Language Scaffolding Strategies Based on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development in Early Reading Education: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Authors

  • Lei Wu

    Faculty of Education,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Selangor 43600, Malaysia
  • Kamariah Abu Bakar

    Faculty of Education,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Selangor 43600, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9624
Received: 21 April 2025 | Revised: 13 May 2025 | Accepted: 21 May 2025 | Published Online: 15 June 2025

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of language scaffolding strategies based on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development theory in early reading education across China, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Through systematic review of 78 studies published between 2014–2024, including 27 Chinese studies, 31 American studies, and 20 British studies, the research examines how scaffolding practices are implemented within each country's distinct cultural and educational context. The methodology employed multi-dimensional analytical framework encompassing theoretical conceptualization, pedagogical implementation, cultural-linguistic adaptation, and effectiveness assessment to ensure comprehensive cross-cultural comparison. The analysis reveals significant variations in scaffolding approaches: Chinese practices emphasize structured teacher guidance tailored to character acquisition and morphological awareness development, reflecting Confucian educational traditions and examination-oriented culture. American strategies prioritize evidence-based methods within multi-tiered support frameworks, incorporating technological integration and individualized assessment protocols. British approaches integrate systematic progression with teacher autonomy in diverse multicultural contexts, demonstrating sustained intervention effectiveness and culturally responsive implementation strategies. The findings demonstrate how educational policy structures, linguistic characteristics, teacher preparation models, and cultural values fundamentally shape scaffolding implementation patterns. Cross-cultural triangulation reveals both universal principles and context-specific adaptations in applying Vygotskian theory to early literacy instruction. The study concludes by proposing evidence-informed adaptations for Chinese early reading education that balance explicit instruction with student-centered approaches while preserving cultural strengths in structured progression and collective learning orientations, contributing to international understanding of culturally responsive scaffolding practices.

Keywords:

Zone of Proximal Development; Scaffolding Strategies; Early Reading Education; Comparative Education; Cross-Cultural Analysis

References

[1] Castles, A., Rastle, K., Nation, K., 2018. Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 19(1), 5–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

[2] Eun, B., 2019. The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 51(1), 18–30.

[3] Gunawardena, M., Sooriyampola, M., Walisundara, N., 2017. Scaffolding thinking in ESL lessons: Negotiating challenges. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 24, 279–285.

[4] Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Beishuizen, J., 2010. Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review. 22, 271–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

[5] Bray, M., Adamson, B., Mason, M. (eds.), 2014. Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods, 2nd ed. Springer: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–453.

[6] Wyse, D., Goswami, U., 2012. Early reading development. In: Hall, N., Larson, J., Marsh, J. (eds.). Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 379–394.

[7] Petticrew, M., Roberts, H., 2008. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 1–336.

[8] Okoli, C., Schabram, K., 2015. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems. 10(26). Available from: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26 (cited 10 June 2024).

[9] Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Booth, A., et al., 2016. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 1–336.

[10] Alexander, R., 2014. Evidence, policy and the reform of primary education: A cautionary tale. Forum. 56(3), 349–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15730/forum.2014.56.3.349

[11] Schweisfurth, M., 2015. Learner-centred pedagogy: Towards a post-2015 agenda for teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development. 40, 259–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.011

[12] Zhao, H., 2024. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Competence in Foreign Language Teaching in China: Practice and Challenges [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Technology Sydney: Sydney, Australia. pp. 1–320.

[13] Murphy, C., Scantlebury, K., Milne, C., 2015. Using Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development to propose and test an explanatory model for conceptualising coteaching in pre-service science teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 43(4), 281–295.

[14] Shabani, K., Khatib, M., Ebadi, S., 2010. Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English Language Teaching. 3(4), 237–248.

[15] Zuo, M., Kong, S., Ma, Y., et al., 2023. The effects of using scaffolding in online learning: A meta-analysis. Education Sciences. 13(7), 705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070705

[16] García-Carrión, R., Villardón-Gallego, L., Martínez-de-la-Hidalga, Z., et al., 2020. Exploring the impact of dialogic literary gatherings on students’ relationships with a communicative approach. Qualitative Inquiry. 26(8–9), 996–1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420938879

[17] van Nooijen, C.C., de Koning, B.B., Bramer, W.M., et al., 2024. A cognitive load theory approach to understanding expert scaffolding of visual problem-solving tasks: A scoping review. Educational Psychology Review. 36(1), 12.

[18] Sharma, S., Sharma, S., 2023. Successful teaching practices for english language learners in multilingual mathematics classrooms: a meta-analysis. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 35(4), 821–848.

[19] Lepola, J., Kajamies, A., Tiilikainen, M., 2022. Opportunities and participation in conversations: The roles of teacher’s approaches to dialogic reading and child’s story comprehension. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research. 11(1), 204–232.

[20] Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K., Cuba Carbajal, N., Zuta, M.E.C., et al., 2023. Collaborative learning, scaffolding-based instruction, and self-assessment: Impacts on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety. Language Testing in Asia. 13(1), 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00227-3

[21] Anisah, Z., 2024. SCAFFOLDING AS A LANGUANGE LEARNING TECHNIQUE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD. Al Hikmah: Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Islamic Education (IJECIE). 8(2), 466–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35896/ijecie.v8i2.868

[22] Copp, S.B., Cabell, S.Q., Gabas, C., et al., 2023. The Rising Star Scaffolding Guide: Supporting Young Children's Early Spelling Skills. The Reading Teacher. 76(4), 380–389.

[23] Cho, B.Y., Lee, H.J., 2020. Exploring the use of scaffolding strategies in a virtual learning environment: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 58(3), 523–545.

[24] Gorlin, R., 2020. Educators' Storybook Reading Practices, Attitudes Toward Adopting Dialogic Reading, and Child Language Status in an Inclusive Early Learning Environment [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA. pp. 1–152.

[25] Rahman, L., 2024. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development of teaching and learning in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT). 13(8), 389–394.

[26] Kristanto, B., Putri, D., Ferianda, S., et al., 2025. A Scaffold-Based Approach for Developing an English Coursebook for Young Learners. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching). 8(2), 57–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v8i2.18045

[27] Sun, X., 2024. Scaffolded extensive reading: a case study of an extensive reading programme in China. Education 3-13. 52(5), 678–689.

[28] Wu, X., 2023. The Application of Scaffolding Instruction Mode in College English Reading Teaching. Open Access Library Journal. 10(11), 1–8.

[29] NA, T., 2023. CONCEPT MAPPING AS A SCAFFOLDING TECHNIQUE IN THE TEACHING OF EFL READING COMPREHENSION AMONG UNDERGRADUATES IN CHINA [Doctoral dissertation]. Universiti Putra Malaysia: Serdang, Malaysia. pp. 1–320.

[30] Xu, Q., Sun, D., Zhan, Y., 2023. Embedding teacher scaffolding in a mobile technology supported collaborative learning environment in English reading class: students' learning outcomes, engagement, and attitudes. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 17(1–2), 280–302.

[31] Nguyen, Q.N., 2022. Teachers' Scaffolding Strategies in Internet-Based ELT Classes. TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. 26(1), 1–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26101a1

[32] Shi, X., Yeung, S.S.S., 2024. A mixed method study of EFL teacher knowledge and practice in Chinese kindergartens. Journal of Education for Teaching. 50(4), 674–690.

[33] Escobar, G.M.P., 2021. Word learning and executive functions in preschool children: Bridging the gap between vocabulary acquisition and domain-general cognitive processes [Doctoral dissertation]. Sydney University: Sydney, Australia. pp. 1–280.

[34] Liao, C.H., Kuo, B.C., Tsao, C.J., et al., 2020. Predictors of Chinese reading and literacy skills among Chinese school children: A 3-year longitudinal study. Educational Psychology. 40(7), 838–855.

[35] Feng, Y., Wang, X., 2023. A comparative study on the development of Chinese and English abilities of Chinese primary school students through two bilingual reading modes: human-AI robot interaction and paper books. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1200675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200675

[36] Costa, F., Guasti, M.T., 2021. Is bilingual education sustainable?. Sustainability. 13(24), 13766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413766

[37] Yang, X., Jansem, A., 2024. Cross-disciplinary Analysis of Modern Chinese Classroom Interaction Discourse Patterns-An Empirical Study Based on Experienced Chinese Teacher. Preprint (Version 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4575638/v1

[38] Luo, M., Main, S., Lock, G., et al., 2020. Exploring Chinese EFL teachers' knowledge and beliefs relating to the teaching of English reading in public primary schools in China. Dyslexia. 26(3), 266–285.

[39] Mizhe, X., Fang, N.C., Jabar, M.A.A., et al., 2021. A Systematic Review of Chinese Language Learning Strategies in the Past Decade (2011-2020). Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 29(S3), 287–307.

[40] Chen, C., 2021. Using scaffolding materials to facilitate autonomous online Chinese as a foreign language learning: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Open. 11(3), 21582440211040131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040131

[41] Ni, A., Cheung, A.C., Shi, J., 2022. Effects of educational technology on reading achievement for Chinese K-12 English second language learners: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 1025761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025761

[42] Petscher, Y., Cabell, S.Q., Catts, H.W., et al., 2020. How the science of reading informs 21st‐century education. Reading Research Quarterly. 55(S1), S267–S282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352

[43] Gillon, G., McNeill, B., Scott, A., et al., 2024. Large scale implementation of effective early literacy instruction. Frontiers in Education. 9, 1354182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1354182

[44] Jamali Kivi, P., Namaziandost, E., Fakhri Alamdari, E., et al., 2021. The comparative effects of teacher versus peer-scaffolding on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 50, 1031–1047.

[45] Such, B., 2021. Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments. 29(3), 473–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579233

[46] Hurry, J., Fridkin, L., Holliman, A.J., 2022. Reading intervention at age 6: Long‐term effects of Reading Recovery in the UK on qualifications and support at age 16. British Educational Research Journal. 48(1), 5–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3755

[47] Liu, Y., Fisher, L., Forbes, K., et al., 2020. The knowledge base of teaching in linguistically diverse contexts: 10 grounded principles of multilingual classroom pedagogy for EAL. In: Arnot, M., Schneider, C. (eds.). Education and Migration. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 10–27.

[48] Ertugruloglu, E., Mearns, T., Admiraal, W., 2023. Scaffolding what, why and how? A critical thematic review study of descriptions, goals, and means of language scaffolding in bilingual contexts. Educational Research Review. 40, 100550.

[49] Lo, N.P.K., 2024. Cross-cultural comparative analysis of student motivation and autonomy in learning: perspectives from Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Education. 9, 1393968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1393968

[50] Dominguez, S., Svihla, V., 2023. A review of teacher implemented scaffolding in K-12. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 8(1), 100613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100613

Downloads

How to Cite

Wu, L., & Bakar, K. A. (2025). Language Scaffolding Strategies Based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in Early Reading Education: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9624

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 6 (July 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Lei Wu, Kamariah Abu Bakar

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.