Evolution and Trends in EFL/ESL Vocabulary Development in Higher Education: Bibliometric and Content Analysis (1984–2024)

Authors

  • ThiTuyet Tran

    Faculty of English Language Studies, Hanoi University of Business and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

  • Apisak Sukying

    Department of Western Languages and Linguistics, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand

  • Pilanut Phusawisot

    Department of Western Languages and Linguistics, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10628
Received: 21 June 2025 | Revised: 27 June 2025 | Accepted: 16 July 2025 | Published Online: 1 September 2025

Abstract

The current study presents a systematic bibliometric review on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL) vocabulary research in higher education from 1984 to 2024. Using 601 Scopus-indexed articles as a dataset, the research analyses trends in publications, research collaboration networks, leading authors, prominent journals, main thematic directions and emerging research gaps. By employing descriptive statistics, co-word analysis, and bibliographic coupling, the study systematically maps the intellectual and structural landscape of the field. The findings indicate a gradual increase in publication trends over the last two decades, with Iran, China, and the United States being the most productive and significant contributors to co-authorship. Key research topics include receptive versus productive vocabulary knowledge, incidental vocabulary learning, mobile-assisted language learning, and data-driven learning. Although there is an increasing interest in technology-assisted vocabulary learning, the study indicates a lack of research into the sustainability, scalability, and contextual adaptability of such innovations. The findings underscore the importance of interdisciplinary work, culturally responsive pedagogy, and longitudinal empirical research to inform future studies. Combining a historical overview, discussion of key authors, and directions in the field, it provides rich material to advance knowledge on and teaching of vocabulary development from an EFL/ESL perspective at the university level.

Keywords:

Vocabulary Development; Higher Education; Bibliometric Analysis; Content Analysis; Research Trends

References

[1] Laufer, B., Nation, P., 1995. Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics. 16(3), 307–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307

[2] Zhang, X.L., Sukying, A., 2021. Receptive and productive knowledge of lexical collocations in Thai university learners of English. European Journal of English Language Teaching. 6(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i6.4067

[3] Nation, P., 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[4] Schmitt, N., 2010. Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, USA.

[5] Meara, P., 1996. The classical research in L2 vocabulary acquisition. In: Anderman, G., Rogers, M. (eds.). Words, Words, Words. The Translator and the Language. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp. 27–40.

[6] Xodabande, I., Hashemi, M., 2022. Learning English with electronic textbooks on mobile devices: impacts on university students' vocabulary development. Education and Information Technologies. 28(2), 1587–1611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11230-1

[7] Alharthi, M., Bown, A., Pullen, S., 2020. The use of social media platforms to enhance vocabulary development in learning a new language: A review of the literature. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 6, 114–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4qysk

[8] Dujardin, E., Auphan, P., Bailloud, N., et al., 2021. Tools and teaching strategies for vocabulary assessment and instruction: A review. Social Education Research. 3(2), 34–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.3120221044

[9] Yang, X.Y., Kuo, L.-J., Eslami, Z., et al., 2021. Theoretical trends of research on technology and L2 vocabulary learning: A systematic review. Journal of Computers in Education. 8(4), 465–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00194-9

[10] Dağdeler, K.O., 2023. A systematic review of mobile-assisted vocabulary learning research. Smart Learning Environments. 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00235-z

[11] Jonathans, P.M., Widiati, U., Astutik, I., et al., 2024. The practices of intentional vocabulary acquisition for Asian EFL learners: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 15(1370965). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370965

[12] Cobo, M.J., López‐Herrera, A.G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., et al., 2011. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(7), 1382–1402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525

[13] Hallinger, P., 2023. Mapping the contributions of the Review of Educational Research to Education, 1931–2020. Review of Educational Research. 93(6), 791–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221132771

[14] Klavans, R., Boyack, K.W., 2017. Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence. Journal of Informetrics. 11(4), 1158–1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.10.002

[15] Pham, H., Nguyen, N., Dinh-Hai, L., et al., 2024. Science mapping the knowledge base on microlearning: using Scopus database between 2002 and 2021. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0132

[16] Stemler, S., 2015. Content analysis. In: Scott, R.A., Kosslyn, S.M. (eds.). Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 1–14.

[17] Vears, D., Gillam, L., 2022. Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal. 23(1), 111–127.

[18] Mongeon, P., Paul‐Hus, A., 2015. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 106(1), 213–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

[19] Kumpulainen, M., Seppänen, M., 2022. Combining Web of Science and Scopus datasets in the citation-based literature study. Scientometrics. 127(10), 5613–5631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04475-7

[20] Saville‐Troike, M., 1984. What really matters in second language learning for academic achievement? TESOL Quarterly. 18(2), 199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586690

[21] Peters, E., Webb, S., 2018. Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 40(3), 551–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263117000407

[22] Webb, S., 2005. Sixpack: a graphical user interface for XAS analysis using IFEFFIT. Physica Scripta. 2005(T115), 1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1238/physica.topical.115a01011

[23] Lin, Y.-J., Wang, H.-c., 2021. Using virtual reality to facilitate learners' creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation in an EFL classroom. Education and Information Technologies. 26(4), 4487–4505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10472-9

[24] Zhang, R.F., Zou, D., 2020. Influential factors of working adults' perceptions of mobile-assisted vocabulary learning with multimedia annotations. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 14(4), 533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2020.110798

[25] Laufer, B., 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different? Applied Linguistics. 19(2), 255–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255

[26] Stæhr, L.S., 2009. Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 31, 577–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990039

[27] Qian, D., 2002. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: an assessment perspective. Language Learning. 52(3), 513–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193

[28] Qian, D.D., 1999. Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review. 56(2), 282–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282

[29] Qian, D.D., Lin, L.H.F., 2019. The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and language proficiency. In: Webb, S. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies. Routledge: London, Uk. pp. 66–80.

[30] Min, C., Sukying, A., 2024. Investigating the role of word knowledge components in Chinese L2 writing ability. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature. 30(4), 273–290. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3004-19

[31] Sukying, A., 2023. The role of vocabulary size and depth in predicting postgraduate students' second language writing Performance. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 16(1), 575–603.

[32] Laufer, B., 2014. Vocabulary in a second language: selection, acquisition, and testing: a commentary on four studies for JALT Vocabulary SIG. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. 3(2), 38–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7820/vli.v03.2.laufer

[33] Paribakht, S.T., Wesche, M.B., 1999. Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 21(2), 195–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226319900203x

[34] Peters, E., 2019. The effect of imagery and on‐screen text on foreign language vocabulary learning from audiovisual input. TESOL Quarterly. 53(4), 1008–1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.531

[35] Sukying, A., 2018. Investigating receptive and productive affix knowledge in EFL learners. In: Hirsh, D. (eds.). Explorations in Second Language Vocabulary Research. Peter Lang: Lausanne, Switzerland. pp. 183–218.

[36] Martínez, R., Schmitt, N., 2012. A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics. 33(3), 299–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams010

Downloads

How to Cite

Tran, T., Sukying, A., & Phusawisot, P. (2025). Evolution and Trends in EFL/ESL Vocabulary Development in Higher Education: Bibliometric and Content Analysis (1984–2024). Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10628