A Phase-Theoretic Approach to Serial Verb Constructions in Semitic

Authors

  • Mansour Altamimi

    Department of English and Translation, College of Languages and Translation, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
  • Jacob Willson

    Department of English, Linguistics and Applied Linguistics Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11016
Received: 11 July 2025 | Revised: 24 July 2025 | Accepted: 30 July 2025 | Published Online: 25 September 2025

Abstract

In this paper, we examine Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Semitic from a phase-theoretic perspective. SVCs are constructions where two verbs appear in series and form a single predicate. In Semitic, SVCs are asymmetrical (i.e., one verb is lighter than the other), contiguous (i.e., nothing can come between the two verbs), and exhibit concordant marking (i.e., both verbs share the same inflection). The question we set out to address is what principles predict the emergence of contiguity, cohesion, and concordant marking? To account for these properties from a phase-theoretic perspective, we then examine two derivations. In the first, SVCs have two CPs, one for each serial verb, and a single pro to be shared between them. We demonstrate that this is likely a pre-canonical derivation in that it is still bi-clausal and has a residual position for a coordinator. In the second derivation, there is only one CP. This solution provides an account for asymmetry (i.e., clausal division of labor) and by upholding the monoclausal criterion is canonical. To support our analysis, we draw on illustrative examples from Arabic, Hebrew, and Aramaic, each fully glossed and structurally analyzed. Finally, we argue that each derivation reflects a stage in the development of SVCs; two CPs for pre-canonical SVCs, one CP for canonical ones. We then show that this clause fusion is the reanalysis of dual-CP into single-CP, which by reducing the number of phases per derivation, is a consequence of the principle of economy.

Keywords:

Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs); Semitic; Syntax; Economy Principle; Diachrony

References

[1] Andrason, A., 2022. Serial verb constructions in North-West Semitic languages: From a synchronic radiation back to the ‘Big Bang'. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus. 65, 67–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5842/65-1-970

[2] Altakhaineh, A.R.M., Zibin, A., 2018. Verb+ verb compound and serial verb construction in Jordanian Arabic (JA) and English. Lingua. 201, 45–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.08.010

[3] Locatell, C., 2022. The earliest serial verb constructions in Aramaic? Verb-verb constructions with hlk ‘go' and ʔth ‘come' in Old Aramaic. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus. 65, 89–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5842/65-1-971

[4] Aikhenvald, A.Y., Dixon, R.M.W., 2005. Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199279159.001.0001

[5] Aikhenvald, A.Y., 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In: Aikhenvald, A.Y., Dixon, R.M.W. (eds.). Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, pp. 1–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199279159.003.0001

[6] Bisang, W., 2009. Serial verb constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass. 3(3), 792–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00128.x

[7] Baker, M.C., 1989. Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(4), 513–553. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178644 (cited 14 June 2024).

[8] Lord, C., 1974. Causative constructions in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics. 5, 195–204.

[9] Muysken, P., Smith, N., Arends, J., 1995. Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. Benjamins: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[10] Durie, M., 1988. Verb serialization and verbal prepositions in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics. 1, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3623147

[11] Waltke, B.K., O'Connor, M., 1990. An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Eisenbrauns: Winona Lake, IN, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157006390X00531

[12] Greenspahn, F.E., 2003. An Introduction to Aramaic, 2nd ed. Society of Biblical Literature: Atlanta, GA, USA.

[13] Fassberg, S.E., 1990. Studies in Hebrew and Aramaic Syntax. Magnes Press: Jerusalem, Israel.

[14] Rainey, A.F., 2014. The El-Amarna correspondence (2 vol. set): A new edition of the cuneiform letters from the site of El-Amarna based on collations of all extant tablets. Brill: Leiden, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004281547

[15] Ingham, B., 1994. Najdi Arabic: Central Arabian. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.1

[16] Prochazka, T., 1988. Saudi Arabian dialects (Library of Arabic Linguistics monograph no. 8). Kegan Paul International: London, UK.

[17] Andrason, A., Aikhenvald, A.Y., 2022. The rise and fall of serial verb constructions: Preambles. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus. 65, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5842/65-1-965

[18] Etheridge, J.W., 1900. The Syrian Churches: Their Early History, Liturgies, and Literature. Longmans, Green & Co.: London, UK.

[19] Chomsky, N., 1995. Categories and transformations. In: The minimalist program, 1st ed. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 219–394.

[20] Chomsky, N., 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry. 36(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655

[21] Chomsky, N., 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Martin, R., Michaels, D., Uriagereka, J. (eds.). Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 89–155.

[22] Chomsky, N., 2001. Derivation by phase. In: Hale, K., Keyser, S.J. (eds.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 1–52.

[23] Zeijlstra, H., 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Amsterdam: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[24] Chomsky, N., 2012. Foreword. In: Kenstowicz, M. (eds.). Phases: Developing the framework. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104.1

[25] Richards, M.D., 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry. 38(3), 563–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563

[26] Cowper, E., DeCaen, V., 2017. Biblical Hebrew: A formal perspective on the left periphery. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. 38. Available from: https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/28212 (cited 14 June 2024).

[27] Hiraiwa, K., Miyagawa, S., Ochi, M., 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. 40(40), 67–80. Available from: https://web.mit.edu/norvin/www/24.956/Hiraiwamultipleagr.pdf (cited 14 June 2024).

Downloads

How to Cite

Altamimi, M., & Willson, J. (2025). A Phase-Theoretic Approach to Serial Verb Constructions in Semitic. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11016

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 10 (October 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Mansour Altamimi, Jacob Willson

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.