Character Education through the Lens of Streaming Media: Exploring the Pragmatic Complexity of Politeness in Series Dialogue

Authors

  • Mila Roysa

    Language Education Science Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia
  • Fathur Rokhman

    Language Education Science Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia
  • Rustono

    Language Education Science Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia
  • Hari Bakti Mardikantoro

    Language Education Science Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.10657
Received: 23 June 2025 | Revised: 1 July 2025 | Accepted: 25 July 2025 | Published Online: 25 September 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the complexity of language politeness in the Digital Era 4.0, where streaming platforms— unlike traditional television—offer uncensored content that exposes audiences to a wide range of language use, potentially impacting social norms. The research analyzes the pragmatic elements of politeness in two popular Indonesian streaming series, “Layangan Putus” and Wedding Agreement. Using a qualitative descriptive method, the study identifies types of utterances (constative, performative, illocutionary, perlocutionary), adherence to and violations of Leech’s politeness maxims, and the use of conversational implicature. The novelty of the study lies in its comparative approach to analyzing pragmatic politeness in widely viewed digital narratives. Results show a rich variety of utterance types and reveal both conformity to politeness principles—such as generosity and tact—and frequent violations, including blunt criticism and baseless accusations. Conversational implicature is also commonly used, illustrating a nuanced linguistic environment. These findings highlight the dual role of streaming media in shaping linguistic behavior, particularly for younger viewers. The study recommends that parents and educators play an active role in helping youth critically engage with media content. This includes guiding them to distinguish polite and impolite language, understand respectful social interaction, choose context-appropriate diction, and develop a positive communication character suitable for the digital age.

Keywords:

Character Education; Complexity of Politeness; Pragmatic; Streaming Media

References

[1] Vasalou, S., 2012. Educating virtue as a mastery of language. Journal of Ethics. 16(1), 67–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-011-9111-5

[2] Rahmawati, L.E., Niasih, A., Kusmanto, H., et al., 2020. Environmental awareness content for character education in grade 10 in Indonesian language student textbooks. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. 11(4), 161–174.

[3] Wallin, J.J., 2012. Representation and the straightjacketing of curriculum’s complicated conversation: The pedagogy of Pontypool’s minor language. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 44(4), 366–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00697.x

[4] Alwadai, M.A.M., Alhaj, A.A.M., 2024. King Khalid University EFL students’ perspectives on teaching professional ethics: A new ethical pedagogical review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 15(2), 617–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.30

[5] Campodonico, A., 2018. Specificity and plurality of virtue ethics. Ragion Pratica. (1), 161–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1415/89763

[6] Maretbayeva, M., Sorokina, O., Kabush, T., et al., 2025. Functional and pragmatic potential of phraseological units and authorial intention. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(4), 155–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8501

[7] Zamudio, S.D.R., 2025. Pragmatic analysis of Invisibles. Voces de un trozo invisible de este mundo by Juan Diego Botto. Oltreoceano. 2025(23), 205–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53154/Oltreoceano110 (in Spanish)

[8] Lorge, I., Katsos, N., 2025. Bilingual children display comparative strength using prosodic cues for pragmatic word learning. International Journal of Bilingualism. 29(1), 17–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231204139

[9] Harrison, T., 2022. A new educational model for online flourishing: A pragmatic approach to integrating moral theory for cyber-flourishing. Pastoral Care in Education. 40(2), 128–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2021.1898665

[10] Concu, V., 2025. Explicit performatives in Old Saxon and Old High German: A comparative study. International Review of Pragmatics. 17(1), 58–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01701003

[11] Alsager, H.N., Aly, M.S.A., 2025. A Pragma-Stylistic Analysis of Muhammad Asad’s The Road to Mecca. World Journal of English Language. 15(4), 60–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n4p60

[12] Bardzokas, V., Desilla, L., 2025. The pragmatics of critical thinking: The case of adventure games. Internet Pragmatics. 8(1), 113–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00118.bar

[13] Callan, E., 2011. When to shut students up: Civility, silencing, and free speech. Theory and Research in Education. 9(1), 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878510394352

[14] Li, H., Tan, C., 2024. Teacher Speech Recognition in Smart Classrooms of Colleges and Universities Based on Audio-To-Text Conversion and Keyword Matching. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application ICCEA, Hangzhou, China, 12–14 April 2024; pp. 1311–1314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEA62105.2024.10603915

[15] Walker, D.I., 2022. Sociological contributions for researching morality and cultivating states of moral character. Journal of Moral Education. 51(1), 24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1772212

[16] Puspitarini, D., Degeng, I.N.S., Praherdhiono, H., et al., 2023. Humanistic Pesantren: Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Visualization Analysis on Character, Moral, and Ethical Values. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 31(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/PJSSH.31.2.01

[17] Riddle, E.M., 2025. Evidential strategies in English: not just lexical. Folia Linguistica. 59(1), 99–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2023-2054

[18] Andriyanto, O.D., Darni, Subandiyah, H., et al, 2022. Ethic values in modern Javanese literature works: Identity and character education in the digital era. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 8(3), 106–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.803009

[19] Garnet, D., 2020. Historying Tragedy through an Object of Empathy: Hon Xuan’s Violin. International Journal of Art and Design Education. 39(3), 648–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12304

[20] Nurhayani, I., 2024. Humans and animal welfare in the Adventures of the Mouse-deer: an ecological discourse analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2316412

[21] Pristiwati, R., Rokhman, F., Lestari, P.M., et al., 2024. How character education is projected through literary works? A textual analysis of metaphors and prophetic ethics in Tegalan songs and poems. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 14(1), 36–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70404

[22] Stubbs, M., 2021. Pragmatic patterns in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Text and Talk. 41(5–6), 813–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0043

[23] Fernández-Urquiza, M., Jiménez-Romero, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., 2020. Pragmatic assessment of language in children with low prevalence chromosomopathies. Pragmalinguistica. (Monografico 2), 152–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.09

[24] Gritta, M., Pilehvar, M.T., Collier, N., 2020. A pragmatic guide to geoparsing evaluation: Toponyms, Named Entity Recognition and pragmatics. Language Resources and Evaluation. 54(3), 683–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-019-09475-3

[25] Famian, A.R.G., 2020. Pragmatics of questions in Persian academic texts. Language Related Research. 11(4), 477–508.

[26] Srailova, A.B., Baranova, K.M., Kalioppin, A.K., et al., 2021. Linguostylistic specifics of the pragmatical and symbolic realization of the English poetic discourse. XLinguae. 14(2), 215–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2021.14.02.16

[27] Dubrovskaya, T.V., 2024. Pragmatics of User Interaction with Scientific Internet Articles. Nauchnyi Dialog. 13(10), 167–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-167-187

[28] Zakaria, M.Z., Khairuddin, M.N., Isa, A.A.M., et al., 2024. Implicit Meanings in the Quran: A Pragmatic Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(11), 3546–3556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.23

[29] Abdelhady, S., 2025. Decoding Ostensible Communication: A Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Study. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(1), 651–674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7593

[30] Ozola, D., 2023. The Pragmatics of Paratextual Apparatus of Contemporary Latvian and American Travelogues. Respectus Philologicus. 44(49), 106–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2023.44.49.112

[31] Macagno, F., Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto, R., 2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation. 35(1), 141–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09525-z

[32] Arrows, F., 2017. Character Education. In: Knowledge and Power in the Global Economy: The Effects of School Reform in a Neoliberal/Neoconservative Age, 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis: London, UK. pp. 423–432.

[33] Brooks, E., Park, R., Sarker, A., 2024. The Oxford Character Project. In: The Routledge International Handbook of Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Character Development, Volume II: Moderators, Threats, and Contexts. Taylor and Francis: London, UK. pp. 325–340.

[34] Donskova, Y.V., Kurilova, A.D., Prirodina, U.P., 2023. Semantic and Pragmatic Characteristics of Pharmacy Ergonyms in Sweden and Great Britain. Nauchnyi Dialog. 12(4), 49–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-4-49-65

[35] Hart, P., 2022. Reinventing character education: the potential for participatory character education using MacIntyre’s ethics. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 54(4), 486–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1998640

[36] Power, F.C., Sheehan, K.K., 2014. Moral and character education through sports. In: Handbook of Moral and Character Education. Taylor and Francis: London, UK. pp. 488–506.

[37] Niccoli, A., Piantoni, M., Ricci, E., 2024. Virtue Monism. Some Advantages for Character Education. Topoi. 43(3), 1043–1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10041-y

[38] Radden, J., Sadler, J., 2010. The Virtuous Psychiatrist: Character Ethics in Psychiatric Practice. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–240.

[39] Smith, R., 2022. Character education and the instability of virtue. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 56(6), 889–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12692

[40] Kristjánsson, K., Harrison, T., Peterson, A., 2025. Reconsidering the ‘Ten Myths’ about Character Education. British Journal of Educational Studies. 73(1), 49–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2024.2378059

[41] Sim, J.B.Y., Tham, P.H.H., 2023. Demystifying character education for the Singapore context. Journal of Moral Education. 54(2), 203–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2260957

[42] Pamungkas, O.Y., Widodo, S.T., Suyitno, et al., 2019. Environmental wisdom: An observation of ecocriticism towards the Javanese cyber literature in 20th Century. Test Engineering and Management. 81(11–12), 3178–3190.

[43] Freeks, F.E., 2015. The influence of role-players on the character-development and character-building of South African college students. South African Journal of Education. 35(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n3a1086

[44] Fiala, A., 2024. Critical Character Education: Whose Character? Which Virtues? Interchange. 55(2), 159–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09510-5

[45] Orzechowski, M., Schochow, M., Steger, F., 2020. Clinical Ethics Consultation in the Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Science and Engineering Ethics. 26(2), 833–850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00141-z

[46] Metz, T., 2013. Communitarian ethics and work-based education: Some African perspectives. In: Learning, Work and Practice: New Understandings. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 191–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4759-3_14

[47] Tan, C., Chua, C.S.K., Goh, O., 2015. Rethinking the Framework for 21st-Century Education: Toward a Communitarian Conception. Educational Forum. 79(3), 307–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2015.1037511

[48] Macagno, F., Bigi, S., 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication: Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context. 9(2), 167–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18044.mac

[49] Koroliova, V., Popova, I., 2020. Destruction of communicative pragmatics in contemporary absurdist dramaturgic texts. Psycholinguistics. 27(2), 195–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-2-195-212

[50] Doyle, P.C., Baker, A.M.H., Evitts, P.M., 2023. Communication competence and disability secondary to laryngectomy and tracheoesophageal puncture voice restoration. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 58(2), 441–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12802

[51] Brock, F.B., Koehler, J., Brock, A., et al., 2024. Educating the Whole Engineer: Leveraging Communication Skills to Cultivate Ethical Leadership Character. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education: Washington, DC, USA.

[52] Minga, J., Sheppard, S.M., Johnson, M., et al., 2023. Apragmatism: The renewal of a label for communication disorders associated with right hemisphere brain damage. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 58(2), 651–666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12807

[53] Goel, N., Kaur, A., Vaidya, M., 2012. Indian youth inclination towards unethical practices in the use of Information and Communication Technology. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 20(4), 1311–1326.

[54] Badeni, B., Saparahayuningsih, S., 2021. Character Education Based on Local Wisdom for the Bengkulu Serawai Tribe Community. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA.

[55] Mucinskas, D., Clark, S., Barendsen, L., et al., 2025. An increase in educator expectations of student character growth during participation in a community of practice. Frontiers in Education. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1466295

[56] Pike, M.A., 2024. The ‘image of God’ and the schooling of virtue: Christian-ethos schools of character for the whole community. Journal of Beliefs and Values. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2024.2377911

[57] Hanif, A., Purnanto, D., Nugroho, M., 2021. Variations of impolite responses in YouTube Podcast videos. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 17(4), 1695–1715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.124

[58] Geschwind, L., Edström, K., 2022. Peer Advocacy: Expressions of Loyalty in Peer Review. In: Peer review in an Era of Evaluation: Understanding the Practice of Gatekeeping in Academia. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 203–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_9

[59] Qub’a, A.A., Al-HajEid, O.A., Abu-Guba, M.N., et al., 2025. The Pragmatic Functions of Allah-Centred Expressions in Jordanian Spoken Arabic. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(4), 832–850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8812

[60] Cezar, L.M., 2021. Exploring Conversational Implicatures in the American Sitcom Seinfeld. Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal. 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2021.1.41842

[61] Alsulaiman, R.S., Alhojailan, A.I., 2024. Emojis as Tools for Learning: Understanding Their Pragmatic Functions in EFL Students’ Tweets. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(12), 3916–3928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1412.27

[62] Ma’arif, S., 2017. Teacher’s art of teaching improvement in Madrasah Mu’allimin Hasyim Asy’ari Jombang: Designing the quality of Islamic education and producing characterized children. Man India. 97(19), 301–312.

[63] Sumaryanto, F.T., Ahmadi, F., Sugiman, et al., 2019. Findings on the evaluation of character values in Math Education Department of Guangxi Normal University - China. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1321(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022080

[64] Chen, Y.L., 2022. Needed “Assembling the Parts Into a Whole”: The Turn of Moral Identity and Its Implications for Character Education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences. 67(4), 255–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0008

[65] Sahertian, P., Effend, Y.R., 2022. Investigating the Principal Transformational Leadership Strategy in Implementing Character Education at the Senior High School Level (SMA) in Indonesia. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi. 12(3), 59–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.07

[66] Comer, D.R., Schwartz, M., 2020. Adapting Mussar to Develop Management Students’ Character. Journal of Management Education. 44(2), 196–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919871083

[67] Baron, M.W., 2010. Kantian Moral Maturity and the Cultivation of Character. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0014

[68] Dunlap, R., Dunlap, A., 2017. Character ethics and interprofessional practice: Description and analysis. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 7, 61–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2017.03.007

[69] Hsiao, H. C., 2021. Effects of Defense Suppliers’ Practice of Online Character Education on the Employees’ Learning Motivation and Perception of Integrity During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771124

[70] Severino-González, P., Martín-Friorino, V., González-Soto, N., 2019. Social responsibility. From decision making to character education: Perceptions of teachers and non-Teachers in a Chilean school. Estudios Sobre Educacion. 37, 69–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/004.37.69-90 (in Spanish)

[71] Potempa, A., 2015. Character matters: On the advantages and limits of teaching virtue ethics to future professionals. International Journal of Humanities Education. 13(1), 1–12.

[72] Pulkki, J., 2022. The Moral Problems of Economism in an Age of Eco-Crisis. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies. 19(3), 224–247.

[73] Li, Y.F., 2013. Formation and transcendence: Institutional change from moral autonomy to heteronomy. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Engineering Economics Management; pp. 1085–1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38442-4_114

Downloads

How to Cite

Mila Roysa, Rokhman, F., Rustono, & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2025). Character Education through the Lens of Streaming Media: Exploring the Pragmatic Complexity of Politeness in Series Dialogue. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.10657

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 10 (October 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Mila Roysa, Fathur Rokhman, Rustono, Hari Bakti Mardikantoro

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.