Refusal Strategies and Face Concerns: A Cross-Cultural Study of Chinese and Malaysian Undergraduates

Authors

  • Gang Yan

    School of Languages, Civilization and Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah 06010, Malaysia

    School of Foreign Languages, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
  • Siti Jamilah Bidin

    School of Languages, Civilization and Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah 06010, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11026
Received: 12 July 2025 | Revised: 1 August 2025 | Accepted: 6 August 2025 | Published Online: 23 September 2025

Abstract

Refusal speech acts are among the most face-threatening interactions, especially in multicultural academic and business settings. This small-scale exploratory study investigates how Chinese Business English Major students (BEMS) and Malaysian Bachelor of Applied Linguistics and Business Administration students (BALBAS) perform refusal speech acts in English and perceive their face-threatening effects. Guided by Speech Act Theory and Politeness Theory, this mixed-methods research utilized Discourse Completion Tasks (DCTs), Scaled Response Questionnaires (SRQs), Retrospective Verbal Reports (RVRs), and semi-structured interviews. Sixteen participants from a Chinese public university and a Malaysian public university participated in the study. They provided data on three key aspects: refusal strategies, semantic formulas, and sociopragmatic perceptions. These were examined across both formal and informal scenarios, which varied systematically in terms of social status and social distance. The results indicate that both groups favored indirect refusal strategies. However, Chinese students employed longer, more complex refusal formulas with a focus on postponement and alternatives, reflecting a cultural emphasis on harmony and indirectness. Malaysian students demonstrated a pragmatic balance between politeness and controlled directness, especially among peers, consistent with multicultural norms. Malaysian participants also reported higher face-threat perceptions across contexts, highlighting greater sensitivity to relational dynamics. Social status and distance significantly influenced pragmatic choices for both groups. These findings offer insights into intercultural communication and underscore the importance of explicit pragmatic instruction in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) education.

Keywords:

Refusal Speech Acts; Cross-Cultural Pragmatics; Face-Threatening Acts; Pragmatic Instruction; ESP

References

[1] Liu, Y., Nguyen, N.D.D., Nguyen, H.C., et al., 2025. Rhetorical move structures and politeness strategies employed in request and refusal emails by international students in a Thai ELF context. Cogent Education. 12(1), 2466284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2466284

[2] Smith, G., 2024. The role of pragmatics in cross-cultural communication. European Journal of Linguistics. 3(1), 13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.1768

[3] Usmani, S., Almashham, A., 2024. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Analysing speech acts in different cultures. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies. 6(1), 186–198. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1586

[4] Hui, X., Liu, Z., Chi, Y., 2024. A systematic review on technology-based instructions to develop English pragmatic competence for non-native speakers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 13(5), 3587–3598. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.28385

[5] Zeng, Z., Nair, S.M., Wider, W., 2022. A comparative study of Chinese EFL undergraduates' pragmatic competence in English letter writing between urban and suburban universities. World Journal of English Language. 12(6), 377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p377

[6] Jia, M., Yang, G., 2021. Emancipating Chinese (im)politeness research: Looking back and looking forward. Lingua. 251, 103028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103028

[7] Abd Hadi, N.H., Midin, M., Tong, S.F., et al., 2023. Exploring Malaysian parents' and teachers' cultural conceptualization of adolescent social and emotional competencies A qualitative formative study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 992863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.992863

[8] Azmi, S. F., Ma'rof, A. A., Abdullah, H., et al., 2023. Culture and communication styles: Collectivism vs individualism cultural orientations from Malaysian perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(16), 201–214. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i16/18738

[9] Brown, P., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press: Cambridge, UK.

[10] Harmia, C.D., 2024. The use of politeness strategy in EFL classroom: Challenges and opportunities. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa. 18(2), 175–192. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/ld.v18i2.128230

[11] Papakonstantinou, V., 2024. Teaching cross-cultural pragmatics through AVT. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts. 10(3), 318–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00142.pap

[12] Taguchi, N. (ed.), 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085

[13] Wong, L., Esler, J., 2020. A review of teaching and learning linguistic politeness. Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature. 1(4), 13–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v1i4.38

[14] Han, D., Xiong, G., 2024. Malaysia's relations with China in 2023 under Anwar and the road ahead. Available from: https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip24009-malaysias-relations-with-china-in-2023-under-anwar-and-the-road-ahead/ (cited 12 April 2025)

[15] Xi, J., Anwar, I., 2024. China and Malaysia should ‘firmly support each other'. Available from: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3285638/china-and-malaysia-should-firmly-support-each-other-xi-jinping-tells-anwar-ibrahim (cited 12 April 2025)

[16] Xiao, T.Y., Zhou, Q., 2024. China–Malaysia economic ties: trade, investment, and opportunities. China Briefing. Available from: https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-malaysia-closer-economic-ties-and-opportunities/ (cited 12 April 2025)

[17] Austin, J.L., 1962. How To Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[18] Searle, J.R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[19] Searle, J.R., 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society. 5(1), 1–23. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166848

[20] Beebe, L.M., Takahashi, T., Uliss Weltz, R., 1990. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In: Scarcella, R.C., Andersen, E., Krashen, S.D. (eds.). Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. Newbury House: New York, NY, USA. pp. 55–73.

[21] Huang, W., Lu, X., 2023. The difficulty of oral speech act production tasks in second language pragmatics testing. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1096399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096399

[22] Zhang, F., 2022. A developmental study of pragmatic strategies of refusals by Chinese English majors. English Language Teaching. 15(10), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n10p1

[23] Raslie, H.B., Azizan, A.B., 2018. Refusals in the Malay culture: Gender differences in focus. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8(12), 1947–1959. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5362

[24] Holmes, J., Wilson, N., 2022. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge: Abingdon, UK.

[25] Jalis, F.M.M., Jabar, M.A.A., Halim, H.A., et al., 2019. Refusal strategy used by Malay and German native speakers to refuse requests. Asian Social Science. 15(4), 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v15n4p49

[26] Mirzieva, L.R., Mirzieva, L.R., 2025. Pragmatic aspect of refusal behavior in Chinese (based on an online survey). Theory of Language and Intercultural Communication. 56(1), 184–196. Available from: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2219-8660/article/view/291168 (cited 12 April 2025)

[27] Farnia, M., Wu, X., 2012. An intercultural communication study of Chinese and Malaysian university students' refusal to invitation. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2(1), 162–172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p162

[28] Saad, N., Bidin, S.J., Shabdin, A.A., 2022. Realization of the speech act of refusals among malay esl students. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 24, 27–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/jps2022.24.2

[29] Alqurashi, H.S., 2022. The impact of social power and social distance on the request strategies employed by Saudi learners and teachers of English as a foreign language. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences. (78), 198–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.78.2022.664

[30] Al-Sallal, R.E., 2024. Pragmatic analysis of refusal strategies in spoken English of Bahraini and Indian L2 learners. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 11(1), 2321682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2321682

[31] House, J., Kádár, D.Z., 2021. Cross-cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[32] Mojarrad, S.S., Abdi, R., Mohammadi, V., et al., 2025. A. Explorations in Refusal and Complaining Speech Acts of Iranian EFL Learners Across Language Proficiency, Mother Tongue, Gender, and Sociocultural Factors. International Journal of Research in English Education, 10(2), 59–78. Available from: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-949-en.html (cited 12 April 2025)

[33] Fang, X., 2024. Making refusals via English as a lingua franca: Chinese English speakers' strategies and sequences. Journal of Pragmatics. 230, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.06.011

[34] Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Wannaruk, A., 2019. Pragmatic competence in business context: A case study of Thai EFL university students. Suranaree Journal of Social Science. 13(2), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55766/RQSP1038

[35] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

[36] Hodeib, C., 2021. An overview of research methods in speech acts and politeness: The case for triangulation. Argumentum. 17, 108–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2021/7

[37] Youn, S.J., 2024. Mixed methods research in L2 pragmatics. Applied Pragmatics. 6(2), 182–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00026.you

[38] Council of Europe, 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (Companion Volume). Available from: https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97 (cited 12 April 2025)

[39] Rahmani, P., Ebadi, S., Eslami, Z.R., 2025. The impact of mobile-mediated dynamic assessment on EFL learners' pragmatic competence: the speech act of disagreement. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 1–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2472062

[40] Saini, F., Ardhy, A.A.S., 2023. Exploring the dimensions of intercultural communicative competence (ICC) in English learning: Insights from EFL students. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context. 8(2), 145–159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v8i2.15111

[41] Beltrán-Palanques, V., 2016. Assessing pragmatics: DCTs and retrospective verbal reports. In: Pareja Lora, A., Calle-Martínez, C., Rodríguez-Arancón, P. (eds.). New perspectives on Teaching and Working with Languages in the Digital Era. Research-publishing.net: Dublin, Ireland. pp. 303–312.

[42] Al-Sallal, R.E., Ahmed, M.O., 2022. The role of cultural background in the use of refusal strategies‎ by L2 learners. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 10 (2, Themed Issue on the Socio-Psychology of Language), 92–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2022.550928.2596

[43] Demirkol, T., 2019. Refusal production via DCT and role play. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 15(1), 200–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547703

[44] Hashimoto, B.J., Nelson, K., 2020. Using a corpus in creating and evaluating a DCT. Applied Pragmatics. 2(1), 80–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.19009.has

[45] Ogiermann, E., 2018. Discourse completion tasks. Methods in Pragmatics. 10, 229–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-009

[46] Karpava, S., 2025. The effect of L1 linguistic and cultural background on L2 pragmatic competence. Languages. 10(5), 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10050112

[47] Spencer-Oatey, H., 2008. Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In: Spencer-Oatey, H.(ed.). Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, 2nd ed. Continuum: London, UK. pp. 11–47.

[48] Spencer-Oatey, H., 2013. Relating at work: Facets, dialectics and face. Journal of Pragmatics. 58, 121–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.010

[49] Spencer-Oatey, H., Kádár, D.Z., 2021. Intercultural Politeness: Managing Relations Across Cultures. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[50] Alsmari, N.A., 2024. The pragmatics of refusal: A study of parent-daughter communication dynamics in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES). 24(1), 224–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i1.553

[51] Kostromitina, M., Miao, Y., 2024. Listener perception of appropriateness of L1 and L2 refusals in English. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 14(2), 291–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38438

[52] Ren, W., 2022. Second Language Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

[53] Park, Y.L., Oh, S.Y., 2019. Korean EFL learners' refusals to requests and their perceptions. English Teaching. 74(4), 75–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.74.4.201912.75

[54] Dörnyei, Z., 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[55] Husband, G., 2020. Ethical data collection and recognizing the impact of semi-structured interviews on research respondents. Education Sciences. 10(8), 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080206

[56] Junnier, F., 2024. Action and understanding in the semi-structured research interview: Using CA to analyse European research scientists' attitudes to linguistic (dis)advantage. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 68, 101355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101355

[57] Sharqawi, M.A., 2021. A pragmatic study of refusal speech act: A gender perspective. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & Humanities. 11(1), 510–526. DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v11i01.029

[58] Kirner-Ludwig, M. 2022. Research methods in intercultural pragmatics. In: Kecskés, I. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 361–394.

[59] Chang, Y.F., Ren, W., 2020. Sociopragmatic competence in American and Chinese children's realization of apology and refusal. Journal of Pragmatics. 164, 27–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.013

[60] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications: London, UK.

[61] Jones, C.P., Armstrong-Moore, R., Penney, T.L., et al., 2022. Adolescents' perspectives on soft drinks after the introduction of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A focus group study using reflexive thematic analysis. Appetite. 179, 106305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106305

[62] Cheng, W., Lam, P.., 2020. Speech acts, facework, and politeness: Sociopragmatics and intercultural relationship-building. In: Jackson, J. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 156–172.

[63] Taguchi, N., Roever, C., 2020. Second Language Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[64] Wang, Y., Ren, W., 2022. The effects of proficiency and study-abroad on Chinese EFL learners' refusals. The Language Learning Journal. 50(4), 521–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2088447

[65] Jackson, J., 2019. Intercultural competence and L2 pragmatics. In: Taguchi, N. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 479–494.

[66] Al-Ghamdi, N., Alrefaee, Y., 2020. The role of social status in the realization of refusal speech act: A cross-cultural study. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(1–2), 207–220. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3570553 (cited 12 April 2025)

[67] Almathkuri, J., 2021. Influence of social power and distance on request strategies in Saudi Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics. 13(3), 95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v13i3.18770

[68] Kamal, M., Ariffin, A., 2023. Gender and power relation in English refusal strategies of ESL undergraduates. e-BANGI Journal. 20(3), 245–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2003.21

[69] Qassim, T.A., Abbas, N.F., Mei, H., 2022. Refusal and politeness strategies favoured among Iraqi and Malaysian learners in marriage proposals. Discourse and Interaction. 16(2), 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2023-2-29

[70] Musha'al A.A., 2022. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Comparing refusal patterns between native speakers of British English (NS) and non-native speaker Saudi's (NNS) who study in the UK [Doctoral dissertation]. Saudi Digital Library: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

[71] Hofstede, G., 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

[72] Lo, N.P.K., 2024. From structuralism to interpretation: Revisiting the Prague School's theoretical legacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(6), 1029–1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7477

[73] Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., Taguchi, N., 2018. Second Language Pragmatics: From Theory to Research. Routledge: London, UK.

Downloads

How to Cite

Yan, G., & Bidin, S. J. (2025). Refusal Strategies and Face Concerns: A Cross-Cultural Study of Chinese and Malaysian Undergraduates. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11026

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 10 (October 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Gang Yan, Siti Jamilah Bidin

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.