Communicative Leadership in a Time of Transformation: Discourse Practices of Academic Leaders in Higher Education

Authors

  • Aisha Yousef Aljendan

    Department of Educational Leadership College of Education, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10768
Received: 27 June 2025 | Revised: 7 July 2025 | Accepted: 24 July 2025 | Published Online: 19 September 2025

Abstract

This study explores the crucial role of leadership communication, language, and discourse in facilitating organisational change within higher education institutions across diverse institutional contexts. By analysing scholarly research, the study identifies key patterns and strategies that impact change outcomes in academic settings. It reveals that communication transcends being a mere tool for disseminating information; rather, it is a core leadership competency that shapes the construction of organisational reality. The concept of communicative leadership is particularly relevant to higher education, highlighting the importance of dialogue, consultation, and collaborative meaning-making among diverse stakeholders, including faculty, staff, and students. Using a thematic synthesis methodology that combines meta-ethnography and grounded theory approaches, the research proposes a comprehensive Communicative Change Leadership Framework (CCLF) comprising five interconnected components: Contextual Assessment and Stakeholder Analysis, Strategic Communication Planning, Discourse and Language Strategy, Multi-Channel Engagement Implementation, and Continuous Feedback and Adaptation. Key findings underscore the significance of developing stakeholder-specific communication strategies, the effectiveness of inclusive language and metaphorical frameworks, and the benefits of viewing resistance as a resource for improvement rather than an obstacle. This study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical application by offering evidence-based recommendations for higher education leaders navigating complex organisational transformations in competitive academic environments.

Keywords:

Leadership Communication; Organisational Change; Higher Education; Discourse Analysis; Change Management; Stakeholder Engagement

References

[1] Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Slipersæter, S., et al., 2013. A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: Strategising pluralistic organisations in multiplex environments. Higher Education. 65(1), 79–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9582-8

[2] Ezzeddine, R., Otaki, F., Darwish, S., et al., 2023. Change management in higher education: A sequential mixed methods study exploring employees' perception. PLOS ONE. 18(7), e0289005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289005

[3] Aljendan, A.Y., 2025. Leadership Practices for Student Engagement in Saudi Arabia Universities. Journal of Posthumanism. 5(6), 804–816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2151

[4] Men, L., Yue, C., Liu, Y., 2020. Vision, passion, and care: The impact of charismatic executive leadership communication on employee trust and support for organizational change. Public Relations Review. 46, 101927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101927

[5] Blankenship, K., Craig, T., 2011. Language use and persuasion: multiple roles for linguistic styles. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 5(4), 194–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00344.x

[6] Holstein, J., Starkey, K., Wright, M., 2018. Strategy and narrative in higher education. Strategic Organization. 16, 61–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016674877

[7] Lueg, K., Graf, A., Boje, D., 2022. A Danish case study of a sociomaterial construction of a new nomos and purpose of higher education. Higher Education. 85, 455–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00844-6

[8] Rieg, N., Gatersleben, B., Christie, I., 2021. Organizational Change Management for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review. Sustainability. 13(7299). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137299

[9] Leão, P., Silva, M., 2021. Impacts of digital transformation on firms' competitive advantages: A systematic literature review. Strategic Change. 30(5), 421–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2459

[10] Peng, J., Li, M., Wang, Z., et al., 2020. Transformational Leadership and Employees' Reactions to Organizational Change: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 57(3), 369–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320920366

[11] Yuliasari, U., Sari, M., 2022. The role of language in shaping intergroup relations: fostering harmony in multicultural societies. Transformational Language Literature and Technology Overview in Learning (TRANSTOOL). 1(4), 45–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55047/transtool.v1i4.1365

[12] Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., et al., 2025. A step-by-step approach to systematic reviews in educational research. European Journal of Educational Research. 14(2), 549–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.549

[13] Aljendan, A.Y., 2024a. A framework for effective implementation of sustainability leadership in Saudi Arabia higher education. International Journal of Religion. 5(10), 1155–1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/8shrf912

[14] Prakash, J., Swathiramya, R., Balambigai, G., et al., 2024. AI-driven real-time feedback system for enhanced student support: Leveraging sentiment analysis and machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering. 10(2), 77–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.780

[15] Alsharif, S., Ahmed, A., Farag, H., et al., 2025. The role of Saudi universities' digital platforms in promoting digital citizenship among students. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 14(1), 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2025-0032

[16] Katla, S., Korivi, N., Manikandan, V., 2023. A sentiment analysis-based intelligent system for summarizing the feedback of educational institutions. In Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Delhi, India, 6–8 July 2023; pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT56998.2023.10306738

[17] Broucker, B., De Wit, K., Mampaey, J., 2020. Brand communication of higher education institutions: A call for multichannel communication analysis in higher education branding research. Higher Education Policy. 34(3), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00178-x

[18] Prabowo, R., Pratama, F., Arimbawa, P., et al., 2021. Investigating multi-channel learning adoption on higher education students. In Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET), Malang, Indonesia, 6–7 October 2021; pp. 282–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575118

[19] Ahmed, F., Zhao, F., Faraz, N., et al., 2020. How inclusive leadership paves way for psychological well‐being of employees during trauma and crisis: A three‐wave longitudinal mediation study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(2), 819–831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14637

[20] Keener, E., Kotvas, K., 2022. Beyond He and She: Does the singular use of “They, Them, Their” function generically as inclusive pronouns for cisgender men and women? Gender Issues. 40(1), 23–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-022-09297-8

[21] Darvin, R., 2023. Moving across a genre continuum: Pedagogical strategies for integrating online genres in the language classroom. English for Specific Purposes. 72, 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.11.004

[22] Arnăutu, D., Dagenais, C., 2021. Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 8(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00885-9

[23] Arimitsu, K., Hofmann, S., 2017. Effects of compassionate thinking on negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion. 31(1), 160–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1078292

[24] Choi, D., Park, J., Loeser, M., et al., 2024. Improving counseling effectiveness with virtual counselors through nonverbal compassion involving eye contact, facial mimicry, and head-nodding. Scientific Reports. 14, 10212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-51115-y

[25] Folabit, N., Jita, L., 2025. Decolonizing academic identities in postcolonial higher education: A collaborative framework for Africa and the Caribbean. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 9(1), 43–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i1.4366

[26] Asea, W., 2022. Epistemic decoloniality of westernised higher education: A discourse on curriculum justice and knowledge integration at historically white universities in South Africa. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 21(4), 375–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222221104343

[27] Ando, E., Clarin, A., Clarin, A., 2022. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of cooperatives. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 10(3), 65–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62249/jmds.2013.2418

[28] Kochukhova, E., 2020. The academic profession as perceived by faculty. Educational Studies. 2, 278–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-278-302

[29] Lynch, K., Ivancheva, M., 2016. Academic freedom and the commercialisation of universities: A critical ethical analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 15(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00160

[30] Seppälä, E., Bradley, C., Moeller, J., et al., 2020. Promoting mental health and psychological thriving in university students: A randomized controlled trial of three well-being interventions. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 11, 590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00590

[31] Vargas, V., Lawthom, R., Prowse, A., et al., 2019. Sustainable development stakeholder networks for organisational change in higher education institutions: A case study from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production. 208, 470–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.078

[32] Woof, V., Hames, C., Speer, S., et al., 2019. A qualitative exploration of the unique barriers, challenges and experiences encountered by undergraduate psychology students with mental health problems. Studies in Higher Education. 46(4), 750–762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1652809

[33] Billón, M., Crespo, J., Lera-López, F., 2021. Do educational inequalities affect Internet use? An analysis for developed and developing countries. Telematics and Informatics. 58, 101521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101521

[34] Peng, J., Chen, X., Zou, Y., et al., 2020. Environmentally specific transformational leadership and team pro-environmental behaviors: The roles of pro-environmental goal clarity, pro-environmental harmonious passion, and power distance. Human Relations. 74(11), 1864–1888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720942306

[35] Wang, J., Torelli, C., Lalwani, A., 2020. The interactive effect of power distance belief and consumers' status on preference for national (vs. private-label) brands. Journal of Business Research. 107, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.001

[36] Marbell-Pierre, K., Grolnick, W., Stewart, A., et al., 2019. Parental autonomy support in two cultures: The moderating effects of adolescents' self-construals. Child Development. 90(3), 825–845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12947

[37] Zhou, L., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C., 2019. Effects of perceived autonomy support from social agents on motivation and engagement of Chinese primary school students: Psychological need satisfaction as mediator. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 58, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.05.001

[38] Aljendan, A.Y., 2024b. Saudi higher education accreditation: From policy to practice: Cultural inquiry into Saudi academics' practices during the implementation of accreditation standards. Journal of Ecohumanism. 3(3), 700–711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3407

[39] Aljendan, A.Y., 2024c. Improving teaching quality in higher education through student evaluation feedback in Saudi universities. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. 30(2), 83–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52152/kuey.v30i2.845

[40] Moussa, M., Doumani, T., McMurray, A., et al., 2022. The influence of culture-communication and communication-relationship. Cross-Cultural Performance Management. 1(1), 101–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91268-0_7

[41] Presbitero, A., Attar, H., 2018. Intercultural communication effectiveness, cultural intelligence and knowledge sharing: Extending anxiety-uncertainty management theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 67, 35–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.08.004

[42] Wang, X., Zainudin, S., Yaakup, H., 2024. Intercultural communication competence among higher education international students: A systematic literature review. Migration Letters. 21(4), 612–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21i4.7683

[43] Marina, K., 2019. The influence of cultural contexts on intercultural communication. Worldview-Philosophy-Religion. 13(13), 87–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/WPR.2018.13.13

[44] Žalėnienė, I., Pereira, P., 2021. Higher education for sustainability: A global perspective. Geography and Sustainability. 2(2), 99–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.001

[45] Burgers, C., 2016. Conceptualizing change in communication through metaphor. Journal of Communication. 66(2), 250–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12211

[46] Damschroder, L., 2020. Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research. Psychiatry Research. 283, 112461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036

[47] Grant, R., 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review. 33(3), 114–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664

[48] Al-Haddad, S., Kotnour, T., 2015. Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 28(2), 234–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215

[49] Angermuller, J., 2018. Truth after post-truth: For a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies. Palgrave Communications. 4, 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0080-1

[50] Bamzai‐Dodson, A., Cravens, A., Wade, A., et al., 2021. Engaging with stakeholders to produce actionable science: A framework and guidance. Weather, Climate, and Society. 13(4), 1123–1137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-21-0046.1

[51] Nilsen, P., 2015. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science. 10(1), 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0

[52] Eaton, W., Brasier, K., Burbach, M., et al., 2021. A conceptual framework for social, behavioral, and environmental change through stakeholder engagement in water resource management. Society & Natural Resources. 34(8), 1111–1132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.1936717

[53] Khan, T., MacEachen, E., 2021. Foucauldian discourse analysis: Moving beyond a social constructionist analytic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 20, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211018009

[54] Bouton, E., Tal, S., Asterhan, C., 2021. Students, social network technology and learning in higher education: Visions of collaborative knowledge construction vs. the reality of knowledge sharing. The Internet and Higher Education. 49, 100787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787

[55] Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M., 2018. A systematic review of social media acceptance from the perspective of educational and information systems theories and models. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 57(8), 2085–2109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118817879

[56] Macmahon, S., Carroll, A., Osika, A., et al., 2022. Learning how to learn—Implementing self‐regulated learning evidence into practice in higher education: Illustrations from diverse disciplines. Review of Education. 10(3), e3339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3339

[57] Jagtap, S., Larsson, T., 2019. Resource-limited societies, integrated design solutions, and stakeholder input. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. 5(4), 273–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.10.001

[58] Öberg, S., Boberg, J., 2023. The decollegialization of higher education institutions in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. 9(2), 126–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2023.2192317

[59] Sahlin, K., Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., 2016. Collegiality in modern universities – The composition of governance ideals and practices. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. 2016(2), 33640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.33640

[60] Sheffield, S., Felten, P., 2018. Iterative practices and academic development. International Journal for Academic Development. 23(2), 162–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1485626

Downloads

How to Cite

Aljendan, A. Y. (2025). Communicative Leadership in a Time of Transformation: Discourse Practices of Academic Leaders in Higher Education. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 1203–1216. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10768

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 9 (September 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Aisha Yousef Aljendan

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.