Orthoepic-prosodic Foundations of the Kazakh Speech Synthesis

Authors

  • Zhumabayeva Zhanar

    The Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynuly, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

  • Fazylzhanova Anar

    The Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynuly, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

  • Bazarbayeva Zeinep

    The Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynuly, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

  • Amanbayeva Aisaule

    The Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynuly, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

  • Ospangaziyeva Nazgul

    The Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynuly, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11233
Received: 23 July 2025 | Revised: 28 August 2025 | Accepted: 5 September 2025 | Published Online: 3 November 2025

Abstract

This article examines the issues related to prosodic and orthoepic norms in Kazakh speech synthesis. To ensure that the synthesizer delivers speech that is both realistic and intelligible, the text must be systematized according to orthoepic standards, with changes in phonemes, vowel reductions, and various sound phenomena described on the basis of linguistic data. The article also outlines the relevance of speech synthesis and the methods employed, while identifying their distinctive features. Furthermore, contemporary speech synthesis programs are discussed, along with their advantages and drawbacks. The article particularly focuses on enhancing speech synthesis by ensuring that narrators read texts in accordance with orthoepic norms and accurately convey prosodic features. The study uses the 11th-grade Kazakh Literature textbook, comprising 62 pages, as its source material. The text was internally segmented into syntagms, and the analysis addressed aspects such as vowel harmony, consonant compatibility, changes between roots and affixes, shifts across rhythmic groups, assimilation, dissimilation, reductions, variations and variants, elision, and other relevant features — all presented in accordance with orthoepic norms. The article analyzes articulatory, formant-based, parametric, and neural models used in the implementation of word synthesis. In order to improve the quality of speech synthesis in the Kazakh language, the study highlights the necessity of expanding abbreviations and numerals, adhering to orthoepic norms, and accurately modeling intonation and rhythmic patterrns. The research findings provide a scientific foundation for developing high-quality speech synthesis based on the phonetic and phonological regularities of the Kazakh language.

Keywords:

Orthoepy; Prosody; Intonation; Reduction; Variant; Phonetics; Spoken word; Algorithm

References

[1] Mussakhojayeva, S., Khassanov, Y., Varol, H.A., 2022. KazakhTTS2: Extending the Open-Source Kazakh TTS Corpus With More Data, Speakers, and Topics. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France, 20–25 June 2022; pp. 5404–5411.

[2] Kaliyev, G., 2005. Explanatory Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. Dictionary: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 440. (in Kazakh)

[3] Abilbekov, A., Mussakhojayeva, S., Yeshpanov, R., et al., 2024. KazEmoTTS: A Dataset for Kazakh Emotional Text-to-Speech Synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), Torino, Italia, 20–25 May 2024; pp. 9626–9632.

[4] Bazarbayeva, Z., Ospangaziyeva, N., Karshigayeva, A., 2024. Syllable Theory and Diachronic Phonology: Vocalism and Consonantism in Turkic Languages. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10(1), 50–59. Available from: https://ejal.info/menuscript/index.php/ejal/article/view/685/224 (cited 11 May 2025)

[5] Zhumabayeva, Z.T., Ospangaziyeva, N., Bazarbayeva, Z.M., et al., 2024. The Historical Change of the Vowels а/ә/е in Turkic Languages. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.10

[6] Derkach, M.F., Gumetsky, R.Y., Gura, B.M., et al., 1983. Dynamic Spectra of Speech Signals. The Higher School, Publishing House at Lviv University: Lviv, Ukraine. p. 168. (in Russian)

[7] Sorokin, V.N., 1992. Speech Synthesis. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. p. 392. (in Russian)

[8] Fant, G., 1964. The Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton Publishers: The Hague, Netherlands. p. 284.

[9] Bondarko, L.V., 1967. The Structure of the Syllable and the Characteristics of Phonemes. Issues of Linguistics. 1, 34–46. (in Russian)

[10] Golubtsov, S.V., 1969. Speech Synthesis. In: Proceedings of the All-Union School-Seminar ARSO-4. Tallinn: Kyiv, Ukraine. pp. 107–130. (in Russian)

[11] Zlatoustova, L.V., 1997. Acoustic and Perceptual Characteristics of Spontaneous Speech. Govor. XIV(1–2), 77–87.

[12] Flanagan, J.L., 1972. Speech Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany. p. 394.

[13] Rybin, S., 2014. Speech Synthesis. ITMO University: St. Petersburg, Russia. p. 92. (in Russian)

[14] Lobanov, B.M., Tsirulnik, L.I., 2008. Computer Speech Synthesis and Cloning. Belarusian Science: Minsk, Belarus. p. 342. (in Russian)

[15] Kjunnap, E.Y., 1975. Speech Signal Synthesizers. Valgus: Tallinn, Estonia. p. 240. (in Russian)

[16] Zhunisbek, A., 2018. Issues of Kazakh Linguistics: Kazakh Phonetics. Abzal-ai: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 368. (in Kazakh)

[17] Bazarbayeva, Z.M., 2022. Intonology. Everest: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 440. (in Kazakh)

[18] Bazarbayeva, Z., 2022. Fundamentals of Kazakh Phonology. Everest: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 460. (in Kazakh)

[19] Kuderinova, K., 2013. History and Theory of Kazakh Writing. Eltanym: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[20] Fazylzhanova, A.M., 2022. Melody of Speech and Intonation: An Experimental Phonetic Study. Bolashak: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 208. (in Kazakh)

[21] Aktanova, A.S., et al., 2020. Kazakh Literature: Part 1. Textbook for the Social-Humanitarian Track of Grade 11 in General Education Schools. Atamura: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 144. (in Kazakh)

[22] Badanbekqyzy, Z., 2001. Phoneme Sound Inventories in the Kazakh Language. Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 134. (in Kazakh)

[23] Uali, N.M., 2018. Graphics. Orthography. Orthoepy. Evero: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 250. (in Kazakh)

[24] Kazakh Grammar: Phonetics, Word Formation, Morphology, Syntax, 2002. Gylym: Astana, Kazakhstan. p. 784. (in Kazakh)

[25] Zhumabayeva, Z., 2016. Speech Synthesis in Kazakh Linguistics. Tiltanym. 2, 91–94. (in Kazakh)

[26] Bazarbayeva, Z., 2008. Kazakh Language: Intonology, Phonology. Zhibek Zholy: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 324. (in Kazakh)

[27] Amanbayeva, A., 2016. Speech Synthesis: Formant and Concatenative Methods. Til-tanym. 2, 88–90. (in Kazakh)

[28] Orthoepic Dictionary, 2007. Arys Publishing House: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 800. (in Kazakh)

[29] Bazarbayeva, Z.M., Sadyk, D., Amanbayeva, A., et al., 2025. Segmental-Prosodic Foundations of Kazakh Speech Synthesis. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 11(2), 69–80.

Downloads

How to Cite

Zhanar, Z., Anar, F., Zeinep, B., Aisaule, A., & Nazgul, O. (2025). Orthoepic-prosodic Foundations of the Kazakh Speech Synthesis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11233