Acquisition of Language, Linguistics Via Computer (AI) in Higher Education Institutions and Its Effects

Authors

  • Banovsha Guloglan Mammadova

    Department of English Language Teaching Methods, Azerbaijan University of Languages, Bakı AZ1000, Azerbaijan

  • Leyla Isa Aliyeva

    Department of Azerbaijani Linguistics, Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan AZ 7012, Azerbaijan

  • Minavvar Mammadova

    Scientific research branches, The Military Institute named after Heydar Aliyev, Baku AZ1018, Azerbaijan

  • Ruhangiz Mammad Aliyeva

    Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Nakhchivan Institute of Teachers, Nakhchivan AZ 7012, Azerbaijan

  • Venkata Siva Kumari Narayanam

    Department of Engineering English, Assistant Professor, English College of Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Educational Foundation (KLEF), Vaddeswaram Andhra Prdesh, India

  • Zuleykha Murad Baghirzadeh

    Department of Foreign Languages, Azerbaijan University, Bakı AZ1007, Azerbaijan

  • Lala Zahir Allahverdiyeva

    Department of Russian and Oriental Languages, Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan AZ 7012, Azerbaijan

  • Elchin Mirzayev

    Department of English Language and Translation, Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan AZ 7012, Azerbaijan

  • Gunel Vilayat Bayramova Mehdiyeva

    Department of Foreign Languages, Baku Engineering University, Khirdalan city AZ0101, Azerbaijan

  • Saadat Jahangir Aliyeva

    Department of Foreign Languages, Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University, Baku AZ1000 Azerbaijan

  • Tamilla Ramin Ahmadzadeh

    Department of Business Management, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku AZ1000, Azerbaijan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.10687
Received: 24 June 2025 | Revised: 30 June 2025 | Accepted: 3 July 2025 | Published Online: 4 August 2025

Abstract

The ever-evolving realm of higher education offers revolutionary prospects for educators and learners through the merging of language studies, linguistics, and artificial intelligence (AI). This paper examines the interdisciplinary integration of these fields, highlighting their combined capacity to improve teaching methods, research innovation, and educational results in higher education institutions. The study initiates by analyzing conventional methods of language and linguistics instruction, pinpointing enduring pedagogical issues like student engagement, assessment precision, and linguistic diversity. It subsequently examines the transformative influence of AI technologies—such as natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, speech recognition, and automated evaluation—in tackling these issues. The paper illustrates how AI-powered technologies may customize learning, support multilingual education, and enhance linguistic research through a comprehensive examination of existing literature, theoretical frameworks, and case studies.

Keywords:

Linguistics; Language; Artificial Intelligence; ELT; HEI; Education; Multilingual Communication

References

[1] Xiao, F., Zhao, P., Sha, H., et al., 2023. "Conversational agents in language learning" Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 4(2), 300–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2022-0032

[2] Williamson, B., Hogan, A., 2020. Commercialisation and Privatisation in/of Education in the Context of covid-19. Education International: Brussels, Belgium.

[3] Weigle, S.C., 2013. English language learners and automated scoring of essays: Critical considerations. Assessing Writing. 18(2), 85–99.

[4] Warschauer, M., 2020. Learning in the age of artificial intelligence. Language Learning & Technology. 24(3), 1–8.

[5] Wang, Y., Vásquez, C., 2022. Intelligent virtual agents in language education: Recent advances and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 35(1–2), 1–34.

[6] VanLehn, K., 2006. The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 16(3), 227–265.

[7] UNESCO, 2021. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris, France.

[8] Dongre, S., Krishnaveni, P., Maharram, V.K., et al., 2024. Advanced analysis of social and psychological factors in higher education institutions using DNN and LSTM. 2024 International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS), Tiptur, India, (26–27 July 2024); pp. 1–6. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSNS62112.2024.10691260

[9] Thorne, S.L., 2014. Mediating Technologies and Second Language Learning. in Handbook of Research on New Literacies. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 415–448.

[10] Thulasimani, T., Saha, L., Poreddy, B.,et al., 2024. Advanced Analysis of Social and Psychological Factors in Higher Education Institutions Using DNN and LSTM. In Proceedings of 2024 International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS), Tiptur, India, (26–27 July 2024); pp. 1–6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSNS62112.2024.10691260

[11] Siemens, G., 2005. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2(1), 3–10.

[12] Selwyn, N., 2019. Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.

[13] Saleem, N., Mufti, T., Sohail, S.S., Madsen, D.Ø., 2024. ChatGPT as an innovative heutagogical tool in medical education. Cogent Education. 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2332850

[14] Dongre, S., Krishnaveni, P., Maharram, V.K., et al., 2025. Graph Theory for Enhanced Feedback and Student Performance Prediction in Higher Education Using a GAT-BiLSTM-Based RL Model. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Advances in Modern Age Technologies for Health and Engineering Science (AMATHE), Shivamogga, India, 24–25 April 2025, pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AMATHE65477.2025.11081268

[15] Popenici, S.A.D., Kerr, S., 2017. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. 12(1), 1–13.

[16] Noble, S.U., 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press: New York, NY, USA.

[17] Morris, S.M., Stommel, J., 2018. An Urgency of Teachers: The Work of Critical Digital Pedagogy, 1st ed. Hybrid Pedagogy: Madison, WI, USA.

[18] Maxwell, M., Hughes, S., 2006. Frontiers in linguistic fieldwork: AI and endangered languages. Language Resources and Evaluation. 40(1), 59–76.

[19] Luckin, R., 2017. Machine Learning and Human Intelligence: The Future of Education for the 21st Century. UCL IOE Press: London, UK.

[20] Lantolf, J.P., Thorne, S.L., 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[21] Krashen, S., 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman: Harlow, UK.

[22] Karimli, V.M., Khudaverdiyeva, T.S., Huseynova, F., et al., 2025. The role of mobile computing in adaptive testing for English language learners: Personalizing assessment to improve outcomes. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(6), 149–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9663

[23] Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H., 2023. Speech and Language Processing. Pearson: Hoboken, NJ, USA

[24] Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., et al., 2018. Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 50(10), 893–899.

[25] IEEE, 2019. Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with autonomous and intelligent systems, Version Ⅱ. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems: Piscataway,NJ, USA.

[26] ZawackiRichter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., et al., 2019. Systematic review of research on AI applications in higher education: Are the promises fulfilled? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 16(1), 1–13.

[27] Hyland, K., 2019. Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[28] Huang, W., Hew, K. F., Fryer, L. K., 2021. Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful?A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2022-0032

[29] Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., et al., 2021. Ethics of AI in education: Towards a communitywide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 31(3), 555–576. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

[30] Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C., 2019. Artificial intelligence in Education Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign: Boston, MA, USA.

[31] Hodges, C., Ocak, C., 2023. Integrating generative AI into higher education: Considerations. Educause Review. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/8/integrating-generative-ai-into-higher-education-considerations (cited 23 March 2024)

[32] Poehner, M.E., Lantolf, J.P., 2010. Vygotsky’s teachingassessment dialectic. Teaching in Higher Education. 15(6), 623–628.

[33] Heffernan, N.T., Heffernan, C.L., 2014. The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 24(4), 470–497.

[34] Bruner, J., 1996. The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[35] Goldie, J.G.S., 2016. Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher. 38(10), 1064–1069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661

[36] Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J., 2015. Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidencebased Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[37] Hayles, N.K., 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

[38] GrimaltÁlvaro, C., Usart, M., 2024. Sentiment analysis for formative assessment in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 36(3), 647–682.

[39] GodwinJones, R., 2018. Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology. 22(1), 1–15.

[40] Giroux, H.A., 2011. On Critical Pedagogy. Bloomsbury: London, UK.

[41] Galla, C.K., 2016. Indigenous language revitalization, promotion, and education: function of digital technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 29(7), 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1166137

[42] Freire, P., 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum: London, UK.

[43] Downes, S., 2012. Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks. National Research Council Canada: Ottawa, Canada.

[44] Dhar, S., Shyam, H.S., Tomar, S., et al., 2023. Digital Disparity in the Technological Era of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. In 2023 9th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, (17–18 March 2023); 1, 2475–2478.

[45] Dai, Y., Liu, A., Lim, C.P., 2023. Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a studentdriven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP. 119, 84–90.

[46] Crystal, D., 2004. The language revolution. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK..

[47] Conrad, D., Openo, J., 2018. Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity. Athabasca University Press. Canada.

[48] Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., 2020. Detecting learners’ cognitive engagement with machine learning. Computers & Education. 155, 103933.

[49] Canale, M., Swain, M., 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics. 1(1), 1–47.

[50] Brunton, G., Stansfield, C., & Thomas, J. (2012). Finding relevant studies. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews, (pp. 107–134). Los Angeles: Sage.

[51] Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., et al., 2020. Language models are fewshot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 33, 1877–1901.

[52] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339, b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.

[53] Phillipson, R., 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[54] Kumaravadivelu, B., 2012. Language Teacher Education for a Global Society: A Modular Model for Knowing, Analyzing, Recognizing, Doing, and Seeing. Routledge: Oxford, UK.

[55] Bird, S., Klein, E., Loper, E., 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. O’Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA, USA.

[56] Bird, S., 2020. Decolonising speech and language technology. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (Online), (8–13 December 2020); International Committee on Computational Linguistics: New York, NY, USA. pp. 3504–3519.

[57] Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[58] Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillanMajor, A., et al., 2021. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Virtual Event, Canada, (3–10 March 2021); Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA. pp. 610–623.

[59] Bayne, S., 2015. Posthumanism and research in digital education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 36(1), 4–15.

[60] Attali, Y., 2013. Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement. Assessing Writing. 18(1), 40–59.

Downloads

How to Cite

Mammadova, B. G., Aliyeva, L. I., Mammadova, M., Aliyeva, R. M., Narayanam, V. S. K., Baghirzadeh, Z. M., Allahverdiyeva, L. Z., Mirzayev, E., Mehdiyeva, G. V. B., Aliyeva, S. J., & Ahmadzadeh, T. R. (2025). Acquisition of Language, Linguistics Via Computer (AI) in Higher Education Institutions and Its Effects. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(8), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.10687