Integrating Authentic Text into CEFR-Aligned English Reading Comprehension Module for Malaysian Upper Primary Schoolers

Authors

  • Jing Rou Kuek

    Education Department, Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
  • Siew Eng Lin

    Education Department, Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.10851
Received: 2 July 2025 | Revised: 18 July 2025 | Accepted: 5 August 2025 | Published Online: 24 September 2025

Abstract

Reading comprehension is a crucial aspect of English language education, particularly in multilingual contexts like Malaysia. Despite ongoing reforms, many Malaysian schoolers continue to struggle with this skill. This study developed an English Reading Comprehension Module that incorporates localized, authentic texts to improve reading proficiency among upper primary schoolers. The module was developed using the Design and Development Research (DDR) approach. Its theoretical framework integrates four theories: Schema Theory, Barrett’s Taxonomy, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory. These theories guided the selection of texts, the scaffolding of comprehension tasks, and the alignment of cognitive demand with students’ developmental stages. The module comprises 60 authentic reading passages suitable for A1 High, A2 Low, and A2 Mid readers, aligned with the Revised Malaysian English Language Curriculum and CEFR descriptors. Barrett’s Reading Comprehension Taxonomy informed the design of literal, reorganization, and inferential comprehension questions. Expert validation confirmed 99% content accuracy, while KR-20 reliability scores ranged from 0.820 to 0.918, indicating strong internal consistency. The module was trialed with 260 Year 5 students across three schools from both urban and rural contexts. Results showed a significant improvement in participants’ pre-test and post-test scores, indicating the effectiveness of the reading module in improving comprehension skills. Pedagogically, the study affirms the value of authentic, contextually relevant materials in fostering engagement and comprehension and supporting the CEFR-aligned direction of Malaysia’s English Language Education roadmap. Both print and online versions of the RCM are available to support self-paced learning and blended classroom instruction.

Keywords:

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages; Reading Comprehension; Reading Modules; Upper Primary Students; English Language Education; Authentic Text

References

[1] Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Larkin, K.M., 2017. Inference in Text Understanding, in: Spiro, R.J., Bruce, B.C., Brewer, W.F. (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Routledge: Oxford, UK. pp. 385–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107493-20

[2] Jamshidifarsani, H., Garbaya, S., Lim, T., et al., 2019. Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: An analytical review. Computers & Education. 128, 427–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.003

[3] OECD, 2023. PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

[4] Ozgungor, S., Guthrie, J.T., 2004. Interactions Among Elaborative Interrogation, Knowledge, and Interest in the Process of Constructing Knowledge From Text. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96(3), 437–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.437

[5] Tiep, N.N., 2017. EFL Teachers’ Perceptions Towards The Use of CEFR-V. 2(4),74–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.820613

[6] Tono, Y., 2019. Coming Full Circle - From CEFR to CEFR-J and back. CEFR Journal - Research and Practice. 1, 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTSIG.CEFR1-1

[7] Mohamed, A.R., Lin, S.E., Mohamed Ismail, S.A.M., 2012. The Potency of ‘READS’ to Inform Students’ Reading Ability. RELC Journal. 43(2), 271–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212451803

[8] Aripin, M.A., Yusoff, A.K., 2022. Level One English Language Teachers’ Evaluation of the Quality and Suitability of the Super Minds CEFR Textbook for Local Use by Malaysian Pupils. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies. 10(1), 114–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v10i1.435

[9] Katawazai, R., Haidari, M., Yahya, N.R., et al., 2022. An Evaluation of the Cultural Elements within Malaysian Year 1 English Textbooks: KSSR SK English Year 1 and CEFR Super Minds 1. Sains Humanika. 14(1), 20–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v14n1.1821

[10] Council of Europe, 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4 (cited 20 May 2025).

[11] Amini, M., Zahabi, A., Amini, D., et al., 2020. A Review of Reading Strategies and Models in Learning and Teaching of English as a Foreign Language. AJELP: The Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy. 8(2), 14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol8.2.2.2020

[12] Azman, H., 2016. Implementation and Challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 22(3), 65–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05

[13] Thirusanku, J., Md Yunus, M., 2014. Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science. 10(14), 254-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n14p254

[14] Abu Bakar, A.L., Mohd. Esa, S., Ationg, R., et al., 2021. The English Language In The Malaysian Education System. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling. 6(43), 122–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.643011

[15] Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2015. English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015–2025. Available from: https://anyflip.com/vxtgr/bifj/basic (cited 23 April 2025).

[16] Heng, C.S., Tan, H., 2006. English for Mathematics and Science: Current Malaysian Language-in-education Policies and Practices. Language and Education. 20(4), 306–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/le631.0

[17] Nawai, R., Said, N.E.M., 2020. Implementation Challenges of Common European Framework Reference (CEFR) in a Malaysian Setting: Insights on English Teachers’ Attitude. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(7), 28-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i7/7394

[18] Mohamad Uri, N.F., Abd Aziz, M.S., 2018. Implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Teachers’ awareness and the Challenges. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 24(3), 168–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-13

[19] Ma, X., Lin, S.E., 2025. Developing English Reading Comprehension Modules Incorporating Chinese Culture for Undergraduates in China. Forum for Linguistic Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8470

[20] Javed, M., Lin, S.E., Mohamed, A.R., 2015. Developing Reading Comprehension Modules to Facilitate Reading Comprehension among Malaysian Secondary School ESL Students. International Journal of Instruction. 8(2), 139–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.8211a

[21] Lin, S.E., Mohamed, A.R., Ismail, S.A.M.M., et al., 2014. Developing the right reading comprehension modules for the right reason with the help of READS. International Journal of Arts Management. 7(2), 511–519. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282879675_Developing_the_Right_Reading_Comprehension_Modules_for_the_Right_Reason_with_the_Help_of_READS (cited 20 June 2025).

[22] Mohamed, A.R., Lin, S.E., Ismail, S.A.M.M., 2010. Making Sense of Reading Scores with Reading Evaluation and Decoding System (READS). English Language Teaching. 3(3), 35-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p35

[23] Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., et al., 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman: New York, NY, USA. pp.1-335.

[24] Ormrod J.E., 2014. Cognitive and linguistic development. In: Ormrod JE, editor. Educational psychology: Developing learners. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson Education. pp. 1–44.

[25] Piaget, J., 1983. Piaget’s theory. In: Mussenm, P. (eds.). Handbook of child psychology, 4th ed. Wiley: New York, NY, USA. pp.41-102.

[26] Vygotsky, L.S., 1980. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

[27] Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D., 2014. Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues, 0 ed. Routledge: Oxford, UK. pp. 1-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034

[28] Aris, N.M., Ibrahim, N.H., Halim, N.D.A., 2024. Design and Development Research (DDR) Approach in Designing Design Thinking Chemistry Module to Empower Students’ Innovation Competencies. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 44(1), 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.5568

[29] Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2017. Curriculum and assessment standard document (DSKP): English language for Years 1–6. Available from: https://anyflip.com/explore?q=DSKP%20KSSR%20ENGLISH%20YEAR%206 (cited 13 April 2024).

[30] Lim, C.K., Lin, S.E., Mohamed, A.R., et al., 2018. Relooking at the ESL Reading Comprehension Assessment for Malaysian Primary Schools. English Language Teaching. 11(7), 146-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n7p146

[31] Sahyoni, S., 2021. Designing Authentic Assessment Model for Writing Skill at Junior High School Students. Journal of English Education and Linguistics. 2(1), 50–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56874/jeel.v2i1.402

[32] Aynalem, Y.B., Tesmand, A.G., 2023. An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Sub-Skills in EFL Textbooks. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching. 11(4), 641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8695

[33] Alghonaim, A.S., 2020. Impact of Related Activities on Reading Comprehension of EFL Students. English Language Teaching. 13(4), 15-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p15

[34] Guariento, W., 2001. Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal. 55(4), 347–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.4.347

[35] Cassady, J.C., Johnson, R.E., 2002. Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 27(2), 270–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094

[36] Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., 2002. Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology. 53(1), 109–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

[37] Jeynes, W.H., 2007. The Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Urban Secondary School Student Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Urban Education. 42(1), 82–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906293818

[38] Piaget, J., 1977. The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures.Viking Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1-232.

[39] Noordan, M.N.H.B., Md. Yunus, M., 2022. Using Digital Comprehension to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills among Young Learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11(2), 727-748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/13208

Downloads

How to Cite

Kuek, J. R., & Lin, S. E. (2025). Integrating Authentic Text into CEFR-Aligned English Reading Comprehension Module for Malaysian Upper Primary Schoolers. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.10851

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 10 (October 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article (This article belongs to the Topical Collection“Technology-Enhanced English Language Teaching and Learning: Innovations and Practices”)

License

Copyright © 2025 Jing Rou Kuek, Siew Eng Lin

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.