and Teaching. 7(2), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.2.235-252

[50] Horarik, M.M., Devereux, L., Jack, C.T., et al., 2018. Negotiating the territory of tertiary literacies: A case study of teacher education. Linguist Educ J [Internet]. 53(1), 1689–1699. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.004

[51] Rozaliev, V.L., Orlova, Y.A., 2013. Model of emotional expressions in movements. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, (22– 24 October 2013); (Celda), 77–84.

[52] Novinger, T., 2001. Intercultural Communication: A Practical Guide. University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA.

[53] Arjulayana, A., Rachmi, R., 2022. The Issues of Academic Literacy in Conversation Practice During Online Learning. VELES Voices English Lang Educ Society. 6(2), 440–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.5137

[54] Abdillah, P., 1959. Young Generation Problematics of Post-Education in the Novel. Nucl Phys. 13(1), 104–116.

[55] Iyer, R., Luke, C., 2009. Multimodal, multiliteracies: Texts and literacies for the 21st century. Multiliteracies Technol Enhanc Educ Soc Pract Glob Classr. 18–34.

[56] Buckley-Walker, K., Tognolini, J., Lockyer, L., et al., 2017. Evaluating the validity of the online multiliteracy assessment tool. Aust J Educ. 61(3), 305–327.

[57] Cloonan, A., 2008. Multimodality Pedagogies : A Multiliteracies Approach. International Journal of Learning. 15(9), 159–168.

Downloads

How to Cite

Arjulayana, A., Arwen , D., Mufliharsi, R., Anggraini, N., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Social Communication and Language Use in Digital Era: A Critical Multiliteracies View. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10547

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 9 (September 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Arjulayana Arjulayana, Desri Arwen , Risa Mufliharsi, Nori Anggraini, Ahmad Ahmad

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.