A Pragmatic Study of Speech Acts in the Twitter Posts of Four Prominent Music Judges

Authors

  • Maria Olivia Christina Sianipar

    Faculty of Language and Arts, Uiversitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia

    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, HKBP Nommensen University, Medan 20235, Indonesia

  • Sumarsih

    Faculty of Language and Arts, Uiversitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia

  • Rahmad Husein

    Faculty of Language and Arts, Uiversitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11004
Received: 11 July 2025 | Revised: 9 October 2025 | Accepted: 21 October 2025 | Published Online: 12 November 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the use of speech acts in social media status updates by four renowned music judges—Simon Cowell, Howie Mandel, Luke Bryan, and Lionel Richie through the lens of Searle’s speech act theory. Status updates, a key feature of social media platforms such as Twitter, serve as tools for self-expression, interaction, and the dissemination of information, including events, promotions, and personal reflections. Adopting a descriptive qualitative design, this research analyzes words, phrases, sentences, expressions, and moods contained in the Twitter posts of the selected public figures, with the primary aim of identifying the types and realizations of speech acts employed. Findings reveal that representative acts constitute a dominant category across the four judges, functioning mainly as reports. Directive acts are also frequently employed, particularly in the form of invitations. Expressive acts are common, with Lionel Richie showing the highest usage, though Howie Mandel, Luke Bryan, and Simon Cowell also rely heavily on them, often in the form of compliments. Commissive acts appear less frequently; Luke Bryan and Simon Cowell each employed one instance, while Lionel Richie used two, typically as promises. Declarative acts, the rarest type, were identified in posts by Richie, Bryan, and Cowell, with Cowell using them most frequently to announce awards and graduations. Notably, Howie Mandel did not employ commissive or declarative acts. Overall, the findings highlight both similarities and distinctions in the communicative styles of these judges. All four demonstrate active engagement through expressive and directive acts, underscoring the role of speech acts in shaping their online presence and interaction with audiences.

Keywords:

Pragmatics; Speech Acts; Representative; Directive; Expressive; Com-Missive; Declarative; Music Judges; Social Media; Twitter

References

[1] Austin, J.L., 1965. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[2] Searle, J.R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[3] Seuren, P.A.M., 1996. Semantic Syntax. Blackwell: London, UK.

[4] Herring, S.C., 2013. Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. Discourse. 2(0), 1–26.

[5] Jassem, Z.A., 2015. The Arabic origins of English and Indo-European “life and death terms”: A radical linguistic theory approach. International Journal of English and Education. 4(1), 322–345.

[6] Sapir, E., 1911. The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist. 13(2), 250–282.

[7] Trager, G.L., 1961. Taos IV: Morphemics, syntax, semology in nouns and in pronominal reference. International Journal of American Linguistics. 27(3), 211–222. Available from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/464634

[8] Chomsky, N., 1957. Logical structure in language. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 8(4), 284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090080406

[9] Hall, E.T., 1963. A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist. 65(5), 1003–1026. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/668580.pdf

[10] Gove, P.B., 1981. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged (Vol. 1). Merriam-Webster: Springfield, MA, USA.

[11] Brown, J.D., Bailey, K.M., 1984. A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills. Language Learning. 34(4), 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00350.x

[12] Atchison, J., 1987. The well-tempered tongue: The politics of standard English in the high school. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 6(2), 135–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8700600205

[13] Yule, G., 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[14] Allott, N., 2010. Key Terms in Pragmatics. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK. Available from: https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5209409

[15] Coposescu, L., 2004. Issues of Pragmatics. Editura Universităţii Transilvania: Brașov, Romania.

[16] Austin, W.M., 1965. Some social aspects of paralanguage. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique. 11(1), 31–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100005703

[17] Tanjung, R., 2021. Implementation of the concept sentence learning model to increase students’ social science learning outcome in state elementary school. JIP Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI. 7(2), 125–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/jip.v7i2.10561

[18] Fitrie, A.S., Senowarsito, Nugrahani, D., 2021. An analysis of directive speech act used in “Among Us” short movie by Jay & Arya. In Proceedings of the Undergraduate Conference on Applied Linguistics, Linguistics, and Literature, Semarang, Indonesia, 2021; pp. 317–327. Available from: https://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/allure/article/view/2021

[19] Putri, I.G.A.V.W., Skolastika, I.M.P., 2022. Directive speech act used by the students of the English Study Program (FBA Unmas Denpasar) during online learning. In Proceedings of the Seminar Nasional Linguistik dan Sastra, Denpasar, Indonesia, July 2022; pp. 294–301.

[20] Manik, M.W., 2022. Directive speech analysis in Acts 99, 99 Komik Strip Kids Jaman Now. Aksaqila International Humanities and Social Sciences (AIHSS) Journal. 1(1). Available from: https://www.aksaqilajurnal.com/index.php/aihss/article/view/56

[21] Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., Widiati, U., 2022. Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 12(1), 124–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539

[22] Ulrikayanti, G.F., 2022. Pragmatics analysis on anger expression in #IndonesiaTerserah on Twitter. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS). 8(1), 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v8i1.3886

[23] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D., 2005. Mixed methods research: Developments, debates, and dilemmas. In Research in Organizations: Foundations and Methods of Inquiry, 2nd ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 315–326. Available from: www.kharazmi-statistics.ir/Uploads/Public/book/research%20in%20organization.pdf#page=334

[24] Creswell, J.W., 2010. Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 45–68.

[25] Sugiono, P.D., 2015. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Method. Alfabeta: Bandung, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)

[26] Searle, J.R., 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society. 5(1), 1–23. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166848

[27] Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J., 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Available from: https://lccn.loc.gov/2018034217

Downloads

How to Cite

Sianipar, M. O. C., Sumarsih, & Husein, R. (2025). A Pragmatic Study of Speech Acts in the Twitter Posts of Four Prominent Music Judges. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11004