Adjectival Marking of Stance in Twitter: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Saudi Women's Tweets on Social Reforms

Authors

  • Ashwaq A. Alsulami

    English Department, Al-Darb College, Jazan University, Jazan 82817, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10567
Received: 18 June 2025 | Revised: 30 June 2025 | Accepted: 8 July 2025 | Published Online: 27 August 2025

Abstract

Writers and speakers use various linguistic techniques to convey their stances. Researchers have shown significant interest in studying these methods over the years. With the rise of social media, it is anticipated that examining how writers express their stances on Twitter and other social media platforms can provide valuable insights, particularly on contentious issues, such as social reforms and women's empowerment. Accordingly, the present study employed a corpus-assisted discourse studies approach to analyse a 5,265-tweet corpus to understand how Saudi women perceive the recent social reforms in their country and how they use adjectives to convey their stances on these reforms. The study's key findings indicated that Saudi women generally view the reforms positively and tend to use evaluative specifically laudatory adjectives more frequently than attitudinal ones to express their support for these changes. The results reveal that laudatory adjectives function as prominent stance markers in social media discourse, supporting their inclusion as a distinct subcategory of evaluative stance markers within this register. These findings have implications for future research, suggesting that analysing linguistic structures in social media can offer valuable insights into the stances of social media users and can be informative for policymakers involved in social reforms.

Keywords:

CADS; Saudi Vision 2030; Social Reforms; Stance-Taking; Women's Empowerment

References

[1] Abid, R., Jassim, M., 2021. Stance-taking in Hillary Clinton's political speeches: a critical discourse study. Journal of Basra Research for Human Sciences. 46(3), 32–52.

[2] Biber, D., 2006. Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5(2), 97–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001

[3] Englebretson, R., 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam: Netherlands.

[4] Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M., Alrashdan, I., et al., 2021. Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon. 7(11), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08463

[5] Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., et al., 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, England.

[6] Biber, D., Finegan, E., 1989. Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 9, 93–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93

[7] Halliday, M.A.K., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. Edward Arnold: London, UK.

[8] Trinh, T., 2021. Analysis of interpersonal metafunction in text messages: a case study of group text messages among teachers of English at Viet Anh School. Thu Dau Mot University Journal of Science. 3(3), 365–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37550/tdmu.EJS/2021.03.215

[9] Hyland, K., 2005. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7(2), 173–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

[10] Aull, L., 2019. Linguistic markers of stance and genre in upper-level student writing. Written Communication. 36(2), 267–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318819472

[11] Jiang, F.K., Hyland, K., 2015. ‘The fact that': stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies. 17(5), 529–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590719

[12] Du Bois, J., 2007. The Stance Triangle. In: Englebretson, R. (ed.). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam: Netherlands. pp. 139–182

[13] Kiesling, S.F., 2022. Stance and stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics. 8, 409–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256

[14] Kaltenböck, G., López-Couso, M., Méndez-Naya, B., 2020. The dynamics of stance constructions. Language Sciences. 82, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101330

[15] Kiesling, S.F., 2011. Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. In Proceedings of The Interaction and Meaning Conference, Bristol, UK, 15 April 2011; pp. 1–12.

[16] Sakita, T., 2013. Discourse markers as stance markers Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction. Pragmatics and Cognition. 21(1), 81–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.1.04sak

[17] Karkkainen, E., 2006. Stance taking in conversation: from subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text and Talk. 26(6), 699–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.029

[18] Chindamo, M., Allwood, J., Ahlsén, E., 2012. Some suggestions for the study of stance in communication. In Proceedings of The 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3–5 September 2012; pp. 617–622.

[19] Gray, B., Biber, D., 2012. Current Conceptions of Stance. In: Hyland, K., Guinda, C. (eds.). Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK. pp. 15–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_2

[20] Kozáčiková, Z., 2021. Stance complement clauses controlled by verbs in academic research papers. Topics in Linguistics. 22(1), 16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2021-0002

[21] Biber, D., Zhang, M., 2018. Expressing evaluation without grammatical stance: informational persuasion on the web. Corpora. 13(1), 97–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2018.0137

[22] Chandrasegaran, A., Kong, K., 2006. Stance-taking and stance-support in students. Linguistics and Education. 17, 374–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.01.003

[23] Kucher, K., Schamp-Bjerede, T., Kerren, A., et al., 2016. Visual analysis of online social media to open up the investigation of stance phenomena. Information Visualisation. 15(1), 93–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871615575079

[24] Al Derham, R.A., 2023. Political Power and Material Identity: Saudi Women in Real and Virtual Societies. In: Rahman, M.M., Al-Azm, A. (eds.). Social Change in the Gulf Region: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Springer: Singapore. pp. 619–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7796-1_36

[25] Eum, I., 2019. “New women for a new Saudi Arabia?” Gendered analysis of Saudi Vision 2030 and women's reform policies. Asian Women. 35(3), 115–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2019.09.35.3.115

[26] Al-Arabiya English, 2025, Mohammed bin Salman on Saudi women's rights and the guardianship laws. Available from: Mohammed bin Salman on Saudi women's rights and the guardianship laws (cited 27 July2025).

[27] Jabbour, R., 2017, April 24. Saudisation: An invented nationalism. Middle East Institute for Research & Strategic Studies. Available from: https://www.meirss.org/saudisation-an-invented-nationalism/ (cited 19 February 2022).

[28] Bassi, M.M.M., 2021. Enhancing the role of Saudi women in community development in light of the Kingdom's 2030 Vision. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences. (66), 426–441.

[29] Khalil, A., Storie, L.K., 2021. Social media and connective action: the case of the Saudi women's movement for the right to drive. New Media & Society. 23(10), 3038–3061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820943849

[30] Rizvi, L.J., Hussain, Z., 2022. Empowering woman through legal reforms – evidence from Saudi Arabian context. International Journal of Law and Management. 64(2), 137–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2021-0068

[31] Baker, P., 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK.

[32] McEnery, T., Hardie, A., 2011. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[33] Sinclair, J., 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[34] Abdellah, A.S., 2002. What every novice translator should know. Translation Journal. 6(3), 1–11.

[35] Baker, M., 2018. Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. Routledge: London, UK.

[36] Parveen, M., 2021. Women empowerment: new paradigm shift of Saudi women into labour workforce. Society and Business Review. 17(1), 66–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-10-2020-0123

[37] Brezina, V., 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[38] Oakes, M.P., 1998. Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK.

[39] Wallis, S., 2022. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A New Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[40] Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., McEnery, A., 2021. #LancsBox v. 5.x [software]. Available from: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox (cited 3 May 2023).

[41] Scott, M., Tribble, C., 2006. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[42] Biber, D., Barbieri, F., 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes. 26(3), 263–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003

[43] Baker, P., Hardie, A., McEnery, T., 2018. A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK.

[44] Shih, R., Chiang, J., Tien, F., 2000. Part-of-speech sequences and distribution in a learner corpus of English. In Proceedings of The Research on Computational Linguistics Conference XIII (ROCLING XIII), Taipei, Taiwan, 24–25 August 2000; pp. 171–177.

Downloads

How to Cite

Alsulami, A. A. (2025). Adjectival Marking of Stance in Twitter: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Saudi Women’s Tweets on Social Reforms. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10567

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 9 (September 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Ashwaq A. Alsulami

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.