Deconstructing Islamophobic Discourse: An Impoliteness Theory Approach to Ayad Akhtar's Disgraced

Authors

  • Khalid Ahmed

    Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts (FELA), INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Syeda Sumera Qamar

    Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Lahore, Gurjat 50700, Pakistan

  • Amna Tughral

    Department of English, University of Gujrat, Gurjat 50700, Pakistan

  • Badriah Khaleel

    Department of Applied Linguistics, Kinnaird College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan

  • Farhat Abdullah

    Department of English, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54782, Pakistan

  • Ruqia Saba Ashraf

    Department of English, The Women University, Multan 60000, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.10649
Received: 23 June 2025 | Revised: 15 July 2025 | Accepted: 22 July 2025 | Published Online: 11 November 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the exercise of impoliteness strategies in Islamophobic discourse in the play Disgraced. Impoliteness is a multifarious matter that is perhaps apparently, closely related to politeness. It is very much the parasite of politeness. Islamophobia refers to irrational fear, hostility, or prejudice directed against Islam and Muslims, representing a significant barrier to achieving a fair society. The purpose behind this study is to pinpoint the distinctive types of  impoliteness strategies used by different characters in the aforesaid play. It further highlights the functions of impolite strategies in an Islamophobic context. Islamophobia is one of the frequently discussed issues in current social scenarios as Muslims constitute a noticeable part of the world and are judged with the lens of prejudice and hatred on the basis of religiosity. It is a qualitative research accomplished by using the latest version of impoliteness model to classify and analyse the facts. The results can be summarized as follows: Among the five strategies of impoliteness—bald on-record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, sarcasm, or mock impoliteness—the negative impoliteness strategy emerges as the most frequently employed in this play. The characters in Disgraced frequently employed the affective function.

Keywords:

Impoliteness; Fair Society; Islamophobia; Disgraced; Strategy; Functions

References

[1] Akhtar, A., 2012. Disgraced. Broadway Play Publishing: New York, NY, USA.

[2] Culpeper, J., Lakoff, R.T., 2004. Language and Woman’s Place. In: Bucholtz, M. (Ed.). Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 35–118.

[3] Merriam-Webster, n.d. Islamophobia. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Islamophobia (cited 20 June 2025).

[4] Poole, E., 2003. Islamophobia. In: Haddad, Y.Y. (Ed.). Muslims in the West: From Sojourners to Citizens. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. p. 217.

[5] Leech, G., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Longman: London, UK.

[6] Brown, P., Levinson, S.C., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[7] Benn, T., Jawad, H., 2003. Muslim Women in the United Kingdom and Beyond: Experiences and Images. Brill: Leiden, Netherlands.

[8] Vertovec, S., 2002. Islamophobia and Muslim Recognition in Britain. In: Haddad, Y.Y. (Ed.). Muslims in the West: From Sojourners to Citizens. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 19–35.

[9] Ahmed, Z., Zhang, J., Ahmed, K., et al., 2019. Manipulation of Pakistani Women through Skin-Whitening Advertising Discourse. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences, Wuhan, China, 12–14 January 2019; pp. 107–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3312662.3312705

[10] Ahmed, Z., Su, L., Ahmed, K., 2017. Pakistani Youth Manipulated through Night-Packages Advertising Discourse. Human Systems Management. 36(2), 151–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-171762

[11] Khan, M., Ahmed, S., Lee, R., 2019. Islamophobia in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Media and Political Discourses. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. 39(3), 321–340.

[12] Ahmed, K., Ali, S., Habib, M.A., et al., 2024. Pragmatic Perception of Politeness in Disagreement by Pakistani ESL Learners. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 22(2), 10889–10913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00822

[13] Khaleel, B., Nordin, U.K.U.M., Ahmed, K., et al., 2024. Societal Stigmatization and Support Mechanism for Rape Victims: An Analysis of Linguistic Features of Rape Judgments in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 22(2), 980–994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.0069

[14] Meesam, T., Khan, A., Hussain, S., 2022. Contemporary Islamophobia: A Systematic Review of Literature (2010–2022). Journal of Religion and Society. 15(2), 45–67.

[15] Ramasamy, G., Raj, S.S.B.D., Senathirajah, A.R.B.S., et al., 2025. An Explorative Study on Intrinsic Factors Influencing Decision-Making and Turnover Intention Among Call Center Employees in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science and Studies. 8(2), 736–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5317

[16] Ahmed, K., tuz Zahra, F., Amin, T., et al., 2023. Voices from the World: An Analysis of Discourse Fragments from World Leaders on Covid-19. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies. 1(4), 783–820. Available from: https://jals.miard.org/index.php/jals/article/view/54

[17] Khaleel, B., Sana-e-Zahra, S., Ahmed, K., 2023. A Thematic Analysis of Lexical Polarity within the Jargons of Legal Drafting in Pakistan. International Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2(2), 147–174. Available from: https://irjssh.com/index.php/irjssh/article/view/48

[18] Fraser, B., 1990. Perspectives on Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics. 14(2), 219–236.

[19] Fraser, B., 2005. Whither Politeness? In: Lakoff, R.T., Ide, S. (Eds.). Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. John Benjamins: Philadelphia, PA, USA. pp. 65–83.

[20] Fiske, S.T., 1998. Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. In: Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (Eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA. pp. 357–411.

[21] Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., Wichmann, A., 2003. Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics. 35(10–11), 1545–1579.

[22] Culpeper, J., 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research. 1(1), 35–72.

[23] Culpeper, J., 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[24] Culpeper, J., 2010. Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics. 42(12), 3232–3245.

[25] Culpeper, J., 2011. “It’s Not What You Said, It’s How You Said It!”: Prosody and Impoliteness. In: Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Ed.). Discursive Approaches to Politeness. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp. 57–84.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ahmed, K., Qamar, S. S., Tughral, A., Khaleel, B., Abdullah, F., & Ashraf, R. S. (2025). Deconstructing Islamophobic Discourse: An Impoliteness Theory Approach to Ayad Akhtar’s Disgraced. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.10649