Comparative Analysis of EFL Writing Instruction: Insights from South Korea and Kazakhstan

Authors

  • Su Jin Lee

    College of Human Sciences and Education, KIMEP University, Almaty 050010, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Yekaterina Rudenko

    College of Human Sciences and Education, KIMEP University, Almaty 050010, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Sok-Hun Kim

    Center for Creative Convergence Education, Hanyang University, Ansan Gyeonggi-do 15588, Republic of Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10893
Received: 5 July 2025 | Revised: 10 August 2025 | Accepted: 17 August 2025 | Published Online: 10 September 2025

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) academic writing instruction in South Korea and Kazakhstan, aiming to identify statistically significant differences in grammatical error frequency and types among university students. Through case studies at two private universities, the research combines descriptive data (academic catalogs, program guides) with a detailed grammatical error analysis. Semester-long data collection involved categorizing prevalent grammatical error types among university students in each country using the grammatical system, followed by an assessment of their pedagogical implications. Findings reveal distinct programmatic emphases: while Kazakhstani programs provide separate writing courses, Korean programs integrate writing components into broader English communication courses. Error analysis indicated that Korean students exhibited significantly higher error rates in areas such as article usage, preposition choice, punctuation, verb formation, and word choice. These differences potentially reflect the impact of varying curriculum structure, writing instructional methodologies, and the differential integration of technology-enhanced learning. Acknowledging a time gap between data collection in Korea (2015) and Kazakhstan (2021), the study carefully considers potential influences such as evolving educational contexts and the increased integration of digital writing tools. The results suggest that universities in EFL contexts should adopt a process-based approach with contextualized corrective feedback to enhance academic writing proficiency within their EAP programs.

Keywords:

University English Curriculum; EFL Writing; Writing Feedback; Teaching Writing Approach; Process-Based Approach

References

[1] Cha, K., 1990. An error analysis of English writing through Korean college students' English compositions. English Education. 40, 139–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.66.1.201103.225

[2] Polio, G.C., 1997. Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning. 47(1), 101–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.31997003

[3] Han, Y., 2014. An error analysis of grammar in university students' English composition. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics. 14(4), 525–548.

[4] Aizawa, I., Rose, H., Thompson, G., et al., 2023. Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency, linguistic challenges, and academic language skills of Japanese students in an English medium instruction programme. Language Teaching Research. 27(4), 837–861.

[5] Mustafa, A., Arbab, A.N., El Sayed, A.A., 2022. Difficulties in academic writing in English as a second/foreign language from the perspective of undergraduate students in higher education institutions in Oman. Arab World English Journal. 13(3), 41–53. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.3

[6] Tajik, M.A., Abdul Manan, S., Arvatu, A.C., et al., 2022. Growing pains: Graduate students grappling with English medium instruction in Kazakhstan. Asian Englishes. 26(1), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2119970

[7] Suprayitno, E., Rois, S., Arifin, A., 2019. Character value: The neglected hidden curriculum in Indonesian EFL context. Asian EFL Journal. 23(3.3), 212–229.

[8] Byun, S.Y., Schofer, E., Kim, K.K., 2012. Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education. 85(3), 219–239. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038040712447180

[9] Choi, H.J., Park, J.H., 2013. Historical analysis of the policy on the college entrance system in South Korea. International Education Studies. 6(11), 106–121. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n11p106

[10] Park, S., 2024. Problems of English education in South Korean high schools. The Korea Times. Available from: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/opinion/20241105/problems-of-english-education-in-south-korean-high-schools (cited 7 January 2025).

[11] OECD, 2017. Higher Education in Kazakhstan 2017, Reviews of National Policies for Education. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268531-en

[12] Kubieva, V., Sagiyeva, A., Salimgerey, Z., et al., 2021. Multilingualism is a trend in the development of modern Kazakhstan. Global Journal of Sociology: Current Issues. 11(1), 40–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v11i1.5480

[13] Terlikbayeva, N., Menlibekova, G., 2021. The dynamics of language shift in Kazakhstan: Review article. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 3(2), 12–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.2.2

[14] Dimitriou, K.K., Omurzakova, D., Narymbetova, K., 2020. L1 Literacy in Kazakhstan and its effect on L2 English academic literacy. Global Trends and Values in Education. 1(1), 27–46.

[15] Tajik, M.A., Akhmetova, G.Y., Fillipova, L.N., et al., 2022. Students’ struggles with EMI in Kazakhstani universities. The Education and Science Journal. 24(8), 95–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-8-95-115

[16] Ferris, D.R., Hedgcock, J.S., 2014. Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. 3rd ed. Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA.

[17] Wang, W., Wen, Q., 2002. L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. 11(3), 225–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00084-X

[18] Wang, L., 2003. Switching to first language among writers with differing second-language proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12(4), 347–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.003

[19] Zhunussova, G., Tajik, M.A., Fillipova, L., et al., 2023. “I am a mixed person of Kazakh, Turkish and English”: Multilingual students’ identity in EMI universities in Kazakhstan. System. 119, 103159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4438963

[20] Newton, J.M., Ferris, D.R., Goh, C.C.M., et al., 2018. Teaching English to second language learners in academic contexts: Reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA.

[21] Hinkel, E., 2002. Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848

[22] Leki, I., Cumming, A., Silva, T., 2008. A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA.

[23] Hasan, M.K., Akhand, M.M., 2010. Approaches to writing in EFL/ESL context: Balancing product and process in writing class at tertiary level. Journal of NELTA. 15(1–2), 77–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v15i1-2.4612

[24] Suryana, Y., Iskandar, D., 2015. The use of process-product hybrid approach to improve students’ writing skills. Indonesian EFL Journal. 1(2), Article 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v1i2.624

[25] Steele, V., 2004. Product and process writing. Available from: http://www.englishonline.org.cn/en/teachers/workshops/teaching-writing/teaching-tips/product-process (cited 22 January 2025).

[26] Zamel, V., 1985. Responding to student writing. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly. 19(1), 79–101.

[27] Flower, L., Hayes, J., 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication. 32, 365–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

[28] Kim, Y., Kim, J., 2005. Teaching Korean university writing class: Balancing the process and genre approach. Asian EFL Journal. 7(2), 1–15.

[29] Kroll, B. (Ed.), 1990. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524551

[30] Raimes, A., 1991. Errors: Windows into the mind. College ESL. 1(2), 55–64.

[31] Nguyen, T.T.H., Nguyen, N.B., 2023. Product and process approaches of teaching English writing skill. International Journal of All Research Writings. 4(11), 34–40.

[32] Muncie, J., 2002. Finding a place for grammar in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal. 56, 180–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.180

[33] Widodo, H.P., 2006. Designing a genre-based lesson plan for an academic writing course. English Teaching: Practice and Critique. 5(3), 173–199.

[34] Hyland, F., 2003. Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System. 31, 217–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

[35] Grabe, W., Stoller, F.L., 2011. Teaching and researching reading. 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274

[36] Costley, J., Zhang, H., Courtney, M., et al., 2023. Peer editing using shared online documents: The effects of comments and track changes on student L2 academic writing quality. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 38(4), 865–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2233573

[37] Giray, L., Sevnarayan, K., Madiseh, F.R., 2025. Beyond policing: AI writing detection tools, trust, academic integrity, and their implications for college writing. Internet Reference Services Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2437174

[38] Hyland, K., Hyland, F., 2019. Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In: Hyland, K., Hyland, F. (eds.). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–22.

[39] Lee, I., 2008. Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing. 17(2), 69–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001

[40] Schulz, R.A., 2001. Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA–Colombia. The Modern Language Journal. 85, 244–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107

[41] Hu, G., 2003. English language teaching in China: Regional differences and contributing factors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 24(4), 290–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630308666503

[42] Chen, S., Nassaji, H., Liu, Q., 2016. EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 1(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y

[43] Bitchener, J., Young, S., Cameron, D., 2005. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 14, 191–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

[44] Pham, L. A., 2021. The effects of indirect feedback on grammatical errors in EFL learning writing. European Journal of English Language Teaching. 6(6), 153–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i6.3971

[45] Duong, T. H. O., Nguyen, T. H., 2006. Memorization and EFL students’ strategies at university level in Vietnam. TESL-EJ. 10(2), 1–21.

[46] Nguyen, T. H. A., 2005. Evaluation of students’ research work. Danang Publisher: Da Nang City, Vietnam

[47] Liu, Y., 2008. The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching. 15, 65–79.

[48] Ferris, D. R., 2003. Response to student writing: Research implications for second language students, 1st ed. Erlbaum: New Jersey, NJ, USA.

[49] Charles, M., 1990. Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique. ELT Journal. 44(4), 286–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.286

[50] Hyland, K., Hyland, F., 2006. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[51] Montgomery, J.L., Baker, W., 2007. Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing. 16(2), 82–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002

[52] German, E., Mahmud, Y.S., 2021. Students’ perception and preference on corrective feedback in online writing classes. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages International Journal. 16(8), 54–71.

[53] Amrhein, H.R., Nassaji, H., 2010. Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 13(2), 95–127.

[54] Abdygapparova, S., Smirnova, L., 2018. Teacher and teaching challenges in EFL higher education in Kazakhstan. In: Proceedings of the 1st Global Conference on Multidisciplinary Academic Research, Bangkok, Thailand, May 2018; Asia Pacific Institute of Advanced Research: Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 19–25.

[55] Corder, S.P., 1975. Error analysis, interlanguage and second language acquisition. Language Teaching. 8(4), 201–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800002822

[56] Selinker, L., 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 10(3), 209–231.

[57] Ferris, D.R., 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing. 8(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

[58] Alawi, T.O., 2014. An error analysis on academic writing: A look into the interlanguage of university students. Surigao del Sur State University Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2(2), 11–14.

[59] Amoakohene, B., 2017. Error analysis of students’ essays: A case of first year students of the University of Health and Allied Science. International Journal of Higher Education. 6(4), 54–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p54

[60] Giri, A., 2010. Errors in the use of English grammar. Journal of Nepal English Language Teachers’ Association. 15(1–2), 54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v15i1-2.4610

[61] Ibrahim, M.M.M., Ibrahim, A.I., 2020. An analysis of grammatical errors in academic writing of EFL students. Asian Journal of Social Science and Management Technology. 2(6), 81–90.

[62] Lee, J.H., 2012. A review of college English programs in Korea: In comparison with ESL and foreign language programs in U.S. universities. Foreign Languages Education. 19(4), 245–269.

[63] Shin, Y., 2018. A study on how to teach English writing in college English class. Korean Journal of General Education. 12(4), 37–65.

[64] Lee, E.H., 2022. The study on correlation between English writing competence and grammatical knowledge. Korean Journal of General Education. 16(4), 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2022.16.4.69

[65] Moldagazinova, Z., 2019. Trilingual education in Kazakhstan: What to expect. Voices on Central Asia. Available from: https://voicesoncentralasia.org/trilingual-education-in-kazakhstan-what-to-expect/ (cited 24 May 2024 .

[66] OECD, 2023. PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

[67] VanPatten, B., 2002. From input to output: A teachers’ guide to second language acquisition. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.

[68] DeWaelsche, S.A., 2015. Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses. Linguistics and Education. 32, 131–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.10.003

[69] Kuzembayeva, G., Umarova, A., Maydangalieva, Z., et al., 2022. Content and language integrated learning practices in Kazakhstan secondary schools during COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology. 14(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11733

[70] Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9(2), 27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

[71] K University, 2024c. University Catalog: 2024–2025 Academic Year. Available from: https://www.kimep.kz/about/files/2024/10/Catalog-2024-2025_final-25-06-24.pdf (cited 22 November 2024).

[72] K University, 2024a. GEN 1120: Academic Reading and Writing 1: Course syllabus. K University: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[73] K University, 2024b. GEN 1121: Academic Reading and Writing 2: Course syllabus. K University: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[74] H University, 2013. Curriculum 2013–2015. Available from: https://aml.hanyang.ac.kr/web/ehaksa/-12 (cited 17 May 2024).

Downloads

How to Cite

Lee, S. J., Rudenko, Y., & Kim, S.-H. (2025). Comparative Analysis of EFL Writing Instruction: Insights from South Korea and Kazakhstan. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 536–552. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10893

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 9 (September 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Su Jin Lee, Yekaterina Rudenko, Sok-Hun Kim

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.