Unraveling Vocabulary Ambiguity: Contextual Lexis Learning and Vocabulary Retention for ESP Learners

Authors

  • Md.Nurul Haque

    International University of Business Agriculture and Technology (IUBAT), Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh
  • Mohd Azidan Bin Abdul Jabar

    Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
  • Muhammad Alif Redzuan Abdullah

    Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11018
Received: 11 July 2025 | Revised: 15 August 2025 | Accepted: 22 August 2025 | Published Online: 20 October 2025

Abstract

Ambiguity of meaning exists in every language and at all levels of linguistic structure. A common feature of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) texts is the ambiguity of meaning in the teaching and learning of ESP. Vocabulary retention is another problematic issue for learners at all levels in every language. For ESP students, Contextual Lexis Learning (CLL) is beneficial, since it has a decisive impact on establishing meaning and retaining vocabulary. The current study aims to investigate the effectiveness of CLL in helping ESP students understand the meaning of vocabulary and retain it. The study involved 50 undergraduate students enrolled in an engineering program, who were assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. Before the training, a pre-test was conducted to determine their levels of proficiency. Post-tests were performed under different conditions after every two training sessions. The results of the T-test and Independent Samples T-test indicate that CLL has a significant and wide-ranging effect on students' ability to comprehend and produce vocabulary in various situations, as well as to retain it in both the short and long term. The current study demonstrates that CLL methods enhance students' confidence and autonomy, reducing their reliance on dictionaries and external resources. This article has some curriculum design and pedagogical implications, suggesting that if we equip our students with improved vocabulary proficiency and a greater understanding of language, we must make CLL a component of any ESP program.

Keywords:

Ambiguity of Meaning; Contextual Meaning; Vocabulary Retention; ESP; Contextual Lexis Learning

References

[1] Arslan, K., 2024. Teaching English Vocabulary: Innovative Methods. Contemporary Research in Language and Linguistics. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62601/crll.v2i1.26

[2] Dmitrieva, E., Poskrebysheva, T., 2021. Teaching English For Specific Purposes In The Modern Technical Education Conditions. In Proceedings of the Freedom and Responsibility in Pivotal Times, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, 19–23 April 2021; pp. 381–394.

[3] Liu, D., Lei, L., 2019. Technical vocabulary. In: Webb, S., (ed.). The Routledge Handbook Of Vocabulary Studies. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 111–124.

[4] Brun-Mercer, N., 2022. Exploring terms in English for specific purposes. In: Viana, V., (ed.). Teaching English with Corpora: A Resource Book, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 217–223.

[5] Binhomran, K., Altalhab, S., 2023. A systematic review of EFL research on the impact of reading comprehension on students’ vocabulary retention, and the relation between reading and vocabulary size. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies. 5(3), 146–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i3.1395

[6] Azalmad, N.-E., 2023. Reconsidering the Distinction between English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and English for General Purposes (EGP)—Towards a Unified Perspective. Journal of Innovative Research. 1(3), 35–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/jir.v1i3.2010

[7] Sakti, N.S.S., Sarkiah, S., Sukma, S., et al., 2024. Redefining Esp: Bridging the Gap between Traditional Methods and Modern Educational Needs. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science. 6(3), 806–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v6i3.1164

[8] Mišić-Ilić, B., Đorđević, J., 2022. ESP and internationalization of higher education and research. Journal of Language & Literary Studies/Folia Linguistica & Litteraria. (42). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.42.2022.2

[9] Basturkmen, H., 2025. Learning a specialized register: An English for Specific Purposes research agenda. Language Teaching. 58(1), 57–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000472

[10] Azalmad, N.-E., 2023. Exploring the Interplay of Vocabulary Size, Depth, and Reading Performance among Engineering Students in an ESP Context. American Journal of Education and Technology. 2(4), 17–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i4.2011

[11] Liu, Y., Medlar, A., Głowacka, D., 2022. Lexical ambiguity detection in professional discourse. Information Processing & Management. 59(5), 103000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103000

[12] Boland, J.E., 2018. Lexical Ambiguity. In: Gaskell, M.G., Rueschemeyer, S.-A. (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press: London, UK. pp. 96–117.

[13] Radetska, S., 2024. Challenges and innovations in scientific and technical translation: terminological complexities and 'false friends'. The Modern Higher Education Review. (9), 119–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266/2024.97

[14] Specht, A., Stall, S., Machicao, J., et al., 2024. Managing linguistic obstacles in multidisciplinary, multinational, and multilingual research projects. Plos one. 19(12), e0311967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311967

[15] Birkelund, L., Dieperink, K.B., Sodemann, M., et al., 2024. Communicating without a Shared Language: A Qualitative Study of Language Barriers in Language-Discordant Cancer Communication. J Health Commun. 29(3), 187–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2309357

[16] Naser, N., Milham, M., 2022. Semantic Perspective on Lexical Ambiguity in English Tetxbook. English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research. 7, 80–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i1.17531

[17] Chandy, R., Serrano, R., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., 2024. The effect of context on the processing and learning of novel L2 vocabulary while reading. Applied Psycholinguistics. 45(6), 1086–1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716424000407

[18] Shih, Y.-C., 2020. Vocabulary Acquisition From a Virtual Street-View Context. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT). 10(4), 14–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2020100102

[19] Teng, F., 2019. The effects of context and word exposure frequency on incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. The Language Learning Journal. 47(2), 145–158. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1244217

[20] Kanazawa, Y., 2023. Lexical and contextual emotional valence in foreign language vocabulary retention: An experimental study and the Deep Epistemic Emotion Hypothesis. The Mental Lexicon. 18(3), 339–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00046.kan

[21] Lowell, R., Pender, K.W., Binder, K.S., 2020. Impact of informative context’s meaning consistency during incidental vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly. 55(4), 679–697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.285

[22] Seyidova, N., 2023. The Influence of Context on the Semantics of a Word. Path of Science. 9(8), 8007–8011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22178/pos.95-38

[23] Ferreira, R.A., Sierra, V.S., Vega, S.A., 2019. Immediate testing is more beneficial than delayed testing when learning novel words in a foreign language. Revista Signos Estudios de Lingüística. 52(100). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342019000200290

[24] Nation, I.S.P., 2022. Learning words from context. In: Nation, I.S.P. (ed.). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 336–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873.010

[25] van den Broek, G.S.E., Takashima, A., Segers, E., et al., 2018. Contextual Richness and Word Learning: Context Enhances Comprehension but Retrieval Enhances Retention. Language Learning. 68(2), 546–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12285

[26] Kecskes, I., 2023. The Role of Context in English as a Lingua Franca. In: Kecskes, I., (ed.). The Socio-Cognitive Approach to Communication and Pragmatics. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 195–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30160-5_10

[27] Ait El Mouden, M., Maliki, M.S., 2024. Bridging the Gap: The Need for a Specialized English Curriculum for Mechanical Engineering Students at ENSEM Engineering School, Hassan II University. TESOL and Technology Studies. 5(2), 52–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v5i2.1298

[28] Weissler, R.E., 2023. Comparison of imaging techniques for the analysis of bubble distribution in ship wakes. the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 153(3_supplement), A211-A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0019234

[29] Nekrasova-Beker, T., 2020. Vocabulary demands for engineering students studying English in Russia: Comparing ESP course materials across three engineering disciplines. Global Business Languages. 20, 159–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4079/gbl.v20.9

[30] Tu, H.-L., 2025. Enhancing Vocabulary Acquisition Efficiency Through Metacognitive Strategies and Vocabulary Tasks: A Study of EFL Learners in a Taiwanese University of Technology. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 16(1), 89–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.10

[31] Durovic, Z., 2021. Corpus linguistics methods for building ESP word lists, glossaries and dictionaries on the example of a marine engineering word list. Lexikos. 31, 259-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5788/31-1-1647

[32] Dar, H., Aziz, R., Khan, J.A., et al., 2024. Gamify4LexAmb: a gamification-based approach to address lexical ambiguity in natural language requirements. PeerJ Computer Science. 10, e2229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2229

[33] Kryzhanivska, A., 2022. Exploring discipline-specific and paper-specific vocabulary. In: Viana, V., (ed.). Teaching English with Corpora, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 338–342.

[34] Dr. Serajum, M., Sumaiya, A., Aklima, A., et al., 2024. Needs Analysis for ESP Courses in the Context of a Private University of Bangladesh. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. 30(11), 411–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.8453

[35] Ngoc, N.T., Anh, N.T.K., Nguyet, H.T.A., 2024. A vocabulary learning strategy investigation on esp majored-students at the university of economics technology for industries (UNETI). Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2024.462

[36] Phuong, N.T.V., 2024. Challenges in ESP Vocabulary Acquisition: A Study of Vietnamese Non-English Majors. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies. 6(1), 109–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v6n1p109

[37] Duong, M.T., 2022. Insights into ESP vocabulary learning strategies used by Vietnamese tertiary students. Journal of Language and Education. 8(1 (29)), 38–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.10924

[38] Tran, T.C., Do, M.C., 2023. The Use of Vocabulary Notebooks for EFL Non-majors' ESP Vocabulary Acquisition. In Proceedings of the ICTE Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 16–17 August 2024; pp. 68–81.

[39] Havwini, T., Ratnasari, D., Fadilah, N., et al., 2024. English vocabulary mastery in vocational higher education: An analysis of challenges and feasible strategies. Journal on Education. 6(4), 19110–19118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.5796

[40] Zulfahmi, M., Kardena, A., 2024. Towards Technical Fluency: Assessing the English Language Needs of Mechanical Engineering Students in a University ESP Context. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi. 3(2), 248-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47233/jpst.v3i2.1627

[41] Agzamovna, T.U., 2024. Bridging language and professional skills: effective ESP pedagogy for diverse learner needs. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics. 5(10), 36–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-05-10-06

[42] Pan, J., 2024. The Study on Vocabulary Learning and Application Strategies Based on Construct Theory. World Journal of Education and Humanities. 6(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/wjeh.v6n6p38

[43] Aghdam, S.S., Mohammadi, R.R., Asadollahfam H, Yousefi MH, 2025. Enhancing Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition through Self-Regulation, Spaced Repetition, and Cognitive Load Management Strategies. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 51(2), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-05-10-06

[44] Zhang, T., Liang, L., 2024. Vocabulary learning strategies of English as a foreign/second language. Lect Notes Educ Psychol Public Media. 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/45/20230216

[45] Strong, B., 2023. Retrieval, repetition, and retention: Unveiling vocabulary acquisition strategies for ESL learners. Arts & Humanities Open Access Journal. 5(3), 185–190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/ahoaj.2023.05.00206

[46] Hanks, E., Hashimoto B, Egbert J, 2024. The contracts word list: Integral vocabulary for reading and writing English contracts. English for Specific Purposes. 75, 37–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.03.002

[47] Khan, A., Roy, S., 2023. Implementation of contextual vocabulary at the tertiary level: learner and instructor perspective. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. 2(10), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v2i10.169

[48] Dudzik, A., Dzięcioł-Pędich, A., 2022. Online tools for individual study of specialised vocabulary–selected challenges. Linguodidactica. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/lingdid.2022.26.03

[49] Nikolova-Stoupak, I., Bibauw, S., Dumont, A., et al., 2024. Generating Contexts for ESP Vocabulary Exercises with LLMs. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Computer Assisted Language Learning, Rennes, France, 25–26 October 2024; pp. 153–175.

[50] Alhama, R.G., Rowland, C.F., Kidd, E., 2023. How does linguistic context influence word learning? Journal of Child Language. 50(6), 1374–1393. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0305000923000302

[51] Yeung, R.C., Fernandes, M.A., 2021. Divided attention at encoding or retrieval interferes with emotionally enhanced memory for words. Memory. 29(3), 284–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1887896

[52] Udaya, M., 2022. Retention and Recall of Lexicon Using Semantic Maps. Education and Development. 30(1), 26-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ed.v30i1.49402

[53] Carter, G.-A., Hoffman P, 2021. Effects of global discourse coherence on local contextual predictions. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 26–29 July 2021; p. 3334.

[54] Nguyen, T.C.D., 2022. The impact of context on efl learners’ vocabulary retention. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v6i2.4295

[55] Johns, B.T., 2021. Disentangling contextual diversity: Communicative need as a lexical organizer. Psychological Review. 128(3), 525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000262

[56] Li, Q., 2024. Cognitive Linguistics and Vocabulary Acquisition: Enhancing English Learners' Mental Lexicon. Education Insights. 1(2), 48–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70088/9qmx7977

[57] Vargo, A., Yamaguchi, K., Iwata, M., et al., 2023. A Context-Based Multimedia Vocabulary Learning System for Mobile Users. Informatics. 11(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11010001

[58] Conklin, K., Carrol, G., 2021. Words Go Together Like ‘Bread and Butter’: The Rapid, Automatic Acquisition of Lexical Patterns. Applied Linguistics. 42(3), 492–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa034

[59] Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., Ha, H., et al., 2023. A Contextualized Meaning-Recall Vocabulary Testing Platform. JALT Journal. 45, 211–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ45.2-2

[60] Wang-Kildegaard, B, Ji, F., 2024. Context Synthesis Accelerates Vocabulary Learning Through Reading: The Implication of Distributional Semantic Theory on Second Language Vocabulary Research. Applied Linguistics. 45(2), 287–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad034

[61] Aswadi, D., 2024. Optimizing Language Learning with Relevant and Contextual Vocabulary Selection in Education. Journal on Education. 7(1), 8615–8625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.7714

[62] Simpson, G.B, Burgess, C., 1988. Chapter 10 — Implications of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution for Word Recognition and Comprehension. In: Small, S.L., Cottrell, G.W., Tanenhaus, M.K. (eds.). Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. Morgan Kaufmann. pp. 271–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051013-2.50014-8

[63] MacGregor, L.J., Peters, F., Gilbert, R.A., et al., 2022. Vocabulary knowledge and non-verbal IQ predict successful comprehension of ambiguous sentences. Cambridge Open Engage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001190

[64] Carignan, C., Casillas, J.V., Chodroff, E., et al., 2022. Fuzzy boundaries: Ambiguity in speech production and comprehension. Frontiers in Communication. 7, 1112753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1112753

[65] Van Vu, D., Michel, M., 2021. An exploratory study on the aspects of vocabulary knowledge addressed in EAP textbooks. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal9345

[66] Hunchenko, Y., 2023. Peculiarities of teaching vocabulary at ESP classes. Pedagogical Sciences: Reality and Perspectives. 2(92), 26–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series5.2023.92.2.06

[67] Xin, L., Caiga, D.B.T., 2024. Tolerance of Ambiguity, Reading Strategies and Ability of Chinese College Non-English Majors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development. 12(2), 75–86. DOI: https://doi.org/110.23977/curtm.2023.061601

[68] Ezzini, S., Abualhaija, S., Arora, C., et al., 2022. TAPHSIR: towards AnaPHoric ambiguity detection and ReSolution in requirements. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM joint european software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering, New York, NY, USA, 14–18 November 2022; pp. 1677–1681.

[69] Lazurko, A., Haider, L.J., Hertz, T., et al., 2024. Operationalizing ambiguity in sustainability science: embracing the elephant in the room. Sustainability Science. 19(2), 595–614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01446-6

[70] Baa, S., 2022. What considerations should the efl/esl teacher take into account when teaching vocabulary? Klasikal: Journal of Education, language teaching and Science. 4(1), 170–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v4i1.138

[71] Terai, M., Yamashita, J., Pasich, K.E., 2021. Effects of learning direction in retrieval practice on EFL vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 43(5), 1116–1137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000346

[72] Goetz, T., 2024. Frustration Gap Bridging: A Second Look at Vocabulary Proficiency with the Yes/No Test. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on e-Learning, Porto, Portugal, 24–25 October 2024; pp. 94–103.

[73] Pulido, M.F., 2022. Why are multiword units hard to acquire for late L2 learners? Insights from cognitive science on adult learning, processing, and retrieval. Linguistics Vanguard. 8(1), 237–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0043

[74] Fayzullayevna, K.M., 2024. Improving lexical competence of a+ level learners. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics. 5(12), 138–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-05-12-28

[75] Lin, C.-H., Zhou, K., Jin, F., et al, 2024. More is not always better? Vocabulary learning strategies instruction in online environment. Interactive Learning Environments. 32(10), 75247541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2324333

[76] Li, Z., Wu, S., Liu, D., 2025. The effects of context, story-type, and language proficiency on EFL word learning and retention from reading. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 63(2), 1507–1531. DOI: https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0155

[77] Rodd, J.M., 2020. Settling into semantic space: An ambiguity-focused account of word-meaning access. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15(2), 411–427. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1745691619885860

[78] Kliegl, O., Bartl, J., Bäuml, K.-H.T., 2024. The pretesting effect comes to full fruition after prolonged retention interval. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 13(1), 63–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000085

[79] Purwanto, M.B., Despita D, 2022. Review on vocabulary teaching strategies: Study case: Effect of learners’ lexical recall. Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics. 5(2), 60–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31540/jeell.v5i2.1934

[80] van Uum, P., 2022. Latijnse vocabulaireverwerving in context. Lampas. 55(2), 180–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/LAM2022.2.005.UUM (in Dutch)

[81] Shykun, A., 2023. Content and language integrated learning: enhancing language acquisition and content understanding. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics. 2(4), 39–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20230204.05

[82] Lysak, H., 2024. Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): research into its efficacy and application in education across Europe and beyond. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/2308-4081/2024-14(1)-10

[83] Dzulkurnain, M.I., Irianto, S., Rasmita, R., et al., 2024. Understanding the benefits and challenges of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in English education: A literature synthesis. Journal on Education. 6(4), 18941–18953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.5876

Downloads

How to Cite

Haque, M., Bin Abdul Jabar, M. A., & Redzuan Abdullah, M. A. (2025). Unraveling Vocabulary Ambiguity: Contextual Lexis Learning and Vocabulary Retention for ESP Learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(11), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11018

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 11 (November 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Md.Nurul Haque, Mohd Azidan Bin Abdul Jabar, Muhammad Alif Redzuan Abdullah

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.